Methods for forecasting the market penetration of electric drivetrains in the passenger car market

References

• Abou-Zeid, M., & Ben-Akiva, M. (2014). Hybrid choice models. In S. Hess, & A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of choice modelling (pp. 383–412). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Achtnicht, M., Bühler, G., & Hermeling, C. (2012). The impact of fuel availability on demand for alternative-fuel vehicles. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 17(3), 262–269. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2011.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Alawi, B. M., & Bradley, T. H. (2013). Review of hybrid, plug-in hybrid, and electric vehicle market modeling studies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 21, 190–203. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anowar, S., Eluru, N., & Miranda-Moreno, L. F. (2014). Alternative modeling approaches used for examining automobile ownership: A comprehensive review. Transport Reviews, 34(4), 441–473. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2014.915440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axsen, J., TyreeHageman, J., & Lentz, A. (2012). Lifestyle practices and pro-environmental technology. Ecological Economics, 82, 64–74. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.07.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bass, F. M. (1969). A new product growth for model consumer durables. Management Science, 15(5), 215–227. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.15.5.215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bass, F. M. (2004). Comments on “a new product growth for model consumer durables the bass model”. Management Science, 50(12_supplement), 1833–1840. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1040.0300
   Google Scholar
• Batley, R. P., Toner, J. P., & Knight, M. J. (2004). A mixed logit model of U.K. Household demand for alternative-fuel vehicles. International Journal of Transport Economics / Rivista Internazionale Di Economia Dei Trasporti, 31(1), 55–77.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Akiva, M., McFadden, D., Gärling, T., Gopinath, D., Walker, J., Bolduc, D., … Rao, V. (1999). Extended framework for modeling choice behavior. Marketing Letters, 10(3), 187–203. doi: 10.1023/A:1008046730291
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Akiva, M., McFadden, D., Train, K., Walker, J., Bhat, C., Bierlaire, M., … Munizaga, M. A. (2002). Hybrid choice models: Progress and challenges. Marketing Letters, 13, 163–175. doi: 10.1023/A:1020254301302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BenDor, T., & Ford, A. (2006). Simulating a combination of feebates and scrappage incentives to reduce automobile emissions. Energy, 31(8/9), 1197–1214. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2005.05.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhat, C. R., & Dubey, S. K. (2014). A new estimation approach to integrate latent psychological constructs in choice modeling. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 67, 68–85. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2014.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böhringer, C., Löschel, A., & Rutherford, T. F. (2004). Efficiency gains from “what” – flexibility in climate policy - an integrated Cge assessment. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.606401
   Google Scholar
• Böhringer, C., & Rutherford, T. F. (2008). Combining bottom-up and top-down. Energy Economics, 30(2), 574–596. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2007.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bossel, H. (2007). Systems and models: Complexity, dynamics, evolution, sustainability. Norderstedt: Books on Demand.
   Google Scholar
• Boulanger, P.-M., & Bréchet, T. (2002). Setting concepts into motion: improving scientific tools in support of sustainable development decision-making. Retrieved from http://users.skynet.be/idd/documents/model/bookletfinal.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Box, G. E. P., & Jenkins, G. M. (1976). Time series analysis: Forecasting and control (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, J. H., & Mellman, R. E. (1980). The effect of fuel economy standards on the U.S. Automotive market: An hedonic demand analysis. Transportation Research Part A: General, 14(5–6), 367–378. doi: 10.1016/0191-2607(80)90055-2
   Google Scholar
• Brand, C., Anable, J., & Tran, M. (2013). Accelerating the transformation to a low carbon passenger transport system: The role of car purchase taxes, feebates, road taxes and scrappage incentives in the UK. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 49, 132–148. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2013.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand, C., Cluzel, C., & Anable, J. (2017). Modeling the uptake of plug-in vehicles in a heterogeneous car market using a consumer segmentation approach. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 97, 121–136. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2017.01.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand, C., Tran, M., & Anable, J. (2012). The UK transport carbon model: An integrated life cycle approach to explore low carbon futures. Energy Policy, 41, 107–124. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.08.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, M. (2013). Catching the PHEVer: Simulating electric vehicle diffusion with an agent-based mixed logit model of vehicle choice. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 16(2). doi: 10.18564/jasss.2127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownstone, D., Bunch, D. S., & Train, K. (2000). Joint mixed logit models of stated and revealed preferences for alternative-fuel vehicles. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 34(5), 315–338. doi: 10.1016/s0191-2615(99)00031-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownstone, D., & Train, K. (1998). Forecasting new product penetration with flexible substitution patterns. Journal of Econometrics, 89(1–2), 109–129. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00057-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunch, D. S., Bradley, M., Golob, T. F., Kitamura, R., & Occhiuzzo, G. P. (1993). Demand for clean-fuel vehicles in California: A discrete-choice stated preference pilot project. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 27(3), 237–253. doi:10.1016/0965-8564(93)90062-P doi: 10.1016/0191-2615(93)90033-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess, M., King, N., Harris, M., & Lewis, E. (2013). Electric vehicle drivers’ reported interactions with the public: Driving stereotype change? Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 17, 33–44. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2012.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caiani, A., Godin, A., Caverzasi, E., Gallegati, M., Kinsella, S., & Stiglitz, J. E. (2016). Agent based-stock flow consistent macroeconomics: Towards a benchmark model. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 69, 375–408. doi: 10.1016/j.jedc.2016.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caperello, N. D., & Kurani, K. S. (2012). Households’ stories of their encounters with a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle. Environment and Behavior, 44(4), 493–508. doi: 10.1177/0013916511402057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carley, S., Krause, R. M., Lane, B. W., & Graham, J. D. (2013). Intent to purchase a plug-in electric vehicle: A survey of early impressions in large US cites. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 18, 39–45. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2012.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chorus, C. G., Arentze, T. A., & Timmermans, H. J. P. (2008). A random regret-minimization model of travel choice. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 42(1), 1–18. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2007.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffman, M., Bernstein, P., & Wee, S. (2015). Factors affecting EV adoption: A literature review and EV forecast for Hawaii. Retrieved from http://www.hnei.hawaii.edu/sites/www.hnei.hawaii.edu/files/Factors%20Affecting%20EV%20Adoption.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Creutzig, F., Jochem, P., Edelenbosch, O. Y., Mattauch, L., Vuuren, D. P.v., McCollum, D., & Minx, J. (2015). Transport: A roadblock to climate change mitigation? Science, 350(6263), 911–912. doi: 10.1126/science.aac8033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, X., Liu, C., Kim, H. K., Kao, S.-C., Tuttle, M. A., & Bhaduri, B. L. (2011). A multi agent-based framework for simulating household PHEV distribution and electric distribution network impact. Proceeding of the Transportation Research Board 90th Annual Meeting, Washington DC, 23-27 January 2011, Paper number 11-2036.
   Google Scholar
• Dagsvik, J. K., Wennemo, T., Wetterwald, D. G., & Aaberge, R. (2002). Potential demand for alternative fuel vehicles. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 36(4), 361–384. doi: 10.1016/S0965-8564(01)00013-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dargay, J., Gately, D., & Sommer, M. (2007). Vehicle ownership and income growth, worldwide: 1960–2030. The Energy Journal, 28(4), 143–170. doi: 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol28-No4-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daziano, R. A., & Achtnicht, M. (2014). Forecasting adoption of ultra-low-emission vehicles using Bayes estimates of a multinomial probit model and the GHK simulator. Transportation Science, 48(4), 671–683. doi: 10.1287/trsc.2013.0464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daziano, R. A., & Bolduc, D. (2011). Incorporating pro-environmental preferences towards Green automobile technologies through a Bayesian hybrid choice model. Transportmetrica, 27, 1–33. doi: 10.1080/18128602.2010.524173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daziano, R. A. (2015). Inference on mode preferences, vehicle purchases, and the energy paradox using a Bayesian structural choice model. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 76, 1–26. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2015.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Haan, P., Mueller, M. G., & Scholz, R. W. (2009). How much do incentives affect car purchase? Agent-based microsimulation of consumer choice of new cars – Part II: Forecasting effects of feebates based on energy-efficiency. Energy Policy, 37(3), 1083–1094. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Weerdt, M. M., Zhang, Y., & Klos, T. (2012). Multiagent task allocation in social networks. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 25(1), 46–86. doi: 10.1007/s10458-011-9168-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Densing, M., Turton, H., & Bäuml, G. (2012). Conditions for the successful deployment of electric vehicles – a global energy system perspective. Energy, 47(1), 137–149. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2012.09.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egbue, O., & Long, S. (2012). Barriers to widespread adoption of electric vehicles: An analysis of consumer attitudes and perceptions. Energy Policy, 48, 717–729. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ensslen, A., Ringler, P., Jochem, P., & Fichtner, W. (2014). About business model specifications of a smart charging manager to integrate electric vehicles into the German electricity market. Paper presented at the 4th IAEE European Conference, Rome.
