Academic dishonesty among Hong Kong secondary school students: application of theory of planned behaviour

References

• Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11–39). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (1987). Attitudes, traits, and actions: Dispositional prediction of behavior in personality and social psychology. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 20, pp. l–63). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived Behavioral Control, Self-Efficacy, Locus of Control, and the Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32 (4): 665–683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 888–918.10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I., & Madden, T. J. (1986). Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22(5), 453–474.10.1016/0022-1031(86)90045-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderman, E. M., Griesinger, T., & Westerfield, G. (1998). Motivation and cheating during early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 84–93.10.1037/0022-0663.90.1.84
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A metaanalytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(4), 471–499.10.1348/014466601164939
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147.10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, L., & Ajzen, I. (1991). Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 25(3), 285–301.10.1016/0092-6566(91)90021-H
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.10.1002/9781118619179
   Google Scholar
• Education Bureau (2015). Personal, social and humanities education key learning area: Ethics and religious studies curriculum and assessment guide (secondary 4–6). Hong Kong: Hong Kong Education Bureau.
   Google Scholar
• Castro-Schilo, L., Widaman, K. F., & Grimm, K. J. (2013). Neglect the structure of multitrait-multimethod data at your peril: Implications for associations with external variables. Structural Equation Modeling, 20(2), 181–207.10.1080/10705511.2013.769385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, K. J., & Lupton, R. A. (2004). Academic dishonesty in a global educational market: A comparison of Hong Kong and American university business students. International Journal of Educational Management, 18(7), 425–435.
   Google Scholar
• Chinese University of Hong Kong. (2015). Honesty in academic work: A guide for students and teachers. Retrieved from http://www.cuhk.edu.hk/policy/academichonesty/
   Google Scholar
• Christakis, E., & Christakis, N. A. (2012). Harvard cheating scandal: Is academic dishonesty on the rise? Time. Retrieved from http://ideas.time.com/2012/09/04/harvard-cheatingscandal-is-academic-dishonesty-on-the-rise/
   Google Scholar
• Chudzicka-Czupała, A., Grabowski, D., Mello, A. L., Kuntz, J., Zaharia, D. V., Hapon, N., … Börü, D. (2016). Application of the theory of planned behavior in academic cheating research–cross-cultural comparison. Ethics & Behavior, 26, 638–659.10.1080/10508422.2015.1112745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, D. A., Ciesla, J. A., & Steiger, J. H. (2007). The insidious effects of failing to include design-driven correlated residuals in latent-variable covariance structure analysis. Psychological Methods, 12(4), 381–398.10.1037/1082-989X.12.4.381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Eid, M. (2000). A multitrait-multimethod model with minimal assumptions. Psychometrika, 65(2), 241–261.10.1007/BF02294377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eid, M., Lischetzke, T., Nussbeck, F. W., & Trierweiler, L. I. (2003). Separating trait effects from trait-specific method effects in multitrait-multimethod models: A multiple-indicator CT-C (M-1) model. Psychological Methods, 8(1), 38–60.10.1037/1082-989X.8.1.38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, X., & Sivo, S. A. (2007). Sensitivity of fit indices to model misspecification and model types. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(3), 509–529.10.1080/00273170701382864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, X., Thompson, B., & Wang, L. (1999). Effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexes. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 56–83.10.1080/10705519909540119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Genereux, R. L., & McLeod, B. A. (1995). Circumstances surrounding cheating: A questionnaire study of college students. Research in Higher Education, 36(6), 687–704.10.1007/BF02208251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding, T. S., Mayhew, M. J., Finelli, C. J., & Carpenter, D. D. (2007). The theory of planned behavior as a model of academic dishonesty in engineering and humanities undergraduates. Ethics and Behavior, 17(3), 255–279.10.1080/10508420701519239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G., & McCrea, R. R. (2004). Personality and culture revisited: Linking traits and dimensions of culture. Cross-Cultural Research, 38(1), 52–88.10.1177/1069397103259443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstee, W., Berge, J. T., & Hendriks, A. (1998). How to score questionnaires. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 897–909.10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00086-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kam, C. C. S., & Meyer, J. P. (2015). Implications of item keying and item valence for the investigation of construct dimensionality. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(4), 457–469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M., & Hunter, J. E. (1993). Relationships among attitudes, behavioral intentions, and behavior: A meta-analysis of past research (Part 2). Communication Research, 20(3), 331–364.10.1177/009365093020003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kisamore, J. L., Stone, T. H., & Jawahar, I. (2007). Academic integrity: The relationship between individual and situational factors on misconduct contemplations. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(4), 381–394.10.1007/s10551-006-9260-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kurland, N. B. (1995). Ethical intentions and the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25(4), 297–313.10.1111/jasp.1995.25.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C. S., & Wen, L. M. (2007). Academic dishonesty in higher education – A nationwide study in Taiwan. Higher Education, 54(1), 85–97.10.1007/s10734-006-9047-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonsdale, D. (2017). Intentions to cheat: Ajzen’s planned behavior and goal-related personality facets. The Journal of Psychology, 151, 113–129.10.1080/00223980.2016.1241737
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsden, H., Carroll, M., & Neill, J. T. (2005). Who cheats at university? A self-report study of dishonest academic behaviours in a sample of Australian university students. Australian Journal of Psychology, 57(1), 1–10.10.1080/00049530412331283426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W. (1996). Positive and negative self-esteem: A substantively meaningful distinction or artifactors? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(4), 810–819.10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.810
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, K. A. (2002). Friends: The role of peer influence across adolescent risk behaviors. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31(4), 267–277.10.1023/A:1015493316865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, D. R., & Pauli, K. P. (2002). The role of moral intensity in ethical decision making: A review and investigation of moral recognition, evaluation, and intention. Business & Society, 41(1), 84–117.10.1177/0007650302041001006
   Google Scholar
• Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Coffman, D. L. (2006). Random intercept item factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 11, 344–362.10.1037/1082-989X.11.4.344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaels, J. W., & Miethe, T. D. (1989). Applying theories of deviance to academic cheating. Social Science Quarterly, 70(4), 870–885.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102(2), 246–268.10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murdock, T. B., & Anderman, E. M. (2006). Motivational perspectives on student cheating: Toward an integrated model of academic dishonesty. Educational Psychologist, 41(3), 129–145.10.1207/s15326985ep4103_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (2013). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Notani, A. S. (1998). Moderators of perceived behavioral control’s predictiveness in the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7(3), 247–271.10.1207/s15327663jcp0703_02
   Google Scholar
• Passow, H. J., Mayhew, M. J., Finelli, C. J., Harding, T., & Carpenter, D. D. (2006). Factors influencing engineering students’ decisions to cheat by type of assessment. Research in Higher Education, 47(6), 643–684.10.1007/s11162-006-9010-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Raats, M. M., Shepherd, R., & Sparks, P. (1995). Including moral dimensions of choice within the structure of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25(6), 484–494.10.1111/jasp.1995.25.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabi, S. M., Patton, L. R., Fjortoft, N., & Zgarrick, D. P. (2006). Characteristics, prevalence, attitudes, and perceptions of academic dishonesty among pharmacy students. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 70(4), Article 73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawwas, M., Swaidan, Z., & Isakson, H. (2007). A comparative study of ethical beliefs of master of business administration students in the United States with those in Hong Kong. Journal of Education in Business, 82(3), 146–158.10.3200/JOEB.82.3.146-158
   Google Scholar
• Seipel, T. (2015). Stanford University looks into allegations of cheating by students. San Jose Mercury News. Retrieved from http://www.mercurynews.com/health/ci_27799963/stanford-university-reportsallegations-cheating-by-students
   Google Scholar
• Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 422–445.10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shteynberg, G., Gelfand, M. J., & Kim, K. (2009). Peering into the ‘magnum mysterium’ of culture: The explanatory power of descriptive norms. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40, 46–69.10.1177/0022022108326196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparks, P. (1994). Food choice and health: Applying, assessing, and extending the theory of planned behaviour. In D. R. Rutter & L. Quine (Eds.), Social psychology and health: European perspectives (pp. 25–45). Brookfield, VT: Avebury/Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, T. H., Jawahar, I. M., & Kisamore, J. L. (2009). Using the theory of planned behavior and cheating justifications to predict academic misconduct. Career Development International, 14(3), 221–241.10.1108/13620430910966415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terry, D. J., & Hogg, M. A. (1996). Group norms and the attitude-behavior relationship: A role for group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(8), 776–793.10.1177/0146167296228002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tofighi, D., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2011). RMediation: An R package for mediation analysis confidence intervals. Behavior Research Methods, 43(3), 692–700.10.3758/s13428-011-0076-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J. (2012). Predicting cheating behavior: A longitudinal study with Chinese business students. Social Behavior and Personality: An international journal, 40(6), 933–944.10.2224/sbp.2012.40.6.933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar