A magic bullet in policy communication? On the ambiguous use of framing in policy research

References

• Bara, Bruno G. 1995. Cognitive Science: A Developmental Approach to the Simulation of the Mind. Hove: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Béland, Daniel. 2005. “Ideas and Social Policy: An Institutionalist Perspective.” Social Policy and Administration 39 (1): 1–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9515.2005.00421.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Béland, Daniel. 2009. “Ideas, Institutions, and Policy Change.” Journal of European Public Policy 16 (5): 701–718. doi:10.1080/13501760902983382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, Andrew, and Jeffrey T. Checkel. 2015. “Process Tracing: From Philosophical Roots to Best Practices.” In Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool, edited by Andrew Bennett and Jeffrey T. Checkel, 3–38. Strategies for Social Inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blatter, Joachim, and M. Haverland. 2012. Designing Case Studies: Explanatory Approaches in Small-N Research. Research Methods Series. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Blyth, Mark. 2001. “The Transformation of the Swedish Model: Economic Ideas, Distributional Conflict, and Institutional Change.” World Politics 54 (01): 1–26. doi:10.1353/wp.2001.0020.
   Google Scholar
• Borah, Porismita. 2011. “‘Conceptual Issues in Framing Theory: A Systematic Examination of a Decade’s Literature’.” Journal of Communication 61 (2): 246–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broockman, David E., and Daniel M. Butler. 2017. “The Causal Effects of Elite Position-Taking on Voter Attitudes: Field Experiments with Elite Communication.” American Journal of Political Science 61: 208–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, Sally. 2005. “Biotechnology and the Politics of Truth: From the Green Revolution to an Evergreen Revolution.” Sociologia Ruralis 45 (4): 360–379. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9523.2005.00310.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacciatore, Michael A., Dietram A. Scheufele, and Shanto Iyengar. 2016. “The End of Framing as We Know It … and the Future of Media Effects.” Mass Communication and Society 19 (1): 7–23. doi:10.1080/15205436.2015.1068811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campomori, Francesca, and Tiziana Caponio. 2013. “Competing Frames of Immigrant Integration in the EU: Geographies of Social Inclusion in Italian Regions.” Policy Studies 34 (2): 162–179. doi:10.1080/01442872.2013.767586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2006. “Britain as a Container: Immigration Metaphors in the 2005 Election Campaign.” Discourse & Society 17 (5): 563–581. doi:10.1177/0957926506066345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, Dennis, and James N. Druckman. 2007a. “A Theory of Framing and Opinion Formation in Competitive Elite Environments.” Journal of Communication 57 (1): 99–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, Dennis, and James N. Druckman. 2007b. “Framing Theory.” Annual Review of Political Science 10 (1): 103–126. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, Dennis, and James N. Druckman. 2011. “Identifying Frames in Political News.” In Sourcebook for Political Communication Research: Methods, Measures, and Analytical Techniques, edited by Erik P. Bucy and R. Lance Holbert, 238–267. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, Robert H. 2001. “The Social Construction of an Imperative: Why Welfare Reform Happened in Denmark and the Netherlands but Not in Germany.” World Politics 53 (3): 463–498. doi:10.1353/wp.2001.0008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dardis, Frank E., Frank R. Baumgartner, Amber E. Boydstun, Suzanna De Boef, and Fuyuan Shen. 2008. “Media Framing of Capital Punishment and Its Impact on Individuals’ Cognitive Responses.” Mass Communication and Society 11 (2): 115–140. doi:10.1080/15205430701580524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, Clarissa C., Jenna Mae Atun, Erika Fille, and Christopher Monterola. 2011. “Finding Frames: Comparing Two Methods of Frame Analysis.” Communication Methods and Measures 5 (4): 329–351. doi:10.1080/19312458.2011.624873.
   Google Scholar
• Deppe, M., W. Schwindt, J. Krämer, H. Kugel, H. Plassmann, P. Kenning, and E. B. Ringelstein. 2005. “Evidence for a Neural Correlate of a Framing Effect: Bias-Specific Activity in the Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex During Credibility Judgments.” Brain Research Bulletin 67 (5): 413–421. doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2005.06.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vreese, Claes H. 2012. “New Avenues for Framing Research.” American Behavioral Scientist 56 (3): 365–375. doi:10.1177/0002764211426331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vreese, Claes H., Susan A. Banducci, Holli A. Semetko, and Hajo G. Boomgaarden. 2006. “The News Coverage of the 2004 European Parliamentary Election Campaign in 25 Countries.” European Union Politics 7 (4): 477–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmelund-Præstekær, Christian, and Patrick Emmenegger. 2013. “Strategic Re-Framing as a Vote Winner: Why Vote-Seeking Governments Pursue Unpopular Reforms.” Scandinavian Political Studies 36 (1): 23–42. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477.2012.00295.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entman, Robert M. 1993. “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.” Journal of Communication 43 (4): 51–58. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entman, Robert M. 2003. “Cascading Activation: Contesting the White House’s Frame After 9/11.” Political Communication 20 (4): 415–432. doi:10.1080/10584600390244176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entman, Robert M. 2004. Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy. Studies in Communication, Media, and Public Opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, Norman. 2000. “Discourse, Social Theory, and Social Research: The Discourse of Welfare Reform.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 4 (2): 163–195. doi:10.1111/1467-9481.00110.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, Frank. 2003. Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frederking, Lauretta Conklin. 2012. “A Comparative Study of Framing Immigration Policy After 11 September 2001.” Policy Studies 33 (4): 283–296. doi:10.1080/01442872.2012.694184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorp, Baldwin van. 2010. “Strategies to Take Subjectivity Out of Framing Analysis.” In Doing News Framing Analysis: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives, edited by Paul D’Angelo, and Jim A. Kuypers, 84–109. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Green-Pedersen, Christoffer. 2002. The Politics of Justification: Party Competition and Welfare-State Retrenchment in Denmark and the Netherlands from 1982 to 1998. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hallahan, Kirk. 1999. “Seven Models of Framing: Implications for Public Relations.” Journal of Public Relations Research 11 (3): 205–242. doi:10.1207/s1532754xjprr1103_02.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, Christopher. 2015. Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science: New Perspectives on Immigration Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Helbling, Marc. 2014. “Framing Immigration in Western Europe.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 40 (1): 21–41. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2013.830888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, Shanto. 2010. “Framing Research. The Next Steps.” In Winning with Words: The Origins and Impact of Political Framing, edited by Brian F. Schaffner, and Patrick J. Sellers, 185–191. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, Alan M. 2009. “How Do Ideas Matter?: Mental Models and Attention in German Pension Politics.” Comparative Political Studies 42 (2): 252–279. doi:10.1177/0010414008325283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, Alan M. 2015. “Process Tracing the Effects of Ideas.” In Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool, edited by Andrew Bennett and Jeffrey T. Checkel, 41–73. Strategies for Social Inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jerit, Jennifer. 2008. “Issue Framing and Engagement: Rhetorical Strategy in Public Policy Debates.” Political Behavior 30 (1): 1–24. doi:10.1007/s11109-007-9041-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, Michael D., and Mark K. McBeth. 2010. “A Narrative Policy Framework: Clear Enough to Be Wrong?: Jones/McBeth: A Narrative Policy Framework.” Policy Studies Journal 38 (2): 329–353. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00364.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kangas, Olli E., Mikko Niemelä, and Sampo Varjonen. 2014. “When and Why Do Ideas Matter? The Influence of Framing on Opinion Formation and Policy Change.” European Political Science Review 6 (1): 73–92. doi:10.1017/S1755773912000306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, Thomas J. 1993. “Reading Policy Narratives: Beginnings, Middles, and Ends.” In The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning, edited by Frank Fischer, and John Forester, 167–185. London: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koenig, Thomas. 2006. “Compounding Mixed-Methods Problems in Frame Analysis through Comparative Research.” Qualitative Research 6 (1): 61–76. doi:10.1177/1468794106058874.
   Google Scholar
• König, Pascal D., and Georg Wenzelburger. 2014. “Toward a Theory of Political Strategy in Policy Analysis.” Politics & Policy 42 (3): 397–427.
   Google Scholar
• Krebs, Ronald R., and Patrick Thaddeus Jackson. 2007. “Twisting Tongues and Twisting Arms: The Power of Political Rhetoric.” European Journal of International Relations 13 (1): 35–66. doi:10.1177/1354066107074284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuipers, Sanneke. 2006. The Crisis Imperative : Crisis Rhetoric and Welfare State Reform in Belgium and the Netherlands in the Early 1990s. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, C. A., and T. E. Dejgaard. 2013. “The Institutional Logic of Images of the Poor and Welfare Recipients: A Comparative Study of British, Swedish and Danish Newspapers.” Journal of European Social Policy 23 (3): 287–299. doi:10.1177/0958928713480068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, Richard R., and Mark Schlesinger. 2005. “Policy Frames, Metaphorical Reasoning, and Support for Public Policies.” Political Psychology 26 (1): 77–114. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00410.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, Regina G. 2000. “Game-Framing the Issues: Tracking the Strategy Frame in Public Policy News.” Political Communication 17 (2): 93–114. doi:10.1080/105846000198422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marier, Patrik, and Jean F. Mayer. 2007. “Welfare Retrenchment as Social Justice: Pension Reform in Mexico.” Journal of Social Policy 36 (04): 585–604. doi:10.1017/S0047279407001195.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, Paul, and Gijs Schumacher. 2016. “The Effect of Economic Change and Elite Framing on Support for Welfare State Retrenchment: A Survey Experiment.” Journal of European Social Policy 26 (1): 20–31. doi:10.1177/0958928715621711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthes, Jörg. 2007. Framing-Effekte. Zum Einfluss Der Berichterstattung Auf Die Einstellungen Der Rezipienten. München: Verlag Reinhard Fischer.
   Google Scholar
• Matthes, Jörg. 2012. “Framing Politics: An Integrative Approach.” American Behavioral Scientist 56 (3): 247–259. doi:10.1177/0002764211426324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthes, Jörg, and Matthias Kohring. 2008. “The Content Analysis of Media Frames: Toward Improving Reliability and Validity.” Journal of Communication 58 (2): 258–279. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00384.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGraw, Kathleen M. 1991. “Managing Blame: An Experimental Test of the Effects of Political Accounts.” The American Political Science Review 85 (4): 1133–1157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, M. Mark, and Bonnie Parnell Riechert. 2001. “The Spiral of Opportunity and Frame Resonance: Mapping the Issue Cycle in News and Public Discourse.” In Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and Our Understanding of the Social World, edited by Stephen D Reese, Oscar H Gandy, and August E Grant. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. http://site.ebrary.com/id/10236086.
   Google Scholar
• Mio, Jeffery Scott. 1997. “Metaphor and Politics.” Metaphor and Symbol 12 (2): 113–133. doi:10.1207/s15327868ms1202_2.
   Google Scholar
• Motta, Giovanni, and Christian Baden. 2013. “Evolutionary Factor Analysis of the Dynamics of Frames: Introducing a Method for Analyzing High-Dimensional Semantic Data with Time-Changing Structure.” Communication Methods and Measures 7 (1): 48–82. doi:10.1080/19312458.2012.760730.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, Thomas E. 2004. “Policy Goals, Public Rhetoric, and Political Attitudes.” The Journal of Politics 66 (2): 581–605. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2004.00165.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, Thomas E., Rosalee A. Clawson, and Zoe M. Oxley. 1997. “Media Framing of a Civil Liberties Conflict and Its Effect on Tolerance.” The American Political Science Review 91 (3): 567–583. doi:10.2307/2952075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, Thomas E., Zoe M. Oxley, and Rosalee A. Clawson. 1997. “Toward a Psychology of Framing Effects.” Political Behavior 19 (3): 221–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet, Matthew C. 2010. “Knowledge into Action: Framing the Debates Over Climate Change and Poverty.” In Doing News Framing Analysis: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives, edited by Paul D’Angelo, and Jim A. Kuypers, 43–83. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Painter, Chris. 2013. “The UK Coalition Government: Constructing Public Service Reform Narratives.” Public Policy and Administration 28 (1): 3–20. doi:10.1177/0952076711427758.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, Zhongdang, and Gerald Kosicki. 1993. “Framing Analysis: An Approach to News Discourse.” Political Communication 10 (1): 55–75. doi:10.1080/10584609.1993.9962963.
   Google Scholar
• Price, Vincent, David Tewksbury, and Elizabeth Powers. 1997. “Switching Trains of Thought: The Impact of News Frames on Readers’ Cognitive Responses.” Communication Research 24 (5): 481–506. doi:10.1177/009365097024005002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridzi, Frank. 2009. Selling Welfare Reform: Work-First and the New Common Sense of Employment. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rohlfing, Ingo. 2012. Case Studies and Causal Inference: An Integrative Framework. Research Methods Series. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, Fiona. 2000. “Framing Welfare Reform in Affluent Societies: Rendering Restructuring More Palatable?” Journal of Public Policy 20 (02): 169–193.
   Google Scholar
• Rüling, Anneli. 2010. “Re-Framing of Childcare in Germany and England: From a Private Responsibility to an Economic Necessity.” German Policy Studies 6 (2): 153–186.
   Google Scholar
• Sato, Kyoko. 2013. “Genetically Modified Food in France: Symbolic Transformation and the Policy Paradigm Shift.” Theory and Society 42 (5): 477–507. doi:10.1007/s11186-013-9198-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheufele, Dietram A., and Shanto Iyengar. 2017. “The State of Framing Research: A Call for New Directions.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication, edited by Kate Kenski and Kathleen H. Jamieson, 619–632. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scheufele, Dietram A., and David Tewksbury. 2007. “Framing, Agenda Setting, and Priming: The Evolution of Three Media Effects Models: Models of Media Effects.” Journal of Communication 57 (1): 9–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Vivien A. 2002. “Does Discourse Matter in the Politics of Welfare State Adjustment?” Comparative Political Studies 35 (2): 168–193. doi:10.1177/0010414002035002002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schram, Sanford F. 1995. “Inverting Political Economy: Perspective, Position, and Discourse in the Analysis of Welfare.” Rethinking Marxism 8 (1): 78–99. doi:10.1080/08935699508658136.
   Google Scholar
• Schram, Sanford F., and Joe Soss. 2001. “Success Stories: Welfare Reform, Policy Discourse, and the Politics of Research.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 577 (1): 49–65. doi:10.1177/000271620157700105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semetko, Holli A., and Patti M. Valkenburg. 2000. “Framing European Politics: A Content Analysis of Press and Television News.” Journal of Communication 50 (2): 93–109. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02843.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, Dhavan V., Mark D. Watts, David Domke, and David P. Fan. 2002. “News Framing and Cueing of Issue Regimes.” Public Opinion Quarterly 66 (3): 339–370. doi:10.1086/341396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slothuus, Rune. 2007. “Framing Deservingness to Win Support for Welfare State Retrenchment.” Scandinavian Political Studies 30 (3): 323–344. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00183.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sniderman, Paul, and Sean Theriault. 2004. “The Structure of Political Argument and the Logic of Issue Framing.” In Studies in Public Opinion, edited by Willem Saris, and Paul Sniderman, 133–165. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stiller, Sabina. 2010. Ideational Leadership in German Welfare State Reform: How Politicians and Policyideas Transform Resilient Institutions. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Takeshita, Toshio. 1997. “Exploring the Media’s Roles in Defining Reality: From Issue-Agenda Setting to Attribute-Agenda Setting.” In Communication and Democracy. Exploring the Intellectual Frontiers in Agenda-Setting Theory, edited by Maxwell E. McCombs, Donald L. Shaw, and David Weaver, 15–27. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tankard, James W. 2001. “The Empirical Approach to the Study of Media Framing.” In Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and Our Understanding of the Social World, edited by Stephen D. Reese, Oscar H. Gandy, and August E. Grant, 95–106. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• ‘t Hart, Paul, and Karen Tindall, eds. 2009. Framing the Global Economic Downturn: Crisis Rhetoric and the Politics of Recession. Canberra: Australia National University E Press. www.oapen.org/download?type=document&docid=459240.
   Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, Hendrik. 2015. Meaning in Action: Interpretation and Dialogue in Policy Analysis. London: Routledge. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=929222.
   Google Scholar
• Wenzelburger, Georg. 2011. “Political Strategies and Fiscal Retrenchment: Evidence From Four Countries.” West European Politics 34 (6): 1151–1184. doi:10.1080/01402382.2011.572385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenzelburger, Georg, and Felix Hörisch. 2016. “Framing Welfare Policy Reform. Evidence of Blame Avoidance Effects From Two Experiments.” Journal for Comparative Policy Analysis 18 (2): 157–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windmann, Sabine, Peter Kirsch, Daniela Mier, Rudolf Stark, Bertram Walter, Onur Güntürkün, and Dieter Vaitl. 2006. “On Framing Effects in Decision Making: Linking Lateral Versus Medial Orbitofrontal Cortex Activation to Choice Outcome Processing.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18 (7): 1198–1211. doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.7.1198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise, David, and Paul R. Brewer. 2010. “Competing Frames for a Public Health Issue and Their Effects on Public Opinion.” Mass Communication and Society 13 (4): 435–457. doi:10.1080/15205430903296077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wueest, Bruno, and Flavia Fossati. 2015. “Quantitative Discursive Institutionalism: A Comparison of Labour Market Policy Discourse across Western Europe.” Journal of European Public Policy 22 (5): 708–730. doi:10.1080/13501763.2014.976834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar