![The World Congress on Controversies in Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility (COGI). Click here to learn more.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/112382/JournalAd-COGI2024-Leaderboard.jpg"})
References
- Bandy L C, Clarke-Pearson D L, Soper J T, et al. Long-term effects on bladder function following radical hysterectomy with and without postoperative radiation. Gynecologic Oncology 1987; 26: 160–168
- Farquharson D I, Shingleton H M, Soong S J, et al. The adverse effects of cervical cancer treatment on bladder function. Gynecologic Oncology 1987; 27: 15–23
- Fishman I J, Shabsigh R, Kaplan A L. Lower urinary tract dysfunction after radical hysterectomy for carcinoma cervix. Urology 1986; 28: 462–468
- Kadar N, Nelson J H, Jr. Treatment of urinary incontinence after radical hysterectomy Obstetrics. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1984; 64: 400–405
- Kindermann G, Debus-Thiede G. Postoperative urological complications after radical surgery for cervical cancer. Balliere's Clinics in Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1988; 2: 933–941
- Lin H H, Yu H J, Sheu B C, et al. Importance of urodynamic study before radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Gynecologic Oncology 2001; 81: 270–272
- Massey A, Abrams P. Urodynamics of the lower urinary tract. Clinics in Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1985; 12: 319–341
- Naik R, Nwabinelli J, Mayne C, et al. Prevalence and management of (non-fistulous) urinary incontinence in women following radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology 2001; 22: 26–30
- Sakamoto S, Takizawa K. An improved radical hysterectomy with fewer urological complications and with no loss of therapeutic results for invasive cervical cancer. Balliere's Clinics in Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1988; 2: 953–962
- Trimbos J B, Mass C P, Deruiter M C, et al. A nerve sparing radical hysterectomy: guidelines and feasibility in Western patients. Journal of Gynaecological Cancer 2001; 11: 180–186
- Zullo M A, Manci N, Angioli R, et al. Vesical dysfunctions after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a critical review. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology 2003; 48: 287–293