Systematic reviews of qualitative evidence: What are the experiences of women with endometriosis?

References

• Ballweg M L. Endometriosis: the patient's perspective. Infertility and Reproductive Medicine Clinics of North America 1992; 3: 747–761
   Google Scholar
• Barbour R S. Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog?. British Medical Journal 2001; 322: 1115–1117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barroso J, Gallup C J, Sandelowski M, et al. The challenge of searching for and retrieving qualitative studies. Western Journal of Nursing Research 2003; 25: 153–178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryman A. Social research methods. Oxford University Press, Oxford 2001
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan D R. An uneasy alliance: combining qualitative and quantitative research methods. Health Education Quarterly 1992; Spring: 117–135
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Consensus Conference. The patient's perspective. The endometriosis association. Journal of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada Special Supplement 1999
   Google Scholar
• Cox H, Henderson L, Andersen N, et al. Focus group study of endometriosis: struggle, loss and the medical merry-go-round. International Journal of Nursing Practice 2003a; 9: 2–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cox H, Henderson L, Wood R, et al. Learning to take charge: women's experiences of living with endometriosis. Complement Therapy Nursing Midwifery 2003b; 9: 62–68
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Denny E. ‘You are one of the unlucky ones’: delay in the diagnosis of endometriosis. Diversity in Health and Social Care 2004a; 1: 39–44
   Google Scholar
• Denny E. Women's experience of endometriosis. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2004b; 46: 641–648
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon-Woods M, Fitzpatrick R. Qualitative research in systematic reviews. Has established a place for itself. British Medical Journal 2001; 323: 765–766
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon-Woods M, Fitzpatrick R, Roberts K. Including qualitative research in systematic reviews: opportunities and problems. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2001; 7: 125–133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon-Woods M, Agarwal S, Young B, et al. Integrative approaches to qualitative and quantitative evidence. Health Development Agency, London 2004
   Google Scholar
• Evans D. Database searches for qualitative research. Journal of the Medical Library Association 2002; 90: 290–293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant M J. Searching for qualitative research studies on the MEDLINE database: the development of an optimal search strategy. Department of Information and Library Studies. 2000
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh T, Taylor R. Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research). British Medical Journal 1997; 315: 740–743
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harden A. A review of tools for assessing the quality of qualitative studies: implications for systematic reviews (abstract). Cochrane Collaboration Colloquium, Ottawa 2004
   Google Scholar
• Harden A, Garcia J, Oliver S, et al. Applying systematic review methods to studies of people's views: an example from public health research. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2004; 58: 794–800
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe K, Eisenhart M. Standards for qualitative (and quantitative) research: a prolegomenon. Educational Researcher 1990; 19: 2–9
   Google Scholar
• Jones G, Jenkinson C, Kennedy S. The impact of endometriosis upon quality of life: a qualitative analysis. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2004; 25: 123–133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan K S, Coomarasamy A. Searching for evidence to inform clinical practice. Current Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2004; 14: 142–146
   Google Scholar
• Undertaking systematic reviews of research on effectiveness. CRD's Guidance for Carrying Out or Commissioning Reviews 2nd ed., K S Khan, G Ter Riet, J Glanville, et al. University of York, York 2001, CRD Report No. 4. NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD) Available at: http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/report4.htm
   Google Scholar
• Khan K S, Kunz R, Kleijnen J, et al. Five steps to conducting a systematic review. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 2003a; 96: 118–121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan K S, Kunz R, Kleijnen J, et al. Systematic reviews to support evidence-based medicine: How to review and apply findings of systematic reviews. Royal Society of Medicine Press, London 2003b
   Google Scholar
• McDermott E, Graham H, Hamilton V. Experience of being a teenage mother in the UK: a report of a systematic review of qualitative studies. University of Glasgow, Glasgow 2004, The Centre for Evidence-based Public Health Policy, the Social and Public Health Services Unit
   Google Scholar
• Neelakantan D, Omojole F, Clark T J, et al. Quality of life instruments in studies of pelvic pain: a systematic review. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2004; 8: 851–858
   Google Scholar
• Noblit G, Hare D. Meta ethnography: synthesising qualitative data. SAGE monograph, California 1988
   Google Scholar
• Popay J, Rogers A, Williams G. Rationale and standards in the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research. Qualitative Health Research 1998; 8: 341–351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prentice A. Regular review: Endometriosis. British Medical Journal 2001; 323: 93–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw R, Booth A, Sutton A, et al. Finding qualitative research: an evaluation of search strategies. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2004; 4: 5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Whitney M L. Importance of lay organizations for coping with endometriosis. Journal of Reproductive Medicine 1998; 43: 331–334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar