Cognitive load in algebra: element interactivity in solving equations

References

• Asquith, P., Stephens, A. C., Knuth, E. J., & Alibali, M. W. (2007). Middle school mathematics teachers’ knowledge of students’ understanding of core algebraic concepts: Equal sign and variable. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 9, 249–272. doi:10.1080/1098606070136091010.1080/10986060701360910
   Google Scholar
• Ayres, P. (1993). Why goal-free problems can facilitate learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18, 376–381. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1993.102710.1006/ceps.1993.1027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballheim, C. (1999). Readers respond to what’s basic. Mathematics Education Dialogues, 3, 11.
   Google Scholar
• Bobis, J., Sweller, J., & Cooper, M. (1993). Cognitive load effects in a primary-school geometry task. Learning and Instruction, 3, 1–21. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(09)80002-910.1016/S0959-4752(09)80002-9
   Google Scholar
• Cai, J., Lew, H. C., Morris, A., Moyer, J. C., Ng, S. F., & Schmittau, J. (2005). The development of students’ algebraic thinking in earlier grades: A cross-cultural comparative perspective. ZDM – The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 37, 5–15.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, R., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2003). Learning and understanding science instructional material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 629–640. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.3.62910.1037/0022-0663.95.3.629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, G., & Sweller, J. (1987). Effects of schema acquisition and rule automation on mathematical problem-solving transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 347–362. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.79.4.34710.1037/0022-0663.79.4.347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramer, K., & Wyberg, T. (2009). Efficacy of different concrete models for teaching the part-whole construct for fractions. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 11, 226–257. doi:10.1080/1098606090324647910.1080/10986060903246479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbo, I., & LeFevre, J.-A. (2009). Cultural differences in complex addition: Efficient Chinese versus adaptive Belgians and Canadians. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 35, 1465–1476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalra, A., & Stamell, J. (2005). Connections maths 10. Sydney: Pascal Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., Tuovinen, J., & Sweller, J. (2001). When problem solving is superior to studying worked examples. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 579–588. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.3.57910.1037/0022-0663.93.3.579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leahy, W., & Sweller, J. (2005). Interactions among the imagination, expertise reversal, and element interactivity effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11, 266–276. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.11.4.266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leahy, W., & Sweller, J. (2008). The imagination effect increases with an increased intrinsic cognitive load. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 273–283. doi:10.1002/acp.137310.1002/(ISSN)1099-0720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus, N., Cooper, M., & Sweller, J. (1996). Understanding instructions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 49–63. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.88.1.4910.1037/0022-0663.88.1.49
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (1985). Mathematical ability. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Human abilities: An information-processing approach (pp. 127–150). New York, NY: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• McNeil, N. M., Grandau, L., Knuth, E. J., Alibali, M. W., Stephens, A. C., Hattikudur, S., & Krill, D. K. (2006). Middle-school students’ understanding of the equal sign: The books they read can’t help. Cognition and Instruction, 24, 367–385. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci2403_310.1207/s1532690xci2403_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mock, J., & Wade, J. (2004). About maths. Sydney: Science Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ngu, B. H., & Rethinasamy, S. (2006). Evaluating a CALL software on the learning of English prepositions. Computers & Education, 47, 41–55. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.08.016
   Google Scholar
• Ngu, B. H., Mit, E., Shahbodin, F., & Tuovinen, J. (2009). Chemistry problem solving instruction: A comparison of three computer-based formats for learning from hierarchical network problem representations. Instructional Science, 37, 21–42. doi:10.1007/s11251-008-9072-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens, P., & Sweller, J. (2007). Cognitive load theory and music instruction. Educational Psychology, 28, 29–45. doi:10.1080/01443410701369146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paas, F., Camp, G., & Rikers, R. (2001). Instructional compensation for age-related cognitive declines: Effects of goal specificity in maze learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 181–186. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.18110.1037/0022-0663.93.1.181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paas, F. G. W. C., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38, 1–4. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3801_110.1207/S15326985EP3801_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paas, F. G. W. C., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1994). Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem-solving skills: A cognitive-load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 122–133. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.86.1.12210.1037/0022-0663.86.1.122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paas, F., Tuovinen, J. E., Tabbers, H., & Van Gerven, P. W. M. (2003). Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educational Psychologist, 38, 63–71. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3801_810.1207/S15326985EP3801_8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock, E., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2002). Assimilating complex information. Learning and Instruction, 12, 61–86. doi:10.1016/s0959-4752(01)00016-010.1016/S0959-4752(01)00016-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quilici, J. L., & Mayer, R. E. (1996). Role of examples in how students learn to categorize statistics word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 144–161. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.88.1.14410.1037/0022-0663.88.1.144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, S. K. (1987). A structure-mapping model for word problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 124–139. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(80)90013-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Retnowati, E., Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2010). Worked example effects in individual and group work settings. Educational Psychology, 30, 349–367. doi:10.1080/0144341100365996010.1080/01443411003659960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittle-Johnson, B., & Star, J. R. (2007). Does comparing solution methods facilitate conceptual and procedural knowledge? An experimental study on learning to solve equations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 561–574. doi:10.1037//1082-989x.7.2.14710.1037/0022-0663.99.3.561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittle-Johnson, B., & Star, J. R. (2009). Compared with what? The effects of different comparisons on conceptual knowledge and procedural flexibility for equation solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 529–544. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a001422410.1037/a0014224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittle-Johnson, B., Star, J. R., & Durkin, K. (2009). The importance of prior knowledge when comparing examples: Influences on conceptual and procedural knowledge of equation solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 836–852. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a001602610.1037/a0016026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rourke, A., & Sweller, J. (2009). The worked-example effect using ill-defined problems: Learning to recognise designers’ styles. Learning and Instruction, 19, 185–199. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.03.00610.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, J. R., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2008). Flexibility in problem solving: The case of equation solving. Learning and Instruction, 18, 565–579. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.01810.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, J. R., & Seifert, C. (2006). The development of flexibility in equation solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31, 280–300. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.08.00110.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens, A. C. (2003). Another look at word problems. The Mathematics Teacher, 96, 63–67.
   Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. (2010). Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 123–138. doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9128-510.1007/s10648-010-9128-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., & Chandler, P. (1994). Why some material is difficult to learn. Cognition and Instruction, 12, 185–233. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1203_110.1207/s1532690xci1203_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., & Cooper, G. A. (1985). The use of worked examples as a substitute for problem solving in learning algebra. Cognition and Instruction, 2, 59–89. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0201_310.1207/s1532690xci0201_3
   Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251–296. doi:10.1023/a:102219372820510.1023/A:1022193728205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tindall-Ford, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1997). When two sensory modes are better than one. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 3, 257–287. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.3.4.257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuovinen, J. E., & Paas, F. (2004). Exploring multidimensional approaches to the efficiency of instructional conditions. Instructional Science, 32, 133–152. doi:10.1023/b:truc.0000021813.24669.6210.1023/B:TRUC.0000021813.24669.62
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Gog, T., Kester, L., & Paas, F. (2011). Effects of worked examples, example-problem, and problem-example pairs on novices’ learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 212–218. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2008). Instructional efficiency: Revisiting the original construct in educational research. Educational Psychologist, 43, 16–26. doi:10.1080/00461520701756248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17, 147–177. doi:10.1007/s10648-005-3951-010.1007/s10648-005-3951-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent, J., Price, B., Caruso, N., McNamara, A., & Tynan, D. (2011). MathsWorld 7 Australian (curriculum ed.). South Yarra: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, E., & Cooper, T. J. (2005). Young children’s ability to use the balance strategy to solve for unknowns. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 17, 58–72. doi:10.1007/bf0321740910.1007/BF03217409
   Google Scholar
• Warren, E., & Cooper, T. J. (2009). Developing mathematics understanding and abstraction: The case of equivalence in the elementary years. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 21, 76–95. doi:10.1007/bf0321754610.1007/BF03217546
   Google Scholar
• Yeung, A. S., Jin, P., & Sweller, J. (1998). Cognitive load and learner expertise: Split-attention and redundancy effects in reading with explanatory notes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23(1), 1–21. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1997.0951
   Google Scholar