Changes over time and transfer of analogy-problem solving of gifted and non-gifted children in a dynamic testing setting

References

• Agresti, A. (2010). Analysis of ordinal categorical data. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.10.1002/9780470594001
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, P. A., & Murphy, P. K. (1999). Nurturing the seeds of transfer: A domain-specific perspective. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 561–576. doi:10.1016/s0883-0355(99)00024-5
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, S. M., & Ceci, S. J. (2002). When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 612–637. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.4.612
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosma, T., & Resing, W. C. M. (2006). Dynamic assessment and a reversal task: A contribution to needs-based assessment. Educational and Child Psychology, 23, 81–98. doi:10.1891/1945-8959.9.2.91
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2001). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Calero, M. D., García-Martín, M. B., Jiménez, M. I., Kazén, M., & Araque, A. (2007). Self-regulation advantage for high-IQ children: Findings from a research study. Learning and Individual Differences, 17, 328–343. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2007.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calero, M. D., García-Martín, M. B., & Robles, M. A. (2011). Learning Potential in high IQ children: The contribution of dynamic assessment to the identification of gifted children. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 176–181. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2010.11.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campione, J. C., Brown, A. L., Ferrara, R. A., Jones, R. S., & Steinberg, E. (1985). Breakdowns in flexible use of information: Intelligence-related differences in transfer following equivalent learning performance. Intelligence, 9, 297–315. doi:10.1016/0160-2896(85)90017-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caropreso, E. J., & White, C. S. (1994). Analogical reasoning and giftedness: A comparison between identified gifted and nonidentified children. The Journal of Educational Research, 87, 271–278. doi:10.1080/00220671.1994.9941254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, M., Alexander, J. M., & Schwanenflugel, P. J. (1996). Where gifted children do and do not excel on metacognitive tasks. Roeper Review, 16, 198–204. doi:10.1080/02783199609553740
   Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H., & VanLehn, K. A. (2012). Seeing deep structure from the interactions of surface features. Educational Psychologist, 47, 177–188. doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.695709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clerc, J., Miller, P. H., & Cosnefroy, L. (2014). Young children’s transfer of strategies: Utilization deficiencies, executive function, and metacognition. Developmental Review, 34, 378–393. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2014.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, S. B., & Goldstone, R. L. (2012). The import of knowledge export: Connecting findings and theories of transfer of learning. Educational Psychologist, 47, 153–176. doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.696438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, J. G. (2003). Dynamic assessment in educational settings: Realising potential. Educational Review, 55, 15–32. doi:10.1080/00131910303253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, J. G., Grigorenko, E. L., & Resing, W. C. M. (2010). Dynamic assessment: The need for a dynamic approach. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (Vol. 3, pp. 220–225). Oxford: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-044894-7.00311-0
   Google Scholar
• Ferrara, R. A., Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1986). Children’s learning and transfer of inductive reasoning rules: studies of proximal development. Child Development, 57, 1087–1099. doi:10.2307/1130433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, K. L., & Speirs Neumeister, K. L. (2012). Research on perfectionism and achievement motivation: Implications for gifted students. Psychology in the Schools, 49, 668–677. doi:10.1002/pits.21623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forbus, K. D., Gentner, D., & Law, K. (1995). MAC/FAC: A model of similarity-based retrieval. Cognitive Science, 19, 141–205. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1902_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geake, J. G. (2008). High abilities at fluid analogizing: A cognitive neuroscience construct of giftedness. Roeper Review, 30, 187–195. doi:10.1080/02783190802201796
   Google Scholar
• Gentner, D., Holyoak, K. J., & Kokinov, B. N. (Eds.). (2001). The analogical mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gentner, D., Loewenstein, J., & Hung, B. (2007). Comparison facilitates children’s learning of names for parts. Journal of Cognition and Development, 8, 285–307. doi:10.1080/15248370701446434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 1–38. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(83)90002-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goswami, U. C. (2012). Analogical reasoning by young children. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning (pp. 225–228). New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_993
   Google Scholar
• Harpaz-Itay, Y., Kaniel, S., & Ben-Amram, E. (2006). Analogy construction versus analogy solution, and their influence on transfer. Learning and Instruction, 16, 583–591. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holyoak, K. J. (1984). Analogical thinking and human intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence, Vol. 2 (pp. 199–230). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Hosenfeld, B., Van den Boom, D. C., & Resing, W. C. M. (1997). New instrument: Constructing geometric analogies for the longitudinal testing of elementary children. Journal of Educational Measurement, 34, 367–372. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1997.tb00524.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeltova, I., Birney, D., Fredine, N., Jarvin, L., Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2007). Dynamic assessment as a process-oriented assessment in educational settings. Advances in Speech-Language Pathology, 9, 273–285. doi:10.1080/14417040701460390
   Google Scholar
• Kanevsky, L. S. (1990). Pursuing qualitative differences in the flexible use of problem-solving strategy by young children. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 13, 115–140. doi:10.1177/016235329001300202
   Google Scholar
• Kanevsky, L. S. (2000). Dynamic assessment of gifted students. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 283–296). Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Klahr, D., & Chen, Z. (2011). Finding one’s place in transfer space. Child Development Perspectives, 5, 196–204. doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2011.00171.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klauer, K. J., & Phye, G. D. (2008). Inductive reasoning: A training approach. Review of Educational Research, 78, 85–123. doi:10.3102/0034654307313402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klavir, R., & Gorodetsky, M. (2001). The Processing of analogous problems in the verbal and visual-humorous (Cartoons) modalities by gifted/average children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 45, 205–215. doi:10.1177/001698620104500305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohnstamm, G. A. (2014). Jean Piaget: Children and the inclusion problem. New Jersey, NJ: Transactions.
   Google Scholar
• Kornilov, S., Tan, M., Elliott, J. G., Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2012). Gifted identification with Aurora: Widening the spotlight. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30, 117–133. doi:10.1177/0734282911428199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyllonen, P. C., Lohman, D. F., & Snow, R. E. (1984). Effects of aptitudes, strategy training, and task facets on spatial task performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 130–145. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.76.1.130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leech, R., Mareschal, D., & Cooper, R. P. (2008). Analogy as relational priming: A developmental and computational perspective on the origins of a complex cognitive skill. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 357–414. doi:10.1017/s0140525x08004469
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mestre, J. P. (Ed.). (2005). Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Mulholland, T. M., Pellegrino, J. W., & Glaser, R. (1980). Components of geometric analogy solution. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 252–284. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(80)90011-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nokes-Malach, T. J., & Mestre, J. P. (2013). Toward a model of transfer as sense-making. Educational Psychologist, 48, 184–207. doi:10.1080/00461520.2013.807556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellegrino, J. W., & Glaser, R. (1982). Analyzing aptitudes for learning: Inductive reasoning. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (pp. 269–345). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Raven, J. (1981). Manual for Raven’s progressive matrices and vocabulary scales. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S., Smith, L. H., White, A. J., Callahan, C. M., Hartman, R. K., & Westberg, K. L. (1997). Scales for rating the behavioral characteristics of superior students. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
   Google Scholar
• Resing, W. C. M., Bakker, M., Pronk, C. M. E., & Elliott, J. G. (2016). Dynamic testing and transfer: An examination of children’s problem-solving strategies. Learning and Individual Differences, 49, 110–119. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2016.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resing, W. C. M., & Elliott, J. G. (2011). Dynamic testing with tangible electronics: Measuring children’s change in strategy use with a series completion task. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 579–605. doi:10.1348/2044-8279.002006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resing, W. C. M., Tunteler, E., & Elliott, J. G. (2015). The effect of dynamic testing with electronic prompts and scaffolds on children’s inductive reasoning: A microgenetic study. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 14, 231–251. doi:10.1891/1945-8959.14.2.231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resing, W. C. M., Xenidou-Dervou, I., Steijn, W. M. P., & Elliott, J. G. (2012). A ‘picture’ of children’s potential for learning: Looking into strategy changes and working memory by dynamic testing. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 144–150. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2011.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richland, L. E., & Burchinal, M. R. (2012). Early executive function predicts reasoning development. Psychological Science, 24, 87–92. doi:10.1177/0956797612450883
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson-Zañartu, C., & Carlson, J. (2013). Dynamic assessment. In K. F. Geisinger (Ed.), APA Handbook of testing and assessment in psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 149–167). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/14049-007
   Google Scholar
• Roth-van der Werf, T. G. M., Resing, W. C. M., & Slenders, A. P. A. C. (2002). Task similarity and transfer of an inductive reasoning training. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 296–325. doi:10.1006/ceps.2001.1096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegler, R. S. (2006). Microgenetic analysis of learning. In W. Damon & R.M. Lerner (Series Eds.) & D. Kuhn & R. S. Siegler (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol 2. Cognition, perception, and language (6th ed., pp. 464–510). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2002). Dynamic testing. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, C. E., Heiser, W. J., & Resing, W. C. M. (2013). Working memory as a moderator of training and transfer of analogical reasoning in children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38, 159–169. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tunteler, E., Pronk, C. M. E., & Resing, W. C. M. (2008). Inter- and intra-individual variability in the process of change in the use of analogical strategies to solve geometric tasks in children: A microgenetic analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 44–60. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2007.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzuriel, D. (2007). Transfer effects of teaching conceptual versus perceptual analogies. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 6, 194–217. doi:10.1891/194589507787382232
   Google Scholar
• Tzuriel, D., & George, T. (2009). Improvement of analogical reasoning and academic achievements by the analogical reasoning program (ARP). Educational and Child Psychology, 29, 71–93.
   Google Scholar
• Zook, K. Z., & Maier, J. M. (1994). Systematic analysis of variables that contribute to the formation of analogical misconceptions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 589–600. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.86.4.589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar