Finger pointing to support learning from split-attention examples

References

• Agauas, S. J., Jacoby, M., & Thomas, L. E. (2020). Near-hand effects are robust: Three OSF pre-registered replications of visual biases in perihand space. Visual Cognition, 28(3), 192–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2020.1751763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2022). The split-attention principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (3rd ed., pp. 199–211). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cierniak, G., Scheiter, K., & Gerjets, P. (2009). Explaining the split-attention effect: Is the reduction of extraneous cognitive load accompanied by an increase in germane cognitive load? Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 315–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Koning, B. B., Rop, G., & Paas, F. (2020a). Learning from split-attention materials: Effects of teaching physical and mental learning strategies. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Koning, B. B., Rop, G., & Paas, F. (2020b). Effects of spatial distance on the effectiveness of mental and physical integration strategies in learning from split-attention examples. Computers in Human Behavior, 110, 106379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, X., & Zhang, Q. (2019). Tracing worked examples: Effects on learning in geometry. Educational Psychology, 39(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2018.1536256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eielts, C., Pouw, W., Ouwehand, K., van Gog, T., Zwaan, R. A., & Paas, F. (2020). Co-thought gesturing supports more complex problem solving in subjects with lower visual working-memory capacity. Psychological Research, 84(2), 502–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1065-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenesi, B., Kramer, E., & Kim, J. A. (2016). Split-attention and coherence principles in multimedia instruction can rescue performance for learners with lower working memory capacity. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30(5), 691–699. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. (2015). Learning as a generative activity: Eight learning strategies that promote understanding. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geary, D. C. (2008). An evolutionarily informed education science. Educational Psychologist, 43(4), 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520802392133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginns, P., Hu, F., & Bobis, J. (2020). Tracing enhances problem‐solving transfer, but without effects on intrinsic or extraneous cognitive load. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 34(6), 1522–1529. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginns, P., & King, V. (2021). Pointing and tracing enhance computer-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(3), 1387–1403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09997-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korbach, A., Ginns, P., Brünken, R., & Park, B. (2020). Should learners use their hands for learning? Results from an eye-tracking study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(1), 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leppink, J., Paas, F., Van der Vleuten, C. P. M., Van Gog, T., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2013). Development of an instrument for measuring different types of cognitive load. Behavior Research Methods, 45(4), 1058–1072. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0334-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macken, L., & Ginns, P. (2014). Pointing and tracing gestures may enhance anatomy and physiology learning. Medical Teacher, 36(7), 596–601. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.899684
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2021). Multimedia learning. (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (Ed.). (2014). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. (2nd Rev. ed.). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mirza, F., Agostinho, S., Tindall-Ford, S., Paas, F., & Chandler, P. (2019). Self-management of cognitive load. In S. Tindall-Ford, S. Agostinho, & J. Sweller (Eds.), Advances in cognitive load theory: Rethinking teaching (pp. 157–167). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ouwehand, K., Dijkstra, K., Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2019). Effects of semantic congruency and pointing gestures on item and source memory in children and young adults. Mind, Brain, and Education, 13(2), 92–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouwehand, K., van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2016). Effects of pointing compared with naming and observing during encoding on item and source memory in young and older adults. Memory (Hove, England), 24(9), 1243–1255. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2015.1094492
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouwehand, K., Wong, J., Van der Kroef, A., & Paas, F. (2021). Measuring cognitive load: Are there more valid alternatives to Likert rating scales? Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 702616.
   Google Scholar
• Paas, F. (1992). Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive-load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 429–434. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.4.429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2012). An evolutionary upgrade of cognitive load theory: Using the human motor system and collaboration to support the learning of complex cognitive tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 24(1), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9179-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paas, F., Tuovinen, J. E., Tabbers, H., & Van Gerven, P. W. M. (2003). Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paas, F., & van Merrienboer, J. J. (1993). The efficiency of instructional conditions: An approach to combine mental effort and performance measures. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 35(4), 737–743. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872089303500412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pouw, W. T. L. J., Rop, G., De Koning, B. B., & Paas, F. (2019). The cognitive basis of the split-attention effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 148(11), 2058–2075. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000578
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pouw, W., Wassenburg, S. I., Hostetter, A. B., De Koning, B. B., & Paas, F. (2020). Does gesture strengthen sensorimotor knowledge of objects? The case of the size-weight illusion. Psychological Research, 84(4), 966–980. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1128-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, C. L., Betz, R., Garza, J. P., & Roberts, R. J. (2010). Grab it! Biased attention in functional hand and tool space. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 72(1), 236–245. https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.1.236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roodenrys, K., Agostinho, S., Roodenrys, S., & Chandler, P. (2012). Managing one’s own cognitive load when evidence of split attention is present. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(6), 878–886. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi-Arnaud, C., Longobardi, E., & Spataro, P. (2017). Pointing movements both impair and improve visuospatial working memory depending on serial position. Memory & Cognition, 45(6), 903–915. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-017-0704-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, S., Beege, M., Nebel, S., & Rey, G. D. (2018). A meta-analysis of how signaling affects learning with media. Educational Research Review, 23, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, N. L., & Cenkci, A. T. (2020). Do measures of cognitive load explain the spatial split-attention principle in multimedia learning environments? A systematic review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(2), 254–270. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schüler, A., & Wesslein, A. K. (2022). Investigating the effect of deictic tracing on multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 77, 101525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sithole, S. T. M., Chandler, P., Abeysekera, I., & Paas, F. (2017). Benefits of guided self-management of attention on learning accounting. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(2), 220–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 261–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Language Archive. (2020). Elan (Version 6.0). Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics. http://archive.mpi.nl/tla/elan
   Google Scholar
• Tindall-Ford, S., Agostinho, S., Bokosmaty, S., Paas, F., & Chandler, P. (2015). Computer-based learning of geometry from integrated and split-attention worked examples: The power of self-management. Educational Technology and Society, 18(4), 89–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unsworth, N., Heitz, R. P., Schrock, J. C., & Engle, R. W. (2005). An automated version of the operation span task. Behavior Research Methods, 37(3), 498–505. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03192720
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2008). Instructional efficiency: Revisiting the original construct in educational research. Educational Psychologist, 43(1), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701756248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, B., Ginns, P., & Mockler, N. (2022). Sequencing tracing with imagination. Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), 421–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09625-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar