What cognitive mechanisms predict travel mode choice? A systematic review with meta-analysis

References

• **Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Gifford, R., & Vlek, C. (2009). Factors influencing car use for commuting and the intention to reduce it: A question of self-interest or morality? Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 12(4), 317–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• **Armitage, C. J., Reid, J. C., & Spencer, C. P. (2013). Changes in cognition and behaviour: A causal analysis of single-occupancy car use in a rural community. Transportmetrica A-Transport Science, 9(1), 1–10. doi:10.1080/18128602.2010.509706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnott, B., Rehackova, L., Errington, L., Sniehotta, F. F., Roberts, J. R., & Araujo-Soares, V. (2014). Efficacy of behavioural interventions for transport behaviour change: Systematic review, meta-analysis and intervention coding. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 11(1), 133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Baldassare, M. (1991). Transportation in suburbia – trends in attitudes, behaviors and policy preferences in Orange county, California. Transportation, 18(3), 207–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• **Bamberg, S. (2006). Is a residential relocation a good opportunity to change people’s travel behavior? Results from a theory-driven intervention study. Environment and Behavior, 38(6), 820–840. doi:10.1177/0013916505285091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Bamberg, S., Ajzen, I., & Schmidt, P. (2003). Choice of travel mode in the theory of planned behavior: The roles of past behavior, habit, and reasoned action. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25(3), 175–187. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp2503_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamberg, S., Fujii, S., Friman, M., & Gärling, T. (2011). Behaviour theory and soft transport policy measures. Transport Policy, 18(1), 228–235. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Bamberg, S., & Schmidt, P. (2003). Incentives, morality, or habit? Predicting students’ car use for university routes with the models of Ajzen, Schwartz, and Triandis. Environment and Behavior, 35(2), 264–285. doi:10.1177/0013916502250134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begg, C. B., & Mazumdar, M. (1994). Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics, 50, 1088–1101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• **Bergstad, C. J., Gamble, A., Hagman, O., Polk, M., Garling, T., & Olsson, L. E. (2011). Affective-symbolic and instrumental-independence psychological motives mediating effects of socio-demographic variables on daily car use. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(1), 33–38. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Burnette, J. L., O'Boyle, E. H., VanEpps, E. M., Pollack, J. M., & Finkel, E. J. (2013). Mind-sets matter: A meta-analytic review of implicit theories and self-regulation. Psychological Bulletin, 139(3), 655–701. doi:10.1037/a0029531
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cairns, S., Sloman, L., Newson, C., Anable, J., Kirkbride, A., & Goodwin, P. (2008). Smarter choices: Assessing the potential to achieve traffic reduction using soft measures. Transport Reviews, 28(5), 593–618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• **Cao, X., & Mokhtarian, P. L. (2005). How do individuals adapt their personal travel? Objective and subjective influences on the consideration of travel-related strategies for San Francisco bay area commuters. Transport Policy, 12(4), 291–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chng, S., White, M., Abraham, C., & Skippon, S. (2016). Commuting and wellbeing in London: The roles of commute mode and local public transport connectivity. Preventive Medicine, 88, 182–188.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Routledge Academic.
   Google Scholar
• *Collins, C. M., & Chambers, S. M. (2005). Psychological and situational influences on commuter-transport-mode choice. Environment and Behavior, 37(5), 640–661. doi:10.1177/0013916504265440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• **Davidov, E. (2007). Explaining habits in a new context – the case of travel-mode choice. Rationality and Society, 19(3), 315–334. doi:10.1177/1043463107077392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Witte, A., Hollevoet, J., Dobruszkes, F., Hubert, M., & Macharis, C. (2013). Linking modal choice to motility: A comprehensive review. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 49, 329–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dittmar, H. (1992). The social psychology of material possessions: To have is to be. New York, NY: Harvester Wheatsheaf, St. Martin's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E., & Van Liere, K. D. (1978). The “new environmental paradigm”. The Journal of Environmental Education, 9(4), 10–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Effective Public Health Practice Project. (1998). Quality assessment tool for quantitative studies. Hamilton, ON: Author. Retrieved from http://www.ephpp.ca/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. British Medical Journal, 315(7109), 629–634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, L., Garvill, J., & Nordlund, A. M. (2008). Interrupting habitual car use: The importance of car habit strength and moral motivation for personal car use reduction. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 11(1), 10–23. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2007.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, J. J., Eccles, M. P., Johnston, M., Walker, A., Grimshaw, J., Foy, R., … Bonetti, D. (2004). Constructing questionnaires based on the theory of planned behaviour. A Manual for Health Services Researchers, 2010, 2–12.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, L. D. (2004). Economic determinants of urban form – resulting trade-offs between active and sedentary forms of travel. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 27(3), 146–153. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2004.06.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, L., Bradley, M., Kavage, S., Chapman, J., & Lawton, T. K. (2008). Urban form, travel time, and cost relationships with tour complexity and mode choice. Transportation, 35(1), 37–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, B. S. (1988). Ein ipsatives modell menschlichen verhaltens. Ein Beitrag zur Ökonomie und Psychologie. Analyse und Kritik, 10(2), 181–205.
   Google Scholar
• **Friedrichsmeier, T., Matthies, E., & Klöckner, C. A. (2013). Explaining stability in travel mode choice: An empirical comparison of two concepts of habit. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 16, 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujii, S., & Gärling, T. (2003). Application of attitude theory for improved predictive accuracy of stated preference methods in travel demand analysis. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 37(4), 389–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujii, S., Gärling, T., & Kitamura, R. (2001). Changes in drivers’ perceptions and use of public transport during a freeway closure effects of temporary structural change on cooperation in a real-life social dilemma. Environment and Behavior, 33(6), 796–808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• **Gardner, B. (2009). Modelling motivation and habit in stable travel mode contexts. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 12(1), 68–76. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2008.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, B., & Abraham, C. (2008). Psychological correlates of car use: A meta-analysis. Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 11(4), 300–311. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2008.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• **Gardner, B., & Abraham, C. (2010). Going Green? Modeling the impact of environmental concerns and perceptions of transportation alternatives on decisions to drive. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(4), 831–849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gärling, T., & Axhausen, K. W. (2003). Introduction: Habitual travel choice. Transportation, 30(1), 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gärling, T., & Friman, M. (2015). Unsustainable travel becoming (more) sustainable. In L. A. Reisch & J. Thøgersen (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Sustainable Consumption (pp. 163–177). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. doi:10.4337/9781783471270.00020
   Google Scholar
• **Gärling, T., Fujii, S., & Boe, O. (2001). Empirical tests of a model of determinants of script-based driving choice. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 4(2), 89–102. doi:10.1016/S1369-8478(01)00016-X
   Google Scholar
• Gärling, T., Gillholm, R., & Gärling, A. (1998). Reintroducing attitude theory in travel behavior research: The validity of an interactive interview procedure to predict car use. Transportation, 25(2), 129–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garver, M. S., & Mentzer, J. T. (1999). Logistics research methods: Employing structural equation modeling to test for construct validity. Journal of Business Logistics, 20, 33–58.
   Google Scholar
• Gauthier, B. (2003). Assessing survey research: A principled approach. Retrieved from http://www.circum.qc.ca/textes/assessing_survey_research.pdf [Accessed 27 January 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Gliem, J. A., & Gliem, R. R. (2003). Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales: Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.iupui.edu/bitstream/handle/1805/344/Gliem%20&%20Gliem.pdf?s.
   Google Scholar
• **Golob, T. F., & Hensher, D. A. (1998). Greenhouse gas emissions and Australian commuters’ attitudes and behavior concerning abatement policies and personal involvement. Transportation Research Part D-Transport and Environment, 3(1), 1–18. doi:10.1016/s1361-9209(97)00006-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham-Rowe, E., Skippon, S., Gardner, B., & Abraham, C. (2011). Can we reduce car use and, if so, how? A review of available evidence. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 45(5), 401–418. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2011.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gwet, K. (2002). Kappa statistic is not satisfactory for assessing the extent of agreement between raters. Statistical Methods for Inter-Rater Reliability Assessment, 1(6), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Hagger, M. S., Chatzisarantis, N. L., & Biddle, S. J. (2002). A meta-analytic review of the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior in physical activity: Predictive validity and the contribution of additional variables. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 24(1), 3–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• **Harland, P., Staats, H., & Wilke, H. A. M. (1999). Explaining proenvironmental intention and behavior by personal norms and the theory of planned behavior1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(12), 2505–2528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• **Haustein, S., & Hunecke, M. (2007). Reduced use of environmentally friendly modes of transportation caused by perceived mobility necessities: An extension of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(8), 1856–1883. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00241.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, J., & Thompson, S. G. (2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21(11), 1539–1558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, J. P. T. & Green, S. (2009). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.2 [updated September 2009]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 1. Retrieved from http://www.cochrane-handbook.org
   Google Scholar
• Hoelter, J. W. (1983). The analysis of covariance structures goodness-of-fit indices. Sociological Methods & Research, 11(3), 325–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Hunecke, M., Blöbaum, A., Matthies, E., & Hoeger, R. (2001). Responsibility and environment. Ecological norm orientation and external factors in the domain of travel mode choice behavior. Environment & Behavior, 33(6), 830–852. doi:10.1177/00139160121973269
   Google Scholar
• *Hunecke, M., Haustein, S., Grischkat, S., & Bohler, S. (2007). Psychological, sociodemographic, and infrastructural factors as determinants of ecological impact caused by mobility behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(4), 277–292. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.08.00l
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• International Energy Agency (IEA). (2015). Energy and climate change. Paris: I. E. Agency. Retrieved from https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/WEO2015SpecialReportonEnergyandClimateChange.pdf
   Google Scholar
• **Joireman, J. A., Van Lange, P. A. M., Kuhlman, D. M., Van Vugt, M., & Shelley, G. P. (1997). An interdependence analysis of commuting decisions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27(4), 441–463. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199707)27:4<441::AID-EJSP804>3.0.CO;2-S
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• **Kaiser, F. G., & Gutscher, H. (2003). The proposition of a general version of the theory of planned behavior: Predicting ecological behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(3), 586–603. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01914.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• **Kerr, A., Lennon, A., & Watson, B. (2010). The call of the road: Factors predicting students’ car travelling intentions and behaviour. Transportation: Planning, Policy, Research, Practice, 37(1), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, K. S., Ter Riet, G., Glanville, J., Sowden, A. J., & Kleijnen, J. (2001). Undertaking systematic reviews of research on effectiveness: CRD’s guidance for carrying out or commissioning reviews. Univeristy of York, UK: NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford press.
   Google Scholar
• **Klöckner, C. A., & Blöbaum, A. (2010). A comprehensive action determination model. Toward a broader understanding of ecological behaviour using the example of travel mode choice. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 574–586. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klöckner, C. A., & Friedrichsmeier, T. (2011). A multi-level approach to travel mode choice – How person characteristics and situation specific aspects determine car use in a student sample. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 14(4), 261–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• **Klöckner, C. A., & Matthies, E. (2004). How habits interfere with norm-directed behaviour: A normative decision-making model for travel mode choice. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(3), 319–327. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macmillan, A. K., Hosking, J., Connor, J. L., Bullen, C., & Ameratunga, S. (2013). A cochrane systematic review of the effectiveness of organisational travel plans: Improving the evidence base for transport decisions. Transport Policy, 29, 249–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• **Mann, E., & Abraham, C. (2012). Identifying beliefs and cognitions underpinning commuters’ travel mode choices. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(11), 2730–2757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• **Matthies, E., Klöckner, C. A., & Preissner, C. L. (2006). Applying a modified moral decision making model to change habitual car use: How can commitment be effective? Applied Psychology – An International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale, 55(1), 91–106. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2006.00237.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• **Murtagh, N., Gatersleben, B., & Uzzell, D. (2012). Multiple identities and travel mode choice for regular journeys. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 15(5), 514–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myrtek, M. (1995). Type A behavior pattern, personality factors, disease, and physiological reactivity: A meta-analytic update. Personality and Individual Differences, 18(4), 491–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI). (2014). Quality assessment tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health.
