The malleability of thinking styles over one year

References

• Barrett, P. (2003). Person-target profiling for selection and recruitment part 2: The coefficient distribution analyzer. Retrieved from http://www.pbarrett.net/presentations/workshop2_NZ2003.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, A., & Jones, K. (2013). The impossibility of separating age, period and cohort effects. Social Science and Medicine, 93, 163–165. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.04.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J., & Gleser, G. C. (1953). Assessing similarity between profiles. Psychological Bulletin, 50, 456–473. doi:10.1037/h0057173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnellan, M. B., Conger, R. D., & Burzette, R. G. (2007). Personality development from late adolescence to young adulthood: Differential stability, normative maturity, and evidence for the maturity-stability hypothesis. Journal of Personality, 75, 237–264. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00438.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, J., & Zhang, L. F. (2014a). The role of learning environments in thinking styles. Educational Psychology, 34, 252–268. doi:10.1080/01443410.2013.817538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, J., & Zhang, L. F. (2014b). The role of perceived parenting styles in thinking styles. Learning and Individual Differences, 32, 204–211. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2014.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, J., Zhang, L. F., & Chen, C. (2018). Thinking styles: Distinct from personality? Personality and Individual Differences, 125, 50–55. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2017.12.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, W. (2012). An experimental comparison of the flexibility in the use of thinking styles in traditional and hypermedia learning environments. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7, 224–233. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2012.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gijbels, D., Segers, M., & Struyf, E. (2008). Constructivist learning environments and the (im)possibility to change students' perceptions of assessment demands and approaches to learning. Instructional Science, 36, 431–443. doi:10.1007/s11251-008-9064-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, C., & Debus, R. (2002). Developing deep learning approaches and personal teaching efficacy within a preservice teacher education context. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 483–511. doi:10.1348/00070990260377488
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grigorenko, E. L., & Sternberg, R. J. (1995). Thinking styles. In D. Saklofske & M. Zeidner (Eds.), International handbook of personality and intelligence. New York: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Groves, M. (2005). Problem-based learning and learning approach: Is there a relationship? Advances in Health Sciences Education, 10, 315–326. doi:10.1007/s10459-005-8556-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59(1), 12–19. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.59.1.12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, C.-H. (2014). Thinking styles, motivational orientation, and academic achievements in learning physics among Hong Kong secondary school students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Loo, R. (1997). Evaluating change and stability in learning style scores. Educational Psychology, 17, 95–100. doi:10.1080/0144341970170106
   Google Scholar
• Low, K. S. D., Yoon, M., Roberts, B. W., & Rounds, J. (2005). The stability of vocational interests from early adolescence to middle adulthood: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 713–737. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.5.713
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandelman, S. D., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2012). The etiology of intellectual styles: Contributions from intelligence and personality. In L. F. Zhang, R. J. Sternberg, & S. Rayner (Eds.), Handbook of intellectual styles: Preferences in cognition, learning, and thinking (pp. 89–107). New York, NY, US: Springer Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• McCartney, K., & Rosenthal, R. (2000). Effect size, practical importance, and social policy for children. Child Development, 71(1), 173–180. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1984). The nature of cognitive styles: Problems and promise in educational practice. Educational Psychologist, 19, 59–74. doi:10.1080/00461528409529283
   Google Scholar
• Riding, R. J., & Rayner, S. G. (1998). Cognitive styles and learning strategies: Understanding style differences in learning and behavior. London: David Fulton.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, B. W., Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T. E. (2001). The kids are alright: Growth and stability in personality development from adolescence to adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 670–683. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.81.4.670
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, B. W., Wood, D., & Caspi, A. (2008). The development of personality traits in adulthood. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 375–398). New York, London: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Thinking styles. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., Wagner, R. K., & Zhang, L. F. (2007). Thinking Styles Inventory-Revised II. Unpublished test. New Haven, CT: Yale University.
   Google Scholar
• Tai, W-y. (2012). The impact of teaching styles on students’ learning styles and career interests (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, K., & Fowler, J. (2005). Assessing the impact of learning environments on students' approaches to learning: Comparing conventional and action learning designs. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(1), 87–101. doi:10.1080/0260293042003251770
   Google Scholar
• Yu, T. M. (2012). Do teachers’ interaction styles affect secondary school students’ thinking styles and academic performance? (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. F. (1999). Further cross-cultural validation of the theory of mental self-government. The Journal of Psychology, 133, 165–181. doi:10.1080/00223989909599731
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. F. (2003). Are parents’ and children’s thinking styles related? Psychological Reports, 93, 617–630. doi:10.2466/pr0.2003.93.2.617
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. F. (2004). Revisiting the predictive power of thinking styles for academic performance. The Journal of Psychology, 138, 351–370. doi:10.3200/JRLP.138.4.351-3701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. F. (2009). Anxiety and thinking styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 347–351. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. F. (2010). Further investigating thinking styles and psychosocial development in the Chinese higher education context. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 593–603. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2010.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. F. (2013). The malleability of intellectual styles. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. F. (2017). The value of intellectual styles. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. F., & Fan, W. (2011). The theory of mental self-government grows up: Where has it led the field after 21 years? In S. Rayner & E. Cools (Eds.), Style differences in cognition, learning, and management (pp. 46–59). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. F., & He, Y. F. (2003). Do thinking styles matter in the use of and attitudes toward computing and information technology among Hong Kong university students? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 29, 471–293. doi:10.2190/3M8D-1D56-V60C-BHR5
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. F., & Postiglione, G. A. (2001). Thinking styles, self-esteem, and socio-economic status. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 1333–1346. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00227-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. F., & Sternberg, R. J. (2002). Thinking styles and teacher characteristics. International Journal of Psychology, 37(1), 3–12. doi:10.1080/00207590143000171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. F., & Sternberg, R. J. (2005). A threefold model of intellectual styles. Educational Psychology Review, 17(1), 1–53. doi:10.1007/s10648-005-1635-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. F., & Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The nature of intellectual styles. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar