Welfare reform and public justification

References

• Austin, J. L. 1962. How to do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Béland, D. 2005. “Ideas and Social Policy: An Institutionalist Perspective.” Social Policy and Administration 39 (1): 1–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9515.2005.00421.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomquist, S., and K. Moene. 2015. “The Nordic Model.” Journal of Public Economics 127 (July): 1–2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2015.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boswell, C., A. Geddes, and P. Scholten. 2011. “The Role of Narratives in Migration Policy-Making: A Research Framework.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 13 (1): 1–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-856X.2010.00435.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, J., and L. I. Terum. 1997. “How Nordic is the Nordic Model?” Scandinavian Journal of Social Welfare 6: 247–256. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2397.1997.tb00001.x
   Google Scholar
• Carstensen, M. B., and V. A. Schmidt. 2016. “Power Through, Over and in Ideas: Conceptualizing Ideational Power in Discursive Institutionalism.” Journal of European Public Policy 23 (3): 318–337. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2015.1115534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, S. 2010. “Theories of Political Justification.” Philosophy Compass 5 (11): 893–903. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2010.00344.x
   Google Scholar
• Dahlstedt, M. 2008. “Att ställa krav är att bry sig.” In Den bästa av världar? Betraktelser över en postpolitisk samtid, edited by M. Tesfahuney, and M. Dahlstedt, 195–221. Stockholm: Tankekraft förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, A. 2014. Rethinking Unemployment and the Work Ethic. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin, G. 1972. “Paternalism.” Monist 56: 64–84. doi: 10.5840/monist197256119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dworkin, R. 1977. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin, G. 2013. “Defining Paternalism.” In Paternalism: Theory and Practice, edited by C. Coons, and M. Weber, 25–38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eichenhofer, E. 2015. The law of the Activating State. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Eichhorst, W., O. Kaufmann, and R. Konle-Seidl. 2008. Bringing the Jobless into Work? Experiences with Activation Schemes in Europe and the US. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Elster, J. 1986. “The Market and the Forum: Three Varieties of Political Theory.” In Foundations of Social Choice Theory, edited by J. Elster, and A. Hylland, 103–132. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elster, J. 1995. “Strategic Uses of Argument.” In Barriers to Conflict Resolution, edited by K. Arrow, R. H. Mnookin, L. Ross, A. Tversky, and R. Wilson, 236–257. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Elster, J. 1998. “Introduction.” In Deliberative Democracy, edited by Elster, 1–18. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Etzioni, A. 1993. The Spirit of Community. New York: Crown Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Feinberg, J. 1986. Harm to Self. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forst, R. 2015. Normativität und Macht. Zur Analyse sozialer Rechtfertigungsordnungen. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Gaus, G. 1996. Justificatory Liberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gaus, G. 2003. Contemporary Theories of Liberalism. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1998. The Third Way. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gjersøe, H. M., Leseth, A. B., and Vilhena, S. 2018. “Frontline Workers' Experience with Mandatory Activation in Norway: Maternalistic Concerns as a Street-Level Strategy.” Paper presented at the International conference: Welfare Conditionality: principles, practices and perspectives, University of York, UK, June 26–28.
   Google Scholar
• Goodin, R. E. 1998. “Social Welfare as a Collective Responsibility.” In Social Welfare and Individual Responsibility, edited by D. Schmidtz, and R. E. Goodin, 97–195. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gosepath, S. 2004. Gleiche Gerechtigkeit. Grundlagen Eines Liberalen Egalitarismus. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Greenawalt, K. 1995. Private Conscience and Public Reasons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grice, P. 1975. “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics, 3: Speech Acts, edited by P. Cole, and J. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 2006. “Religion in the Public Sphere.” European Journal of Philosophy 14 (1): 1–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0378.2006.00241.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heclo, H. 1974. Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden: From Relief to Income Maintenance. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henning, C. 2009. “Liberalism, Perfectionism and Workfare.” Analyse & Kritik 31 (1): 159–180. doi: 10.1515/auk-2009-0111
   Google Scholar
• Hoop, R. 2014. “Political–Philosophical Perspectives on the Duty to Work in Activation Policies for the Unemployed.” In Activation Policies for the Unemployed, the Right to Work and the Duty to Work, edited by E. Dermine, and D. Dumont, 33–56. Brussels: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Innst. 208 L. 2014–2015. Recommendation to the Storting from the Standing Committee on Labour and Social Affairs, Prop. 29 L (2014–2015). Oslo: Stortinget.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, B. 1992. “Basic Income and the Common Good.” In Arguing for Basic Income: Ethical Foundations for a Radical Reform, edited by P. van Parijs, 155–177. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Jupskås, A. 2016. “The Taming of the Shrew: How the Progress Party (Almost) Became Part of the Mainstream.” In Radical Right-Wing Populist Parties in Western Europe. Into the Mainstream?, edited by T. Akkerman, S. L. de Lange, and M. Rooduijn, 169–192. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jupskås, A., and O. Garvik. 2017. “Fremskrittspartiet.” In Store norsle leksikon [Norwegian Online Encyclopedia].
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, M. 2013. Kein Recht auf Faulheit. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.
   Google Scholar
• Kenworthy, L. 2010. “Labour Market Activation.” In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Welfare States, edited by L. G. Castles, S. Leibfried, J. Lewis, H. Obringer, and C. Pierson, 435–447. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krause, S. 2008. Civil Passions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lieberman, R. C. 2002. “Ideas, Institutions, and Political Order: Explaining Political Change.” American Political Science Review 96 (4): 697–712. doi: 10.1017/S0003055402000394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lødemel, I. 1997. The Welfare Paradox. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lødemel, I., and E. Gubrium. 2014. “Trajectories of Change.” In Activation or Workfare?, edited by I. Lødemel, and A. Moreira, 327–347. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., and Guassora, A. D. 2016. “Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power.” Qualitative Health Research 26 (13): 1753–1760. doi: 10.1177/1049732315617444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J., J. Bohman, S. Chambers, T. Christiano, A. Fung, J. Parkinson, and M. E. Warren. 2012. “A Systemic Approach to Deliberative Democracy.” In Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale, edited by J. Parkinson, and J. Mansbridge, 1–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miliband, E. 2005. “Does Inequality Matter?” In The new Egalitarianism, edited by A. Giddens, and P. Diamond 29–51. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Molander, A., and G. Torsvik. 2015. “Getting People Into Work: What (if Anything) can Justify Mandatory Activation of Welfare Recipients?” Journal of Applied Philosophy 32 (4): 373–392. doi: 10.1111/japp.12132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2013. “Employment Outlook.” doi:10.1787/empl_outlook-2013-en.
   Google Scholar
• Paz-Fuchs, A. 2008. Welfare to Work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. 1996. “The new Politics of the Welfare State.” World Politics 48: 143–179. doi: 10.1353/wp.1996.0004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prop. 39 L. 2014–2015. Endringer i arbeidsmiljøloven og sosialtjenesteloven [Changes in working environment act and social service act]. Oslo: Arbeids- og sosialdepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. 1993. Political Liberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Røed, K. 2012. “Active Social Insurance.” IZA Journal of Labour Policy 1 (8): 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, B. 1998. Just Institutions Matter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scanlon, T. M. 1998. What we owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. 2002a. “Does Discourse Matter in the Politics of Welfare State Adjustment?” Comparative Political Studies 35 (2): 168–193. doi: 10.1177/0010414002035002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. 2002b. The Futures of European Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. 2008. “Bringing Ideas and Discourse Back into the Explanations of Change in Varieties of Capitalism and Welfare States.” CGPE Working Paper Series, no. 2.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. 2011. “Speaking of Change: Why Discourse is key to the Dynamics of Policy Transformation.” Critical Policy Studies 5 (2): 106–126. doi: 10.1080/19460171.2011.576520
   Google Scholar
• Soss, J., R. Fording, and S. F. Schram. 2011. Disciplining the Poor: Neoliberal Paternalism and the Persistent Power of Race. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Terum, L. I. 1996. Grenser for Sosialpolitisk Modernisering. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• van Parijs, P. 1995. Real Freedom for All. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Parijs, P., and Y. Vanderborght. 2017. Basic Income: A Radical Proposal for a Free Society and a Sane Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wall, S. 1996. “Public Justification and the Transparency Argument.” The Philosophical Quarterly 46 (185): 501–505. doi: 10.2307/2956360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wertheimer, A. 1987. Coercion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• White, S. 2003. The Civic Minimum. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• White Paper 33. 2015–2016. Nav i en ny tid – for arbeid og aktivitet [Nav in a New age: For Work and Activity]. Oslo: Arbeids og sosialdepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• White Paper 35. 1994–1994. Velferdsmeldingen [The welfare report]. Oslo: Arbeids og sosialdepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• White Paper 9. 2006–2007. Arbeid, Velferd og Inkludering [Work, welfare and inclusion]. Oslo: Arbeids og sosialdepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• White, J., and L. Ypi. 2011. “On Partisan Political Justification.” American Political Science Review 105 (2): 381–396. doi: 10.1017/S0003055411000074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, J., and L. Ypi. 2016. The Meaning of Partisanship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, J. 2004. “Training, Perfectionism and Fairness.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 21 (3): 285–295. doi: 10.1111/j.0264-3758.2004.00282.x
   Google Scholar
• Zoll, P. 2016. Perfektionistischer Liberalismus. Warum Neutralität ein falsches Ideal in der Politikbegründung ist. München: Karl Alber Verlag.
   Google Scholar