Comparison of ‘push method’ with ‘Patwardhan’s method’ on maternal and perinatal outcomes in women undergoing caesarean section in second stage

References

• Allen VM, O'Connell CM, Baskett TF. 2005. Maternal and perinatal morbidity of caesarean delivery at full cervical dilatation compared with caesarean delivery in the first stage of labour. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 112:986–990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastani P, Pourabolghasem S, Pourabolghase S, Abbasalizadeh F, Motvalli L. 2012. Comparison of neonatal and maternal outcomes associated with head-pushing and head-pulling methods for impacted fetal head extraction during cesarean delivery. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: The Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 118:1–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blickstein I. 2004. Difficult delivery of the impacted fetal head during cesarean section: intraoperative disengagement dystocia. Journal of Perinatal Medicine 32:465–469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chopra S, Bagga R, Keepanasseril A, Jain V, Kalra J, Suri V. 2009. Disengagement of the deeply engaged fetal head during cesarean section in advanced labor: conventional method versus reverse breech extraction. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 88:1163–1166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fasubaa OB, Ezechi OC, Orji EO, Ogunniyi SO, Akindele ST, Loto OM, Okogbo FO. 2002. Delivery of the impacted head of the fetus at caesarean section after prolonged obstructed labour: a randomised comparative study of two methods. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology : The Journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 22:375–378.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fong YF, Arulkumaran S. 1997. Breech extraction-an alternative method of delivering a deeply engaged head at cesarean section. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: The Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 56:183–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frass KA, Al Eryani A, Al-Harazi AH. 2011. Reverse breech extraction versus head pushing in cesarean section for obstructed labor. A comparative study in Yemen. Saudi Medical Journal 32:1261–1266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govender V, Panday M, Moodley J. 2010. Second stage caesarean section at a tertiary hospital in South Africa. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 23:1151–1155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gifford DS, Morton SC, Fiske M, Keesey J, Keeler E, Kahn KL. 2000. Lack of progress in labor as a reason for cesarean. Obstetrics and Gynecology 95:589–595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeve YB, Navti OB, Konje JC. 2016. Comparison of techniques used to deliver a deeply impacted fetal head at full dilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bjog: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 123:337–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khosla AH, Dahiya K, Sangwan K. 2003. Cesarean section in a wedged head. Indian Journal of Medical Sciences 57:187–191.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levy R, Chernomoretz T, Appelman Z, Levin D, Or Y, Hagay ZJ. 2005. Head pushing versus reverse breech extraction in cases of impacted fetal head during Cesarean section. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology 121:24–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukhopadhyay PNT, Dalui R, Hazra S, Bhattacharya D. 2005. Evaluation of Patwardhan’s technic – a four study in a rural teaching hospital. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of India 55:244–246.
   Google Scholar
• Pandit SN, Khan RJ. 2013. Surgical techniques for performing caesarean section including CS at full dilatation. Best Practice &Amp; Research. Clinical Obstetrics &Amp; Gynaecology 27:179–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polin RA. 2012. Committee on Fetus and Newborn Management of neonates with suspected or proven early-onset bacterial sepsis. Pediatrics 129:1006–1015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha PK, Gulati R, Goel P, Tandon R, Huria A. 2014. Second stage caesarean section: evaluation of patwardhan technique. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research : Jcdr 8:93–95.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sarnat HB, Sarnat MS. 1976. Neonatal encephalopathy following fetal distress: a clinical and electroencephalographic study. Archives of Neurology 33:695–706.
   Google Scholar
• Schwake D, Petchenkin L, Younis JS. 2012. Reverse breech extraction in cases of second stage caesarean section. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology : The Journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 32:548–551.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Singh M, Varma R. 2008. Reducing complications associated with a deeply engaged head at caesarean section: a simple instrument. The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist 10:38–41.
   Google Scholar
• Sung JF, Daniels KI, Brodzinsky L, El-Sayed YY, Caughey AB, Lyell DJ. 2007. Cesarean delivery outcomes after a prolonged second stage of labor. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 197: e1–e5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veisi F, Zangeneh M, Malekkhosravi S, Rezavand N. 2012. Comparison of “push” and “pull” methods for impacted fetal head extraction during cesarean delivery. International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 118:4–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziyauddin F, Hakim S, Khan T. 2013. Delivery of the deeply engaged fetal head during cesarean section in advanced labour: a comparative study of head pushing versus reverse breech extraction. Current Pediatric Research 17:41–43.
   Google Scholar