Policymaking in personalist dictatorships: a theory of outbidding

References

• Barrio, A., and J. Rodriguez-Teruel. 2016. “Reducing the Gap Between Leaders and Voters? Elite Polarization, Outbidding Competition, and the Rise of Secessionism in Catalonia.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 4 (10): 1176–1794. doi:10.1080/01419870.2016.1213400.
   Google Scholar
• Beasley, R., J. Kaarbo, J. Lantis, and M. Snarr. 2013. Foreign Policy in Comparative Perspective: Domestic and International Influences on State Behavior. 2nd ed. California: SAGE Knowledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, A., and A. George. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, K., K. Watanabe, H. Wang, P. Nulty, A. Obeng, S. Muller, and A. Matsuo. 2018. “Quanteda: An R Package for the Quantitative Analysis of Textual Data.” Journal of Open Source Software 3 (30): 774. doi:10.21105/joss.00774
   Google Scholar
• Blaydes, L. 2011. Elections and Distributive Politics in Mubarak’s Egypt. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, M. 2005. Dying to Kill: The Allure of Suicide Terrorism. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Böhmelt, T. 2014. “Political Opportunity Structures in Dictatorships? Explaining ENGO Existence in Autocratic Regimes.” The Journal of Environment and Development 23 (4): 446–471. doi:10.1177/1070496514536396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonvecchi, A., and E. Simison. 2022. “Lawmaking in Personalist Dictatorships: Evidence from Spain.” The Journal of Legislative Studies, doi:10.1080/13572334.2021.2015885.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooker, P. 2014. Non-Democratic Regimes. 3rd ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Brym, R., and B. Araj. 2008. “Palestinian Suicide Bombing Revisited: A Critique of the Outbidding Thesis.” Political Science Quarterly 123 (3): 485–500. doi:10.1002/j.1538-165X.2008.tb00632.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandra, K. 2005. Why Ethnic Parties Succeed: Patronage and Ethnic Head Counts in India. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chehabi, H., and J. Linz. 1998. Sultanistic Regimes. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, G. 1997. Making Votes Count. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crisman-Cox, C., and M. Gibilisco. 2021. “Tug of War: Dynamic Outbidding Between Terrorist Groups.” Unpublished Manuscript, 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Davenport, C. 2007. “State Repression and the Tyrannical Peace.” Journal of Peace Research 44 (4): 485–504. doi:10.1177/0022343307078940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denny, M., and A. Spirling. 2018. “Text Preprocessing For Unsupervised Learning: Why It Matters, When It Misleads, And What To Do About It.” Political Analysis 26 (2): 168–189. doi:10.1017/pan.2017.44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Ruiter, R., and J. Schalk. 2017. “Explaining Cross-National Policy Diffusion in National Parliaments: A Longitudinal Case Study of Plenary Debates in the Dutch Parliament.” Acta Politica 52: 133–155. doi:10.1057/ap.2015.29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz-Cayeros, A., and B. Magaloni. 2001. “Party Dominance and the Logic of Electoral Design in Mexico’s Transition to Democracy.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 13 (3): 271–293. doi:10.1177/095169280101300303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodds, A. 2018. Comparative Public Policy. 2nd ed. UK: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Eckstein, H. 2000. “Case Study and Theory in Political Science.” In Case Study Method, edited by R. Gomm, M. Hammersley, and P. Foster, 119–164. California: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Findley, M., and J. Young. 2012. “More Combatant Groups, More Terror?: Empirical Tests of an Outbidding Logic.” Terrorism and Political Violence 24 (5): 706–721. doi:10.1080/09546553.2011.639415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, C. 1980. Comparative Public Policy and Citizen Participation: Energy, Education, Health and Urban Issues in the U.S. and Germany. New York: Pergamon Press Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Frear, M. 2019. Belarus Under Lukashenka: Adaptive Authoritarianism. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gandhi, J. 2008. Political Institutions Under Dictatorship. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gandhi, J., and A. Heller. 2018. “Electoral Systems in Authoritarian States.” In The Oxford Handbook of Electoral Systems, edited by E. Herron, R. Pekkanen, and M. Shugart, 387–402. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gandhi, J., and E. Lust-Okar. 2009. “Elections Under Authoritarianism.” Annual Review of Political Science 12: 403–422. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060106.095434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandhi, J., B. Noble, and M. Svolik. 2020. Legislatures and Legislative Politics Without Democracy.” Comparative Political Studies 53 (9): 1359–1379. doi:10.1177/0010414020919930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geddes, B. 1999. “What Do We Know About Democratization After Twenty Years?” Annual Review of Political Science 2: 115–144. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, K. 2007. Why Dominant Parties Lose: Mexico’s Democratization in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grimmer, J., and B. Stewart. 2013. “Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts.” Political Analysis 21 (3): 267–297. doi:10.1093/pan/mps028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horowitz, D. 1985. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., and J. Tosun. 2019. Policy Styles and Policy Making: Exploring the Linkages. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, S. 1996. “Spiraling to Ethnic War: Elites, Masses, and Moscow in Moldova’s Civil War.” International Security 21 (2): 108–138. doi:10.1162/isec.21.2.108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krol, G. 2017. “Legislative Performance of the Russian State Duma: The Role of Parliament in an Authoritarian Regime.” East European Politics 33 (4): 450–471. doi:10.1080/21599165.2017.1346504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krol, G. 2020. “Parliamentary Initiative in Authoritarian Regimes: Power Sharing in Eurasian Legislatures.” The Journal of Legislative Studies 26 (2): 248–274. doi:10.1080/13572334.2020.1738671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krol, G. 2021. “Amending Legislatures in Authoritarian Regimes: Power Sharing in Post-Soviet Eurasia.” Democratization 28 (3): 562–582. doi:10.1080/13510347.2020.1830065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kydd, A., and B. Walter. 2006. “The Strategies of Terrorism.” International Security 31: 49–80. doi:10.1162/isec.2006.31.1.49
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kydd, A., and B. Walter. 2009. “Outbidding and the Overproduction of Terrorism.” Unpublished Manuscript, 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Lauderdale, B., and A. Herzog. 2016. “Measuring Political Positions from Legislative Speech.” Political Analysis 24 (3): 374–394. doi:10.1093/pan/mpw017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linz, J. 2000. Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes. Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lü, X., M. Liu, and F. Li. 2020. “Policy Coalition Building in an Authoritarian Legislature: Evidence from China’s National Assemblies (1983-2007).” Comparative Political Studies 53 (9): 1380–1416. doi:10.1177/0010414018797950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magaloni, B. 2006. Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and Its Demise in Mexico. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malesky, E., and P. Schuler. 2010. “Nodding or Needling: Analyzing Delegate Responsiveness in an Authoritarian Parliament.” American Political Science Review 104 (3): 482–502. doi:10.1017/S0003055410000250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manion, M. 2017. “‘Good Types’ in Authoritarian Elections: The Selectoral Connection in Chinese Local Congresses.” Comparative Political Studies 50 (3): 362–394. doi:10.1177/0010414014537027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, L., and G. Vanberg. 2011. Parliaments and Coalitions: The Role of Legislative Institutions in Multiparty Governance. UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Medzihorsky, J., L. Littvay, and E. Jenne. 2014. “Has the Tea Party Era Radicalized the Republican Party? Evidence from Text Analysis of the 2008 and 2012 Republican Primary Debates.” PS: Political Science and Politics 47 (4): 806–812. doi:10.1017/S1049096514001085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mucciaroni, G., K. Ferraiolo, and M. Rubado. 2019. “Framing Morality Policy Issues: State Legislative Debates on Abortion Restrictions.” Policy Sciences 52: 171–189. doi:10.1007/s11077-018-9336-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myagkov, M., P. Ordeshook, and D. Shakin. 2009. The Forensics of Electoral Fraud: Russia and Ukraine. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noble, B. 2020. “Authoritarian Amendments: Legislative Institutions as Intraexecutive Constraints in Post-Soviet Russia.” Comparative Political Studies 53 (9): 1417–1454. doi:10.1177/0010414018797941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble, B., and E. Schulmann. 2018. “Not Just a Rubber Stamp: Parliament and Lawmaking.” In The New Autocracy: Information, Politics, and Policy and Putin’s Russia, edited by D. Treisman, 49–82. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, K. J. 1994. “Agents and Remonstrators: Role Accumulation by Chinese People’s Congress Deputies.” The China Quarterly 138: 359–380. doi:10.1017/S0305741000035797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pepinsky, T. 2014. “The Institutional Turn in Comparative Authoritarianism.” British Journal of Political Science 44 (3): 631–653. doi:10.1017/S0007123413000021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabushka, A., and K. Shepsle. 1971. “Political Entrepreneurship and Patterns of Democratic Instability in Plural Societies.” Race 12 (4): 461–476. doi:10.1177/030639687101200407
   Google Scholar
• Rabushka, A., and K. Shepsle. 1972. Politics in Plural Societies. A Theory of Democratic Instability. Ohio: Charles E. Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Ramani, S. 2015. “The North Korean Government is Getting Weaker and More Vulnerable. That Should Scare You.” The Washington Post, August 4.
   Google Scholar
• Remington, T. 2001. The Russian Parliament: Institutional Evolution in a Transitional Regime. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reuter, J., and R. Turovsky. 2014. “Dominant Party Rule and Legislative Leadership in Authoritarian Regimes.” Party Politics 20 (5): 663–664. doi:10.1177/1354068812448689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rummel, R. 1997. Power Kills. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Russian Election Monitor. 2021. “The New-Old Central Election Commission: An Authentic Renewal or a Superficial Touch Up?” May. Accessed April 26, 2022. https://www.russian-election-monitor.org/new-old-central-election-commission.html.
   Google Scholar
• Schreier, M. 2012. Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice. Los Angeles: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Schuler, P. 2020. “Position Taking or Position Ducking? A Theory of Public Debate in Single-Party Legislatures.” Comparative Political Studies 53 (9): 1493–1524. doi:10.1177/0010414018758765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silitski, V., A. Goujon, P. vel Grajewski, C. Rontoyanni, and D. Trenin. 2005. “Internal Developments in Belarus.” In Changing Belarus, edited by D. Lynch, 25–46. European Union Institute for Security Studies (EUISS). http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep06940.
   Google Scholar
• Simison, E. 2022. “Supporters and Opposition in Authoritarian Legislatures.” The Journal of Legislative Studies 28 (1): 47–66. doi:10.1080/13572334.2020.1847375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpser, A. 2013. Why Government and Parties Manipulate Elections, Theory, Practice and Implications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slapin, J., and S.-O. Proksch. 2008. “A Scaling Model for Estimating Time-Series Party Positions from Texts.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (3): 705–722. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00338.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, D., and K. Moloney. 2019. The Oxford Handbook of Global Policy and Transnational Administration. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, D. 2003. “A General Inductive Approach for Qualitative Data Analysis.” Unpublished manuscript. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/David-Thomas-57/publication/263769109_Thomas_2003_General_Inductive_Analysis_-_Original_web_version/links/0a85e53bdc04f64786000000/Thomas-2003-General-Inductive-Analysis-Original-web-version.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Transcript of Meeting 139. 2014. Bill No. No. 385644-6, January 14. sozd.duma.gov.ru.
   Google Scholar
• Transcript of Meeting 191. 2006. Bill No. 301353-4, November 8. sozd.duma.gov.ru.
   Google Scholar
• Transcript of Meeting 71. 2017. Bill No. 236830-7, October 25. sozd.duma.gov.ru.
   Google Scholar
• Transcript of Meeting 74. 2001. Bill No. 43556-3, February 7. sozd.duma.gov.ru.
   Google Scholar
• Truex, R. 2014. “The Returns to Office in a 'Rubber Stamp' Parliament.” American Political Science Review 108 (2): 235–251. doi:10.1017/S0003055414000112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truex, R. 2016. Making Autocracy Work: Representation and Responsiveness in Modern China. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Truex, R. 2020. “Authoritarian Gridlock? Understanding Delay in the Chinese Legislative System.” Comparative Political Studies 53 (9): 1455–1492. doi:10.1177/0010414018758766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogt, M., K. Gleditsch, and L.-E. Cederman. 2021. “From Claims to Violence: Signaling, Outbidding, and Escalation in Ethnic Conflict.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 65 (7–8): 1–30. doi:10.1177/0022002721996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waller, J. 2021a. “Mimicking the Mad Printer: Legislating Illiberalism in Post-Soviet Eurasia.” Problems of Post-Communism 1–16. doi:10.1080/10758216.2021.1960863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waller, J. 2021b. “Elites and Institutions in the Russian Thermidor: Regime Instrumentalism, Entrepreneurial Signaling, and Inherent Illiberalism.” Journal of Illiberalism Studies 1 (1): 1–23. doi:10.53483/VCHS2523
   Google Scholar
• Wright, J. 2008. “Do Authoritarian Institutions Constrain? How Legislatures Affect Economic Growth and Investment.” American Journal of Political Science 52: 322–343. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00315.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yusuf, A. 2019. “Saddam Hussein: How a Deadly Purge of Opponents Set Up His Ruthless Dictatorship.” The Conversation.
   Google Scholar
• Zahariadis, N., and L. Buonanno. 2018. The Routledge Handbook of European Public Policy. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zuber, C. 2011. “Beyond Outbidding? Ethnic Party Strategies in Serbia.” Party Politics 19 (5): 758–777. doi:10.1177/1354068811410368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuber, C., and E. Szocsik. 2015. “Ethnic Outbidding and Nested Competition: Explaining the Extremism of Ethnonational Minority Parties in Europe.” European Journal of Political Research 54: 784–801. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar