A comparative study of legitimation strategies in hybrid regimes

References

• Ambrosio, T. 2007. “Insulating Russia from a Colour Revolution: How the Kremlin Resists Regional Democratic Trends.” Democratization 14 (2): 232–252. doi: 10.1080/13510340701245736
   Google Scholar
• Anckar, D. 2010. “Small Is Democratic, But Who Is Small?” Arts and Social Sciences Journal 2 ASSJ-2: 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. D. Jr. 2013. “Discourse and Strategic Continuity from Gorbachev through Putin.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 46 (1): 123–135. doi: 10.1016/j.postcomstud.2012.07.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angosto-Ferrandez, L., ed. 2013. Democracy, Revolution and Geopolitics: Venezuela and the International Politics of Discontent. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Asmolov, A., A. Levinson, and I. Prokhorova. 2014. “A Flat Country” [Ploskaya strana]. Novoye Vremya, June 16. Accessed June 20. http://www.newtimes.ru/articles/detail/83515
   Google Scholar
• Baker, B. 2008. “Seychelles: Democratising in the Shadows of the Past.” Journal of Contemporary African Studies 26: 279–293. doi: 10.1080/02589000802332481
   Google Scholar
• BBC. 2012. “Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez in Cuba for more Cancer Surgery.” Accessed December 10. www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-20663782.
   Google Scholar
• Bertelsmann Stiftung. 2014. “Transformation Index BTI.” Accessed August 21, 2015. http://www.bti-project.org/index/status-index/.
   Google Scholar
• Bogaards, M. 2009. “How to Classify Hybrid Regimes? Defective Democracy and Electoral Authoritarianism.” Democratization 16 (2): 399–423. doi: 10.1080/13510340902777800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bratton, M., and N. Van de Walle. 1994. “Neopatrimonial Regimes and Political Transitions in Africa.” World Politics 46 (4): 453–489. doi: 10.2307/2950715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campling, L., and M. Rosalie. 2006. “Sustaining Social Development in a Small Island Developing State? The Case of Seychelles.” Sustainable Development 14: 115–125. doi: 10.1002/sd.298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carothers, T. 2002. “The End of the Transition Paradigm.” Journal of Democracy 13 (1): 5–21. doi: 10.1353/jod.2002.0003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaplin, A. 2014. Chavez’s Legacy: Venezuela’s Transformation from Democracy to a Mafia State. Maryland: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Chávez, H. 2012. Todos Somos Chávez (Televised Speech of Hugo Chávez’s Presidential Campaign Launch 2012). Caracas: teleSur.
   Google Scholar
• Colton, T. J., and H. E. Hale. 2009. “The Putin Vote: Presidential Electorates in a Hybrid Regime.” Slavic Review 68 (3): 473–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppedge, M. 2002. “Venezuela: Popular Sovereignty Versus Liberal Democracy.” Working paper No. 294, Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame.
   Google Scholar
• Corrales, J., and M. Penfold-Becerra. 2012. Un Dragón En El Trópico. 1a. edición. ed, Reportaje. Caracas: La Hoja del Norte.
   Google Scholar
• Crisp, B., and D. Levine. 1998. “Democratizing the Democracy? Crisis and Reform in Venezuela.” Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 40 (2): 27–61. doi: 10.2307/166373
   Google Scholar
• Dawisha, K. 2014. Putin’s Kleptocracy: Who Owns Russia? New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• De Lazari, A. 2014. Idea Rosyjska” Po Putinowsku, Liberté! Accessed June 20, 2014. http://liberte.pl/idea-rosyjska-putinowsku/.
   Google Scholar
• De Waal, T. 2014. Anti-Fascism and Its Discontents. Carnegie Moscow Center. Accessed June 25, 2014. http://carnegie.ru/eurasiaoutlook/?fa=55659.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, L. J. 2002. “Thinking about Hybrid Regimes.” Journal of Democracy 13 (2): 21–35. doi: 10.1353/jod.2002.0025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, L. J., and S. Tsalik. 1999. “Size and Democracy: The Case for Decentralization.” In Developing Democracy, edited by L. J. Diamond, 117–160. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dogan, M. 1992. “Conceptions of Legitimacy.” In Encyclopedia of Government and Politics, edited by M. Hawkesworth and M. Kogan, 116–126. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Easton, D. 1975. “A Re-Assessment of the Concept of Political Support.” British Journal of Political Science 5 (4): 435–457. doi: 10.1017/S0007123400008309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Economist Intelligence Unit. 2011. “Democracy Index 2011: Democracy under Stress.” Accessed April 20, 2016. https://www.eiu.com/public/topical_report.aspx?campaignid=DemocracyIndex2011.
   Google Scholar
• Ekman, J. 2009. “Political Participation and Regime Stability: A Framework for Analyzing Hybrid Regimes.” International Political Science Review 30 (1): 7–31. doi: 10.1177/0192512108097054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellner, S. 2008. Rethinking Venezuelan Politics: Class, Conflict and the Chávez Phenomenon. Boulder: Lynne Reinner.
   Google Scholar
• Finkel, E., and Y. M. Brudny. 2012. “Russia and the Colour Revolutions.” Democratization 19 (1): 15–36. doi: 10.1080/13510347.2012.641297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedom House. 2014. 2014 Freedom in the World. Freedom House. https://freedomhouse.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, T. P., and M. Hout. 1998. “More Shock Than Therapy: Market Transition, Employment, and Income in Russia, 1991-1995.” American Journal of Sociology 104 (1): 1–50. doi: 10.1086/210001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerschewski, J. 2013. “The Three Pillars of Stability: Legitimation, Repression, and Co-Optation in Autocratic Regimes.” Democratization 20 (1): 13–38. doi: 10.1080/13510347.2013.738860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, L., and P. Mohseni. 2011. “Beyond Authoritarianism: The Conceptualization of Hybrid Regimes.” Studies in Comparative International Development 46 (3): 270–297. doi: 10.1007/s12116-011-9088-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilley, B. 2006. “The Meaning and Measure of State Legitimacy: Results for 72 Countries.” European Journal of Political Research 45 (3): 499–525. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00307.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grauvogel, J., and C. von Soest. 2014. “Claims to Legitimacy Count: Why Sanctions Fail to Instigate Democratisation in Authoritarian Regimes.” European Journal of Political Research 53 (4): 635–653. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudkov, L. 2014a. Levada Center Presentation. Accessed June 25, 2014. http://www.levada.ru/books/prezentatsiya-doklada-lva-gudkova-v-kakoi-strane-my-zhivem-rossiiskoe-obshchestvo-ot-noyabrya-.
   Google Scholar
• Gudkov, L. 2014b. “Rossiya, kotoruju vybirayet bol’shinstvo, -kakaya ona?” [Russia Chosen by Majority – How Does it Look Like?]. Accessed June 25, 2014. http://www.levada.ru/21-06-2014/rossiya-kotoruyu-vybiraet-bolshinstvo-kakaya-ona.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, H. E. 2010. “Eurasian Polities as Hybrid Regimes: The Case of Putin’s Russia.” Journal of Eurasian Studies 1: 33–41. doi: 10.1016/j.euras.2009.11.001
   Google Scholar
• Hale, H. E. 2011. “Hybrid Regimes.” In The Dynamics of Democratization: Dictatorship, Development, and Diffusion, edited by N. J. Brown, 23–45. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, P. 1999. “The Russian Economic Crisis and the Future of Russian Economic Reform.” Europe-Asia Studies 51 (7): 1141–1166. doi: 10.1080/09668139998471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatchard, J. 1993. “Re-Establishing a Multi-Party State: Some Constitutional Lessons from the Seychelles.” The Journal of Modern African Studies 31 (4): 601–612. doi: 10.1017/S0022278X0001226X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, S. L. 2011. “Civil Society in Russia.” Problems of Post-Communism 58 (3): 11–27. doi: 10.2753/PPC1075-8216580302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huntington, S. P. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hyde, A. 1983. “The Concept of Legitimation in the Sociology of Law.” Wisconsin Law Review 379: 385–426.
   Google Scholar
• Kailitz, S. 2013. “Classifying Political Regimes Revisited: Legitimation and Durability.” Democratization 20 (1): 39–60. doi: 10.1080/13510347.2013.738861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, A. 2000. “The Enduring Legacy of the KGB in Russian Politics.” Problems of Post-Communism 47 (4): 3–15. doi: 10.1080/10758216.2000.11655889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kryshtanovskaya, O., and S. White. 2005. “Inside the Putin Court: A Research Note.” Europe-Asia Studies 57 (7): 1065–1075. doi: 10.1080/09668130500302830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levada Center. 2014a. Indexes. Accessed June 19, 2014. http://www.levada.ru/indeksy.
   Google Scholar
• Levada Center. 2014b. Counter-Sanctions: Problems and Consequences [Kontrasanktsii: Problemy i Posledstviya]. Accessed December 4, 2014. http://www.levada.ru/11-11-2014/kontrsanktsii-problemy-i-posledstviya.
   Google Scholar
• Levitsky, S., and L. Way. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levitsky, S., and L. Way. 2002. “The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism.” Journal of Democracy 13 (2): 51–65. doi: 10.1353/jod.2002.0026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lievesley, G. 2005. “The Latin American Left: The Difficult Relationship between Electoral Ambition and Popular Empowerment.” Contemporary Politics 11 (1): 3–18. doi: 10.1080/13569770500098615
   Google Scholar
• March, L. 2012. “Nationalism for Export? The Domestic and Foreign-Policy Implications of the New ‘Russian Idea’.” Europe-Asia Studies 64 (3): 401–425. doi: 10.1080/09668136.2012.661927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquez, X. 2015. “The Irrelevance of Legitimacy.” Political Studies. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.12202.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, M. G., and K. Jaggers. 2011. “Polity IV Project: Political Regime.” Characteristics and Transitions, 1800-2010. Accessed March 8, 2013. http://www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez, E. 2011. “Satisfacción con gestión de Chávez cae en todas las áreas.” El Universal, 7 September, Accessed August 3, 2015. http://www.eluniversal.com/2011/09/07/satisfaccion-con-gestion-de-chavez-cae-en-todas-las-areas.
   Google Scholar
• Mazepus, H. 2012a. Interview with Denis Volkov on Civil Society in Russia. March 2.
   Google Scholar
• Mazepus, H. 2012b. Interview with Lilia Shibanova on civil society in Russia, March 16.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, F. 2013. Venezuelan Democracy and the Legitimacy of State Institutions’ Council on Hemispheric Affairs. Accessed January 10, 2016. http://www.coha.org/venezuelan-democracy-and-the-legitimacy-of-state-institutions/.
   Google Scholar
• Morlino, L. 2009. “Are There Hybrid Regimes? Or Are They Just an Optical Illusion?” European Political Science Review 1 (2): 273–296. doi: 10.1017/S1755773909000198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, D. 2004. “The Normalization of Punto Fijo Democracy.” In The Unravelling of Representative Democracy in Venezuela. edited by J. McCoy, and D. Myers, 11–30. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, G. A. 1996. “Illusions about Consolidation.” Journal of Democracy 7 (2): 34–51. doi: 10.1353/jod.1996.0034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortiz, N. 2004. “Entrepreneurs: Profits without Power?” In The Unravelling of Representative Democracy in Venezuela, edited by J. McCoy and D. Meyers, 71–92. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petrone, L. 2011. “Institutionalizing Pluralism in Russia: A new Authoritarianism?” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 27 (2): 166–194. doi: 10.1080/13523279.2011.564086
   Google Scholar
• Przeworski, A. 1991. Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putin, V. 2004. “Address of the President of Russia Vladimir Putin to the Federal Assembly of the RF: 2004.” Accessed May 11, 2012. http://www.intelros.ru/2007/02/05/poslanie_prezidenta_rossii_vladimira_putina_federalnomu_sobraniju_rf_2004_god.html.
   Google Scholar
• Putin, V. 2014. “Presidential Address to the Federal Assembly,” December 4. Accessed April 20, 2016. http://eng.kremlin.ru/news/23341.
   Google Scholar
• Remington, T. 2008. “Patronage and the Party of Power: President-Parliament Relations under Vladimir Putin.” Europe-Asia Studies 60 (6): 959–987. doi: 10.1080/09668130802161215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, R., W. Mishler, and N. Munro. 2011. Popular Support for an Undemocratic Regime: The Changing Views of Russians. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saxonberg, S. 2013. Transitions and Non-Transitions from Communism: Regime Survival in China, Cuba, North Korea, and Vietnam. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stokes, S. C. 2007. “Political Clientelism.” In The Oxford Hanbook of Comparative Politics, edited by C. Boix and S. C. Stokes, 604–627. Oxford: Oxford Handbooks Online.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, M. C. 1995. “Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches.” Academy of Management Review 20 (3): 571–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surkov, V. 2008. “Russian Political Culture: The View from Utopia.” Russian Politics and Law 46 (5): 10–26. doi: 10.2753/RUP1061-1940460502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torbakov, I. 2014. “The Russian Orthodox Church and Contestations over History in Contemporary Russia.” Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization 22 (1): 145–170.
   Google Scholar
• Treisman, D. 2011. “Presidential Popularity in a Hybrid Regime: Russia under Yeltsin and Putin.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (3): 590–609. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00500.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. 2006. “Psychological Perspectives on Legitimacy and Legitimation.” Annual Review of Psychology 57 (1): 375–400. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Nieuwkerk, A., and W. M. Bell. 2007. “Seychelles.” In Security and Democracy in Southern Africa, edited by G. Cawthra, A. du Pisani, and A. Omari, 142–155. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Veenendaal, W. P. 2014. Politics and Democracy in Microstates. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Volkov, D. 2011. Perspektivy Grazhdanskovo Obshchestva v Rossii. Levada Center, Moscow. Accessed August 7, 2011. http://webfile.ru/5241336.
   Google Scholar
• Weatherford, M. S. 1992. “Measuring Political Legitimacy.” The American Political Science Review 86 (1): 149–166. doi: 10.2307/1964021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, M. 1964. The Theory of Social And Economic Organization. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weisbrot, M. 2008. “Poverty Reduction in Venezuela: A Reality-Based View.” ReVista: Harvard Review of Latin America 8 (1): 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• White, S., and I. McAllister. 2008. “The Putin Phenomenon.” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 24 (4): 604–628. doi: 10.1080/13523270802510610
   Google Scholar
• Wigell, M. 2008. “Mapping ‘Hybrid Regimes’: Regime Types and Concepts in Comparative Politics.” Democratization 15 (2): 230–250. doi: 10.1080/13510340701846319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, M. Y. 2011. “Factors Hindering ‘Larger’ Representation of Women in Parliament: The Case of Seychelles.” Commonwealth and Comparative Politics 49 (1): 98–114. doi: 10.1080/14662043.2011.541116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelditch, M. Jr. 2001. “Theories of Legitimacy.” In The Psychology of Legitimacy: Emerging Perspectives on Ideology, Justice, and Intergroup Relations, edited by J. T. Jost and B. Major, 33–53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar