The effect of being graded on later achievement: evidence from 13-year olds in Swedish compulsory school

References

• Alexander, R. (Ed.). (2010). Children, their world, their education. Final report and recommendations of the Cambridge primary review. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Azmat, G., & Iriberri, N. (2009). The importance of relative performance feedback information: Evidence from a natural experiment using high school students. CEP Discussion Paper No. 915, Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics and Political Science.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Benmansour, N. (1999). Motivational orientations, self-efficacy, anxiety and strategy use in learning high school mathematics in Morocco. Mediterranean Journal of Educational Studies, 4, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5, 7–74.10.1080/0969595980050102
   Google Scholar
• Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Grading and learning practices that support student achievement. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, R. (1988). Enhancing and undermining intrinsic motivation: The effects of task-involving and ego-involving evaluation on interest and performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 1–14.10.1111/j.2044-8279.1988.tb00874.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, J. (2001). Negative effects of reward on intrinsic motivation–A limited phenomenon: Comment on Deci, Koestner, and Ryan (2001). Review of Educational Research, 71, 29–42.10.3102/00346543071001029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covington, M. V. (2000). Goal theory, motivation, and school achievement: An integrative review. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 171–200.10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crooks, T. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of Educational Research, 58, 438–481.10.3102/00346543058004438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 627–668.10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (2001). Extrinsic rewards and intrinsic motivation in education: Reconsidered once again. Review of Educational Research, 71, 1–27.10.3102/00346543071001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, P. D. (2010). The essential guide to effect sizes. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511761676
   Google Scholar
• Evans, E., & Engelberg, R. (1988). Pupils’ perceptions of school grading. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 21, 44–54.
   Google Scholar
• Frydenberg, E. (2008). Adolescent coping: Advances in theory, research and practice. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, J.-E., & Yang Hansen, K. (2009). Resultatutvecklingen i den svenska grundskolan [The development of results in Swedish comprehensive school]. In Skolverket (Ed.), Vad påverkar resultaten i svensk grundskola? Kunskapsöversikt om betydelsen av olika faktorer [What affects the results in the Swedish compulsory school? A research review of the importance of different factors.] (pp. 40–83). Stockholm: Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• Harlen, W., & Deakin Crick, R. (2002). A systematic review of the impact of summative assessment and tests on students′ motivation for learning (EPPI-Centre Review, version 1.1*). Research Evidence in Educational Library. Issue 1. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Harlen, W., & Deakin Crick, R. (2003). Testing and motivation for learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 10, 169–207.10.1080/0969594032000121270
   Google Scholar
• Härnqvist, K. (2000). Evaluation through follow-up. A longitudinal program for studying education and career development. In C.-G. Janson (Ed.), Seven Swedish longitudinal studies in behavioural science (pp. 76–114). Forskningsrådsnämnden: Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of 800+ meta-analyses on achievement. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. A. C., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feed-back. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44, 513–524.10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobfoll, S. E. (2001). The influence of culture, community, and the nested-self in the stress process: Advancing conservation of resources theory. Applied Psychology, 50, 337–421.10.1111/apps.2001.50.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, J., & McClune, W. (2000). Selection project sel 5.1: Pupil motivation and attitudes – Self-esteem, locus of control, learning disposition and the impact of selection on teaching and learning. Belfast: Queen’s University.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, W. H., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2001). Reunification of East and West German school systems: Longitudinal multilevel modeling study of the Big-Fish-Little-Pond effect on academic self-concept. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 321–350.10.3102/00028312038002321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, H. H., & Weinstein, R. S. (1984). Classroom factors affecting students’ self-evaluations: An interactional model. Review of Educational Research, 54, 301–325.10.3102/00346543054003301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meece, J. L., Glienke, B. B., & Burg, S. (2006). Gender and motivation. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 351–373.10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, P. (2000). Equity, assessment and gender. In J. Salisbury & S. Riddell (Eds.), Gender, policy and educational change (pp. 134–152). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, B., Kaplan, D., & Hollis, M. (1987). On structural equation modeling with data that are not missing completely at random. Psychometrika, 52, 431–462.10.1007/BF02294365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2009). Mplus user’s guide (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, B., & Satorra, A. (1995). Technical aspects of Muthén’s LISCOMP approach to estimation of latent variable relations with a comprehensive measurement model. Psychometrika, 60, 489–503.10.1007/BF02294325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Agency for Education (2014). Beskrivande data 2013 [Descriptive statistics 2013]. Retrieved February 6, 2014, from http://www.skolverket.se/statistik-och-utvardering/laget-i-forskola-skola/beskrivande-data/overgang-mellan-grundskola-och-gymnasieskola-1.217772
   Google Scholar
• Natriello, G. (1987). The impact of evaluation processes on students. Educational Psychologist, 22, 155–175.10.1207/s15326985ep2202_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollard, A., Triggs, P., Broadfoot, P., Mcness, E., & Osborn, M. (2000). What pupils say: Changing policy and practice in primary education (chapters 7 and 10). London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Reay, D., & Wiliam, D. (1999). ‘I’ ll be a nothing’: Structure, agency and the construction of identity through assessment. British Educational Research Journal, 25, 343–354.10.1080/0141192990250305
   Google Scholar
• Rosén, M. (1998). Gender differences in patterns of knowledge. Gothenburg studies in educational science, Vol. 124. Gothenburg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenholtz, R. S., & Rosenholtz, S. J. (1981). Classroom organization and the perception of ability. Sociology of Education, 54, 132–140.10.2307/2112357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, C. (1981). Classroom structure and the organization of ability. Sociology of Education, 54, 120–132.10.2307/2112356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjögren, A. (2010). Graded children – Evidence of long-run consequences of school grades from a nationwide reform. Uppsala: IFAU – Institute for Labour Market Policy Evaluation.
   Google Scholar
• Svensson, A. (1971). Relative achievement. School performance in relation to intelligence, sex and home environment. Göteborg studies in educational science, Vol. 6. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37, 3–14.10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001
   Google Scholar