Urban walkability considering pedestrians’ perceptions of the built environment: a 10-year review and a case study in a medium-sized city in Latin America

References

• Alfonzo, M. A. (2005). To walk or not to walk? The hierarchy of walking needs. Environment and Behavior, 37(6), 808–836. doi: 10.1177/0013916504274016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arellana, J., Saltarín, M., Larrañaga, A. M., & Henao, C. A. (2019). Developing an urban bikeability index for different types of cyclists as a tool to prioritize bicycle infrastructure investments. Submitted to Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Under 2nd review.
   Google Scholar
• Barranquilla Cómo vamos. (2017). Encuesta de Percepción. Barranquilla cómo vamos 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Cantillo, V., Arellana, J., & Rolong, M. (2015). Modelling pedestrian crossing behaviour in urban roads: A latent variable approach. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 32, 56–67. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2015.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervero, R., Sarmiento, O., Jacoby, E., Gomez, L. F., & Neiman, A. (2009). Influences of built environments on walking and cycling: Lessons from Bogota. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 3(4), 203–226. doi: 10.1080/15568310802178314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiang, Y. C., Sullivan, W., & Larsen, L. (2017). Measuring neighborhood walkable environments: A comparison of three approaches. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(6), 593. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14060593
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Consorcio TPD-Epypsa. (2012). Formulación del Plan Maestro de Movilidad del distrito de Barranquilla. Barranquilla: Financiera de Desarrollo Nacional - FDN. Retrieved from https://fileserver.fdn.com.co/Descarga?ruta=fdn/PROCESOS/00023/FDNINFEST000230162016092301
   Google Scholar
• Decreto 0798. (2010). Ministerio de Ambiente, Vivienda y Desarrollo Territorial. Bogotá: 5 de marzo de 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, L. D., Sallis, J. F., Saelens, B. E., Leary, L., Cain, K., Conway, T. L., & Hess, P. M. (2010a). The development of a walkability index: Application to the neighborhood quality of life study. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 44(13), 924–933. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2009.058701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaviria, A., & Vélez, C. E. (2001). Who bears the burden of crime in Colombia? (Final report). Bogotá, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Hasan, T., Siddique, A., Hadiuzzaman, M., & Musabbir, S. R. (2015). Determining the most suitable pedestrian level of service method for Dhaka city, Bangladesh, through a synthesis of measurements. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2519, 104–115. doi: 10.3141/2519-12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keyvanfar, A., Ferwati, M. S., Shafaghat, A., & Lamit, H. (2018). A path walkability assessment index model for evaluating and facilitating retail walking using decision-tree-making (DTM) method. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(4), 1–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S., Park, S., & Lee, J. S. (2014). Meso-or micro-scale? Environmental factors influencing pedestrian satisfaction. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 30, 10–20. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2014.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrañaga, A. M., Arellana, J., Rizzi, L., Strambi, O., & Cybis, H. B. (2019). Using best-worst scaling to identify barriers to walkability: A study of Porto Alegre, Brazil. Transportation, 46(6), 2347–2379. doi: 10.1007/s11116-018-9944-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrañaga, A. M., Rizzi, L. I., Arellana, J., Strambi, O., & Cybis, H. B. (2016). The influence of built environment and travel attitudes on walking: A case study of Porto Alegre, Brazil. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 10(4), 332–342. doi: 10.1080/15568318.2014.933986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luce, R., & Suppes, P. (1965). Preference, utility, and subjective probability. In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, & E. Galanter (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology (Vol. III, pp. 249–410). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Moura, F., Cambra, P., & Gonçalves, A. (2017). Measuring walkability for distinct pedestrian groups with a participatory assessment method: A case study in Lisbon. Landscape and Urban Planning, 157, 282–296. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, O. (1996). Creating defensible space. Washington, DC: Diane Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Raad, N., & Burke, M. I. (2018). What are the most important factors for pedestrian level-of-service estimation? A systematic review of the literature. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2672(35), 101–117. doi: 10.1177/0361198118790623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Padillo, A., Pasqual, F. M., Larranaga, A. M., & Cybis, H. B. (2018). Application of multi-criteria decision analysis methods for assessing walkability: A case study in Porto Alegre, Brazil. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 63, 855–871. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2018.07.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saelens, B. E., Sallis, J. F., & Frank, L. D. (2003). Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: Findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 25(2), 80–91. doi: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2502_03
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sillano, M., Greene, M., & Ortúzar, J. D. D. (2006). Cuantificando la percepción de inseguridad ciudadana en barrios de escasos recursos. EURE (Santiago), 32(97), 17–35. doi: 10.4067/S0250-71612006000300002
   Google Scholar
• Singleton, P. A., Schneider, R. J., Muhs, C., & Clifton, K. J. (2014). The pedestrian index of the environment: Representing the walking environment in planning applications (No. 14-4261).
   Google Scholar
• Singleton, P. A., & Wang, L. (2014). Safety and security in discretionary travel decision making: Focus on active travel mode and destination choice. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2430, 47–58. doi: 10.3141/2430-06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talavera-Garcia, R., & Soria-Lara, J. A. (2015). Q-PLOS, developing an alternative walking index. A method based on urban design quality. Cities, 45, 7–17. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2015.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tribby, C., Miller, H., Brown, B., Werner, C., & Smith, K. (2016). Assessing built environment walkability using activity-space summary measures. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 9(1), 187–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walkscore.com. (2010). Find a walkable place to live. Retrieved from http://www.walkscore.com
   Google Scholar
• Witten, K., Pearce, J., & Day, P. (2011). Neighbourhood destination accessibility index: A GIS tool for measuring infrastructure support for neighbourhood physical activity. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 43(1), 205–223. doi: 10.1068/a43219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar