But why do we need politicians? A critical review

References

• Arklay, T., J. Nethercote, and J. Wanna, eds. 2006. Australian Political Lives. Canberra: ANU E Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ascher, I. 2013. “We Are All Occasional Politicians’: For a New Weberian Conception of Politics.” Constellations 20 (1): 138–149. doi:10.1111/cons.12017.
   Google Scholar
• Bang, H. 2005. “Among Everyday Makers and Expert Citizens.” In Remaking Governance: Peoples, Politics and the Public Sphere, edited by J. Newman, 159–178. Bristol: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bang, H., and A. Esmark. 2009. “Good Governance in Network Society: Reconfiguring the Political from Politics to Policy.” Administrative Theory & Praxis 31 (1): 7–37. doi:10.2753/ATP1084-1806310101.
   Google Scholar
• Bang, H. P. 2011. “The Politics of Threats: Late-modern Politics in the Shadow of Neoliberalism.” Critical Policy Studies 5 (4): 434–448. doi:10.1080/19460171.2011.628065.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L. 2012. “The Personalization of Politics: Political Identity, Social Media, and Changing Patterns of Participation.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 644 (1): 20–39. doi:10.1177/0002716212451428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1989. “Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy.” In Debates in Contemporary Political Philosophy, edited by Derek Matravers and Jon Pike, 342–360. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1997. “Procedure and Substance in Deliberative Democracy.” In Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, edited by James Bohman and William Rehg, 407–437. Cambridge and London: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corbett, J. forthcoming. The Human Dimension: Towards a Practical Defence of Politicians. Unpublished.
   Google Scholar
• Crick, B. ([ 1962] 2000). In Defence of Politics. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Dionne, E. 2004. Why Americans Hate Politics. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, P., and R. A. W. Rhodes. 1990. “Core Executive Studies in Britain.” Public Administration 68 (1): 3–28. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.1990.tb00744.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easton, D. 1965. A Framework for Political Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Elgie, R. 1995. Political Leadership in Liberal Democracies. New York: St. Martin's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elgie, R. 2011. “Core Executive Studies Two Decades On.” Public Administration 89 (1): 64–77. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01899.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, M., G. Stoker, and J. Nasir. 2013. How Do Australians Imagine Their Democracy? Australian Survey of Political Engagement Findings 2013. Canberra: Australian and New Zealand School of Government. Accessed November 19. http://www.governanceinstitute.edu.au/magma/media/upload/ckeditor/files/DEMOCRACY%20REPORT-%20UPDATED%20VERSION-27-6-13.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fawcett, P., and D. Marsh. Forthcoming. “Depoliticization, Governance and Political Participation.”
   Google Scholar
• Flinders, M. V. 2012a. Defending Politics: Why Democracy Matters in the Twenty-first Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flinders, M. V. 2012b. “The Demonisation of Politicians: Moral Panics, Folk Devils and MPs’ Expenses.” Contemporary Politics 18 (1): 1–17. doi:10.1080/13569775.2012.651263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, A. 2004. Empowered Participation: Reinventing Urban Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gutmann, A., and D. Thompson. 2004. Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. A. 2010. Authoritative Governance: Policy Making in the Age of Mediatization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hatier, C. 2012. “‘Them’ and ‘Us’: Demonising Politicians by Moral Double Standards.” Contemporary Politics 18 (4): 467–480. doi:10.1080/13569775.2012.728033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, C. 2007. Why We Hate Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, C., and G. Stoker. 2009. “Revitalising Politics: Have We lost the Plot?” Representation 45 (3): 225–236. doi:10.1080/00344890903129681.
   Google Scholar
• Heffernan, R. 2003. “Prime Ministerial Predominance? Core Executive Politics in the UK.” The British Journal of Politics & International Relations 5 (3): 347–372. doi:10.1111/1467-856X.00110.
   Google Scholar
• Hibbing, J. R., and E. Theiss-Morse. 2002. Stealth Democracy: Americans’ Beliefs about How Government Should Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hindess, B. 1996. “Fears of Intrusion: Anti-political Motifs in Western Political Discourse.” In The End of Politics, edited by A. Schedler, 21–39. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hindess, B. 1997. “Democracy and Disenchantment.” Australian Journal of Political Science 32 (1): 79–92. doi:10.1080/10361149751011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hindess, B. 2001. “Democracy as Anti-democracy.” Southern Review 34 (1): 9–21.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, M. 2007. “Anti-political Sentiment in Contemporary Liberal Democracies.” Australian Review of Public Affairs 8 (1): 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. 2003. “Multi-level Governance and Meta-governance: On Reflexivity, Requisite Variety and Requisite Irony.” In Governance as Social and Political Communication, edited by H. Bang, 101–116. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, K. 2008. “Professional Politicians as the Subjects of Moral Panic.” Australian Journal of Political Science 43 (2): 243–258. doi:10.1080/10361140802035762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, J., and H. Patapan. 2012. The Democratic Leader: How Democracy Defines, Empowers, and Limits Its Leaders. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keane, J. 2009. The Life and Death of Democracy. London, New York, Sydney, and Toronto: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Leighninger, M. 2012. “Mapping Deliberative Civic Engagement: Pictures from a (R)evolution.” In Democracy in Motion: Evaluating the Practice and Impact of Deliberative Civic Engagement, edited by T. Nabatchi, J. Gastil, M. Leighninger, and G. M. Weiksner, 19–42. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, D. 2011a. “Late Modernity and the Changing Nature of Politics: Two Cheers for Henrik Bang.” Critical Policy Studies 5 (1): 73–89. doi:10.1080/19460171.2011.555684.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, D. 2011b. “The New Orthodoxy: The Differentiated Polity Model.” Public Administration 89 (1): 32–48. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01897.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, D., and P. Fawcett. 2011. “Branding, Politics and Democracy.” Policy Studies 32 (5): 515–530. doi:10.1080/01442872.2011.586498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, D., D. Richards, and M. Smith. 2003. “Unequal Plurality: Towards an Asymmetric Power Model of British politics.” Government and Opposition 38 (3): 306–332. doi:10.1111/1477-7053.t01-1-00017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, D., P. ‘t Hart, and K. Tindall. 2010. “Celebrity Politics: The Politics of the Late Modernity?” Political Studies Review 8 (3): 322–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAnulla, S. 2006. “Challenging the New Interpretivist Approach: Towards a Critical Realist Alternative.” British Politics 1 (1): 113–138. doi:10.1057/palgrave.bp.4200013.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. 2011. Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. 1997. Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity, and Accountability. Buckingham and Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. 2007. “Understanding Governance: Ten Years on.” Organisation Studies 28 (8): 1243–1264. doi:10.1177/0170840607076586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. 2012. “Theory, Method and British Political Life History.” Political Studies Review 10 (2): 161–176. doi:10.1111/j.1478-9302.2011.00236.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W., and M. Bevir. 2010. The State as Cultural Practice. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riddell, P. 2010. “In Defence of Politicians: In Spite of Themselves.” Parliamentary Affairs 63 (3): 545–557. doi:10.1093/pa/gsq015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runciman, D. 2008. Political Hypocrisy: The Mask of Power, from Hobbes to Orwell and Beyond. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E. 2006. “Metagovernance the Changing Role of Politicians in Processes of Democratic Governance.” The American Review of Public Administration 36 (1): 98–114. doi:10.1177/0275074005282584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoker, G. 2006. Why Politics Matters: Making Democracy Work. Houndmills and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, D. F. 2008. “Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical Political Science.” Annual Review of Political Science 11: 497–520. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.081306.070555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torcal, M., and J. R. Montero, eds. 2006. Political Disaffection in Contemporary Democracies: Social Capital, Institutions, and Politics. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Uhr, J. 1998. Deliberative Democracy in Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. ([ 1919] 1978). “Politics as a Vocation.” In Max Weber: Selections in Translation, edited by W. G. Runciman, 212–225. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. ([ 1922] 1978). Economy and Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, M., and Flinders, M. 2012. “From Folk Devils to Folk Heroes: Rethinking the Theory of Moral Panics.” Moral Panic Studies Working Paper Series No. 2012/2. Accessed November 21. http://www.brunel.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/255339/20122FromFolkDevilstoFolkHeroesWoodandFlinders.pdf.
   Google Scholar