   Google Scholar
• Neoh, J. G., Chipulu, M., & Marshall, A. (2015). What encourages people to carpool? An evaluation of factors with meta-analysis. Transportation, 1–25. doi:10.1007/s11116-015-9661-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• **Nilsson, M., & Kuller, R. (2000). Travel behaviour and environmental concern. Transportation Research Part D-Transport and Environment, 5(3), 211–234. doi:10.1016/s1361-9209(99)00034-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pace, R., Pluye, P., Bartlett, G., Macaulay, A. C., Salsberg, J., Jagosh, J., & Seller, R. (2012). Testing the reliability and efficiency of the pilot mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT) for systematic mixed studies review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 49(1), 47–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pole, N. (2007). The psychophysiology of posttraumatic stress disorder: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 133(5), 725–746.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• **Panter, J., Desousa, C., & Ogilvie, D. (2013). Incorporating walking or cycling into car journeys to and from work: The role of individual, workplace and environmental characteristics. Preventive Medicine, 56(3-4), 211–217. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.01.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S., Kang, J., & Choi, K. (2014). Finding determinants of transit users’ walking and biking access trips to the station: A pilot case study. Ksce Journal of Civil Engineering, 18(2), 651–658. doi:10.1007/s12205-014-0073-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, D., Manstead, A. S. R., & Stradling, S. G. (1995). Extending the theory of planned behaviour: The role of personal norm. British Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 127–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• **Polk, M. (2003). Are women potentially more accommodating than men to a sustainable transportation system in Sweden? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 8(2), 75–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., … Duffy, S. (2006). Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. A Product From the ESRC Methods Programme. Version, 1. Available from: [email protected]
   Google Scholar
• Ram, Y., Nawijn, J., & Peeters, P. M. (2013). Happiness and limits to sustainable tourism mobility: A new conceptual model. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 21(7), 1017–1035. doi:10.1080/09669582.2013.826233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, J., Friman, M., & Gärling, T. (2010). Review of implementations of soft transport policy measures. Transportation: Theory and Application, 2(1), 5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 638–641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. (2013). Cochrane consumers and communication review group reviews: Meta-analysis. Retrieved from: http://cccrg.cochrane.org/
   Google Scholar
• Sahlqvist, S., Song, Y. N., & Ogilvie, D. (2012). Is active travel associated with greater physical activity? The contribution of commuting and non-commuting active travel to total physical activity in adults. Preventive Medicine, 55(3), 206–211. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.06.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• **Scheiner, J., & Holz-Rau, C. (2007). Travel mode choice: Affected by objective or subjective determinants? Transportation, 34(4), 487–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 221–279.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, R. J., Hassett, K. A., & Arnold, F. S. (2002). Conserving energy and preserving the environment: The role of public transportation. American Public Transportation Association, 9, 1–39.
   Google Scholar
• Şimşekoğlu, Ö, Nordfjærn, T., & Rundmo, T. (2015). The role of attitudes, transport priorities, and car use habit for travel mode use and intentions to use public transportation in an urban Norwegian public. Transport Policy, 42, 113–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sniehotta, F. F., Presseau, J., & Araújo-Soares, V. (2014). Time to retire the theory of planned behaviour. Health Psychology Review, 8(1), 1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• **Steg, L. (2005). Car use: Lust and must. Instrumental, symbolic and affective motives for car use. Transportation Research Part A – Policy and Practice, 39(2-3), 147–162. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2004.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• **Steg, L., & Sievers, I. (2000). Cultural theory and individual perceptions of environmental risks. Environment and Behavior, 32(2), 250–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T. D., Guagnano, G. A., & Kalof, L. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6(2), 81–97.
   Google Scholar
• Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(3), 220–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stryker, S. (1980). Identity theory: A social structural version. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin Cummings Company.
   Google Scholar
• Sunkanapalli, S., Pendyala, R., & Kuppam, A. (2000). Dynamic analysis of traveler attitudes and perceptions using panel data. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1718(1), 52–60.
   Google Scholar
• Sustrans. (2014) Short journeys, big savings. Retrieved October 9, 2015, from http://www.sustrans.org.uk/sites/default/files/images/files/publications/Short20journeys20big20savings2023%20AUG.pdf
   Google Scholar
• **Tanner, C. (1999). Constraints on environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19(2), 145–157. doi:10.1006/jevp.1999.0121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• **Tischer, M. L., & Phillips, R. V. (1979). Relationship between transportation perceptions and behavior over time. Transportation (Netherlands), 8(1), 21–36.
   Google Scholar
• Tranfield, D. R., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14, 207–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triandis, H. C. (1977). Interpersonal behavior. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Ulfarsson, G. F., & Shankar, V. N. (2008). Children’s travel to school: Discrete choice modeling of correlated motorized and nonmotorized transportation modes using covariance heterogeneity. Environment and Planning B-Planning & Design, 35(2), 195–206. doi:10.1068/b3360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Van Acker, V., Mokhtarian, P. L., & Witlox, F. (2011). Going soft: On how subjective variables explain modal choices for leisure travel. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 11(2), 115–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• **Van Vugt, M., van Lange, P. A. M., & Meertens, R. M. (1996). Commuting by car or public transportation? A social dilemma analysis of travel mode judgements. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26(3), 373–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• **Van Vugt, M., Meertens, R. M., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (1995). Car versus public transportation? The role of social value orientations in a real-life social dilemma. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25(3), 258–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• **Verplanken, B., Aarts, H., van Knippenberg, A., & van Knippenberg, C. (1994). Attitude versus general habit: Antecedents of travel mode choice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24(4), 285–300. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb00583.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• **Verplanken, B., Aarts, H., van Knippenberg, A., & Moonen, A. (1998). Habit versus planned behaviour: A field experiment. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 111–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verplanken, B., & Roy, D. (2016). Empowering interventions to promote sustainable lifestyles: Testing the habit discontinuity hypothesis in a field experiment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 45, 127–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• **Verplanken, B., Walker, I., Davis, A., & Jurasek, M. (2008). Context change and travel mode choice: Combining the habit discontinuity and self-activation hypotheses. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(2), 121–127. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., Vandenbroucke, J. P., & Strobe Initiative. (2007). The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Preventive Medicine, 45(4), 247–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, I., Thomas, G. O., & Verplanken, B. (2015). Old habits die hard travel habit formation and decay during an office relocation. Environment and Behavior, 47(10), 1089–1106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wener, R. E., & Evans, G. W. (2007). A morning stroll. Levels of physical activity in car and mass transit commuting. Environment & Behavior, 39(1), 62–74. doi:10.1177/0013916506295571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, F. M. (1986). Meta-analysis: Quantitative methods for research synthesis. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, W. C., Cheung, C. S., & Hart, G. J. (2008). Development of a quality assessment tool for systematic reviews of observational studies (QATSO) of HIV prevalence in men having sex with men and associated risk behaviours. Emerging Themes in Epidemiology, 5(1), 1–23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• **Yang-Wallentin, F., Schmidt, P., Davidov, E., & Bamberg, S. (2004). Is there any interaction effect between intention and perceived behavioral control. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 127–157.
   Google Scholar
• Young, K., Ashby, D., Boaz, A., & Grayson, L. (2002). Social science and the evidence-based policy movement. Social Policy and Society, 1(3), 215–224.
   Google Scholar