Making the most of the frame: developing the analytical potential of frame analysis

References

• Benford, R. D. 1997. “An Insider’s Critique of the Social Movement Framing Perspective.” Sociological Inquiry 67 (4): 409–430. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-682X.1997.tb00445.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benford, R. D., and D. A. Snow. 2000. “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment.” Annual Review of Sociology 26: 611–639. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, Sheri. 2013. “Ideational Theorizing in the Social Sciences since ‘Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State.’” Governance 26 (2): 217–237. doi: 10.1111/gove.12008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björnehed, Emma. 2012. Ideas in Conflict: The Effect of Frames in the Nepal Conflict and Peace Process. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.
   Google Scholar
• Blyth, M. 2003. “Structures Do Not Come with an Instruction Sheet: Interests; Ideas and Progress in Political Science.” Perspectives on Politics 1 (4): 695–706. doi: 10.1017/S1537592703000471
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, B., O. Waever, and J. de Wilde. 1998. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Carragee, K. M., and W. Roefs. 2004. “The Neglect of Power in Recent Framing Research.” Journal of Communication 54 (2): 214–233. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02625.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, Dennis, and James N. Druckman. 2007. “A Theory of Framing and Opinion Formation in Competitive Elite Environments.” Journal of Communication 57 (1): 99–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, R. H. 2004. “The Path-Dependency of an Idea: Why Scandinavian Welfare States Remain Distinct.” Social Policy and Administration 38: 204–219. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9515.2004.00386.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vreese, C. H. 2012. “New Avenues for Framing Research.” American Behavioral Scientist 56 (3): 365–375. doi: 10.1177/0002764211426331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drake, L. E., and W. A. Donohue. 1996. “Communicative Framing Theory in Conflict Resolution.” Communication Research 23 (3): 297–322. doi: 10.1177/009365096023003003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. 1993. “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.” Journal of Communication 43 (4): 51–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erikson, Josefina. 2011. Strider om mening. En dynamisk frameanalys av den svenska sexköpslagen. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.
   Google Scholar
• Erikson, Josefina. 2012. “The Various ‘Problems’ of Prostitution- A Dynamic Frame Analysis of Swedish Prostitution Policy.” In Prostitution, Harm and Gender Inequality: Theory, Research and Policy, edited by Maddy Coy. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Erikson, J. 2015. “Ideas and Actors in Policy Processes: Where is the Interaction?” Policy Studies 36 (5): 451–467. doi: 10.1080/01442872.2015.1091067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erikson, J. 2017. Criminalising the Client. Institutional Change, Gendered Ideas, and Feminist Strategies. New York: Rowman and Littlefield International.
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A. 1988. “Political Discourse and Collective Action.” International Social Movement Research 1 (2): 219–244.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. 1995. The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, Peter A. 1993. “Policy Paradigms, Social Learning and the State.” Comparative Politics 25 (3): 275–296. doi: 10.2307/422246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, C. 2006. “Constructivist Institutionalism.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, edited by R. A. W. Rhodes, S. A. Binder, and B. A. Rockman, 56–74. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, Michael. 2000. “Managing the ‘Hollow State’: Procedural Policy Instruments and Modern Governance.” Canadian Public Administration 43 (4): 412–431. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-7121.2000.tb01152.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kangas, O. E., M. Niemelä, and S. Varjonen. 2014. “When and Why Do Ideas Matter? The Influence of Framing on Opinion Formation and Policy Change.” European Political Science Review 6 (1): 73–92. doi: 10.1017/S1755773912000306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhnberger, A. 1998. “The Influence of Framing on Risky Decisions: A Meta-analysis.” Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes 75 (1): 23–55. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, Irwin P., Gary J. Gaeth, Judy Schreiber, and Marco Lauriola. 2002. “A New Look at Framing Effects: Distribution of Effect Sizes, Individual Differences, and Independence of Types of Effects.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 88 (1): 411–429. doi: 10.1006/obhd.2001.2983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, I. P., S. L. Schneider, and G. J. Gaeth. 1998. “All Frames Are Not Created Equal: A Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing Effects.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 76 (2): 149–188. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, James G., and Johan P. Olsen. 2008. “The Logic of Appropriateness.” In The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, edited by Michael Moran, Martin Rein, and Robert E. Goodin, 689–708. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matthes, J. 2011. “Framing Politics: An Integrative Approach.” American Behavioral Scientist. doi:10.1177/0002764211426324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintz, A., and S. B. Redd. 2003. “Framing Effects in International Relations.” Synthese 135: 193–213. doi: 10.1023/A:1023460923628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, A. D., and C. McClurg Mueller. 1992. Frontiers in Social Movement Theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reese, S. D., O. H. Gandy, Jr., and A. E. Grant. 2010. Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and Our Understanding of the Social World. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rhee, June Woong. 1997. “Strategy and Issue Frames in Election Campaign Coverage: A Social Cognitive Account of Framing Effects.” Journal of Communication 47 (3): 26–48. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1997.tb02715.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharpf, Fritz W. 2002. “The European Social Model: Coping with the Challenges of Diversity.” Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (4): 645–670. doi: 10.1111/1468-5965.00392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharpf, Fritz W. 2003. “Legitimate Diversity: The New Challenge of European Integration.” Journal of Comparative Government and European Policy 1 (1): 32–60.
   Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. A. 1999. “Framing as a Theory of Media Effects.” Journal of Communication 49 (1): 103–122. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F. 2001. “The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union.” International Organization 55 (1): 47–80. doi: 10.1162/002081801551414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Vivien A. 2008. “Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse.” Annual Review of Political Science 11: 303–326. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, A., and M. Sidney. 2009. “What Is Next for Policy Design and Social Construction Theory?” The Policy Studies Journal 37 (1): 103–119. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00298.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A., and M. Rein. 1994. Frame Reflection. Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, D. A., and R. D. Benford. 1988. “Ideology, Frame Resonance, and Participant Mobilization.” International Social Movement Research 1 (1): 197–217.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, D. A., and R. D. Benford. 1992. “Master Frames and Cycles of Protests.” In Frontiers in Social Movement Theory, edited by Aldon D. Morris and Carol McClurg Mueller, 133–155. London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, D. A., and R. D. Benford. 2000. “Clarifying the Relationship Between Framing and Ideology in the Study of Social Movements: A Comment on Oliver and Johnston.” Mobilisation: An International Quarterly 5 (1): 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D. 1989. “Causal Stories and the Formation of Policy Agendas.” Political Science Quarterly 104 (2): 281–300. doi: 10.2307/2151585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thapa, Deepak. 2002. “The Maobadi of Nepal.” In State of Nepal, edited by Kanak Mani Dixit and Shastri Ramachandaran, 77–100. Lalitpur: Himal Books.
   Google Scholar
• van Hulst, M., and D. Yanow. 2014. “From Policy ‘Frames’ to ‘Framing’: Theorizing a More Dynamic, Political Approach.” The American Review of Public Administration. doi:10.1177/0275074014533142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verloo, M., and E. Lombardo. 2007. “Contested Gender Equality and Policy Variety in Europe: Introducing a Critical Frame Analysis Approach.” In Multiple Meanings of Gender Equality: A Critical Frame Analysis of Gender Policies in Europe, edited by M. Verloo, 21–49. Budapest: Central European University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verloo, M., E. Lombardo, and P. Meier. 2009. The Discursive Politics of Gender Equality: Stretching, Bending, and Policy-making. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vliegenthart, R., and L. van Zoonen. 2011. “Power to the Frame: Bringing Sociology Back to Frame Analysis.” European Journal of Communication 26 (2): 101–115. doi: 10.1177/0267323111404838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver, O. 1995. “Securitization and Desecuritization.” In On Security, edited by Ronnie D. Lipschutz, 46–87. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• “ We Had Face-to-Face with Maoists: Koirala.” 2005. Kathmandu Post, December 8, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Parliamentary sources
   Google Scholar
• Committee Report SoU 1987/88:3y.
   Google Scholar
• Debate Protocol 1983/84:152.
   Google Scholar
• Governmental Inquiry Report 1995:15.
   Google Scholar
• Governmental Inquiry Report SOU 1981:71.
   Google Scholar
• Governmental Inquiry Report SOU 1982:61.
   Google Scholar
• Govt. Bill 1981/82:187.
   Google Scholar
• Interviews
   Google Scholar
• Arjun KC, NC, Kathmandu, December 14th, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Dev Gurung, CPN (Maoist), Kathmandu, April 23th, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Hisila Yami, CPN (Maoist), Kathmandu, October 5th, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Jhala Nath Khanal, UML, Kathmandu, October 20th, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Malla K. Sundar, Kathmandu, September 28th, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Markus Heiniger, December 2nd, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Pradeep Gyawali, CPN (UML), Kathmandu, November 4th, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Prakash, facilitator, Kathmandu, December 8th, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Prakash Sharma Mahat, NCD, Kathmandu, November 4th, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Pushpa Kamal Dahal a.k.a Prachanda, CPN (Maoist), Kathmandu, October 20th, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Ram S. Mahat, NC, Kathmandu, October 15th, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Sher Bahadur Deuba, NC/NCD, Kathmandu, October 13th, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Shyam Shreshta, Civil Society Leader, Kathmandu, November 17th, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Suresh Ale Magar, CPN (Maoist), Kathmandu, November 10th, 2010.
   Google Scholar