   Google Scholar
• Eppstein, M. J., Grover, D. K., Marshall, J. S., & Rizzo, D. M. (2011). An agent-based model to study market penetration of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. Energy Policy, 39(6), 3789–3802. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorello, D., Fermi, F., & Bielanska, D. (2010). The ASTRA model for strategic assessment of transport policies. System Dynamics Review, 26(3), 283–290. doi: 10.1002/sdr.452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, A. (1995). Simulating the controllability of feebates. System Dynamics Review, 11(1), 3–29. doi: 10.1002/sdr.4260110103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, A. (1999). Modeling the environment: An introduction to system dynamics modeling of environmental systems (1st ed.). Washington , DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forrester, J. W. (1961). Industrial dynamics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forrester, J. W. (1969). Urban dynamics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forrester, J. W. (1973). World dynamics (Auflage: 2nd Revised ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forrester, J. W. (1995). Counterintuitive behavior of social systems. Update of the original text appeared in the January, 1971, issue of the Technology Review published by the Alumni Association of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Frisch, R. (1933). Editor’s note. Econometrica, 1(1), 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Fulton, L., Cazzola, P., & Cuenot, F. (2009). IEA mobility model (MoMo) and its use in the ETP 2008. Energy Policy, 37(10), 3758–3768. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, R. (2007). Modeling vehicle choice behavior using agent-based approach. Presented at the Second Workshop on agent-based models of market dynamics and consumer behaviour 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, C. L. (1986). Practitioners’ corner: Professor Hendry’s econometric methodology. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 48(3), 283–307. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0084.1986.mp48003007.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, G. N. (2008). Agent-based models. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Glerum, A., Stankovikj, L., Thémans, M., & Bierlaire, M. (2014). Forecasting the demand for electric vehicles: Accounting for attitudes and perceptions. Transportation Science, 48(4), 483–499. doi: 10.1287/trsc.2013.0487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gül, T., Kypreos, S., Turton, H., & Barreto, L. (2009). An energy-economic scenario analysis of alternative fuels for personal transport using the global multi-regional MARKAL model (GMM). Energy, 34(10), 1423–1437. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2009.04.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnann, T., Plötz, P., Funke, S., & Wietschel, M. (2015). What is the market potential of plug-in electric vehicles as commercial passenger cars? A case study from Germany. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 37, 171–187. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2015.04.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnann, T. (2015). Market diffusion of plug-in electric vehicles and their charging infrastructure. Stuttgart: Fraunhofer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Golder, P. N., & Tellis, G. J. (1997). Will it ever fly? Modeling the takeoff of really new consumer durables. Marketing Science, 16(3), 256–270. doi: 10.1287/mksc.16.3.256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham-Rowe, E., Gardner, B., Abraham, C., Skippon, S., Dittmar, H., Hutchins, R., & Stannard, J. (2012). Mainstream consumers driving plug-in battery-electric and plug-in hybrid electric cars: A qualitative analysis of responses and evaluations. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46(1), 140–153. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2011.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grahn, M., Azar, C., Williander, M. I., Anderson, J. E., Mueller, S. A., & Wallington, T. J. (2009). Fuel and vehicle technology choices for passenger vehicles in achieving stringent CO2 targets: Connections between transportation and other energy sectors. Environmental Science & Technology, 43(9), 3365–3371. doi: 10.1021/es802651r
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griliches, Z. (1986). Chapter 25: economic data issues. In Z. Griliches & M. D. Intriligator (Eds.), Handbook of econometrics (Vol. 3, pp. 1465–1514). Elsevier. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1573441286030052
   Google Scholar
• Gärling, T. (1992). The importance of routines for the performance of everyday activities. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 33(2), 170–177. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.1992.tb00896.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haavelmo, T. (1944). The probability approach in econometrics. Econometrica, 12, iii-115. doi: 10.2307/1906935
   Google Scholar
• Harberger, A. C. (1962). The incidence of the corporation income tax. Journal of Political Economy, 70(3), 215–240. doi: 10.1086/258636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensher, D. A., Beck, M. J., & Rose, J. M. (2011). Accounting for preference and scale heterogeneity in establishing whether it matters who is interviewed to reveal household automobile purchase preferences. Environmental and Resource Economics, 49(1), 1–22. doi: 10.1007/s10640-010-9420-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbst, A., Toro, F., Reitze, F., & Jochem, E. (2012). Introduction to energy systems modelling. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, 148(2), 111–135. doi: 10.1007/BF03399363
   Google Scholar
• Hewitt, C. (1977). Viewing control structures as patterns of passing messages. Artificial Intelligence, 8(3), 323–364. doi: 10.1016/0004-3702(77)90033-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, A., Paevere, P., Gardner, J., & Quezada, G. (2012). Combining choice modelling and multi-criteria analysis for technology diffusion: An application to the uptake of electric vehicles. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(8), 1399–1412. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoover, K. D. (2005). The methodology of econometrics ( SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 728683). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=728683.
   Google Scholar
• Horne, M., Jaccard, M., & Tiedemann, K. (2005). Improving behavioral realism in hybrid energy-economy models using discrete choice studies of personal transportation decisions. Energy Economics, 27(1), 59–77. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2004.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hourcade, J.-C., Jaccard, M., Bataille, C., & Ghersi, F. (2006). Hybrid modeling: New answers to old challenges introduction to the special issue of “The Energy Journal”. The Energy Journal, 27, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2014). Climate Change 2014, synthesis report. Geneva, Switzerland. Retrieved from https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/syr/SYR_AR5_FINAL_full_wcover.pdf
   Google Scholar
• International Energy Agency. (2016a). Energy technology perspectives 2016. Paris, France. Retrieved from http://www.iea.org/bookshop/719-Energy_Technology_Perspectives_2016
   Google Scholar
• International Energy Agency. (2016b). Global EV Outlook 2016. Paris, France. Retrieved from https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/Global_EV_Outlook_2016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Intriligator, M. D. (1983). Chapter 3: economic and econometric models. In Z. Griliches & M. D. Intriligator (Eds.), Handbook of econometrics (Vol. 1, pp. 181–221). Elsevier. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1573441283010077
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, A. F., Cherchi, E., & Mabit, S. L. (2013). On the stability of preferences and attitudes before and after experiencing an electric vehicle. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 25, 24–32. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2013.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, A. F., Cherchi, E., Mabit, S. L., & Ortúzar, J. de D. (2016). Predicting the potential market for electric vehicles. Transportation Science. doi: 10.1287/trsc.2015.0659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeon, S. Y. (2010). Hybrid & electric vehicle technology and its market feasibility. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Jong, G. D., Fox, J., Daly, A., Pieters, M., & Smit, R. (2004). Comparison of car ownership models. Transport Reviews, 24(4), 379–408. doi: 10.1080/0144164032000138733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (2000). Choices, values, and frames. Singapore: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karplus, V. J., Paltsev, S., & Reilly, J. M. (2010). Prospects for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles in the United States and Japan: A general equilibrium analysis. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 44(8), 620–641. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2010.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay, D., Hill, N., & Newman, D. (2013). Powering ahead – the future of low-carbon cars and fuels (p. 176). London: UK Pia and RAC Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.racfoundation.org/assets/rac_foundation/content/downloadables/powering_ahead-kay_et_al-apr2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Keith, D. R. (2012). Essays on the dynamics of alternative fuel vehicle adoption : Insights from the market for hybrid-electric vehicles in the United States (Thesis). Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Retrieved from http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/79546
   Google Scholar
• Ketelaer, T., Kaschub, T., Jochem, P., & Fichtner, W. (2014). The potential of carbon dioxide emission reductions in German commercial transport by electric vehicles. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 11(8), 2169–2184. doi: 10.1007/s13762-014-0631-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kieckhäfer, K. (2013). Marktsimulation zur strategischen Planung von Produktportfolios: Dargestellt am Beispiel innovativer Antriebe in der Automobilindustrie. Wiesbaden: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kieckhäfer, K., Volling, T., & Spengler, T. S. (2014). A hybrid simulation approach for estimating the market share evolution of electric vehicles. Transportation Science, 48(4), 651–670. doi: 10.1287/trsc.2014.0526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiesling, E., Günther, M., Stummer, C., & Wakolbinger, L. M. (2012). Agent-based simulation of innovation diffusion: A review. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 20(2), 183–230. doi: 10.1007/s10100-011-0210-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koopmans, T. C. (1949). Identification problems in economic model construction. Econometrica, 17(2), 125–144. doi: 10.2307/1905689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krail, M. (2009). System-based analysis of income distribution impacts on mobility behaviour. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Krupa, J. S., Rizzo, D. M., Eppstein, M. J., Brad Lanute, D., Gaalema, D. E., Lakkaraju, K., & Warrender, C. E. (2014). Analysis of a consumer survey on plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 64, 14–31. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2014.02.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, B., & Potter, S. (2007). The adoption of cleaner vehicles in the UK: Exploring the consumer attitude–action gap. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(11–12), 1085–1092. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.05.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieven, T., Mühlmeier, S., Henkel, S., & Waller, J. F. (2011). Who will buy electric cars? An empirical study in Germany. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 16(3), 236–243. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2010.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewenstein, G. (1996). Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65(3), 272–292. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1996.0028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopes, M. M., Moura, F., & Martinez, L. M. (2014). A rule-based approach for determining the plausible universe of electric vehicle buyers in the Lisbon metropolitan area. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 59, 22–36. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2013.09.009 doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2013.10.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lévay, P. Z., Drossinos, Y., & Thiel, C. (2017). The effect of fiscal incentives on market penetration of electric vehicles: A pairwise comparison of total cost of ownership. Energy Policy, 105, 524–533. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.02.054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Moyano, I. J. (2012). Documentation for model transparency. System Dynamics Review, 28(2), 199–208. doi: 10.1002/sdr.1471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCollum, D. L., Wilson, C., Pettifor, H., Ramea, K., Krey, V., Riahi, K., … Fujisawa, S. (2016). Improving the behavioral realism of global integrated assessment models: An application to consumers’ vehicle choices. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2016.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCollum, D., Yang, C., Yeh, S., & Ogden, J. (2012). Deep greenhouse gas reduction scenarios for California – Strategic implications from the CA-TIMES energy-economic systems model. Energy Strategy Reviews, 1(1), 19–32. doi: 10.1016/j.esr.2011.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadden, D. (2000). Economic choices: Nobel prize lecture. American Economic Review, 91, 351–378. doi: 10.1257/aer.91.3.351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McManus, W., & Senter, R. (2009). Market models for predicting PHEV adoption and diffusion (Technical challenges of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles and impacts to the U.S. power system) (p. 32). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan. Retrieved from https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/64436/102399.pdf;sequence=1
   Google Scholar
• Meadows, D. H. (1972). Limits to growth. White River Junction, Vermont: Signet.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, G. (2009). Analyse und technisch-ökonomische Bewertung von Gesetzesfolgen im Individualverkehr: dargestellt am Beispiel der Automobilindustrie Japans und Deutschlands. Braunschweig, Germany. Retrieved from https://publikationsserver.tu-braunschweig.de/receive/dbbs_mods_00031582
   Google Scholar
• Miller, R. E., & Blair, P. D. (2009). Input–output analysis: Foundations and extensions (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mock, P., Hülsebusch, D., Ungethüm, J., & Schmid, S.A. (2010). Electric vehicles – a model based assessment of future market prospects and environmental impacts. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 1(3), 172–185.
   Google Scholar
• Moons, I., & De Pelsmacker, P. (2012). Emotions as determinants of electric car usage intention. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(3–4), 195–237. doi: 10.1080/0267257X.2012.659007
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, M. S. (2008). The history of econometric ideas (Auflage: Revised.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morgenstern, O. (1965). On accuracy of economic observations (2nd Revised edition). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noppers, E. H., Keizer, K., Bolderdijk, J. W., & Steg, L. (2014). The adoption of sustainable innovations: Driven by symbolic and environmental motives. Global Environmental Change, 25, 52–62. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.01.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagan, A. (1987). Three econometric methodologies: A critical appraisal. Journal of Economic Surveys, 1(1/2), 3–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6419.1987.tb00022.x
   Google Scholar
• Pasaoglu, G., Harrison, G., Jones, L., Hill, A., Beaudet, A., & Thiel, C. (2016). A system dynamics based market agent model simulating future powertrain technology transition: Scenarios in the EU light duty vehicle road transport sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 104, 133–146. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, A., & Dütschke, E. (2014). How do consumers perceive electric vehicles? A comparison of German consumer groups. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 16(3), 359–377. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2013.879037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, A., Gutscher, H., & Scholz, R. W. (2011). Psychological determinants of fuel consumption of purchased new cars. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 14(3), 229–239. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2011.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfahl, S., Jochem, P., & Fichtner, W. (2013). When will electric vehicles capture the German market? And why? Presented at the Electric Vehicle Symposium 27, Barcelona.
   Google Scholar
• Pietzcker, R. C., Longden, T., Chen, W., Fu, S., Kriegler, E., Kyle, P., & Luderer, G. (2014). Long-term transport energy demand and climate policy: Alternative visions on transport decarbonization in energy-economy models. Energy, 64, 95–108. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.08.059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plötz, P. (2011). Uncertainty in diffusion of competing technologies and application to electric vehicles. Working Paper Sustainability and Innovation, 12, 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Plötz, P., Schneider, U., Globisch, J., & Dütschke, E. (2014). Who will buy electric vehicles? Identifying early adopters in Germany. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 67, 96–109. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2014.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potoglou, D., & Kanaroglou, P. S. (2008). Disaggregate demand analyses for conventional and alternative fueled automobiles: A review. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 2(4), 234–259. doi: 10.1080/15568310701230398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Propfe, B., Kreyenberg, D., Wind, J., & Schmid, S. (2013). Market penetration analysis of electric vehicles in the German passenger car market towards 2030. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 38(13), 5201–5208. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.02.049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purwanto, J., de Ceuster, G., & Vanherle, K. (2016). Mobility, Vehicle fleet, Energy use and Emissions forecast Tool (MOVEET), presentation at the World Conference of Transport Research Society (WCTRS), 10-15 July 2016, Shanghai, China. Retrieved from http://tmleuven.be/project/MOVEETupdate/20160710_Joko_paperWCTR_MOVEET.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rahmandad, H., & Sterman, J. D. (2012). Reporting guidelines for simulation-based research in social sciences. System Dynamics Review, 28(4), 396–411. doi: 10.1002/sdr.1481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rai, V., & Henry, A. D. (2016). Agent-based modelling of consumer energy choices. Nature Climate Change, 6(6), 556–562. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rand, W., Herrmann, J., Schein, B., & Vodopivec, N. (2015). An agent-based model of urgent diffusion in social media. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 18(2). doi: 10.18564/jasss.2616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raveau, S., Yáñez, M. F., & Ortúzar, J. d. e. D. (2012). Practical and empirical identifiability of hybrid discrete choice models. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 46(10), 1374–1383. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2012.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezvani, Z., Jansson, J., & Bodin, J. (2015). Advances in consumer electric vehicle adoption research: A review and research agenda. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 34, 122–136. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2014.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, G. P. (2011). Reflections on the foundations of system dynamics: Foundations of system dynamics. System Dynamics Review, 27(3), 219–243. doi: 10.1002/sdr.462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romilly, P., Song, H., & Liu, X. (1998). Modelling and forecasting car ownership in Britain: A cointegration and general to specific approach. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 165–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, M. (2013). General equilibrium with imperfect competition. Retrieved from http://www.loglinear.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/CournotSeptember06.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schade, W. (2005). Strategic sustainability analysis: Concept and application for the assessment of European transport policy (Auflage: 1). Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Schäfer, A., & Jacoby, H. D. (2006). Vehicle technology under CO2 constraint: A general equilibrium analysis. Energy Policy, 34(9), 975–985. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2004.08.051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmelzer, S., & Miess, M. (2015). The economic costs of electric vehicles.
   Google Scholar
• Schuitema, G., Anable, J., Skippon, S., & Kinnear, N. (2013). The role of instrumental, hedonic and symbolic attributes in the intention to adopt electric vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 48, 39–49. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2012.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwoon, M. (2006). Simulating the adoption of fuel cell vehicles. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 16(4), 435–472. doi: 10.1007/s00191-006-0026-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafiei, E., Thorkelsson, H., Ásgeirsson, E. I., Davidsdottir, B., Raberto, M., & Stefansson, H. (2012). An agent-based modeling approach to predict the evolution of market share of electric vehicles: A case study from Iceland. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(9), 1638–1653. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shay, C. L., DeCarolis, J., Gage, C., Yeh, S., & W, E. L. (2006). EPA U.S. National MARKAL database documentation. Research Triangle Park, NC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd, S., Bonsall, P., & Harrison, G. (2012). Factors affecting future demand for electric vehicles: A model based study. Transport Policy, 20, 62–74. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2011.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoven, J. B., & Whalley, J. (1984). Applied general-equilibrium models of taxation and international trade: An introduction and survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 22(3), 1007–1051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skippon, S., & Garwood, M. (2011). Responses to battery electric vehicles: UK consumer attitudes and attributions of symbolic meaning following direct experience to reduce psychological distance. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 16(7), 525–531. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2011.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spanos, A. (1999). Probability theory and statistical inference: Econometric modeling with observational data. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stephan, C., & Sullivan, J. (2009). An agent-based hydrogen vehicle/infrastructure model. In Proceedings of the 2004 Congress on Evolutionary Computation (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8753). Institute of Electrical & Electronics Engineers (IEEE). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1109/cec.2004.1331110
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, T. (2010). An agent-based model of energy demand and emissions from plug-in hybrid electric vehicle use. Retrieved from https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/77595/Stephens_MSthesis_final.pdf?sequence=1
   Google Scholar
• Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. Boston , MA: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Struben, J., & Sterman, J. D. (2008). Transition challenges for alternative fuel vehicle and transportation systems. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 35(6), 1070–1097. doi: 10.1068/b33022t
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, J. L., Salmeen, I., & Simon, C. (2009). PHEV marketplace penetration: An agent based simulation. Retrieved from http://www.cars21.com/assets/link/PHEV-Marketplace-Penetration%20.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Svenson, O. (1979). Process descriptions of decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23(1), 86–112. doi: 10.1016/0030-5073(79)90048-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sycara, K. P. (1998). Multiagent systems. AI Magazine, 19(2), 79–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinbergen, J. (1937). An econometric approach to business cycle problems. Retrieved from http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=US201300606041
   Google Scholar
• Train, K. (1986). Qualitative choice analysis: Theory, econometrics, and an application to automobile demand (Vol. 10). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Vliet, O., de Vries, B., Faaij, A., Turkenburg, W., & Jager, W. (2010). Multi-agent simulation of adoption of alternative fuels. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 15(6), 326–342. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2010.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhulst, P. F. (1838). Notice sur la loi que la population suit dans son accroissement. Correspondance Mathematique et Physique Publiee par A. Quetelet, 10, 113–121.
   Google Scholar
• Vij, A., & Walker, J. L. (2016). How, when and why integrated choice and latent variable models are latently useful. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 90, 192–217. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2016.04.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, G., Wansart, J., Kieckhäfer, K., Schnieder, E., & Spengler, T. S. (2010). Impact assessment in the automotive industry: Mandatory market introduction of alternative powertrain technologies. System Dynamics Review, 26(3), 239–261. doi: 10.1002/sdr.453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wansart, J. (2012). Analyse von Strategien der Automobilindustrie zur Reduktion von CO2-Flottenemissionen und zur Markteinführung Alternativer Antriebe: Ein (2012th ed.). Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.
   Google Scholar
• Weikl, R. (2010). Simulationen zur Abschätzung der Marktanteilsentwicklung unterschiedlicher Antriebsvarianten am deutschen Fahrzeugmarkt: Ein systemdynamisches Modell zur Entschediungsunterstützung in der strategischen Marktanalyse (1st ed.). Chemnitz: GUC Gesellschaft f. Unternehmensrechnung u. Controlling.
   Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, M., & Jennings, N. R. (1995). Intelligent agents: Theory and practice. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 10(2), 115. doi: 10.1017/S0269888900008122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh, S., Farrell, A., Plevin, R., Sanstad, A., & Weyant, J. (2008). Optimizing U.S. mitigation strategies for the light-duty transportation sector: What we learn from a bottom-up model. Environmental Science & Technology, 42(22), 8202–8210. doi: 10.1021/es8005805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., & Vorobeychik, Y. (2016). Empirically grounded agent-based models of innovation diffusion: A critical review. CoRR, abs/1608.08517. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1608.08517
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., Yu, Y., & Zou, B. (2011). Analyzing public awareness and acceptance of alternative fuel vehicles in China: The case of EV. Energy Policy, 39(11), 7015–7024. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.07.055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar