Using social psychological theory to understand choice of a pSTEM academic major

References

• Banchefsky, S., & Park, B. (2018). Negative gender ideologies and gender-science stereotypes are more pervasive in male-dominated academic disciplines. Social Sciences, 7(2), 27. doi:10.3390/socsci/7020027
   Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betz, N. E., & Hackett, G. (1983). The relationship of mathematics self-efficacy expectations to the selection of science-based college majors. Journal of Vocational behavior, 23, 329–345. doi:10.1016/0001-8791(83)90046-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatti, I. P., Lohano, H. D., Pirzado, Z. A., & Jafri, I. A. (2006). A logistic regression analysis of the ischemic heart disease risk. Journal of Applied Sciences, 6, 785–788. doi:10.3923/jas.2006.785.788
   Google Scholar
• Blickenstaff, C. J. (2005). Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender and Education, 17, 369–386. doi:10.1080/09540250500145072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brescoll, V., & LaFrance, M. (2004). The correlates and consequences of newspaper reports of research on sex differences. Psychological Science, 15, 515–520. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00712.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceci, S. J., & Williams, W. M. (2011). Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 3157–3162. doi:10.1073/pnas.1014871108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceci, S. J., Williams, W. M., & Barnett, S. M. (2009). Women’s underrepresentation in science: Sociocultural and biological considerations. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 218–261. doi:10.1037/a0014412
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charles, M., & Bradley, K. (2009). Indulging our gendered selves? Sex segregation by field of study in 44 countries. American Journal of Sociology, 114, 924–976. doi:10.1086/595942
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheryan, S., Master, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2015). Cultural stereotypes as gatekeepers: Increasing girls’ interest in computer science and engineering by diversifying stereotypes. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 49. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheryan, S, Plaut, V. C., Davies, P. G., & Steele, C. M. (2009). Ambient belonging: How stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1045–1060. doi:10.1037/a0016239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheryan, S., Siy, J. O., Vichayapai, M., Drury, B. J., & Kim, S. (2011). Do female and male role models who embody STEM stereotypes hinder women’s anticipated success in STEM? Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 656–664. doi:10.1177/1948550611405218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A., Montoya, A. K., & Jiang, L. (2016). Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others? Psychological Bulletin, 143(1), 1–35. doi:10.1037/bul0000052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. M., & Hong, Y.-Y. (2008). Beyond nature and nurture: The influence of lay gender theories on self-stereotyping. Self and Identity, 7, 34–53. doi:10.1080/15298860600980185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correll, S. J. (2001). Gender and the career choice process: The role of biased self‐assessments. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1691–1730. doi:10.1086/321299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correll, S. J. (2004). Constraints into preferences: Gender, status, and emerging career aspirations. American Sociological Review, 69, 93–113. doi:10.1177/000312240406900106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dar-Nimrod, I., & Heine, S. J. (2006). Exposure to scientific theories affects women’s math performance. Science, 314, 435. doi:10.1126/science.1131100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dar-Nimrod, I., & Heine, S. J. (2011). Genetic essentialism: On the deceptive determinism of DNA. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 800–818. doi:10.1037/a0021860
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diekman, A. B., Brown, E. R., Johnston, A. M., & Clark, E. K. (2010). Seeking congruity between goals and roles a new look at why women opt out of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers. Psychological Science, 21, 1051–1057. doi:10.1177/0956797610377342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diekman, A. B., Clark, E. K., Johnston, A. M., Brown, E. R., & Steinberg, M. (2011). Malleability in communal goals and beliefs influences attraction to stem careers: Evidence for a goal congruity perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 902–918. doi:10.1037/a0025199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. (2009). Who am I and what am I going to do with my life? Personal and collective identities as motivators of action. Educational Psychologist, 44, 78–89. doi:10.1080/00461520902832368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S. (1994). Understanding women’s educational and occupational choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 585–609. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1994.tb01049.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecklund, E. H., Lincoln, A., & Tansey, C. (2012). Gender segregation in elite academic science. Gender & Society, 26, 3157–3717. doi:10.1177/0891243212451904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (2010). Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(1), 103–127. doi:10.1037/a0018053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferriman, K., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2009). Work preferences, life values, and personal views of top math/science graduate students and the profoundly gifted: Developmental changes and gender differences during emerging adulthood and parenthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 924–932. doi:10.1037/a0016030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fine, C. (2010). From scanner to sound bite: Issues in interpreting and reporting sex differences in the brain. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 280–283. doi:10.1177/0963721410383248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Good, C., Rattan, A., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women’s representation in mathematics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 700–717. doi:10.1037/a0026659
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, H., & Dweck, C. S. (2003). Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 541–553. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.541
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn, A., Banchefsky, S., Park, B., & Judd, C. M. (2015). Measuring intergroup ideologies positive and negative aspects of emphasizing versus looking beyond group differences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 1646–1664. doi:10.1177/0146167215607351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpern, D.F., Benbow, C.P., Geary, D.C., Gur, R.C., Hyde, J.S., & Gernsbacher, M.A. (2007). The science of sex differences in science and mathematics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8(1), 1–51. doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2007.00032.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424. doi:10.1037//1082-989x.3.4.424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenig, A. M., & Eagly, A. H. (2014). Evidence for the social role theory of stereotype content: Observations of groups’ roles shape stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 371. doi:10.1037/a0037215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lent, R.W., Lopez, F.G., & Bieschke, K.J. (1991). Mathematics self-efficacy: Sources and relation to science-based career choice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 424–430. doi:10.1037//0022-0167.38.4.424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, K.L., Stout, J.G., Finkelstein, N.D., Pollock, S.J., Miyake, A., Cohen, G.L., & Ito, T.A. (2017). Fitting in to move forward: Using a belonging framework to understand gender disparities in persistence in the physical sciences, technology, engineering, and mathematics (pSTEM). Psychology of Women Quarterly, 41, 420–436. doi:10.1177/0361684317720186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyake, A., Kost-Smith, L. E., Finkelstein, N. D., Pollock, S. J., Cohen, G. L., & Ito, T. A. (2010). Reducing the gender achievement gap in college science: A classroom study of values affirmation. Science, 330, 1234–1237. doi:10.1126/science.1195996
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, M. C., Steele, C. M., & Gross, J. J. (2007). Signaling threat: How situational cues affect women in math, science, and engineering settings. Psychological Science, 18, 879–885. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01995.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics. (2015). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2015 [Special Report NSF 15-311]. Arlington, VA. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/
   Google Scholar
• Olson, K. R., Key, A. C., & Eaton, N. R. (2015). Gender cognition in transgender children. Psychological Science, 26, 467–474. doi:10.1177/0956797614568156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, B., & Banchefsky, S. (in press). Leveraging the social role of dad to change gender stereotypes of men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. doi:10.1177/0146167218768794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rattan, A., Good, C., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). “It’s ok—Not everyone can be good at math”: Instructors with an entity theory comfort (and demotivate) students. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 731–737. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riegle-Crumb, C., King, B., Grodsky, E., & Muller, C. (2012). The more things change, the more they stay the same? Prior achievement fails to explain gender inequality in entry into STEM college majors over time. American Educational Research Journal, 49, 1048–1073. doi:10.3102/0002831211435229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmader, T., Johns, M., & Forbes, C. (2008). An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance. Psychological Review, 115, 336–356. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.115.2.336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikora, J., & Pokropek, A. (2012). Gender segregation of adolescent science career plans in 50 countries. Science Education, 96, 234–264. doi:10.1002/sce.20479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. L., Lewis, K. L., Hawthorne, L., & Hodges, S. D. (2013). When trying hard isn’t natural: Women’s belonging with and motivation for male-dominated STEM fields as a function of effort expenditure concerns. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 131–143. doi:10.1177/0146167212468332
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spelke, E.S. (2005). Sex differences in intrinsic aptitude for mathematics and science?: A critical review. The American Psychologist, 60, 950–958. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.60.9.950
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, S.J., Steele, C.M., & Quinn, D.M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4–28. doi:10.1006/jesp.1998.1373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele, J., James, J. B., & Barnett, R. C. (2002). Learning in a man’s world: Examining the perceptions of undergraduate women in male-dominated academic areas. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 46–50. doi:10.1111/1471-6402.00042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stout, J.G., Dasgupta, N., Hunsinger, M., & McManus, M.A. (2011). STEMing the tide: Using ingroup experts to inoculate women's self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 255–270. doi:10.1037/a0021385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, R., Rounds, J., & Armstrong, P.I. (2009). Men and things, women and people: A meta-analysis of sex differences in interests. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 859–884. doi:10.1037/a0017364
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton, G.M., & Cohen, G.L. (2007). A question of belonging: Race, social fit, and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 82–96. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisgram, E.S., Bigler, R.S., & Liben, L.S. (2010). Gender, values, and occupational interests among children, adolescents, and adults. Child Development, 81, 778–796. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01433.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, W.M., & Ceci, S.J. (2012). When scientists choose motherhood: A single factor goes a long way in explaining the dearth of women in math-intensive fields. How can we address it? American Scientist, 100, 138–145. doi:10.1511/2012.95.138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2012). Biosocial construction of sex differences and similarities in behavior. In M. P. Zanna & J. M. Olson (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 46, pp. 55–123). Burlington: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar