Publication Cover
Educational Psychology
An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology
Volume 41, 2021 - Issue 2
322
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Multi-level factors affecting immediate and delayed concept recall in concept mapping with adult learners

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , & ORCID Icon
Pages 224-244 | Received 21 Oct 2019, Accepted 02 Aug 2020, Published online: 20 Aug 2020

References

  • Ausubel, D. P. (2000). The acquisition and retention of knowledge: A cognitive view. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Bjork, R. A., & Whitten, W. B. (1974). Recency-sensitive retrieval processes in long-term free recall. Cognitive Psychology, 6(2), 173–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(74)90009-7
  • Blunt, J. R., & Karpicke, J. D. (2014). Learning with retrieval-based concept mapping. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(3), 849–858. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035934
  • Cañas, A. J., Novak, J. D. (2009). What is a concept map? CMAP. http://cmap.ihmc.us/docs/conceptmap.php.
  • Colman, A. M. (2015). A dictionary of psychology (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
  • Cowan, N. (2008). What are the differences between long-term, short-term, and working memory. Progress in Brain Research, 169, 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(07)00020-9
  • Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2007). Building path diagrams for multilevel models. Psychological Methods, 12(3), 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.3.283
  • Daley, B. J. (2010). Concept maps: Practice applications in adult education and human resource development. New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development, 24(2-4), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/nha3.10383
  • Dunkel, C. S., & Lavoi, J. C. (2005). Ego-identity and the processing of self-relevant information. Self and Identity, 4(4), 349–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860500220542
  • Garroway, L. A. (2013). Two of a kind: Implications of bilateral directional asymmetry on pair matching of human limb bones [Master’s thesis]. University of Tennessee. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/2415
  • Glanzer, M., & Cunitz, A. R. (1966). Two storage mechanisms in free recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5(4), 351–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(66)80044-0
  • Groome, D. (2014). An introduction to cognitive psychology: Processes and disorders (3rd ed.). Psychology Press.
  • Hallgren, K. A. (2012). Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: An overview and tutorial. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 8(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.08.1.p023
  • Heck, R. H., Thomas, S. L., & Tabata, L. N. (2012). Multilevel modeling of categorical outcomes using IBM SPSS. Routledge.
  • Heck, R. H., Thomas, S. L., & Tabata, L. N. (2014). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling with IBM SPSS (2nd ed.). Routledge.
  • Howard, M. W., & Kahana, M. J. (1999). Contextual variability and serial position effects in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(4), 923–941. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.25.4.923
  • Hox, J. J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (2nd ed.). Routledge.
  • Kandiko, C., Hay, D., & Weller, S. (2013). Concept mapping in the humanities to facilitate reflection: Externalizing the relationship between public and personal learning. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 12(1), 70–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022211399381
  • Karpicke, J. D., & Blunt, J. R. (2011). Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping. Science (New York, N.Y.), 331(6018), 772–775. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1199327
  • Karpicke, J. D., & Smith, M. A. (2012). Separate mnemonic effects of retrieval practice and elaborative encoding. Journal of Memory and Language, 67(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.02.004
  • Karpicke, J. D. (2016, June). A powerful way to improve learning and memory: Practicing retrieval enhances long-term, meaningful learning. Psychological Science Agenda. http://www.apa.org/science/about/psa/2016/06/learning-memory.aspx
  • Klein, S. B. (2012). Self, memory, and the self-reference effect: An examination of conceptual and methodological issues. Personality and Social Psychology Review: An Official Journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc, 16(3), 283–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311434214
  • Klein, S. B., & Kihlstrom, J. F. (1986). Elaboration, organization, and the self-reference effect in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115(1), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.115.1.26
  • Klein, S. B., Loftus, J., & Burton, H. A. (1989). Two self reference effects: The importance of distinguishing between self descriptiveness judgements and autobiographical retrieval in self reference encoding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(6), 853–865. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.6.853
  • Lechuga, M. T., Ortega-Tudela, J. M., & Gómez-Ariza, C. J. (2015). Further evidence that concept mapping is not better than repeated retrieval as a tool for learning from texts. Learning and Instruction, 40, 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.08.002
  • Maas, C. J. M., & Hox, J. J. (2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology, 1(3), 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241.1.3.86
  • Mayer, R. E. (1975). Information processing variables in learning to solve problems. Review of Educational Research, 45(4), 525–541. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543045004525
  • Meyer, J. H. F., Land, R., & Baillie, C. (2010). Threshold concepts and transformational learning. Sense Publishers.
  • Nesbit, J. C., & Adesope, O. O. (2006). Learning with concept maps and knowledge maps: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 76(3), 413–448. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543076003413
  • Northoff, G., & Bermpohl, F. (2004). Cortical midline structures and the self. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(3), 102–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.01.004
  • Novak, J. D. (2010). Learning, creating, and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations (2nd ed.). Routledge.
  • Novak, J. D. & Cañas, A. J. (2006). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct them. Technical Report IHMC CmapTools 2006-01. Institute for Human and Machine Cognition. https://cmap.ihmc.us/docs/theory-of-concept-maps
  • Oliver, K. (2009). An investigation of concept mapping to improve the reading comprehension of science texts. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(5), 402–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-009-9157-3
  • Ortega-Tudela, J. M., Lechuga, M. T., & Gómez-Ariza, C. J. (2019). A specific benefit of retrieval-based concept mapping to enhance learning from texts. Instructional Science, 47(2), 239–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-018-9476-y
  • Pearl, J., & Mackenzie, D. (2018). The book of why: The new science of cause and effect. Basic Books.
  • Pentimonti, J. M., Zucker, T. A., & Justice, L. M. (2011). What are preschool teachers reading in their classrooms? Reading Psychology, 32(3), 197–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711003604484
  • Perron, B. E., & Gillespie, D. F. (2015). Key concepts in measurement. Oxford University Press.
  • Roessger, K. M., Daley, B. D., & Hafez, D. (2018). Effects of teaching concept mapping using practice, feedback, and relational framing. Learning and Instruction, 54, 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.01.011
  • Schroeder, N. L., Nesbit, J. C., Anguiano, C. J., & Adesope, O. O. (2018). Studying and constructing maps: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 30(2), 431–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9403-9
  • Seto, M. C., & Barbaree, H. E. (1999). Psychopathy, treatment behavior, and sex offender recidivism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14(12), 1235–1248. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626099014012001
  • Silge, J., & Robinson, D. (2016). Tidytext: Text mining and analysis using tidy data principles in R. Journal of Open Source Software, 1(3), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00037
  • Slotte, V., & Lonka, K. (1999). Spontaneous concept maps aiding the understanding of scientific concepts. International Journal of Science Education, 21(5), 515–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290552
  • Stringer, H. (2015, April). The nontraditional student. gradPSYCH Magazine. American Psychological Association. http://www.apa.org/gradpsych/2015/04/nontraditional-student.aspx
  • Symons, C. S., & Johnson, B. T. (1997). The self-reference effect in memory: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 121(3), 371–394. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.121.3.371
  • UA Production Services. (2017a, February 28). Video 1A version 1 [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O9cX5Irbhow&feature=youtu.be
  • UA Production Services. (2017b, February 28). Video 1B version 1 [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/rAEzabyxdmE
  • West, D. C., Park, J. K., Pomeroy, J. R., & Sandoval, J. (2002). Concept mapping assessment in medical education: A comparison of two scoring systems. Medical Education, 36(9), 820–826. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01292.x
  • Williams, J. C. (2007). The impact of concept map visualizations on the information behavior, perceptions of performance, learning and use with novices in the information retrieval context [Doctoral dissertation]. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/88d4/0da0d48551f4174fd2e084c4eb441664c759.pdf

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.