References
- Ahmed, W., Minnaert, A., Kuyper, H., & van der Werf, G. (2012). Reciprocal relationships between math self-concept and math anxiety. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(3), 385–389. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.12.004
- Beauducel, A., & Wittmann, W. W. (2005). Simulation study on fit indexes in CFA based on data with slightly distorted simple structure. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 12(1), 41–75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1201_3
- Bergin, D. A. (1999). Influences on classroom interest. Educational Psychologist, 34(2), 87–98. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3402_2
- Boehme, K. L., Goetz, T., & Preckel, F. (2017). Is it good to value math? Investigating mothers’ impact on their children’s test anxiety based on control-value theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 51, 11–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.05.002
- Bollen, K. A., & Curran, P. J. (2004). Autoregressive latent trajectory (ALT) models: A synthesis of two traditions. Sociological Methods & Research, 32, 336–383. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124103260222
- Bong, M. (2001). Between- and within-domain relations of academic motivation among middle and high school students: Self-efficacy, task-value, and achievement goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 23–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.23
- Bong, M. (2005). Within-grade changes in Korean girls’ motivation and perceptions of the learning environment across domains and achievement levels. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(4), 656–672. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.4.656
- Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233–255. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed., pp. 40–41). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Davies, P. G., & Spencer, S. J. (2005). Women’s understanding in quantitative domains through the lens of stereotype threat. In A. M. Gallagher & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Gender differences in mathematics (pp. 172–188). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Dietrich, J., Dicke, A. L., Kracke, B., & Noack, P. (2015). Teacher support and its influence on students’ intrinsic value and effort: Dimensional comparison effects across subjects. Learning and Instruction, 39, 45–54.
- Dowker, A., Sarkar, A., & Looi, C. Y. (2016). Mathematics anxiety: What have we learned in 60 years? Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00508
- Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (2010). Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(1), 103–127. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018053
- Fisher, P. H., Dobbs-Oates, J., Doctoroff, G. L., & Arnold, D. H. (2012). Early math interest and the development of math skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 673–681. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027756
- Fraine, B. D., Damme, J. V., & Onghena, P. (2007). A longitudinal analysis of gender differences in academic self-concept and language achievement: A multivariate multilevel latent growth approach. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(1), 132–150. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.10.005
- Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., & Goetz, T. (2007). Girls and mathematics—A “hopeless” issue? A control-value approach to gender differences in emotions towards mathematics. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22(4), 497–514. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173468
- García, T., Rodríguez, C., Betts, L., Areces, D., & González-Castro, P. (2016). How affective-motivational variables and approaches to learning predict mathematics achievement in upper elementary levels. Learning and Individual Differences, 49, 25–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.05.021
- Goetz, T., Bieg, M., Lüdtke, O., Pekrun, R., & Hall, N. C. (2013). Do girls really experience more anxiety in mathematics?. Psychological Science, 24(10), 2079–2087. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613486989
- Goetz, T., Cronjaeger, H., Frenzel, A. C., Lüdtke, O., & Hall, N. C. (2010). Academic self-concept and emotion relations: Domain specificity and age effects. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(1), 44–58. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.10.001
- Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Hall, N. C., & Pekrun, R. (2008). Antecedents of academic emotions: Testing the internal/external frame of reference model for academic enjoyment. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(1), 9–33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.12.002
- Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., Hall, N. C., & Lüdtke, O. (2007). Between- and within-domain relations of students’ academic emotions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(4), 715–733. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.715
- Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Stoeger, H., & Hall, N. C. (2010). Antecedents of everyday positive emotions: An experience sampling analysis. Motivation and Emotion, 34(1), 49–62. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-009-9152-2
- Goetz, T., Pekrun, R., Hall, N., & Haag, L. (2006). Academic emotions from a social-cognitive perspective: Antecedents and domain specificity of students’ affect in the context of Latin instruction. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(2), 289–308. doi:https://doi.org/10.1348/000709905X42860
- Goetz, T., Preckel, F., Zeidner, M., & Schleyer, E. J. (2008). Big fish in big ponds: A multilevel analysis of test anxiety and achievement in special gifted classes. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 21, 185–198. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10615800701628827
- Gogol, K., Brunner, M., Goetz, T., Preckel, F., & Martin, R. (2014). Structural models of achievement motivation. Personality and Individual Differences, 60, S70. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.07.309
- Gogol, K., Brunner, M., Martin, R., Preckel, F., & Goetz, T. (2017). Affect and motivation within and between school subjects: Development and validation of an integrative model. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 49, 46–65. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.11.003
- Heene, M., Hilbert, S., Draxler, C., Ziegler, M., & Bühner, M. (2011). Masking misfit in confirmatory factor analysis by increasing unique variances: A cautionary note on the usefulness of cut-off values of fit indices. Psychological Methods, 16(3), 319–336. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024917
- Hembree, R. (1990). The nature, effects, and relief of mathematics anxiety. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(1), 33–46. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/749455
- Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
- Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
- Hulleman, C. S., Barron, K. E., Kosovich, J. J., & Lazowski, R. A. (2016). Student motivation: Current theories, constructs, and interventions within an expectancy-value framework. In A. A. Lipnevich, F. Preckel, & R. D. Roberts (Eds.), Psychosocial skills and school systems in the 21st century. Theory, research, and practice. The Springer series on human exceptionality (pp. 241–278). New York: Springer.
- Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., Ryan, M., Frost, L. A., & Hopp, C. (1990). Gender comparisons of mathematics attitudes and affect. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 14(3), 299–324. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1990.tb00022.x
- Lau, R. S., & Cheung, G. W. (2012). Estimating and comparing specific mediation effects in complex latent variable models. Organizational Research Methods, 15, 3–16.
- Lauer, J. E., Esposito, A. G., & Bauer, P. J. (2018). Domain-specific anxiety relates to children’s math and spatial performance. Developmental Psychology, 54(11), 2126–2138. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000605
- Lee, J. (2009). Universals and specifics of math self-concept, math self-efficacy, and math anxiety across 41 PISA 2003 participating countries. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(3), 355–365. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2008.10.009
- Lee, W., Lee, M. J., & Bong, M. (2014). Testing interest and self-efficacy as predictors of academic self-regulation and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(2), 86–99. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.02.002
- Liu, Y., & Shen, S. (2015). Relations among mathematics self-concept, mathematics learning strategy, mathematics emotion, and mathematics academic achievement: The self-enhancement model. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 46, 491–516.
- Lupart, J. L., Cannon, E., & Telfer, J. O. (2004). Gender differences in adolescent academic achievement, interests, values, and life-role expectations. High Ability Studies, 15, 25–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1359813042000225320
- Ma, X. (1999). A meta-analysis of the relationship between anxiety toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(5), 520–540. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/749772
- Marsh, H. W. (1988). The content specificity of math and English anxieties: The high school and beyond study. Anxiety Research, 1(2), 137–149. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10615808808248226
- Marsh, H. W. (1989). Sex differences in the development of verbal and math constructs: The high school and beyond study. American Educational Research Journal, 26, 191–225. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1163031
- Marsh, H. W., Abduljabbar, A. S., Parker, P. D., Morin, A. J. S., Abdelfattah, F., Nagengast, B., … Abu-Hilal, M. M. (2015). The internal/external frame of reference model of self-concept and achievement relations: Age-cohort and cross-cultural differences. American Educational Research Journal, 52(1), 168–202. doi: https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831214549453
- Marsh, H. W., & Hau, K. T. (2004). Explaining paradoxical relations between academic self-concepts and achievements: Cross-cultural generalizability of the internal/external frame of reference predictions across 26 countries. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 56–67. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.56
- Marsh, H. W., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2005). Academic self-concept, interest, grades, and standardized test scores: Reciprocal effects models of causal ordering. Child Development, 76(2), 397–416. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00853.x
- Marsh, H. W., & Yeung, A. S. (1997). Causal effects of academic self-concept on academic achievement: Structural equation models of longitudinal data. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 41–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.41
- Meece, J. L., Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1990). Predictors of math anxiety and its influence on young adolescents’ course enrollment intentions and performance in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 60–70. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.60
- Miller, J. W. (2000). Exploring the source of self-regulated learning: The influence of internal and external comparisons. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 27(1), 47–52.
- Möller, J., Müller-Kalthoff, H., Helm, F., Nagy, N., & Marsh, H. W. (2016). The generalized internal/external frame of reference model: An extension to dimensional comparison theory. Frontline Learning Research, 4(4), 1–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v4i2.169
- Muis, K. R., Psaradellis, C., Lajoie, S. P., Di Leo, I., & Chevrier, M. (2015). The role of epistemic emotions in mathematics problem solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 42, 172–185. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.06.003
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2017). Mplus User’s Guide: 8th Edition. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
- O’Mara, A. J., Marsh, H. W., Craven, R. G., & Debus, R. L. (2006). Do self-concept interventions make a difference? A synergistic blend of construct validation and meta-analysis. Educational Psychologist, 41, 181–206. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4103_4
- OECD. (2004). Learning for tomorrow’s world – first results from PISA 2003. Paris: OECD.
- Pekrun, R. (2000). A social cognitive, control-value theory of achievement emotions. In J. Heckhausen (Ed.), Motivational psychology of human development. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
- Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 315–341. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9
- Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2006). Achievement goals and discrete achievement emotions: A theoretical model and prospective test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 583–597. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.583
- Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of quantitative and qualitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 91–106. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3702_4
- Pekrun, R., & Perry, R. P. (2014). Control-value theory of achievement emotions. In R. Pekrun & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 120–141). New York: Routledge.
- Pekrun, R., & Stephens, E. J. (2010). Achievement emotions: A control-value approach. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(4), 238–255. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00259.x
- Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
- R Core Team. (2012). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
- Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. (2002). Student interest and achievement: Developmental issues raised by a case study. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), The development of achievement motivation (pp. 173–195). New York: Academic Press.
- Revelle, W. (2015). Psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psychVersion=1.5.8.
- Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7(2), 147–177.
- Schiefele, U., Krapp, A., & Winteler, A. (1992). Interest as a predictor of academic achievement: A meta-analysis of research. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 183–212). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Schurtz, I. M., Pfost, M., Nagengast, B., & Artelt, C. (2014). Impact of social and dimensional comparisons on student's mathematical and English subject-interest at the beginning of secondary school. Learning and Instruction, 34, 32–41. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.08.001
- Skaalvik, E. M., & Rankin, R. J. (1995). A test of the internal/external frame of reference model at different levels of math and verbal self-perception. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 161–184. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032001161
- Skinner, E. A. (1996). A guide to constructs of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(3), 549–570. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.549
- Stankov, L., Lee, J., Luo, W., & Hogan, D. J. (2012). Confidence: A better predictor of academic achievement than self-efficacy, self-concept and anxiety?. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(6), 747–758. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.05.013
- Valentine, J. C., Dubois, D. L., & Cooper, H. (2004). The relation between self-beliefs and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 111–133. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3902_3
- Van der Beek, J. P. J., Van der Ven, S. H. G., Kroesbergen, E. H., & Leseman, P. P. M. (2017). Self-concept mediates the relation between achievement and emotions in mathematics. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(3), 478–495. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12160