![The World Congress on Controversies in Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility (COGI). Click here to learn more.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/112382/JournalAd-COGI2024-Leaderboard.jpg"})
References
- Al-Mufti R, McCarthy A, Fisk N M. Survey of obstetricians' personal preference and discretionary practice. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Biology 1997; 73: 1–4
- Barrett J FR, Jarvis G J, MacDonald H N, Buchan P C, Tyrrell S N, Lilford R J. Inconsistencies in clinical decisions in obstetrics. Lancet 1990; 336: 549–551
- Birthchoice. 2006. Available at: www.birthchoice.org.uk
- Commentaries. What is the correct caesarean section rate?. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1993; 100: 403–404
- Department of Health. Changing Childbirth Report of the Expert Maternity Group chaired by Cumberlege, J. HMSO, London 1993
- Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2000. DHHS Publications, Washington, DC 1991, (PHS) 91 – 50212
- Francome C, Savage W. Caesarean section in Britain and the United States 12% or 24%: is either the right rate?. Social Science Medicine 1993; 37: 1199–1218
- General Medical Council. Good Medical Practice. GMC, London 1995; 4
- Hannah M E, Hannah W J, Hewson S A, Hodnett E D, Saigal S. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. The Lancet 2000; 356: 1375–1383
- House of Commons. Health Select Committee Report. Maternity Services. Conclusions and Recommendations. HMSO, London 1992, Vols 1 – 3. Winterton Report
- National Institutes of Health (NIH). Cesarean childbirth. Report of a Consensus Development Conference 82 – 2067. US Institute of Health and Human Services, Washington 1981
- Olah K S. Reversal of the decision for caesarean section in the second stage of labour on the basis of consultant vaginal assessment. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2005; 25: 115–116
- RCOG. Caesarean section: NICE Guidelines. RCOG Press, London 2004
- Savage W. Is it so difficult to define an optimal caesarean section rate for a population. Health Policy Report for MSc in Public Health. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London 1997
- Savage W, Francome C. British caesarean section rates: have we reached a plateau?. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1993; 100: 493–406
- Thomas J, Paranjothy S. National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report. RCOG Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit. RCOG Press, London 2001
- Turner M. The Term Breech Trial: are the clinical guidelines justified by the evidence?. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2006; 26: 491–494
- World Health Organization (WHO). Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet 1985; ii: 436–437