![The World Congress on Controversies in Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility (COGI). Click here to learn more.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/112382/JournalAd-COGI2024-Leaderboard.jpg"})
References
- Alarab M, Regan C, O'Connell M P, et al. Singleton vaginal breech delivery at term: still a safe option. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2004; 103: 407–412
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Mode of term singleton breech delivery. ACOG, Washington 2001, ACOG Committee Opinion No. 265
- Coombe Women's Hospital. Annual Clinical Report. Dublin 1998
- Coughlan C, Kearney R, Turner M J. What are the implications for the next delivery in primigravidae who have an elective caesarean section for breech presentation?. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2002; 109: 624–626
- Glezerman M. Five years to the term breech trial: the rise and fall of a randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2006; 194: 20–25
- Greene R, Gardeil F, Turner M J. Data on episiotomy rates need analysis by parity. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1998; 176: 498–499
- Hannah M E, Hannah W J, Hewson S A, et al. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. The Lancet 2000; 356: 1375–1383
- Kaushik V, Gudgeon C. Caesarean for breech: A paradigm shift?. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2003; 43: 298–301
- Kotaska A. Inappropriate use of randomised trials to evaluate complex phenomena: case study of vaginal breech delivery. British Medical Journal 2004; 329: 1039–1042
- Lynch C M, Kearney R, Turner M J. Maternal morbidity after elective repeat caesarean section after two or more previous procedures. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 2003; 106: 10–13
- Rietberg C T, Elferink-Stinkens P M, Visser G HA. The effect of the Term Breech Trial on medical intervention behaviour and neonatal outcome in The Netherlands: an analysis of 35,453 term breech infants. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2005; 112: 205–209
- Roosmalen J, Rosendaal F. There is still room for disagreement about vaginal delivery of breech infants at term. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2002; 109: 967–969
- Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The management of breech presentation. RCOG, London 2001, Guideline No 20. (Revised April 2001)
- Su M, McLedd L, Ross S, et al. Factors associated with adverse perinatal outcome in the Term Breech Trial. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2003; 189: 740–745
- Su M, Hannah W J, Willan A, et al. Planned caesarean section decreases the risk of adverse perinatal outcome due to both labour and delivery complications in the Term Breech Trial. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2004; 111: 1065–1074
- Taylor P J, Hannah W J. The Canadian Consensus on Breech Management at Term. Journal of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada 1994; 16: 1839–1848
- Turner M J. Uterine rupture. Best Practice and Research in Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2002; 16: 69–79
- Whyte H, Hannah M E, Saigal S, et al. Term breech trial collaborative group: Outcomes of children at 2 years after planned caesarean birth versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the international randomized term breech trial. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2004; 191: 864–871
- Wingfield M, Turner M J, Rasmussen M J, et al. Labour in twin pregnancy: an analysis by parity. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1992; 12: 14–16