Computerised analysis of antepartum foetal heart parameters: New reference ranges

References

• American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (ACOG). 1989. Intrapartum foetal heart rate monitoring. ACOG Technical Bulletin 132:1–6.
   Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (ACOG). 1995. Technical bulletin 207: foetal heart rate patterns: monitoring, interpretation, and management. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 51:65–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (ACOG). 2005. Practise bulletin 70: intrapartum foetal heart rate monitoring. Obstetrics and Gynecology 106:1453–1460.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (ACOG). 2009. Practise bulletin 106: intrapartum foetal heart rate monitoring: nomenclature, interpretation, and general management principles. Obstetrics and Gynecology 114:192–202.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anceschi MM, Piazze JJ, Ruozi-Berretta A, Cosmi E, Cerekja A, Maranghi L, Cosmi EV. 2003. Validity of short term variation (STV) in detection of fetal acidemia. Journal of Perinatal Medicine 31:231–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annunziata ML, Tagliaferri S, Esposito FG, Giuliano N, Mereghini F, Di Lieto A, et al. 2016. Computerized analysis of fetal heart rate variability signal during the stages of labor. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 42:258–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arduini D, Rizzo G, Piana G, Bonalumi A, Brambilla P, Romanini C. 1993. Computerised analysis of foetal heart rate: I. description of the system (2CTG). Maternal Foetal Investment 3:159.
   Google Scholar
• Ayres-de-Campos D, Costa-Santos C, Bernardes J, SisPorto Multicentre Validation Study Group. 2005. Prediction of neonatal state by computer analysis of foetal heart rate tracings: the antepartum arm of the SisPorto multicentre validation study. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 118:52–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardes J, Costa-Pereira A, Ayres-de-Campos D, Van Geijn HP, Pereira-Leite L. 1997. Evaluation of interobserver agreement of cardiotocograms. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 57:33–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butt K, Lim K, Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. 2014. Determination of gestational age by ultrasound. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 36:171–183.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Costa A, Ayres-de-Campos D, Costa F, Santos C, Bernardes J. 2009. Prediction of neonatal acidemia by computer analysis of foetal heart rate and ST event signals. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 201:e1–e6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton KJ, Phill D, Dawes GS, Patrick JE. 1983. The autonomic nervous system and fetal heart rate variability. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 146:456–462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawes GS, Moulden M, Redman CW. 1991. System 8000: computerized antenatal FHR analysis. Journal of Perinatal Medicine 19:47–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawes GS, Moulden M, Redman CWG. 1996. Improvements in computerized fetal heart rate analysis antepartum. Journal of Perinatal Medicine 24:25–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druzin ML, Hutson JM, Edersheim TG. 1986. Relationship of baseline fetal heart rate to gestational age and fetal sex. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 154:1102–1103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrario M, Signorini MG, Magenes G, Cerutti S. 2006. Comparison of entropy-based regularity estimator: application to the foetal heart rate signal for the identification of foetal distress. IEEE Transactions on Bio-Medical Engineering 53:119–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueras F, Albela S, Bonino S, Palacio M, Barrau E, Hernandez S, et al. 2005. Visual analysis of antepartum foetal heart rate tracings: inter- and intra-observer agreement and impact of knowledge of neonatal outcome. Journal of Perinatal Medicine 33:241–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagnon R, Campbell MK, Humse C. 1993. A comparison between visual and computer analysis of antepartum foetal heart rate tracings. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 168:842–847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grivell RM, Alfirevic Z, Gyte GM, Devane D. 2010. Antenatal cardiotocography for foetal assessment. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews CD007863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzman ER, Vintzileos AM, Martins M, Benito C, Houlihan C, Hanley M. 1996. The efficacy of individual computer heart rate indices in detencting acidemia at birth in growth-restricted foetuses. Obstetrics and Gynecology 87:969–974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Sharman RS, Deter RL, Park SK. 1985. Estimation of foetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements–a prospective study. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 151:333–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macones GA, Hankins GDV, Spong CY, Hauth J, Moore T. 2008. The 2008 national institute of child health and human development workshop report on electronic foetal monitoring: update on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines. Obstetrics and Gynecology 112:661–666
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mantel R, van Geijn HP, Caron FJ, Swartjes JM, van Woerden EE, Jongsma HW. 1990. Computer analysis of antepartum fetal heart rate: 1. Baseline determination. International Journal of Biomedical Computing 25:261–272.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children’s Health, commissioned by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). 2007. Intrapartum care. London: RCOG Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute of Child Health and Human Development research planning workshop (NICHHD). 1997. Electronic foetal heart rate monitoring: research guidelines for interpretation. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 177:1385–1390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nidhal S, Ali MMA, Zaidan AA, Zaidan BB, Najah H. 2011. Computerised algorithm for foetal heart rate baseline and baseline variability estimation based on distance between signal average and α value. International Journal of Pharmacology 7:228–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardey J, Moulden M, Redman CWG. 2002. A computer system for the numerical analysis of nonstress tests. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 186:1095–1103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park MI, Hwang JH, Cha KJ, Park YS, Koh SK. 2001. Computerized analysis of fetal heart rate parameters by gestational age. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 74:157–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillai M, James D. 1990. The development of fetal heart rate patterns during normal pregnancy. Obstetrics and Gynecology 76:812–816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pincus SM. 1991. Approximate entropy as a measure of system complexity. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 88:2297–2301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pincus SM. 1995. Approximate entropy (ApEn) as a complexity measure. Chaos 5:110–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preboth M. 2000 ACOG guidelines on antepartum foetal surveillance. American college of obstetricians and gynaecologists. American Family Physician 62:1184,1187–1188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romano M, Bracale M, Cesarelli M, Campanile M, Bifulco P, De Falco M, et al. 2006. Antepartum cardiotocography: a study of fetal reactivity in frequency domain. Computers in Biology and Medicine 36:619–633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). 2001. The use of electronic foetal monitoring. Evidence-based clinical guideline, number 8. London: RCOG Press.
   Google Scholar
• Serra V, Bellver J, Moulden M, Redman CW. 2009. Computerised analysis of normal foetal heart rate pattern throughout gestation. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 34:74–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serra V, Moulden M, Bellver J, Redman CW. 2008. The value of the short-term foetal heart rate variation for timing the delivery of growth-retarded foetuses. BJOG 115:1101–1107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Signorini MG, Magenes G, Cerutti S, Arduini D. 2003. Linear and nonlinear parameters for the analysis of fetal heart rate signal from cardiotocographic recordings. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 50:365–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siristatidis C, Kassanos D, Salamalekis G, Creatsa M, Chrelias C, Creatsas G. 2012. Cardiotocography alone versus cardiotocography plus Doppler evaluation of the foetal middle cerebral and umbilical artery for intrapartum foetal monitoring: a Greek prospective controlled trial. Journal of Maternal Foetal Neonatal Medicine 25:1183–1187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Struijk PC, Ursem NT, Mathews J, Clark EB, Keller BB, Wladimiroff LW. 2001. Power spectrum analysis of heart rate and blood flow velocity variability measured in the umbilical and uterine arteries in early pregnancy: a comparative study. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 17:316–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wróbel J, Horoba K, Pander T, Jeżewski J, Czabański R. 2013. Improving foetal heart rate signal interpretation by application of myriad filtering. Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering 33:211–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiaotian L, Daan Z, Shufeng Z. 2005. Approximate entropy of fetal heart rate variability as a predictor of fetal distress in women at term pregnancy. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 84:837–843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh P, Emary K, Impey L. 2012. The relationship between umbilical cord arterial pH and serious adverse neonatal outcome: analysis of 51,519 consecutive validated samples. BJOG 119: 824–831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhuravlev YE, Rassi D, Mishin AA, Emery SJ. 2002. Dynamic analysis of beat-to-beat fetal heart rate variability recorded by SQUID magnetometer: quantification of sympatho-vagal balance. Early Human Development 66:1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuspan FP, Quilligan EJ, Iams JD, van Geijn HP. 1979. Predictors of intrapartum fetal distress: the role of electronic fetal monitoring. Report of the national institute of child health and human development consensus development task force. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 135:287–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar