Symposium: revisiting the three pillars of Deliberative Policy Analysis

References

• Ahmed, S. 2013. The Cultural Politics of Emotion. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ani, E. F. 2019. “The Consensus Project and Three Levels of Deliberation.” Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review 58 (2): 299–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, C. K. 2011. Pragmatist Democracy. Evolutionary Learning as Public Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., and A. Gash. 2008. “Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice.” Journal of Public Administration Research andTheory 18 (4): 543–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arkesteijn, M. B., and C. L. van Mierlo. 2015. “The Need for Reflexive Evaluation Approaches in Development Cooperation.” Evaluation 21 (1): 99–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacchi, C. 2009. Analysing Policy: What’s the Problem Represented to be?. London: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Bächtiger, A., and J. Parkinson. 2019. Mapping and Measuring Deliberation. Towards a New Deliberative Quality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, B. 2003. Strong Democracy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartels, K. 2018. “Policy as Practice.” In Handbook on Policy, Process and Governing, edited by H. Colebatch and R. Hoppe, 68–88. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bartels, K., and N. Turnbull. 2019. “Relational Public Administration: a Synthesis and Heuristic Classification of Relational Approaches.” Public Management Review, 1–23. doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1632921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels, K., and H. Wagenaar. 2018. “Doubt and Excitement: An Experiential Learning Approach to Teaching the Practice of Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Research 18 (2): 191–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels, K., H. Wagenaar, and Y. Li. 2020. “Introduction: Toward Deliberative Policy Analysis 2.0.” Policy Studies 41 (4): 295–306. doi:10.1080/01442872.2020.1772219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels, K. P. R., and J. M. Wittmayer, eds. 2018. Action Research in Policy Analysis: Critical and Relational Approaches to Sustainability Transitions. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bollier, D., and S. Helfrich. 2019. Free, Fair, and Alive: The Insurgent Power of the Commons. Gabrioloa, BC: New Society Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bondi, L. 2014. “Understanding Feelings: Engaging with Unconscious Communication and Embodied Knowledge.” Emotion, Space and Society 10: 44–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosswell, J., J. Corbnett, and R. A. W. Rhodes. 2019. The Art and Craft of Comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boswell, John, and Jack Corbett. 2015a. “Embracing Impressionism: Revealing the Brush Strokes of Interpretive Research.” Critical Policy Studies 9 (2): 216–225. doi:10.1080/19460171.2014.971039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boswell, John, and Jack Corbett. 2015b. “Stoic Democrats? Anti-Politics, Elite Cynicism and the Policy Process.” Journal of European Public Policy 22 (10): 1388–1405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boswell, J., C. M. Hendriks, and S. A. Ercan. 2016. “Message Received? Examining Transmission in Deliberative Systems.” Critical Policy Studies 10 (3): 263–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowman, Q. 2019. “Studying Democratic Innovations: Toward a Problem-Driven Approach to Case Study Research.” Policy Studies 40 (5): 556–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capelos, T. 2013. “Understanding Anxiety and Aversion: The Origins and Consequences of Affectivity in Political Campaigns.” In Emotions in Politics: The Affect Dimension in Political Tension, edited by N. Demertzis, 39–59. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1989. “Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy.” In The Good Polity: Normative Analysis of the State, edited by A. Hamlin and P. Pettit, 17–34. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, W. E. 2011. A World of Becoming. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, S. D. N., and H. Wagenaar. 2012. “Navigating the Eternally Unfolding Present; Toward an Epistemology of Practice.” American Review of Public Administration 42 (1): 3–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramer, J., and A. Loeber. 2004. “Governance Through Learning: Making Corporate Social Responsibility in Dutch Industry Effective from a Sustainable Development Perspective.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 6 (3/4): 271–287.
   Google Scholar
• Curato, N., J. Dryzek, S. A. Ercan, C. M. Hendriks, and S. Niemeyer. 2017. “Twelve Key Findings in Deliberative Democracy Research.” Daedalus 146 (3): 28–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B. 2015. “The Rhetoric of Emotions.” In Methods of Exploring Emotions, edited by H. Kleres and J. Flam, 67–78. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• De Haan, F. J., and J. Rotmans. 2011. “Patterns in Transitions: Understanding Complex Chains of Change.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 78 (1): 90–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1925) 1994. Experience and Nature. Chicago, IL: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. 1996. Democracy in Capitalist Times: Ideals, Limits, and Struggles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. 2010. “Rhetoric in Democracy: A Systemic Appreciation.” Political Theory 38 (3): 319–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. 2016. “Deliberative Policy Analysis.” In Evidence-Based Policy Making in the Social Sciences: Methods That Matter, edited by G. Stoker and M. Evans, 229–241. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Durnová, A. 2015. “Lost in Translation: Expressing Emotions in Policy Deliberation.” In Handbook of Critical Policy Studies, edited by Fischer Frank, Douglas Torgerson, Anna Durnová, and Michael Orisini, 222–238. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Durnová, A. 2018. “Understanding Emotions in Policy Studies Through Foucault and Deleuze.” Politics and Governance 6 (4): 95–102. doi:10.17645/pag.v6i4.1528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durnová, A., and E. M. Hejzlarová. 2017. “Framing Policy Designs Through Contradictory Emotions: The Case of Czech Single Mothers.” Public Policy and Administration. doi:10.1177/0952076717709524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, D. G. 2012. Deliberative Communication and Ethnopolitical Conflict. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Elstub, S., S. A. Ercan, and R. F. Mendonça. 2016. “Editorial Introduction: The Fourth Generation of Deliberative Democracy.” Critical Policy Studies 10 (2): 139–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elzen, B., B. van Mierlo, and A. Leeuwis. 2012. “Anchoring of Innovations: Assessing Dutch Efforts to Harvest Energy from Glasshouses.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 5: 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Ercan, S. A. 2014. “Same Problem, Different Solutions: The Case of ‘Honour Killing’ in Germany and Britain.” In Honour Killing and Violence. Theory, Policy and Practice, edited by A. K. Gill, C. Strange, and K. Roberts, 199–217. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ercan, S. A. 2017. “From Polarisation to Pluralisation: A Deliberative Democratic Approach to Illiberal Cultures.” International Political Science Review 38 (1): 114–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ercan, S. A., C. M. Hendriks, and J. Boswell. 2017. “Studying Public Deliberation After the Systemic Turn: The Crucial Role for Interpretive Research.” Policy and Politics 45 (2): 195–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ercan, S. A., C. M. Hendriks, and J. S. Dryzek. 2019. “Public Deliberation in an Era of Communicative Plenty.” Policy and Politics 47 (1): 19–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erisen, C. 2018. Political Behavior and the Emotional Citizen. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fay, B. 1975. Social Theory and Political Practice. London: George Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Fesmire, S. 2003. John Dewey and Moral Imagination. Pragmatism in Ethics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Finlay, L. 2002. “‘Outing’ the Researcher: The Provenance, Process, and Practice of Reflexivity.” Journal of Qualitative Health Research 12 (4): 531–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. 2003. Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., and P. Boossabong. 2018. “Deliberative Policy Analysis.” In The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, edited by A. Bächtiger, J. S. Dryzek, J. Mansbridge, and M. E. Warren, 584–594. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., and H. Gottweis. 2012. The Argumentative Turn Revisited: Public Policy as Communicative Practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., D. Torgerson, A. Durnova, and M. Orsini, eds. 2015. Handbook of Critical Policy Studies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Fishkin, J. S. 1991. Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions for Democratic Reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fishkin, J. S., and J. Mansbridge. 2017. “The Prospects & Limits of Deliberative Democracy.” American Academy of Arts and Sciences. doi:10.1162/DAED_x_0042.
   Google Scholar
• Flam, H., and J. Kleres. 2015. Methods of Exploring Emotions. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. 1998. Planning in the Face of Power. Oakland: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J., M. Kuitenbrouwer, and D. Laws. 2019. “Enacting Reflective and Deliberative Practices in Action Research.” Policy Studies 40 (5): 456–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, N., R. Ison, C. Blackmore, and K. Collins. 2019. “Revisiting Deliberative Policy Analysis Through Systemic Co-Inquiry: Some Experiences From the Implementation of the Water Framework Directive in England.” Policy Studies 40 (5): 510–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friberg-Fernros, H., J. K. Schaffer, and C. Holst. 2018. “Deliberation After Consensus: Introduction to the Symposium.” Journal of Public Deliberation 15 (1): Article 12.
   Google Scholar
• Fricker, M. 2009. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garud, R., C. Hardy, and S. Maguire. 2007. “Institutional Entrepreneurship as Embedded Agency: In Introduction to the Special Issue.” Organization Studies 28 (7): 957–969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gastil, J., E. Rosenzweig, K. R. Knobloch, and D. Brinker. 2016. “Does the Public Want Mini-Publics? Voter Responses to the Citizens’ Initiative Review.” Communication and the Public 1 (2): 174–192.
   Google Scholar
• Grundmann, R. 2018. “The Rightful Place of Expertise.” Social Epistemology 32 (6): 372–386. doi:10.1080/02691728.2018.1546347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutmann, A., and D. Thompson. 2004. Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. A. 2005. “Rebuilding Ground Zero. The Politics of Performance.” Planning Theory & Practice 6 (4): 445–464.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. A., and H. Wagenaar, eds. 2003a. Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M., and H. Wagenaar. 2003b. “Editors’ Introduction.” In Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society, edited by M. Hajer and H. Wagenaar, 1–30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hildebrand, D. L. 2003. Beyond Realism and Anti-Realism. John Dewy and the Neopragmatists. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, J. G., and A. Loeber. 2016. “Exploring the Micro-Politics in Transitions from a Practice Perspective: The Case of Greenhouse Innovation in the Netherlands.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 18 (5): 692–711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holdo, M. 2018. “A Relational Perspective on Deliberative Systems: Combining Interpretive and Structural Analysis.” Critical Policy Studies. doi:10.1080/19460171.2018.1506349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howarth, D. 2010. “Power, Discourse, and Policy: Articulating a Hegemony Approach to Critical Policy Studies.” Critical Policy Studies 3 (3-4): 309–335. doi:10.1080/19460171003619725.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, S. 2016. “The Role of Multicultural Fantasies in the Enactment of the State.” In Emotional States: Sites and Spaces of Affective Governance, edited by E. Jupp, J. Pykett, and F. M. Smith, 161–177. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J. I., and D. E. Booher. 2010. Planning with Complexity. An Introduction to Collaborative Rationality for Public Policy. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• James, W. 1978. Pragmatism and the Meaning of Truth. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasper, J. M. 2011. “Emotions and Social Movements: Twenty Years of Theory and Research.” Annual Review of Sociology 37 (1): 285–303. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-081309-150015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimbell, L. 2012. “Rethinking Design Thinking: Part II.” Design and Culture 4 (2): 129–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. H. 2008. “Complexity Theory and Public Administration: What's New?” Public Management Review 10 (3): 299–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knorr Cetina, K. 2001. “Objectural Practice.” In The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, edited by T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr-Cetina, and E. von Savigny, 184–197. London: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laws, D., and J. Forester. 2015. Conflict, Improvisation, Governance. Street Level Practices for Urban Democracy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y. 2019. “Deliberative Policy Analysis: Towards a Methodological Orientation.” Policy Studies 40 (5): 437–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., and H. Wagenaar. 2019a. “Conclusion: Building New Momentum for Deliberative Policy Analysis.” Policy Studies 40 (5): 580–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., and H. Wagenaar. 2019b. “Revisiting Deliberative Policy Analysis.” Policy Studies 40 (5): 427–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loeber, A. 2007. “Designing for Phronèsis: Experiences with Transformative Learning on Sustainable Development.” Critical Policy Analysis [Now: Critical Policy Studies] 1 (4): 389–414.
   Google Scholar
• Loeber, A., and J. Cohen. 2019. Framework for Comparative Assessment and Narrative Evaluation. Deliverable 8.1 in NewHoRRIzon Project (European Commission Grant Agreement No 741402).
   Google Scholar
• Loeber, A., and T. Vermeulen. 2016. “Reflexive Project Management in High-Ambition Projects: Exploring the Competences for Managing Innovative Sustainable Designs.” Social Business 6 (1): 15–37.
   Google Scholar
• Maor, M. 2012. “Policy Overreaction.” Journal of Public Policy 32 (03): 231–259. doi:10.1017/S0143814X1200013X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maor, M. 2016. “Emotion-Driven Negative Policy Bubbles.” Policy Sciences 49 (2): 191–210. doi:10.1007/s11077-015-9228-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. E., W. R. Neuman, and M. B. MacKuen. 2017. “Measuring Emotional Response: Comparing Alternative Approaches to Measurement.” Journal of Political Science Research Methods 5 (4): 733–754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGee, Z. A., and B. D. Jones. 2019. “Reconceptualizing the Policy Subsystem: Integration with Complexity Theory and Social Network Analysis.” Policy Studies Journal 47 (S1): 138–S158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercier, H., and H. Landemore. 2012. “Reasoning Is for Arguing: Understanding the Successes and Failures of Deliberation.” Political Psychology 33 (2): 243–258. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00873.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montessori, N. M., M. Farrelly, and J. Mulderigg, eds. 2019. Critical Policy Discourse Analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P., and R. Inglehart. 2019. Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. 1986. The Fragility of Goodness. Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. 1992. Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Offe, C. 2017. “Referendum vs. Institutionalized Deliberation: What Democratic Theorists Can Learn From the 2016 Brexit Decision.” Daedalus 146 (3): 14–27. doi:10.1162/DAED_a_00443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Flynn, I., and D. Caluwaerts. 2018. “Deliberation in Deeply Divided Societies’, Analysis.” In The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, edited by A. Bächtiger, J. S. Dryzek, J. Mansbridge, and M. E. Warren, 742–754. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Papanastasiou, N. 2019. The Politics of Scale in Policy. Scalecraft and Education Governance. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson, J., and J. Mansbridge, eds. 2012. Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, A. 1995. The Mangle of Practice. Time, Agency and Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pouliot, V. 2008. “The Logic of Practicality: A Theory of Practice of Security Communities.” International Organization 62 (2): 257–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reckwitz, A. 2002. “Toward a Theory of Social Practices. A Development in Culturalist Theorizing.” European Journal of Social Theory 5 (2): 245–265.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. 2011. Everyday Life in British Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R., K. Knorr-Cetina, and E. von Savigny. 2001. The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schirmer, J., L. Dare, and S. A. Ercan. 2016. “Deliberative Democracy and the Tasmanian Forest Peace Process.” Australian Journal of Political Science 51 (2): 288–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A., and M. Rein. 1994. Frame Reflection. Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz-Sea, P., and D. Yanow. 2006. Interpretation and Method. Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn. New York: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz-Shea, P., and D. Yanow. 2013. Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scudder, M. F. 2019. “The Ideal Uptake in Democratic Deliberation.” Political Studies. doi:10.1177/0032321719858270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shove, E. 2010. “Beyond the ABC: Climate Change Policy and Theories of Social Change.” Environment and Planning A 42: 1273–1285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shove, E., M. Pantzar, and M. Watson. 2012. The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and How It Changes. New York: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D. 2013. “Taking Emotion Seriously: The Promise of Interpretive Policy Analysis.” Keynote Speech to the 8th Interpretive Policy Analysis Conference, Vienna, July 4.
   Google Scholar
• Stout, M., and J. M. Love. 2018. Integrative Governance: Generating Sustainable Responses to Global Crises. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Szerszynski, B. 2018. “A Planetary Turn for the Social Sciences?” In Mobilities and Complexities, edited by S. Kesselring, M. Sheller, and O. B. Jensen, 223–227. London: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. 1995. “Overcoming Epistemology.” In Philosophical Arguments, edited by C. Taylor, 1–19. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, S., and P. Hoggett. 2001. “The Emotional Dynamics of Deliberative Democracy.” Policy & Politics 29 (3): 351–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmermans, J., H. de Haan, and F. Squazzoni. 2008. “Computational and Mathematical Approaches to Societal Transitions.” Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory 14: 391–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torgerson, D. 1995. “Policy Analysis and Public Life: The Restoration of Phronesis?” In Political Science in History: Research Programs and Political Traditions, edited by J. Farr, J. S. Dryzek, and S. T. Leonard, 225–253. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tully, J. 2008. Public Philosophy in a New Key: Democracy and Civic Freedom, Vol. 1: Ideas in Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ugur-Cinar, M., and C. Gunduz-Arabaci. 2018. “Deliberating in Difficult Times: Lessons from Public Forums in Turkey in the Aftermath of the Gezi Protests.” British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies. doi:10.1080/13530194.2018.1491294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoeven, I., and J. W. Duyvendak. 2016. “Enter Emotions. Appealing to Anxiety and Anger in a Process of Municipal Amalgamation.” Critical Policy Studies 10 (4): 468–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, H. 2007. “Governance, Complexity and Democratic Participation: How Citizens and Public Officials Harness the Complexities of Neighbourhood Decline.” American Review of Public Administration 37 (1): 17–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, H. 2011. Meaning in Action: Interpretation and Dialogue in Policy Analysis. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, Hendrik. 2015. “Systematic Improvisation. Some Misunderstandings in Boswell and Corbett’s ‘Embracing Impressionism’.” Critical Policy Studies 9 (2): 226–229. doi:10.1080/19460171.2015.1040252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, H. 2016. “Extending Interpretivism: Articulating the Practice Dimension in Bevir and Rhodes’ Differentiated Polity Model.” In Interpreting Governance, High Politics and Public Policy: Essays Commemorating Interpreting British Governance, edited by N. Turnbull, 133–150. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, H. 2018. “Policy as Practice: Explaining Persistent Patterns in Prostitution Policy.” The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice 57 (3): 379–400.
   Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, H., and S. Altink. 2012. “Prostitution as Morality Politics or Why It Is Exceedingly Difficult To Design and Sustain Effective Prostitution Policy.” Sexuality Research and Social Policy 9: 279–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, H., H. Amesberger, and S. Altink. 2017. Designing Prostitution Policy: Intention and Reality in the Sex Trade. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, H., and S. D. N. Cook. 2003. “Understanding Policy Practices: Action, Dialectic and Deliberation in Policy Analysis.” In Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society, edited by M. A. Hajer and H. Wagenaar, 139–171. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, H. Forthcoming. “Deliberative Policy Analysis.” In Assessing Deliberation: Methodological Approaches in Deliberative Democracy, chapter prepared for H. Asenbaum, N. Curato, S. A. Ercan, and R. F. Mendonça.
   Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, H., and F. Wenninger. 2020. “Deliberative Policy Analysis, Interconnectedness and Institutional Design: Lessons from “Red Vienna”.” Policy Studies 41 (4): 411–437. doi:10.1080/01442872.2020.1717456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, S., R. Beilin, and H. Wagenaar. 2019. “Introducing a Practice Perspective on Monitoring for Adaptive Management.” People and Nature 1 (2): 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• West, S., L. van Kerkhoff, and H. Wagenaar. 2019. “Beyond ‘Linking Knowledge and Action’: Towards a Practice-Based Approach to Transdisciplinary Sustainability Interventions.” Policy Studies 40 (5): 534–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanow, Dvora. 1996. How Does a Policy Mean? Interpreting Policy and Organizational Actions. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar