Unravelling the influence of cognitive style on Chinese students’ classroom behaviours: the mediating effects of the structure-oriented/depth-oriented learning approach

References

• Alesandrini, K. I., Wittirock, M. C., & Langstaff, J. J. (1984). Visual-verbal and analytic–holistic strategies, abilities, and styles. Journal of Educational Research, 77, 151–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y., & Phillips, L. W. (1991). Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 421–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. (1991). Approaches to learning in secondary and tertiary students in Hong Kong: Some comparative studies. Educational Research Journal, 6, 27–39.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. B. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Calcaterra, A., Antonietti, A., & Underwood, J. (2005). Cognitive style, hypermedia navigation and learning. Computers & Education, 44, 441–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T. & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S. Y. & Macredie, R. D. (2002). Cognitive styles and hypermedia navigation: Development of a learning model. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53, 3–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, H., Andrade, H. L., & Yan, Z. (2011). A cross-cultural study of learning behaviours in the classroom: From a thinking style perspective. Educational Psychology, 31, 825–841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, R. & Gieve, S. N. (2006). On the discursive construction of the Chinese learner. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 19, 54–73.
   Google Scholar
• Curry, L. (1983). An organization of learning styles theory and constructs. In L. Curry (Ed.), Learning style in continuing medical education (pp. 115–123). Ottawa: Canadian Medical Association ( ERIC Reproduction Document ED 235 185).
   Google Scholar
• Cuthbert, P. F. (2005). The student learning process: Learning styles or learning approaches. Teaching in Higher Education, 10, 235–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlin, B. & Watkins, D. (2000). The role of repetition in the processes of memorising and understanding: A comparison of the views of German and Chinese secondary school students in Hong Kong. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 65–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, S. & Kitayama, S. (2007). Mnemonic context effect in two cultures: Attention to memory representations. Cognitive Science, 31, 1009–1020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, C. & Waring, M. (2006). Towards inclusive teacher education: Sensitizing individuals to how they learn. Educational Psychology, 6, 499–518.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, C., & Waring, M. (2009). The place of cognitive style in pedagogy: Realizing potential in practice. In L. F. Zhang & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Perspectives on intellectual styles (pp. 169–208). Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fiorina, L., Antonietti, A., Colombo, B., & Bartolomeo, A. (2007). Thinking tyle, browsing primes and hypermedia navigation. Computers & Education, 49, 916–941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flowerdew, L. (1998). A cultural perspective on group work. ELT Journal, 52, 323–328.
   Google Scholar
• Gan, Z. (2009). “Asian learners” re-examined: An empirical study of language learning attitudes, strategies and motivation among mainland Chinese and Hong Kong students. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 30, 41–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graff, M. (2003). Learning from web-based instructional systems and cognitive style. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34, 407–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimshaw, T. (2007). Problematizing the construct of “the Chiense learner”: Insights from ethnographic research. Educational Studies, 33, 299–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, I., Salili, F., Biggs, J., & Hau, K. T. (1999). The relationship among causal attributions, learning strategies and level of achievement: A Hong Kong case study. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 19, 44–58.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, J. (2009). What happens when two cultures meet in the classroom? Journal of Instructional Psychology, 36, 335–342.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, E. F. & Chapman, D. W. (1982). Explaining course oriented attitude: A canonical analysis. Educational Research Quarterly, 2, 52–60.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, P. (2002). Reading literature in Hong Kong: The beliefs and perceptions of three groups of adult learners. In J. Cribbin & P. Kennedy (Eds.), Lifelong learning in action: Hong Kong practitioners’ perspectives (pp. 219–228). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kozhevnikov, M. (2007). Cognitive styles in the context of modern psychology: Toward an integrated framework of cognitive style. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 464–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003). Problematizing culture stereotypes in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 37, 709–716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, C. C. & Chuang, S. H. (2007). Assessing the effect of cognitive styles with different learning modes on learning outcomes. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 105, 184–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littlewood, W. (1999). Hong Kong students and their English: LEAP report. Hong Kong: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masuda, T. & Nisbett, R. E. (2006). Culture and change blindness. Cognitive Science, 30, 381–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyers, L. S., Gamst, G., & Guarino, A. J. (2006). Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, A. (1987). Cognitive styles: An integrated model. Educational Psychology, 7, 251–268.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, L. M. (2005). Using learning style to evaluate computer-based instruction. Computers in Human Behaviour, 21, 287–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic vs. analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108, 291–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norenzayan, A. & Nisbett, R. E. (2000). Culture and causal cognition. Current Direction in Psychological Science, 9, 132–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olaussen, B. S. (1999). Students’ use of strategies for self-regulated learning: Cross-cultural perspectives. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 43, 409–422.
   Google Scholar
• Oosterheert, I. E., Vermunt, J. D., & Denessen, E. (2002). Assessing orientations to learning to teach. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 41–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 17–59). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J. & Hayes, A. E. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 36, 717–731.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Purdie, N. & Hattie, J. (1996). Cultural differences in the use of strategies for self-regulated learning. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 845–862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastall, P. (2006). Introduction: The Chinese learner in higher education – Transition and quality issues: International Conference on the needs of Chinese learners in higher education, University of Portsmouth, 16–17 July 2004. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 19(1), 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Riding, R. (1997). On the nature of cognitive style. Educational Psychology, 17, 29–49.
   Google Scholar
• Riding, R. J. & Rayner, S. (1999). Cognitive styles and learning strategies: Understanding style differences in learning and behaviour. London: D. Fulton.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler-Smith, E. & Riding, R. (1999). Cognitive style and instructional preferences. Instructional Science, 27, 355–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmeck, R. R. & Geisler-Bernstein, E. (1983). Inventory of learning processes-R. Carbondale, IL: Ronald R. Schmeck.
   Google Scholar
• Shi, L. (2006). The successors to confucianism or a new generation. A questionnaire study on Chinese students’ culture of learning English. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 19, 122–147.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, C. S. (1998). Assessment of classroom communication and study skills. Eau Claire, WI: Thinking.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. & Grigorenko, E. L. (1997). Are cognitive styles still in style? American Psychologist, 52, 700–712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1988). Style of learning and thinking: Administrator’s manual. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Tweed, R. G. & Lehman, D. R. (2002). Learning considered within a cultural context: Confucian and Socratic approaches. American Psychologist, 57, 89–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins, D. A. & Biggs, J. B. (2001). Teaching the Chinese learner: Psychological and pedagogical perspectives. Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong Comparative Education Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Workman, M. (2004). Performance and perceived effectiveness in computer-based and computer-aided education: Do cognitive styles make a difference? Computers in Human Behaviour, 20, 517–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. F. (2006). Does student–teacher thinking style match/mismatch matter in students’ achievement? Educational Psychology, 26, 395–409.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. F. & Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The nature of intellectual styles. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar