Publication Cover
Educational Psychology
An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology
Volume 39, 2019 - Issue 2
996
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Implicit beliefs of ability and maladaptive learning: does self-efficacy matter?

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 153-168 | Received 15 Nov 2017, Accepted 05 Aug 2018, Published online: 15 Nov 2018

References

  • Aronson, J., Fried, C., & Good, C. (2002). Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 113–125.
  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.
  • Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. H. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 586–598.
  • Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78, 246–263.
  • Brock, A., & Hundley, H. (2016). The growth mindset coach: A teacher's month-by-month handbook for empowering students to achieve (Vol). Ulysses Press: Berkeley, CA.
  • Burnette, J. L., Boyle, E. H., VanEpps, E. M., & Pollack, J. P. (2013). Mind-sets matter: A meta-analytic review of implicit theories and self-regulation. Psychological Bulletin, 139(3), 655–701.
  • Cury, F., Da Fonseca, D., Zahn, I., & Elliot, A. J. (2008). Implicit theories and IQ test performance: A sequential mediational analysis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 783–791.
  • Cury, F., Elliot, A. J., Da Fonseca, D., & Moller, A. C. (2006). The social-cognitive model of achievement motivation and the 2 x 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 666–679.
  • Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040–1048.
  • Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology.
  • Dweck, C. S. (2011). Implicit theories. In P. Van Lange, A. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories in social psychology (pp. 43–61). London: Sage.
  • Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C. Y., & Hong, Y. Y. (1995). Implicit theories: Elaboration and extension of the model. Psychological Inquiry, 6(4), 322–333.
  • Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological review, 95, 256–273.
  • Dweck, C. S., & Molden, D. C. (2005). Self-theories: Their impact on competence motivation and acquisition. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 122–140). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Earley, P. C., & Lituchy, T. R. (1991). Delineating goal and efficacy effects: A test of three models. Journal of APplied Psychology, 76, 81–98.
  • Erdley, C., Cain, K., Loomis, C., Dumas-Hines, F., & Dweck, C. S. (1997). The relations among children's social goals, implicit personality theories and responses to social failure. Developmental Psychology, 33, 263–272.
  • Fredricks, J. A., Wang, M. T., Linn, J. S., Hofkens, T. L., Sung, H., Parr, A., & Allerton, J. (2016). Using qualitative methods to develop a survey measure of math and science engagement. Learning and Instruction, 43, 5–15.
  • Hong, Y., Chiu, C., Dweck, C. S., Lin, D. M., & Wan, W. (1999). Implicit theories, attributions, and coping: A meaning system approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 588–599.
  • Kaplan, A., Gheen, M., & Midgley, C. (2002). Classroom goal structure and student disruptive behavior. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 191–211.
  • Kaplan, A., & Midgley, C. (1997). The effect of achievement goals: Does level of perceived academic competence make a difference. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 415–435.
  • Krull, J. L., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2001). Multilevel modeling of individual and group-level mediated effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 249–277.
  • Lerdpornkulrat, T., Koul, R., & Sujivorakul, C. (2012). The influence of ability beliefs and motivational orientation on the self-efficacy of high school science students in Thailand. Australian Journal of Education, 56(2), 163–181.
  • Liem, A. G. D., Lau, S., & Nie, Y. (2008). The role of self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals in predicting learning strategies, task disengagement, peer relationship, and achievement outcome. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 486–512.
  • Luo, W., Lee, K., Ng, P. T., & Ong, J. X. W. (2014). Incremental beliefs of ability, achievement emotions, and learning of Singapore students. J Appl Psychol, 34(5), 619–634.
  • Luo, W., Ng, P. T., Lee, K., & Aye, K. M. (2016). Self-efficacy, value, and achievement emotions as mediators between parenting practice and homework behavior: A control-value theory perspective. Learning and Individual Differences, 50, 275–282.
  • Luo, W., Paris, S. G., Hogan, D., & Luo, Z. (2011). Do performance goals promote learning? A pattern analysis of Singapore students' achievement goals. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 165–176.
  • Marsh, H. W., Wen, Z., & Hau, K. T. (2004). Structural equation models of latent interactions: Evaluation of alternative estimation strategies and indicator construction. Psychological Methods, 9(3), 275–300.
  • Martocchio, J. J. (1994). Effects of conceptions of ability on anxiety, self-efficacy, and learning in training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 819–825.
  • Meece, J. L., Glienke, B. B., & Burg, S. (2006). Gender and motivation. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 351–373.
  • Midgley, C., Maehr, M. L., Hruda, L. Z., Anderman, E., Anderman, L., & Freeman, K. E. (2000). Manual for the Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales (PALS). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
  • Mooijaart, A., & Satorra, A. (2009). On insensitivity of the X2 model test to nonlinear misspecification in structural equation models. Psychometrika, 74, 443–455.
  • Murphy, M., & Dweck, C. S. (2010). A culture of genius: How an organization's lay theories shape people's cognition, affect, and behavior. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 36, 283–296.
  • Muthen, B. (2012). Latent variable interactions. Retrieved from https://www.statmodel.com/download/LV%20Interaction.pdf
  • Muthen, L., & Muthen, B. (2010). Mplus statistical analysis with latent variables: User's guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.
  • Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., & Perry, R. P. (2007). Achievement emotions questionnaire (AEQ-M) - Mathematics: Users' manual. Munich, Germany: Department of Psychology, University of Munich.
  • Ratnam-Lim, C. T. L., & Tan, K. H. K. (2015). Large-scale implementation of formative assessment practices in an examination-oriented culture. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(1), 61–78.
  • Robins, R. W., & Pals, J. L. (2002). Implicit self-theories in the academic domain: Implications for goal orientation, attributions, affect and self-esteem change. Self and Identity, 1, 313–336.
  • Stipek, D., & Gralinski, J. H. (1996). Children's beliefs about intelligence and school performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(3), 397–407.
  • Tabernero, C., & Wood, R. E. (1999). Implicit theories versus the social construal of ability in self-regulation and performance on a complex task. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 78(2), 104–127.
  • Trautwein, U., Marsh, H. W., Nagengast, B., & Ludtke, O. (2012). Probing for the multiplicative term in modern expectancy–value theory: A latent interaction modeling study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 763–777.
  • Vogler, J. S., & Bakken, L. (2007). Motivation across domains: Do goals and attributions change with subject matter for Grades 4 and 5 students. Learning Environment Research, 10, 17–33.
  • Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.