Uniqueness, integration or separation? exploring the nature of creativity through creative writing by elementary school students in Taiwan

References

• Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 997–1013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, O. E., & Torrance, E. P. (1980). Effectiveness of new materials developed for training the streamlined scoring of the TTCT, figural A and B forms. Journal of Creative Behavior, 14, 199–203.
   Google Scholar
• Caroff, X., & Besancon, M. (2008). Variability of creativity judgments. Learning and Individual Difference, 18, 367–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, P. R., Guildord, J. P., & Wilson, R. C. (1959). Relation of creative responses to working time and instruction. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 82–88.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, P. M., & Mirels, H. L. (1970). Fluency as a pervasive element in the measurement of creativity. Journal of Educational Measurement, 7, 83–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, D. H., Marrinan, B. M., & Hartfeldt, S. D. (1972). Transformational power as a possible index of creativity. Psychological Reports, 30, 335–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gramond, B. (1999). The Torrance tests of creative thinking: Going beyond the scores. In A. S.Fishkin, B.Gramond, & P.Olszewski-Kubilius (Eds.), Investigating creativity in youth (pp. 307–328). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gramond, B., Matthews-Morgan, J., Bandalos, D., & Zuo, L. (2005). A report on the 40-year follow-up of the Torrance tests of thinking: Alive and well in the new millennium. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 283–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1956). The structure of the intellect. Psychological Bulletin, 53, 267–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hocevar, D. (1979a). Ideational fluency as a confounding factor in the measurement of originality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 191–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hocevar, D. (1979b). A comparison of statistical infrequency and subjective judgment as criteria in the measurement of originality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 43, 609–623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hocevar, D. (1981). Measurement of creativity: Review and critique. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45, 450–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hocevar, D., & Michael, W. B. (1979). The effects of scoring formulas on the discriminant validity of tests of divergent thinking. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 39, 917–921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazelskis, R. (1972). The convergent, divergent, and factorial validity of the Torrance figural test of creativity. Southern Journal of Educational Research, 6, 123–129.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K. H. (2006). Is creativity unidimensional or multidimensional? Analyses of the Torrance tests of creative thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 251–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K. H., Gramond, B., & Bandalos, D. L. (2006). The latent structure and measurement invariance of scores on the Torrance tests of creative thinking-figural. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 459–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kousoulas, F. (2010). The interplay of creative behavior, divergent thinking, and knowledge base in students’ creative expression during learning activity. Creativity Research Journal, 22, 387–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, W. W., Chu, T. L., & Wang, Y. L. (2011). Construction and validation of imagination tests. Paper presented at TERA International Conference on Education (TICE). Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
   Google Scholar
• Michael, W. B., & Wright, C. R. (1989). Psychometric issues in the assessment of creativity. In J. A.Glover & R. R.Ronning (Eds.), Handbook of creativity: Perspectives on individual differences. (pp. 33–52). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milgram, R. M., Milgram, N. A., Rosenbloom, G., & Rabkin, L. (1978). Quantity and quality of creative thinking in children and adolescents. Child Development, 49, 385–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, J. D., Milgram, R. M., Sawyers, J. K., & Fu, V. R. (1983). Original thinking in preschool children. Child Development, 54, 921–926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouchiroud, C., & Lubart, T. (2001). Children’s original thinking: An empirical examination of alternative measures derived from divergent thinking tasks. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 162, 382–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plass, H., Michael, J., & Michael, W. (1974). The factorial validity of the Torrance tests of creative thinking for a sample of 111 sixth-grade children. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34, 413–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappa, 42, 305–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A. (1986). Flexibility and originality in children’s divergent thinking. Journal of Psychology, 120, 345–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 66–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., & Charles, R. E. (1993). Judgments of originality and appropriateness as predictors of creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 537–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., & Mraz, W. (1992). Scoring divergent thinking tests using total ideational output and a creativity index. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 213–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., Okuda, S. M., & Thurston, B. J. (1987). The psychometric properties of four systems for scoring divergent thinking tests. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 5, 149–156.
   Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (1997). Creative productivity: A predictive and explanatory model of career trajectories and landmarks. Psychological Review, 104, 66–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51, 668–677.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. J.Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 3–13). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1966). Torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms-technical manual (Research Ed. ed.). Princeton, NJ: Personnel Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms-technical manual. Lexingon, MA: Ginn.
   Google Scholar
• Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Zarnegar, Z., Hocevar, D., & Michael, W. B. (1988). Components of original thinking in gifted children. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48, 5–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar