![The World Congress on Controversies in Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility (COGI). Click here to learn more.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/112382/JournalAd-COGI2024-Leaderboard.jpg"})
References
- Alcazar J L, Castillo G. Comparison of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional power-Doppler imaging in complex adnexal masses for the prediction of ovarian cancer. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2005; 192: 807–812
- Aslam N, Tailor A, Lawton F, Carr J, Savvas M, Jurkovic D. Prospective evaluation of three different models for the pre-operative diagnosis of ovarian cancer. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2000; 107: 1347–1353
- Cohen L S, Escobar P F, Scharm C, Glimco B, Fishman D A. Three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound improves the diagnostic accuracy for ovarian cancer prediction. Gynecologic Oncology 2001; 82: 40–48
- Guerriero S, Alcazar J L, Coccia M E, Ajossa S, Scarselli G, Boi M, et al. Complex pelvic mass as a target of evaluation of vessel distribution by color Doppler sonography for the diagnosis of adnexal malignancies: results of a multicenter European study. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine 2002; 21: 1105–1111
- Jacobs I, Oram D, Fairbanks J, Turner J, Frost C, Grudzinskas J G. A risk of malignancy index incorporating CA125, ultrasound and menopausal status for the accurate preoperative diagnosis of ovarian cancer. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1990; 97: 922–929
- Jarvela I Y, Sladkevicius P, Tekay A H, Campbell S, Nargund G. Intraobserver and interobserver variability of ovarian volume, gray-scale and color flow indices obtained using transvaginal three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasonography. Ultrasound in Obstetrics Gynecology 2003; 21: 277–282
- Kinkel K, Hricak H, Lu Y, Tsuda K, Filly R A. US characteri-zation of ovarian masses: a meta-analysis. Radiology 2000; 217: 803–811
- Kinkel K, Lu Y, Mehdizade A, Pelte M F, Hricak H. Indeterminate ovarian mass at US: incremental value of second imaging test for characterization – meta-analysis and Bayesian analysis. Radiology 2005; 236: 85–94
- Kurjak A, Kupesic S, Sparac V, Prka M, Bekavac I. The detection of stage I ovarian cancer by three-dimensional sonography and power Doppler. Gynecological Oncology 2003; 90: 258–264
- Pascual M A, Tresserra F, Grases P J, Labastida R, Dexeus S. Borderline cystic tumors of the ovary: gray-scale and color Doppler sonographic findings. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound 2002; 30: 76–82
- Testa A C, Ajossa S, Ferrandina G, Fruscella E, Ludovisi M, Malaggese M, et al. Does quantitative analysis of three-dimensional power Doppler angiography have a role in the diagnosis of malignant pelvic solid tumors? A preliminary study. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 2005; 26: 67–72