Understanding American cultural policy: the multi-level governance of the arts and humanities

References

• Adams, J. 1780. Letter to Abigail Adams, 1780. Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Alcantara, C., and J. Nelles. 2014. “Indigenous Peoples and the State in Settler Societies Toward a More Robust Definition of Multilevel Governance.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 44: 183–204. doi: 10.1093/publius/pjt013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andranovich, G., and J. T. Anagoson. 2015. “Public Administration and Governance in the USA.” The International Handbook of Public Administration and Governance. Ringgold, Inc., 200–227.
   Google Scholar
• Bache, I., G. Andreou, G. Atanasova, et al. 2011. “Europeanization and Multi-Level Governance in South-East Europe: the Domestic Impact of EU Cohesion Policy and Pre-Accession Aid.” Journal of European Public Policy 18: 122–141. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2011.520884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benz, A., and B. Eberlein. 1999. “The Europeanization of Regional Policies: Patterns of Multi-Level Governance.” Journal of European Public Policy 6: 329–348. doi: 10.1080/135017699343748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, R. 1984. Culture & Politics. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Binkiewicz, D. M. 2004. Federalizing the Muse: United States Arts Policy and the National Endowment for the Arts, 1965-1980. Chapel Hill, North Carolina: The University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borgonovi, F., and M. O'Hare. 2004. “The Impact of the National Endowment for the Arts in the United States: Institutional and Sectoral Effects on Private Funding.” Journal of Cultural Economics 28: 21–36. doi: 10.1023/B:JCEC.0000009823.76834.64
   Google Scholar
• Commission on the Humanities. 1964. Report of the Commission on the Humanities. Washington, DC: The American Council of Learned Society.
   Google Scholar
• Cowen, T. 2009. Good and Plenty: The Creative Successes of American Arts Funding. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. 1991. “Decentralization of Arts Funding From the Federal Government to the States.” In Public Money and the Muse, edited by S. Bennedict, 215–256. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, W. 2008. Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction. Upper Saddle River New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Ferington, E. 2015. To Bring the Humanities to All Americans, NEH Needed Local Partners. https://www.neh.gov/humanities/2015/septemberoctober/feature/bring-the-humanities-all-americans-neh-needed-local-partner.
   Google Scholar
• Finn, C. E. 1984. “Endowing Culture.” Commentary Magazine.
   Google Scholar
• Fry, E. H. 2005. “Federalism and the Evolving Cross-Border Role of Provincial, State, and Municipal Governments.” International Journal: Canada's Journal of Global Policy Analysis 60: 471–482. doi: 10.1177/002070200506000216
   Google Scholar
• Galligan, A. 1993. “The Politicization of peer-review panels of the NEA.” Paying the Piper.
   Google Scholar
• Gormley, W. T. J., and S. J. Balla. 2004. Bureaucracy and Democracy. Accountability and Performance. London; Boston: CQPRess.
   Google Scholar
• Griswold, W. 2016. American Guides: the Federal Writers Project and the Casting of American Culture. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guess, G. M., and P. G. Farnham. 2011. Cases in Public Policy Analysis. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, M., and P. Hupe. 2009. Implementing Public Policy: An Introduction to the Study of Operational Governance. London, Thousad Oacks, New Dehli: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hoberg, G. 1992. Pluralism by Design: Environmental Policy and the American Regulatory State. Westport, CT: PRAEGER.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., and G. Marks. 2003. “Unraveling the Central State, But How? Types of Multi-level Governance.” American Political Science Review 97: 233–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., M. Ramesh, and A. Perl. 2009. Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kammen, M. 1996. “Culture and State in America.” The Journal of American History 83: 791–814. doi: 10.2307/2945640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. W. 2011. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston, MA: Longman Scientific Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, G. O. 1983. The Reluctant Patron: the United States Government and the Arts, 1943-1965. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leff, T. P. 1995. “The Arts: A Traditional Sphere of Free Expression? First Amendment Implications of Government Funding to the Arts in the Aftermath of Rust v. Sullivan.” American University Law Review 45: 353–414.
   Google Scholar
• Love, J. 1991. “Sorting Out our Roles: The State Arts Agencies and the National Endowment for the Arts.” Journal of Arts Management & Law 21 (3): 215–226.
   Google Scholar
• Lowell, J. F. 2004. State Arts Agencies 1965-2003. Whose Interests to Serve? Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
   Google Scholar
• Lowell, J. F. 2008. State Arts Policy: Trends and Future Prospects. R. Corporation Ed. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Research in the Arts.
   Google Scholar
• Lowell, J. F., and E. H. Ondaatje. 2006. The Arts and State Governments: At Arm’s Length of Arm in Arm? Santa Monica, CA: RAND Research in the Arts.
   Google Scholar
• Mankin, L. D. 1995. “Federal Arts Patronage in the New Deal.” In America’s Commitment fo Culture. Government and the Arts, edited by K. V. Mulcahy, and M. J. Wyszomirski, 77–94. Boulder, San Francisco: Oxford Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• March, J., and J. Olsen. 1984. “The New Institutionalism Organizational Factors in Political Life.” The American Political Science Review 78: 734–749. doi: 10.2307/1961840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mark, C. C. 1969. A Study of Cultural Policy in the Unted States. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Mark, C. C. 1991. Reluctant Bureaucrats: The Struggle to Establish the National Endowment for the Arts. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• McNeely, C. L., and G. E. Shockley. 2006. “Deconstructing US Arts Policy: A Dialectical Exposition of the Excellence-Access Debate.” Social Justice 33: 45–62.
   Google Scholar
• Mettler, S. 2011. The Submerged State: How Invisible Government Policies Undermine American Democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, S. 1984. Excellence & Equity: the National Endowment for the Humanities. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, T. 2000. “The National Endowment for the Arts in the 1990s. A Black Eye on the Arts.” American Behavioral Scientist 43: 1429–1445. doi: 10.1177/00027640021955973
   Google Scholar
• Mulcahy, K. 1985. The NEA as Public Patron of the Arts. Washington, DC: NEA, 315–341.
   Google Scholar
• Mulcahy, K. V. 2002. “The State Arts Agency: An Overview of Cultural Federalism in the United States.” The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society 32: 67–80. doi: 10.1080/10632920209597335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulcahy, K., and M. J. Wyszomirski. 1995. America's Commitment to Culture: Government and the Arts. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• NASAA. 2014. State Arts Agency Placement: Frequently Asked Questions. Washington, DC: NASAA.
   Google Scholar
• National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act of 1965, U.S. Code 20 (2016), §§ 952 et seq.
   Google Scholar
• NEA. 2000. The National Endowment for the Arts 1965-2000: A Brief Chronology of Federal Support for the Arts. Washington, DC: NEA.
   Google Scholar
• NEA. 2012. How the United States Funds the Arts. Washington, DC: NEA.
   Google Scholar
• NEH. 2016. NEH timeline. https://www.neh.gov/about/history/timeline.
   Google Scholar
• Netzer, D. 2006. “Cultural Policy: An American View.” In Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture, edited by V. A. Ginsburgh, and D. Throsby, 1223–1251. Amsterdam; Boston, MA: Elsevir North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Newig, J., and T. M. Koontz. 2014. “Multi-level Governance, Policy Implementation and Participation: the EU's Mandated Participatory Planning Approach to Implementing Environmental Policy.” Journal of European Public Policy 21: 248–267. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2013.834070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paquette, J., and E. Redaelli. 2015. Arts Management and Cultural Policy Research. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, G. B. 2004. “Governance and Public Bureaucracy: New Forms of Democracy or New Forms of Control?” Asian Journal of Public Administration 26: 3–15.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, G., and J. Pierre. 2001. “Administrative Reform and Political Power in the United States.” Policy and Politics 29: 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, G. B., and J. Pierre. 2003. “Introduction: The Role of Public Administration in Governing.” In Handbook of Public Administration, edited by G. B. Peters, and J. Pierre, 1–9. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, G., and J. Pierre. 2004. Mulit-level Governance and Democracy: A Faustian Bargain? Multi-Level Governance. Sheffield, UK: Sheffield University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, R. A. 1986. “From Impresario to Arts Administrator: Formal Accountability in Nonprofit and Cultural Management.” In Non-Profit Enterprise in the Arts: Studies in Mission and Constraint, edited by Paul DiMaggio, 161–183. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piattoni, S. 2010. The Theory of Multi-Level Governance. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radin, B. A., and P. Posner. 2010. “Policy Tools, Mandates, and Intergovernmental Relations.” In The Oxford Handbook of American Bureaucracy, edited by R. F. Durant, 447–471. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Redaelli, E. 2016. “Creative Placemaking and the NEA: Unpacking a Multi-Level Governance.” Policy Studies 37: 387–402. doi: 10.1080/01442872.2016.1157857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regional Arts Organizations. 2018. About the Regionals. http://usregionalarts.org/about-the-regionals/#history.
   Google Scholar
• Ripley, R. B., and G. A. Franklin. 1982. Bureaucracy and Policy Implementation. Belmont, CA: The Dorsey Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandfort, J., and S. Moulton. 2015. Effective Implementation in Practice: Integrating Public Policy and Management. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Schuster, J. M. 2002. Informing Cultural Policy: The Research and Information Infrastructure. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Schuster, J. M. 2003. Mapping State Cultural Policy The State of Washington. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, M. 1970. “The Federal-State Partnership in the Arts.” Public Administration Review 30: 376–386. doi: 10.2307/974460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shockley, G., and C. McNeely. 2009. “A Seismic Shift in U.S. Federal Arts Policy: A Tale of Organizational Challenge and Controversy in the 1990s.” The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society 39: 7–23. doi: 10.3200/JAML.39.1.7-23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair, A. H., and A. B. Whitford. 2012. “Separation and Integration in Public Health: Evidence From Organizational Structure in the States.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 23: 55–77. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mus005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strom, E., and A. Cook. 2004. “Old Pictures in New Frames: Issue Definition and Federal Arts Policy.” Review of Policy Research 21: 505–522. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2004.00091.x
   Google Scholar
• Svenson, A. 1982. “State and Local Arts Agencies.” In Public Policy and the Arts, edited by K. Mulcahy, and R. Swaim, 195–205. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Urice, J. K. 1992. “The Future of the State Arts Agency Movement in the 1990s: Decline and Effect.” The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society 22: 19–32. doi: 10.1080/10632921.1992.9944392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyszomirski, M. 2004. “From Public Support for the Arts to Cultural Policy.” Review of Policy Research 21: 469–484. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2004.00089.x
   Google Scholar
• Zainaldin, J. 2013. “Public Works: NEH, Congress, and the State Humanities Councils.” The Public Historian 35: 28–50. doi: 10.1525/tph.2013.35.1.28
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeigler, J. W. 1994. Arts in Crisis: The National Endowment for the Arts Versus America. Chicago, IL: Chicago Review Press.
   Google Scholar