Testing two path models to explore relationships between students’ experiences of the teaching–learning environment, approaches to learning and academic achievement

References

• Almeida, P., Teixeira‐Dias, J., Martinho, M., & Balasooriya, C. (2011). The interplay between students’ perceptions of context and approaches to learning. Research Papers in Education, 26, 149–169.10.1080/02671522.2011.561975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, B., Lee, S., Simpson, M., & Stein, S. (2011). Study orchestrations in distance learning: Identifying dissonance and its implications for distance educators. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Baeten, M., Kyndt, E., Struyven, K., & Dochy, F. (2010). Using student-centred learning environments to stimulate deep approaches to learning: Factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness. Educational Psychology Review, 5, 243–260.
   Google Scholar
• Bandalos, D. L. (2002). The effects of item parceling on goodness-of-fit and parameter estimate bias in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 78–102.10.1207/S15328007SEM0901_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandalos, D. L., & Finney, S. J. (2001). Item parceling issues in structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling (pp. 269–296). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, R. (1999). Learning to work and working to learn. In D. Boud & J. Garrick (Eds.), Understanding learning at work (pp. 29–55). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, R. (2000). Realizing the university in an age of supercomplexity. Buckingham: Open University Press & The Society for Research into Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. (1993). What do inventories of students’ learning processes really measure? A theoretical review and clarification. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 3–19.10.1111/bjep.1993.63.issue-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (3rd ed.). Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22, 151–167.10.1080/713695728
   Google Scholar
• Bryne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, M., Flood, B., & Willis, P. (2004). Validation of the approaches and study skills inventory for students (ASSIST) using accounting students in the USA and Ireland: A research note. Accounting Education, 13, 449–459.10.1080/0963928042000306792
   Google Scholar
• Casella, G., & Berger, R. L. (2002). Statistical inference (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury.
   Google Scholar
• Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2008). Personality, intelligence and approaches to learning as predictors of academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1596–1603.10.1016/j.paid.2008.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E., & Ecclestone, K. (2004). Should we be using learning styles? What research has to say to practice. London: Learning and Skills Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Croon, M. (2002). Using predicted latent scores in general latent structure models. In G. A. Marcoulides & I. Moustaki (Eds.), Latent variable and latent structure models (pp. 195–224). Abingdon: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diseth, Å. (2001). Validation of a Norwegian version of the approaches and study skills inventory for students (ASSIST): Application of structural equation modelling. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 45, 381–394.10.1080/00313830120096789
   Google Scholar
• Diseth, Å. (2003). Personality and approaches to learning as predictors of academic achievement. European Journal of Personality, 17, 143–155.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diseth, Å. (2007). Approaches to learning, course experience and examination grade among undergraduate psychology students: Testing of mediator effects and construct validity. Studies in Higher Education, 32, 373–388.10.1080/03075070701346949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diseth, Å., & Martinsen, Ø. (2003). Approaches to learning, cognitive style, and motives as predictors of academic achievement. Educational Psychology, 23, 195–207.10.1080/01443410303225
   Google Scholar
• Diseth, Å., Pallesen, S., Brunborg, G., & Larsen, S. (2010). Academic achievement among first semester undergraduate psychology students: The role of course experience, effort, motives and learning strategies. Higher Education, 59, 335–352.10.1007/s10734-009-9251-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diseth, Å., Pallesen, S., Hovland, A., & Larsen, S. (2006). Course experience, approaches to learning and academic achievement. Education + Training, 48, 156–169.10.1108/00400910610651782
   Google Scholar
• Duff, A. (2003). Quality of learning on an MBA programme: The impact of approaches to learning in academic performance. Educational Psychology, 23, 127–139.
   Google Scholar
• Duff, A., Boyle, E., Dunleavy, K., & Ferguson, J. (2004). The relationship between personality, approach to learning and academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1907–1920.10.1016/j.paid.2003.08.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N. (2009). Teaching for understanding at university: Deep approaches and distinctive ways of thinking. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N., & Karagiannopoulou, E. (in press). Students’ perceptions of assessment and its influences on learning. In C. Kreber, C Anderson, N. Entwistle, & J. McArthur (Eds.), Advances and innovations in assessment and feedback. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N., & McCune, V. (2013). The disposition to understand for oneself at university: Integrating learning processes with motivation and metacognition. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 267–279.10.1111/bjep.2013.83.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N., McCune, V., & Hounsell, J. (2003). Investigating ways of enhancing university teaching-learning environments: Measuring students’ approaches to studying and perceptions of teaching. In E. De Corte, L. Verschaffel, N. Entwistle, & J. van Merrienboer (Eds.), Unravelling basic components and dimensions of powerful learning environments (pp. 89–107). Oxford: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N., McCune, V., & Walker, P. (2001). Conceptions, styles, and approaches within higher education: Analytical abstractions and everyday experience. In R. J. Sternberg & L. F. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on thinking, learning and cognitive styles (pp. 103–136). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. London: Croom Helm.
   Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N., & Tait, H. (1990). Approaches to learning, evaluations of teaching, and preferences for contrasting academic environments. Higher Education, 19, 169–194.10.1007/BF00137106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gijbels, D., & Dochy, F. (2006). Students’ assessment preferences and approaches to learning: Can formative assessment make a difference? Educational Studies, 32, 399–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heikkilä, A., & Lonka, K. (2006). Studying in higher education: Students’ approaches to learning, self‐regulation, and cognitive strategies. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 99–117.10.1080/03075070500392433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoshino, T., & Bentler, P. M. (2013). Bias in factor score regression and a simple solution. In A. R. de Leon & K. C. Chough (Eds.), Analysis of mixed data: Methods & applications (pp. 43–62). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karagiannopoulou, E. (2010). Effects of classroom learning experiences and examination type on students’ learning. In E. Karagiannopoulou & N. Entwistle (Eds.), Experiences of learning and academic understanding in higher education. Research into teaching and learning: The situation in Greece. Psychology: The Journal of the Hellenic Psychological Society, 17 (pp. 325–342). Athens: Ellinika Grammata.
   Google Scholar
• Karagiannopoulou, E., & Christodoulides, P. (2005). The impact of Greek University students’ perceptions of their learning environment on approaches to studying and academic outcomes. International Journal of Educational Research, 43, 329–350.10.1016/j.ijer.2006.05.002
   Google Scholar
• Karagiannopoulou, E., & Christodoulides, P. (2009). The approaches and study skills inventory for students: Reliability and validity in a Greek university students sample. In A. Brouzos, P. Misailidi, & A. Efklides (Eds.), Scientific annals of the psychological society of Northern Greece, Volume 7. Studies in psychological assessment (pp. 217–243). Athens: Ellinika Grammata.
   Google Scholar
• Karagiannopoulou, E., & Entwistle, N. (2013). Influences on the development of academic understanding: Approaches to learning, perceptions of assessment, and the ‘meeting of minds’. Psychology Teaching Review, 13, 80–96.
   Google Scholar
• Karagiannopoulou, E., & Milienos, F. S. (2013a). Exploring the relationship between experienced students’ preference for open- and closed-book examinations, approaches to learning and achievement. Educational Research and Evaluation, 19, 271–296.10.1080/13803611.2013.765691
   Google Scholar
• Karagiannopoulou, E., & Milienos, F. S. (2013b). Experiences of the teaching-learning environment and approaches to learning. Testing the structure of the ‘Experiences of Teaching and Learning Questionnaire’ in relation to earlier analyses. submitted.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Kreber, C. (2003). The relationship between students’ course perception and their approaches to studying in undergraduate science courses: A Canadian experience. Higher Education Research & Development, 22, 57–75.10.1080/0729436032000058623
   Google Scholar
• Lawless, C., & Richardson, J. T. E. (2002). Approaches to studying and perceptions of academic quality in distance education. Higher Education, 44, 257–282.10.1023/A:1016315114558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2003). Broadening an understanding of the phenomenon of dissonance. Studies in Higher Education, 28, 63–77.10.1080/03075070309306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lizzio, A., Wilson, K., & Simons, R. (2002). University students’ perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: Implications for theory and practice. Studies in Higher Education, 27, 27–52.10.1080/03075070120099359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, I. R. R., & Thomas, D. R. (2008). Avoiding and correcting bias in score-based latent variable regression with discrete manifest items. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 15, 462–490.10.1080/10705510802154323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W. (1987). Students’ evaluations of university teaching: Research findings, methodological issues, and directions for future research. International Journal of Educational Research, 11, 253–388.10.1016/0883-0355(87)90001-2
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I-outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4–11.10.1111/bjep.1976.46.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1997). Approaches to learning. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning. Implications for teaching and studying in higher education (2nd ed., pp. 39–58). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Svensson, L. (1979). Conceptions of research in student learning. Higher Education, 8, 471–486.10.1007/BF01680537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Newble, D. I., & Entwistle, N. (1986). Learning styles and approaches: Implications for medical education. Medical Education, 20, 162–175.10.1111/medu.1986.20.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newstead, S. E. (1992). A study of two ‘quick-and-easy’ methods of assessing individual differences in student learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 299–312.10.1111/bjep.1992.62.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Northedge, A., & McArthur, J. (2009). Guiding students into a discipline: The significance of the teacher. In C. Kreber (Ed.), The university and its disciplines: Teaching and learning within and beyond disciplinary boundaries (pp. 107–118). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Parpala, A., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2012). Using a research instrument for developing quality at the university. Quality in Higher Education, 18, 313–328.10.1080/13538322.2012.733493
   Google Scholar
• Parpala, A., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Komulainen, E., & Entwistle, N. (2013). Assessing students’ experiences of teaching-learning environments and approaches to learning: Validation of a questionnaire used in different countries and varying contexts. Learning Environments Research, 16, 201–215.
   Google Scholar
• Parpala, A., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Komulainen, E., Litmanen, T., & Hirsto, L. (2010). Students’ approaches to learning and their experiences of the teaching-learning environment in different disciplines. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 269–282.10.1348/000709909X476946
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prosser, M., & Sendlak, I. (1994). Student evaluation of teaching questionnaire. Research and Development in Higher Education, 16, 551–555.
   Google Scholar
• Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999a). Relational perspectives on higher education teaching and learning in the sciences. Studies in Science Education, 33, 31–60.10.1080/03057269908560135
   Google Scholar
• Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999b). Understanding learning and teaching: The experience in higher education. Buckingham: SRHE & Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prosser, M., Trigwell, K., Hazel, E., & Gallagher, P. (1994). Students’ experiences of teaching and learning at the topic level. Research and Development in Higher Education, 16, 305–310.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsden, P. (1991). A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The course experience questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education, 16, 129–150.10.1080/03075079112331382944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsden, P., Martin, E., & Bowden, J. (1989). School environment and sixth form pupils’ approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 368–383.
   Google Scholar
• Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2006). A first course in structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. (2013). Exploring the factors affecting academic achievement. Discussion paper presented at the 15th EARLI Conference ‘Responsible teaching and sustainable learning’, Munich Technological Institute, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. T. E. (2003). Approaches to studying and perceptions of academic quality in a short web-based course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34, 433–442.10.1111/bjet.2003.34.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. T. E. (2005). Students’ perceptions of academic quality and approaches to studying in distance education. British Educational Research Journal, 31, 7–27.10.1080/0141192052000310001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. T. E. (2006). Investigating the relationship between variations in students’ perceptions of their academic environment and variations in study behaviour in distance education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 867–893.10.1348/000709905X69690
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. T. E. (2007). Variations in student learning and perceptions of academic quality. In N. Entwistle & P. D. Tomlinson (Eds.), Student learning and university teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology, Monograph Series II: Psychological Aspects of Education – Current Trends (pp. 61–71). Leicester: Psychological Society.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. T. E. (2010). Perceived academic quality and approaches to studying in higher education: Evidence from Danish students of occupational therapy. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 54, 189–203.10.1080/00313831003637972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. T. E., & Price, L. (2003). Approaches to studying and perceptions of academic quality in electronically delivered courses. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34, 45–56.10.1111/bjet.2003.34.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rytkönen, H., Parpala, A., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Virtanen, V., & Postareff, L. (2012). Factors affecting bioscience students’ academic achievement. Instructional Science, 40, 241–256.10.1007/s11251-011-9176-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadlo, G., & Richardson, J. T. E. (2003). Approaches to studying and perceptions of the academic environment in students following problem-based and subject-based curricula. Higher Education Research & Development, 22, 253–274.10.1080/0729436032000145130
   Google Scholar
• Skrondal, A., & Laake, P. (2001). Regression among factor scores. Psychometrika, 66, 563–575.10.1007/BF02296196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Struyven, K., Dochy, F., & Janssens, S. (2003). Student’s perceptions about new modes of assessment in higher education. In M. Segers, F. Dochy, & E. Cascallar (Eds.), Optimising new modes of assessment: In search of qualities and standards (pp. 171–223). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/0-306-48125-1
   Google Scholar
• Struyven, K., Dochy, F., Janssens, S., & Gielen, S. (2006). On the dynamics of students’ approaches to learning: The effects of the teaching/learning environment. Learning and Instruction, 16, 279–294.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tait, H., Entwistle, N., & McCune, V. (1998). ASSIST: A reconceptualisation of the approaches to studying inventory. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student learning: Improving students as learners (pp. 262–271). Oxford: Oxford Brooks University, Centre for Staff and Learning Development.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, P. R., & Bain, J. D. (1984). Contextual dependence of learning approaches: The effects of assessments. Human Learning, 3, 227–240.
   Google Scholar
• Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1991). Improving the quality of student learning: The influence of learning context and student approaches to learning on learning outcomes. Higher Education, 22, 251–266.10.1007/BF00132290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valadas, S. C., Gonçalves, F., & Faísca, L. (2010). Approaches to studying in higher education Portuguese students: A Portuguese version of the approaches and study skills inventory for students. Higher Education, 59, 259–275.10.1007/s10734-009-9246-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermetten, Y. J., Lodewijks, H. G., & Vermunt, J. D. (1999). Consistency and variability of learning strategies in different university courses. Higher Education, 37, 1–21.10.1023/A:1003573727713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wachtel, H. (1998). Student evaluation of college teaching effectiveness: A brief review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 23, 191–212.10.1080/0260293980230207
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, D. (1982). Identifying the study process dimensions of Australian university students. Australian Journal of Education, 26, 76–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins, D. (1983). Assessing tertiary study processes. Human Learning, 2, 29–37.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, D. (1986). The approaches to learning of Australian tertiary students: A replication. Higher Education Research & Development, 5, 185–190.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, D. (2001). Correlates of approaches to learning: A cross-cultural meta-analysis. In R. Sternberg & L. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles (pp. 165–195). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, R. (2004). Chinese mainland students’ experiences of teaching and learning at a Chinese University: Some Emerging Findings. Paper presented at the BERA Conference, Manchester, UK.
   Google Scholar