Metagoverning through intermediaries: the role of the Norwegian “Klimasats” Fund in translating national climate goals to local implementation

References

• Abbott, K. W., D. Levi-Faur, and D. Snidal. 2017. “Introducing Regulatory Intermediaries.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 670 (1): 6–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbott, K. W., and D. Snidal. 2009. “Strengthening International Regulation Through Transmittal new Governance: Overcoming the Orchestration Deficit.” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 42: 501.
   Google Scholar
• Bache, I., L. Reardon, I. Bartle, G. Marsden, and M. Flinders. 2015. “Symbolic Meta-Policy: (Not) Tackling Climate Change in the Transport Sector.” Political Studies 63: 830–851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, S., and K. Eckerberg. 2007. “Governance for Sustainable Development in Sweden: The Experience of the Local Investment Programme.” Local Environment 12 (4): 325–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, S., and K. Eckerberg, eds. 2008. Pursuit of Sustainable Development: New Governance Practices at the Sub-National Level in Europe. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bäckstrand, K., J. W. Kuyper, B. O. Linnér, and E. Lövbrand. 2017. “Non-state Actors in Global Climate Governance: From Copenhagen to Paris and Beyond.” Environmental Politics 26 (4): 561–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomqvist, P. 2016. “Soft and Hard Governing Tools.” In Handbook on Theories of Governance, edited by C. Ansell, and J. Torfing, 267–281. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Brulle, R. J. 2018. “The Climate Lobby: A Sectoral Analysis of Lobbying Spending on Climate Change in the USA, 2000 to 2016.” Climatic Change 149 (3): 289–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H., and M. Betsill. 2005. “Rethinking Sustainable Cities: Multilevel Governance and the “Urban” Politics of Climate Change’.” Environmental Politics 14 (1): 42–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capano, G., M. Howlett, and M. Ramesh. 2015. “Bringing Governments Back in: Governance and Governing in Comparative Policy Analysis.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 17 (4): 311–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckerberg, K., T. Bjärstig, M. Miljand, and I. Mancheva. 2020. “Devolving Power from the State: Local Initiatives for Nature Protection and Recreation in Sweden.” Local Environment 25 (6): 433–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farstad, F. M., E. A. T. Hermansen, B. S. Grasbekk, K. Brudevoll, and B. van Oort. 2022. “Explaining Radical Policy Change: Norwegian Climate Policy and the ban on Cultivating Peatlands.” Global Environmental Change 74: 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, S., and W. D. Eggers. 2004. Governing by Network – The New Shape of the Public Sector. Washinton, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hodson, M., and S. Marvin. 2012. “Mediating low-Carbon Urban Transitions? Forms of Organization, Knowledge and Action.” European Planning Studies 30 (3): 421–439.
   Google Scholar
• Hodson, M., S. Marvin, and H. Bulkeley. 2013. “The Intermediary Organisation of low Carbon Cities: A Comparative Analysis of Transitions in Greater London and Greater Manchester.” Urban Studies 50 (7): 1403–1422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstad, H., E. Sørensen, J. Torfing, and T. Vedeld. 2021. “Leading Co-Creation for the Green Shift.” Public Money & Management, doi:10.1080/09540962.2021.1992120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovik, S., and G. S. Hanssen. 2015. “The Impact of Network Management and Complexity on Multi-Level Coordination.” Public Administration 93 (2): 506–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howells, J. 2006. “Intermediation and the Role of Intermediaries in Innovation.” Research Policy 35 (5): 715–728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., D. Huitema, H. van Asselt, and J. Forster. 2018. Governing Climate Change: Polycentricity in Action? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kivimaa, P., W. Boon, S. Hyysalo, and L. Klerkx. 2019. “Towards a Typology of Intermediaries in Sustainability Transitions: A Systematic Review and a Research Agenda.” Research Policy 48 (4): 1062–1075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kooiman, J., ed. 1993. Modern Governance. New Government – Society Interactions. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Local Government and Modernisation (MLGM). 2014. “Kriterier for god kommunestruktur.” Final expert group report. Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Local Government and Modernisation (MLGM). 2019. “White paper 5 (2019–2020).” Levende lokalsamfunn for fremtiden. Distriktsmeldingen.
   Google Scholar
• Norsk rikskringkasting (NRK). 2021. “Kronikk: Seks klimakrav til regjeringen: Hvem tar utfordringen?” Published online 16.08.21: https://www.nrk.no/ytring/seks-klimakrav-til-regjeringen_-hvem-tar-utfordringen_-1.15609349.
   Google Scholar
• O'Toole, L. 2004. “Implementation Theory and the Challenge of Sustainable Development: The Transformative Role of Learning.” In Governance of Sustainable Development: The Challenge of Adapting Form to Function, edited by W. M. Lafferty, 32–61. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Obydenkova, A., V. G. Rodrigues Vieira, and J. Tosun. 2021. “The Impact of new Actors in Global Environmental Politics: The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development Meets China.” Post-Communist Economies 34 (5): 603–623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polzin, F., P. von Flotow, and L. Klerkx. 2016. “Addressing Barriers to eco-Innovation: Exploring the Finance Mobilisation Functions of Institutional Innovation Intermediaries.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 103: 34–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. 2006. “Policy Network Analysis.” In The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, edited by M. Moran, M. Rein, and R. E. Goodin, 425–448. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, A., and H. Ingram. 1993. “Social Construction of Target Populations: Implications for Politics and Policy.” American Political Science Review 87 (2): 334–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selin, H., and S. D. VanDeveer. 2020. “Climate Change Politics and Policy in the United States: Forward, Reverse and Through the Looking Glass.” In Climate Governance Across the Globe: Pioneers, Leaders and Followers, edited by R. K. Wurzel, M. S. Andersen, and P. Tobin, 123–141. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E. 2007. “Local Politicians and Administrators as Metagovernors.” In Democratic Network Governance in Europe, edited by M. Marcussen, and J. Torfing, 89–108. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E., and J. Torfing. 2009. “Making Governance Networks Effective and Democratic Through Metagovernance.” Public Administration 87 (2): 234–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistisk sentralbyrå (SSB). 2022. “Utslipp Til Luft.” Accessed September 9, 2022 https://www.ssb.no/natur-og-miljo/forurensning-og-klima/statistikk/utslipp-til-luft.
   Google Scholar
• Tobin, P., J. Tosun, and F. M. Farstad. forthcoming. “Intermediating Climate Change: The Evolving Strategies, Interactions and Impacts of Neglected ‘Climate Intermediaries’.” Special Issue of Policy Studies, forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Torfing, J. 2016. “Metagovernance.” In Handbook on Theories of Governance, edited by C. Ansell, and J. Torfing, 525–538. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Torfing, J., and E. Sørensen. 2014. “The European Debate on Governance Networks: Towards a new and Viable Paradigm?” Policy and Society 33 (4): 329–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westskog, H., E. Selvig, C. Aall, H. Amundsen, E. S. Jensen, and E. Schøyen. 2018. “Potensial og barrierer for kommunale klimatiltak.” CICERO Report; 2018:03.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, P., J. Harboe, C. S. Rothbarth, U. Gaudenz, L. Arsan, C. Obrist, and M. van Leeuwen. 2021. “Non-governmental Organisations and Universities as Transition Intermediaries in Sustainability Transformations Building on Grassroots Initiatives.” Creativity and Innovation Management 30 (3): 596–618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar