Dilemmas of public participation in science policy

References

• Bovaird, T. 2007. “Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community Coproduction of Public Services.” Public Administration Review 67 (5): 846–860. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chilvers, J., and M. Kearnes, eds. 2015. Remaking Participation: Science, Environment and Emerging Publics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chubb, J., and R. Watermeyer. 2016. “Artifice or Integrity in the Marketization of Research? Investigating the Moral Economy of Impact Statements Within Research Funding Proposals in the UK and Australia.” Studies in Higher Education 42: 2360–2372. doi:10.1080/03075079.2016.1144182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1927. The Public and its Problems. New York: Holt.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. 2000. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, A. R. H., H. van Dijk, J. de Jonge, G. Rowe, and L. J. Frewer. 2013. “The Impact of Information on Attitudinal Ambivalence: The Case of Nanotechnology in Food Production.” Public Understanding of Science 22 (7): 817–831. doi: 10.1177/0963662512440220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishkin, J. S. 2011. When the People Speak: Deliberative Democracy and Public Consultation. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garwood, C. 2007. Flat Earth: The History of an Infamous Idea. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gutmann, A., and D. Thompson. 2009. Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, J. 2010. Biotechnology and Public Engagement in Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, M. 2012. The Geek Manifesto: Why Science Matters. London: Corgi.
   Google Scholar
• Horlick-Jones, T., J. Walls, G. Rowe, N. Pidgeon, W. Poortinga, G. Murdock, and T. O’Riordan. 2007. The GM Debate: Risk, Politics and Public Engagement. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Horlick-Jones, T., J. Walls, G. Rowe, N. Pidgeon, W. Poortinga, and T. O’Riordan. 2006. “On Evaluating the GM Nation? Public Debate about the Commercialisation of Transgenic Crops in Britain.” New Genetics and Society 25 (3): 265–288. doi: 10.1080/14636770601032858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• INVOLVE. 2005. People and Participation: How to Put Citizens at the Heart of Decision Making. Eastleigh: INVOLVE.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, O. 2015. The Establishment: And How They Get Away with it. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. 2015. Do-it-yourself Democracy: The Rise of the Public Engagement Industry. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mihaly, M. 2010. “Citizen Participation in the Making of Environmental Decisions – Evolving Obstacles and Potential Solutions Through Partnerships with Experts and Agents.” Pace Environmental Law Review 27: 2009–2010.
   Google Scholar
• O’Doherty, K., and E. Einsiedel, eds. 2013. Public Engagement and Emerging Technologies. Vancouver: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Faircheallaigh, C. 2010. “Public Participation and Environmental Impact Assessment: Purposes, Implications, and Lessons for Public Policy Making.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 30 (10): 19–27. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2009.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens, S. 2000. “‘Engaging the Public’: Information and Deliberation in Environmental Policy.” Environment and Planning A 32: 1141–1148. doi: 10.1068/a3330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pidgeon, N. F., W. Poortinga, G. Rowe, T. Horlick-Jones, J. Walls, and T. O’Riordan. 2005. “Using Surveys in Public Participation Processes for Risk Decision-Making: The Case of the 2003 British GM Nation? Public Debate.” Risk Analysis 25 (2): 467–479. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00603.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pieczka, M., and O. Escobar. 2013. “Dialogue and Science: Innovation in Policy-Making and the Discourse of Public Engagement in the UK.” Science and Public Policy 40 (1): 113–126. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scs073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plous, S. 1993. The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. 2001. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Pytlik-Zillig, L. M., and A. J. Tomkins. 2011. “Public Engagement for Informing Science and Technology Policy: What Do We Know, What Do We Need to Know, and How Will We Get There?” Review of Policy Research 28 (2): 197–217. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2011.00489.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, G., and L. J. Frewer. 2000. “Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 25 (1): 3–29. doi: 10.1177/016224390002500101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, G., and L. J. Frewer. 2004. “Evaluating Public Participation Exercises: A Research Agenda.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 29 (4): 512–556. doi: 10.1177/0162243903259197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, G., and L. J. Frewer. 2005. “A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 30 (2): 251–290. doi: 10.1177/0162243904271724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, G., and J. G. Gammack. 2004. “Promise and Perils of Electronic Public Engagement.” Science and Public Policy 31 (1): 39–54. doi: 10.3152/147154304781780181
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, G., T. Horlick-Jones, J. Walls, and N. F. Pidgeon. 2005. “Difficulties in Evaluating Public Engagement Initiatives: Reflections on an Evaluation of the UK “GM Nation?” Public Debate.” Public Understanding of Science 14 (4): 331–352. doi: 10.1177/0963662505056611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wason, P. C. 1968. “Reasoning about a Rule.” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 20 (3): 273–281. doi: 10.1080/14640746808400161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watermeyer, R. 2010. “Social Network Science: Pedagogy, Dialogue and Deliberation.” Jcom 09 (01): A04.
   Google Scholar
• Watermeyer, R. 2013. “Communication and the New Media.” In The Right to Know and the Right Not to Know: 15 Years on, edited by R. Chadwick, M. Levitt, and D. Shinckle, 180–195. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watermeyer, R. 2014. “Impact in the REF: Issues and Obstacles.” Studies in Higher Education 41: 199–214. doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.915303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watermeyer, R. 2015a. “Public Intellectuals vs. New Public Management. The Defeat of Public Engagement in Higher Education.” Studies in Higher Education, doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1034261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watermeyer, R. 2015b. “Lost in the Third Space: The Impact of Public Engagement in Higher Education on Academic Identity, Research Practice and Career Progression.” European Journal of Higher Education 5 (3): 331–347. doi: 10.1080/21568235.2015.1044546
   Google Scholar
• Wilsdon, J., and R. Willis. 2004. See Through Science: Why Public Engagement Needs to Move Upstream. London: Demos.
   Google Scholar