Enhancing memory recall during video lectures: does the visual display format matter?

References

• Adesope, O. O., & Nesbit, J. C. (2012). Verbal redundancy in multimedia learning environments: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(1), 250–263. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adesope, O. O., & Nesbit, J. C. (2013). Animated and static concept maps enhance learning from spoken narration. Learning and Instruction, 27, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2017). Digital learning compass: Distance education enrollment report 2017. Babson Survey Research Group. https://www.bayviewanalytics.com/reports/digtiallearningcompassenrollment2017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Amadieu, F., Van Gog, T., Paas, F., Tricot, A., & Mariné, C. (2009). Effects of prior knowledge and concept-map structure on disorientation, cognitive load, and learning. Learning and Instruction, 19(5), 376–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barideaux, K. J., Jr., & Pavlik, P. I. (2021). Can concept maps attenuate auditory distraction when studying with music? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35(6), 1547–1558. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchi, L., & Risko, E. (2022). The role of graphics in video lectures. The Journal of Experimental Education, 90(1), 56–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2021.1873087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blankenship, J., & Dansereau, D. F. (2000). The effect of animated node-link displays on information recall. The Journal of Experimental Education, 68(4), 293–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220970009600640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blunt, J. R., & Karpicke, J. D. (2014). Learning with retrieval-based concept mapping. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(3), 849–858. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cade, W., Maass, J., Hays, P., & Olney, A. (2014). Animated presentation of pictorial and concept map media in biology. In S. Trausan-Matu, K. Boyer, M. Crosby, & K. Panourgia (Eds.), Lecture notes in computer science. Intelligent tutoring systems. (pp. 416–425). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07221-0_52
   Google Scholar
• Callihan, L., & Callihan, D. (2013). CLEP natural sciences. Research & Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Clariana, R., & Koul, R. (2008). The effects of learner prior knowledge when creating concept maps from a text passage. International Journal of Instructional Media, 35(2), 229–236.
   Google Scholar
• Dansereau, D. F. (2005). Node-link mapping principles for visualizing knowledge and information. In S.-O. Tergan & T. Keller (Eds.), Knowledge and information visualization. Searching for synergies. (pp. 61–81). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/11510154_4
   Google Scholar
• deWinstanley, P. A., & Bjork, R. A. (2002). Successful lecturing: Presenting information in ways to engage effective processing. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2002(89), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.44
   Google Scholar
• Farley, J., Risko, E. F., & Kingstone, A. (2013). Everyday attention and lecture retention: The effects of time, fidgeting, and mind wandering. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 619. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00619
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foos, P. W., Mora, J. J., & Tkacz, S. (1994). Student study techniques and the generation effect. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(4), 567–576. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.86.4.567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garner, J., & Alley, M. (2013). How the design of presentation slides affects audience comprehension: A case for the assertion–evidence approach. International Journal of Engineering Education, 29(6), 1564–1579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorissen, P., van Bruggen, J., & Jochems, W. (2012). Students and recorded lectures: Survey on current use and demands for higher education. Research in Learning Technology, 20, 297–311. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v20i0.17299
   Google Scholar
• Grimaldi, P. J., Poston, L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2015). How does creating a concept map affect item-specific encoding? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(4), 1049–1061. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000076
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, R. H., Dansereau, D. F., & Skaggs, L. P. (1992). Knowledge maps and the presentation of related information domains. The Journal of Experimental Education, 61(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1992.9943845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, R. H., & O’Donnell, A. (1996). Cognitive and affective outcomes of learning from knowledge maps. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(1), 94–101. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1996.0008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpicke, J. D., & Blunt, J. R. (2011). Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping. Science), 331(6018), 772–775. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1199327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambiotte, J. G., & Dansereau, D. D. (1992). Effects of knowledge maps and prior knowledge on recall of science lecture content. The Journal of Experimental Education, 60(3), 189–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1992.9943875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebauer, R. S. (1984). Using lecture transcripts in EAP lecture comprehension courses. TESOL Quarterly, 18(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannes, S. M., & Kintsch, W. (1987). Knowledge organization and text organization. Cognition and Instruction, 4(2), 91–115. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0402_2
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2005). Principles for reducing extraneous processing in multimedia learning: Coherence, signaling, redundancy, spatial contiguity, and temporal contiguity principles. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2014). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., Hegarty, M., Mayer, S., & Campbell, J. (2005). When static media promote active learning: Annotated illustrations versus narrated animations in multimedia instruction. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 11(4), 256–265. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.11.4.256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeachie, W., & Svinicki, M. (2013). McKeachie’s teaching tips. Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Nesbit, J. C., & Adesope, O. O. (2006). Learning with concept and knowledge maps: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 76(3), 413–448. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543076003413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesbit, J. C., & Adesope, O. O. (2011). Learning from animated concept maps with concurrent audio narration. The Journal of Experimental Education, 79(2), 209–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220970903292918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newbern, D., Dansereau, D. F., & Patterson, M. E. (1997). Spatial–semantic display processing: The role of spatial structure on recall. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22(3), 319–337. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1997.0936
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, L. A., & Huckin, T. H. (1990). Point-driven understanding in engineering lecture comprehension. English for Specific Purposes, 9(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(90)90027-A
   Google Scholar
• Richey, J. E., & Nokes-Malach, T. J. (2015). Comparing four instructional techniques for promoting robust knowledge. Educational Psychology Review, 27(1), 181–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9268-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santhanam, E., Leach, C., & Dawson, C. (1998). Concept mapping: How should it be introduced, and is there evidence for long term benefit? Higher Education, 35(3), 317–328. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003028902215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schacter, D. L., & Szpunar, K. K. (2015). Enhancing attention and memory during video-recorded lectures. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 1(1), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000011
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, N. L., Nesbit, J. C., Anguiano, C. J., & Adesope, O. O. (2018). Studying and constructing concept maps: A meta‐analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 30(2), 431–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9403-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4(4), 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90003-5
   Google Scholar
• Tufte, E. R. (2003). The cognitive style of PowerPoint. (Vol. 2006). Graphics Press Cheshire.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., Adesope, O., Sundararajan, N., & Buckley, P. (2021). Effects of different concept map activities on chemistry learning. Educational Psychology, 41(2), 245–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2020.1749567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiegmann, D. A., Dansereau, D. F., McCagg, E. C., Rewey, K. L., & Pitre, U. (1992). Effects of knowledge map characteristics on information processing. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 17(2), 136–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(92)90055-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, R. L., & Eggert, A. C. (2002). Notetaking in college classes: Student patterns and instructional strategies. The Journal of General Education, 51(3), 173–199. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27797918 https://doi.org/10.1353/jge.2003.0006
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, K., & Korn, J. H. (2007). Attention during lectures: Beyond ten minutes. Teaching of Psychology, 34(2), 85–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986280701291291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, R. M., Sundararajan, N., Adesope, O., & Nishida, K. R. (2021). Static and interactive concept maps for chemistry learning. Educational Psychology, 41(2), 206–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2020.1761299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar