Personality similarity between teachers and their students influences teacher judgement of student achievement

References

• Ajzen, I. (1974). Effects of information on interpersonal attraction: Similarity versus affective value. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 374–380. doi:10.1037/h0036002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, K. L., Entwisle, D. R., & Thompson, M. S. (1987). School performance, status relations, and the structure of sentiment: Bringing the teacher back in. American Sociological Review, 52, 665–682.10.2307/2095602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artelt, C., & Rausch, T. (2014). Accuracy of teacher judgements. When and for what reasons? In S. Krolak-Schwerdt, S. Glock, & M. Böhmer (Eds.), Teachers’ professional development (pp. 27–43). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.10.1007/978-94-6209-536-6
   Google Scholar
• Bates, C., & Nettelbeck, T. (2001). Primary school teachers’ judgements of reading achievement. Educational Psychology, 21, 177–187. doi:10.1080/01443410020043878
   Google Scholar
• Baumert, J., & Kunter, M. (2006). Stichwort: Professionelle Kompetenz von Lehrkräften [Teachers’ professional competence]. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 9, 469–520. doi:10.1007/s11618-006-0165-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, R. E., Gottesman, R. L., Rock, D. A., & Cerullo, F. (1993). Influence of behavior perceptions and gender on teacher’s judgements of students’ academic skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 347–356. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.2.347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blien, U., Wiedenbeck, M., & Arminger, G. (1994). Reconciling macro and micro perspectives by multilevel models: An application to regional wage differences. In I. Borg & P. P. Mohler (Eds.), Trends and perspectives in empirical social research (pp. 266–282). Berlin: de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Brunner, M., Anders, Y., Hachfeld, A., & Krauss, S. (2011). Diagnostische Fähigkeiten von Mathematiklehrkräften [Mathematics teachers’ diagnostic skills]. In M. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, & U. Klusmann (Eds.), Professionelle Kompetenz von Lehrkräften: Ergebnisse des Forschungsprogramms COACTIV (pp. 215–234). Münster: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, D. (1997). An overview (and underview) of research and theory within the attraction paradigm. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14, 417–431. doi:10.1177/0265407597143008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, M., & Kurtz-Costes, B. E. (1994). Is being smart everything? The influence of student achievement on teachers’ perceptions. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 263–276. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1994.tb01101.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coladarci, T. (1986). Accuracy of teacher judgements of student responses to standardized test items. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 141–146. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.78.2.141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J., & Gleser, G. C. (1953). Assessing similarity between profiles. Psychological Bulletin, 50, 456–473. doi:10.1037/h0057173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demaray, M. K., & Elliott, S. N. (1998). Teachers’ judgements of students’ academic functioning: A comparison of actual and predicted performances. School Psychology Quarterly, 13, 8–24. doi:10.1037/h0088969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dipboye, R., & Gaugler, B. B. (1993). Cognitive and behavioral processes in the selection interview. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 135–170). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Englehart, J. M. (2009). Teacher–student interaction. In L. J. Saha & A. G. Dworkin (Eds.), International handbook of research on teachers and teaching (pp. 711–722). Boston, MA: Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-73317-3
   Google Scholar
• Feinberg, A. B., & Shapiro, E. S. (2009). Teacher accuracy: An examination of teacher-based judgements of students’ reading with differing achievement levels. The Journal of Educational Research, 102, 453–462. doi:10.3200/JOER.102.6.453-462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaunt, R. (2006). Couple similarity and martial satisfaction: Are similar spouses happier? Journal of Personality, 74, 1401–1420. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00414.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlitz, J.-Y., & Schupp, J. (2005). Zur Erhebung der Big-Five-basierten Persönlichkeitsmerkmale im SOEP [Assessment of big-five-based personality traits in the German socioeconomic panel study]. Berlin: DIW.
   Google Scholar
• Graubard, B. I., & Korn, E. L. (1994). Regression analysis with clustered data. Statistics in Medicine, 13, 509–522. doi:10.1002/sim.4780130514
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadley, S. T. (1954). A school mark – Fact or fancy? Educational Administration and Supervision, 40, 305–312.
   Google Scholar
• Hany, E. A. (1997). Modeling teachers’ judgement of giftedness: A methodological inquiry of biased judgement. High Ability Studies, 8, 159–178. doi:10.1080/1359813970080203
   Google Scholar
• Helmke, A. (2007). Unterrichtsqualität erfassen, bewerten, verbessern [Assessment, evaluation, and improvement of instructional quality]. Stuttgart: Klett/Kallmeyer.
   Google Scholar
• Hoge, R. D., & Coladarci, T. (1989). Teacher-based judgements of academic achievement: A review of literature. Review of Educational Research, 59, 297–313. doi:10.3102/00346543059003297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins, K. D., George, C. A., & Williams, D. D. (1985). The concurrent validity of standardized achievement tests by content area using teachers’ ratings as criteria. Journal of Educational Measurement, 22, 177–182. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1985.tb01056.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurwitz, J. T., Elliott, S. N., & Braden, J. P. (2007). The influence of test familiarity and student disability status upon teachers’ judgements of students’ test performance. School Psychology Quarterly, 22, 115–144. doi:10.1037/1045-3830.22.2.115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Impara, J. C., & Plake, B. S. (1998). Teachers’ ability to estimate item difficulty: A test of assumptions in the Angoff standard setting method. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 69–81. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1998.tb00528.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itskowitz, R., Navon, R., & Strauss, H. (1988). Teachers’ accuracy in evaluating students’ self-image: Effect of perceived closeness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 337–341. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jussim, L., Eccles, J., & Madon, S. (1996). Social perception, social stereotypes, and teacher expectations: Accuracy and the quest for the powerful self-fulfilling prophecy. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 281–388.10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60240-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, J., Helm, F., Retelsdorf, J., Südkamp, A., & Möller, J. (2012). Zum Zusammenhang von Intelligenz und Urteilsgenauigkeit bei der Beurteilung von Schülerleistungen im Simulierten Klassenraum [On the relation of intelligence and judgement accuracy in the process of assessing student achievement in the simulated classroom]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 26, 251–261. doi:10.1024/1010-0652/a000076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, J., Retelsdorf, J., Südkamp, A., & Möller, J. (2013). Achievement and engagement: How student characteristics influence teacher judgements. Learning and Instruction, 28, 73–84. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karing, C., Matthäi, J., & Artelt, C. (2011). Genauigkeit von Lehrerurteilen über die Lesekompetenz ihrer Schülerinnen und Schüler in der Sekundarstufe I – Eine Frage der Spezifität? [Lower secondary school teacher judgement accuracy of students’ reading competence – A matter of specificity?]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 25, 159–172. doi:10.1024/1010-0652/a000041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kreft, I. G. G. (1996). Are multilevel techniques necessary? An overview, including simulation studies. Los Angeles: California State University.
   Google Scholar
• Kruglanski, A. W., & Ajzen, I. (1983). Bias and error in human judgement. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 1–44. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420130102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, S., & Klohnen, E. C. (2005). Assortative mating and martial quality in newlyweds: A couple-centered approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 304–326. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.2.304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montoya, R. M., & Horton, R. S. (2013). A meta-analytic investigation of the processes underlying the similarity-attraction effect. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 64–94. doi:10.1177/0265407512452989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montoya, R. M., Horton, R. S., & Kirchner, J. (2008). Is actual similarity necessary for attraction? A meta-analysis of actual and perceived similarity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25, 889–922. doi:10.1177/0265407508096700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ready, D. D., & Wright, D. L. (2011). Accuracy and inaccuracy in teachers’ perceptions of young children’s cognitive abilities: The role of child background and classroom context. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 335–360. doi:10.3102/0002831210374874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritts, V., Patterson, M. L., & Tubbs, M. E. (1992). Expectations, impressions, and judgements of physically attractive students: A review. Review of Educational Research, 62, 413–426. doi:10.3102/00346543062004413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrader, F.-W., & Helmke, A. (1990). Lassen sich Lehrer bei der Leistungsbeurteilung von sachfremden Gesichtspunkten leiten? Eine Untersuchung zu Determinanten diagnostischer Lehrerurteile [Let teachers guide themselves by inappropriate factors when judging their students’ abilities? Determinants of teacher judgements]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 22, 312–324.
   Google Scholar
• Shavelson, R. J., & Stern, P. (1981). Research on teachers’ pedagogical thoughts, judgements, decisions, and behavior. Review of Educational Research, 51, 455–498. doi:10.3102/00346543051004455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, J. P., Barrick, M. R., & Connerley, M. L. (2001). An investigation of personality similarity effects (relational and perceived) on peer and supervisor ratings and the role of familiarity and liking. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 637–657. doi:10.1348/096317901167569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Südkamp, A., Kaiser, J., & Möller, J. (2012). Accuracy of teachers’ judgements of students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 743–762. doi:10.1037/a0027627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S. S., Treat, T. A., & Brownell, K. D. (2008). Cognitive processing about classroom-relevant contexts: Teachers’ attention to and utilization of girls’ body size, ethnicity, attractiveness, and facial affect. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 473–489. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar