351
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Blood is thicker than water: local favouritism and inter-local collaborative governance

ORCID Icon &
Pages 748-766 | Received 28 Aug 2022, Accepted 20 Dec 2022, Published online: 28 Dec 2022

References

  • Akerlof, G. A., and R. E. Kranton. 2000. “Economics and Identity.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 115 (3): 715–753. doi:10.1162/003355300554881.
  • Akerlof, G. A., and R. E. Kranton. 2010. Identity Economics: How Our Identities Shape Our Work, Wages, and Well-Being. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Barrutia, J. M., and C. Echebarria. 2021. “Public Managers’ Attitudes Towards Networks: Different Motivations, Different Attitudes.” Public Management Review 23 (7): 1006–1031. doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1708440.
  • Baskaran, T., and M. Lopes da Fonseca. 2021. “Appointed Public Officials and Local Favoritism: Evidence from the German States.” Journal of Urban Economics 124: 103354. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2021.103354.
  • Benjamin, D. J., J. J. Choi, and A. J. Strickland. 2010. “Social Identity and Preferences.” American Economic Review 100 (4): 1913–1928. doi:10.1257/aer.100.4.1913.
  • Bouwman, R., S. van Thiel, A. van Deemen, and E. Rouwette. 2019. “Cooperation and Competition in Public-Sector Negotiations: A Laboratory Experiment.” Public Performance & Management Review 42 (5): 1164–1185. doi:10.1080/15309576.2018.1553720.
  • Brewer, M. B. 1999. “The Psychology of Prejudice: Ingroup Love and Outgroup Hate?” Journal of Social Issues 55 (3): 429–444. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00126.
  • Casula, M. 2020. “A Contextual Explanation of Regional Governance in Europe: Insights from Inter-Municipal Cooperation.” Public Management Review 22 (12): 1819–1851. doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1665700.
  • Chen, T., and J. Y. Hong. 2021. “Rivals Within: Political Factions, Loyalty, and Elite Competition Under Authoritarianism.” Political Science Research and Methods 9 (3): 599–614. doi:10.1017/psrm.2019.61.
  • Chen, Yunsen, J. Huang, H. Liu, and W. Wang. 2019a. “Regional Favoritism and Tax Avoidance: Evidence from China.” Accounting & Finance 58 (5): 1413–1443. doi:10.1111/acfi.12447.
  • Chen, Yan, and S. X. Li. 2009. “Group Identity and Social Preferences.” American Economic Review 99 (1): 431–457. doi:10.1257/aer.99.1.431.
  • Chen, B., J. Ma, R. Feiock, and L. Suo. 2019b. “Factors Influencing Participation in Bilateral Interprovincial Agreements: Evidence from China’s Pan Pearl River Delta.” Urban Affairs Review 55 (3): 923–949. doi:10.1177/1078087418825002.
  • Conner, T. W. 2016. “Representation and Collaboration: Exploring the Role of Shared Identity in the Collaborative Process.” Public Administration Review 76 (2): 288–301. doi:10.1111/puar.12413.
  • De Luca, G., R. Hodler, P. A. Raschky, and M. Valsecchi. 2018. “Ethnic Favoritism: An Axiom of Politics?” Journal of Development Economics 132: 115–129. doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2017.12.006.
  • Do, Q.-A., K.-T. Nguyen, and A. N. Tran. 2017. “One Mandarin Benefits the Whole Clan: Hometown Favoritism in an Authoritarian Regime.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 9 (4): 1–29. doi:10.1257/app.20130472.
  • Emerson, K., and T. Nabatchi. 2015. Collaborative Governance Regimes. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
  • Esteve, M., G. Boyne, V. Sierra, and T. Ysa. 2013. “Organizational Collaboration in the Public Sector: Do Chief Executives Make a Difference?” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 23 (4): 927–952. doi:10.1093/jopart/mus035.
  • Esteve, M., A. van Witteloostuijn, and G. Boyne. 2015. “The Effects of Public Service Motivation on Collaborative Behavior: Evidence from Three Experimental Games.” International Public Management Journal 18 (2): 171–189. doi:10.1080/10967494.2015.1012573.
  • Everett, J. A. C., N. S. Faber, and M. Crockett. 2015. “Preferences and Beliefs in Ingroup Favoritism.” Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 9, doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00015.
  • Feiock, R. C. 2007. “Rational Choice and Regional Governance.” Journal of Urban Affairs 29 (1): 47–63. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9906.2007.00322.x.
  • Feiock, R. C. 2013. “The Institutional Collective Action Framework.” Policy Studies Journal 41 (3): 397–425. doi:10.1111/psj.12023.
  • Feiock, R. C., and J. T. Scholz. 2009. Self–Organizing Federalism: Collaborative Mechanisms to Mitigate Institutional Collective Action Dilemmas. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Fiva, J. H., and A. H. Halse. 2016. “Local Favoritism in at-Large Proportional Representation Systems.” Journal of Public Economics 143: 15–26. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.08.002.
  • Franck, R., and I. Rainer. 2012. “Does the Leader’s Ethnicity Matter? Ethnic Favoritism, Education, and Health in Sub-Saharan Africa.” American Political Science Review 106 (2): 294–325. doi:10.1017/S0003055412000172.
  • Frederickson, H. G., K. B. Smith, C. W. Larimer, and M. J. Licari. 2011. The Public Administration Theory Primer. 2nd ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Gonschorek, G. J. 2021. “Subnational Favoritism in Development Grant Allocations: Empirical Evidence from Decentralized Indonesia.” World Development 139: 105299. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105299.
  • Guo, P., G. Shi, G. G. Tian, and S. Duan. 2021. “Politicians’ Hometown Favoritism and Corporate Investments: The Role of Social Identity.” Journal of Banking & Finance 125: 106092. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2021.106092.
  • Hodler, R., and P. A. Raschky. 2014. “Regional Favoritism.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 129 (2): 995–1033. doi:10.1093/qje/qju004.
  • Houston, D. J. 2006. ““Walking the Walk” of Public Service Motivation: Public Employees and Charitable Gifts of Time, Blood, and Money.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16 (1): 67–86. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui028.
  • Hu, Q., K. Huang, and B. Chen. 2020. “Professional Friendship, Resource Competition, and Collaboration in a Homeless Service Delivery Network.” Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance 44 (2): 110–126. doi:10.1080/23303131.2019.1696908.
  • Huang, C., H. Yi, T. Chen, X. Xu, and S. Chen. 2022. “Networked Environmental Governance: Formal and Informal Collaborative Networks in Local China.” Policy Studies 43 (3): 403–421. doi:10.1080/01442872.2020.1758306.
  • Kim, S. Y., W. L. Swann, C. M. Weible, T. Bolognesi, R. M. Krause, A. Y. S. Park, T. Tang, K. Maletsky, and R. C. Feiock. 2022. “Updating the Institutional Collective Action Framework.” Policy Studies Journal 50 (1): 9–34. doi:10.1111/psj.12392.
  • Lee, Y., and I. W. Lee. 2022. “A Longitudinal Network Analysis of Intergovernmental Collaboration for Local Economic Development.” Urban Affairs Review 58 (1): 229–257. doi:10.1177/1078087420949936.
  • LeRoux, K., P. W. Brandenburger, and S. K. Pandey. 2010. “Interlocal Service Cooperation in U.S. Cities: A Social Network Explanation.” Public Administration Review 70 (2): 268–278. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02133.x.
  • LeRoux, K., and S. K. Pandey. 2011. “City Managers, Career Incentives, and Municipal Service Decisions: The Effects of Managerial Progressive Ambition on Interlocal Service Delivery.” Public Administration Review 71 (4): 627–636. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02394.x.
  • Li, P., Y. Lu, and J. Wang. 2016. “Does Flattening Government Improve Economic Performance? Evidence from China.” Journal of Development Economics 123: 18–37. doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2016.07.002.
  • Lieberthal, K., and M. Oksenberg. 1988. Policy Making in China: Leaders, Structures, and Processes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Liu, W., T. S. James, and C. Man. 2022. “Governance and Public Administration in China.” Policy Studies 43 (3): 387–402. doi:10.1080/01442872.2022.2054091.
  • Meng, Q., and Z. Fan. 2022. “Punctuations and Diversity: Exploring Dynamics of Attention Allocation in China’s E-Government Agenda.” Policy Studies 43 (3): 502–521. doi:10.1080/01442872.2021.1961719.
  • Pill, M. 2022. “Neighbourhood Collaboration in co-Production: State-Resourced Responsiveness or State-Retrenched Responsibilisation?” Policy Studies 43 (5): 984–1000. doi:10.1080/01442872.2021.1892052.
  • Ren, S., D. Liu, B. Li, Y. Wang, and X. Chen. 2020. “Does Emissions Trading Affect Labor Demand? Evidence from the Mining and Manufacturing Industries in China.” Journal of Environmental Management 254: 109789. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109789.
  • Rubado, M. E. 2022. “Collaborating with the Competition? A Study of Interlocal Partnership Choices.” Public Administration, doi:10.1111/padm.12812.
  • Schlager, E., and C. M. Weible. 2013. “New Theories of the Policy Process.” Policy Studies Journal 41 (3): 389–396. doi:10.1111/psj.12030.
  • Sullivan, H., and C. Skelcher. 2002. Working Across Boundaries: Collaboration in Public Services. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Tajfel, H. 1972. “La Catégorisation Sociale.” In Introduction a La Psychologie Sociale, edited by S. Moscovici, 272–301. Paris: Librairie Larousse.
  • Tajfel, H. 1982. “Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations.” Annual Review of Psychology 33 (1): 1–39. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245.
  • Thomson, A. M., and J. L. Perry. 2006. “Collaboration Processes: Inside the Black Box.” Public Administration Review 66 (s1): 20–32. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00663.x.
  • Tropp, L. R., and S. C. Wright. 2001. “Ingroup Identification as the Inclusion of Ingroup in the Self.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 27 (5): 585–600. doi:10.1177/0146167201275007.
  • Tummers, L., and V. Bekkers. 2014. “Policy Implementation, Street-Level Bureaucracy, and the Importance of Discretion.” Public Management Review 16 (4): 527–547. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.841978.
  • Yi, H., L. Suo, R. Shen, J. Zhang, A. Ramaswami, and R. C. Feiock. 2018. “Regional Governance and Institutional Collective Action for Environmental Sustainability.” Public Administration Review 78 (4): 556–566. doi:10.1111/puar.12799.
  • Youm, J., and R. C. Feiock. 2019. “Interlocal Collaboration and Local Climate Protection.” Local Government Studies 45 (6): 777–802. doi:10.1080/03003930.2019.1615464.
  • Zeemering, E. 2008. “Governing Interlocal Cooperation: City Council Interests and the Implications for Public Management.” Public Administration Review 68 (4): 731–741. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00911.x.
  • Zeemering, E. 2016. “Assessing Local Elected Officials’ Concerns About Interlocal Agreements.” Urban Studies 53 (11): 2347–2362. doi:10.1177/0042098015590768.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.