References
- Arikan DC, Ozer A, Arikan I, Coskun A, Kiran H. 2011. Turkish obstetricians’ personal preference for mode of delivery and attitude toward cesarean delivery on maternal request. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 284:543–549.
- Atun R, Chaumont C, Fitchett JR, Haakenstad A, Kaberuka D. 2016. Poverty alleviation and the economic benefits of investing in health. Systematic analysis and policy implications. Harvard T.C. Chan Harvard Kennedy School, Ministerial Leadership, Forum for Finance Ministers; [cited 2019 Feb 6]. Available from: https://cdn2.sph.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/61/2015/09/L-MLIH_Health-economic-growth-and-development_Atun-and-Kaberuka_4-11-16.pdf
- Buyukbayrak EE, Kaymaz O, Kars B, Karsidag AY, Bektas E, Unal O, Turan C. 2010. Caesarean delivery or vaginal birth: preference of Turkish pregnant women and influencing factors. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 30:155–158.
- Costa-Ramón AM, Rodríguez-González A, Serra-Burriel M, Campillo-Artero C. 2018. It’s about time: cesarean sections and neonatal health. Journal of Health Economics 59:46–59.
- Hooper D, Coughlan J, Mullen M. 2008. Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods 6:53–60.
- Kabakian-Khasholian T, Bashour H, El-Nemer A, Kharouf M, Sheikha S, El Lakany N, et al. 2017. Women’s satisfaction and perception of control in childbirth in three Arab countries. Reproductive Health Matters 25:16–26.
- Koc I. 2003. Increased cesarean section rates in Turkey. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care 8:1–10.
- Loehlin JC, Beaujean AA. 2017. Latent variable models. An introduction to factor, path, and structural equation analysis. 5th ed. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
- MoH. 2016a. The Turkish Ministry of Health (MoH). Health statistics year book-2016; [cited 2019 Oct 6]. Available from: https://dosyasb.saglik.gov.tr/Eklenti/13160,sy2016enpdf.pdf?0
- MoH. 2016b. The Turkish Ministry of Health (MoH). Sağlık Bakanlığı normal doğumu artırmak için düğmeye bastı. Ministry of Health pressed the button to increase normal birth [in Turkish]. cnnturk; [cited 2019 Oct 6]. Available from: http://www.cnnturk.com/turkiye/saglik-bakanligi-normal-dogumu-artirmak-icin-dugmeye-basti
- MoH. 2017a. The Turkish Ministry of Health (MoH). Doğum şekli tercihinin multidisipliner irdelenmesi çalıştayı. Multidisciplinary investigation workshop about preference of birth type [in Turkish]; [cited 2019 Oct 6]. Available from: https://www.saglik.gov.tr/TR,13458/sezaryen-oranlari-gereksiz-yuksek-olan-hastaneleri-cezalandiracagiz.html
- MoH. 2017b. Turkish Ministry of Health (MoH). Kamu hastaneleri istatistik raporu-2017. Public hospitals statistical report-2017 [in Turkish]. General Directorate of Public Hospitals; [cited 2019 Jan 10]. Available from: https://dosyasb.saglik.gov.tr/Eklenti/21853,kamu-hastaneleri-istatistik-raporu–2017pdf.pdf?0
- OECD. 2017. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Health at a glance 2017: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing; [cited 2019 Feb 8]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1787/health_glance-2017-en
- Santas G, Santas F. 2018. Trends of caesarean section rates in Turkey. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 38:658–662.
- Tavares LP. 2016. Who delays childbearing? The associations between time to first birth, personality traits and education. European Journal of Population 32:575–597.
- TDHS. 2014. Turkey Demographic and Health Survey (TDHS); [cited 2019 Apr 4]. Available from: http://www.hips.hacettepe.edu.tr/tnsa2013/rapor/TNSA_2013_ana_rapor.pdf
- TurkStat. 2017. Turkish Statistical Institute (TurkStat); [cited 2017 Oct 5]. Available from: http://www.turkstat.gov.tr/Start.do;jsessionid=bNJ6d10TBWBMH2d3ypw7mbjyLhvWFFSZRdbtbyxWd4T8pGYdk9JB!1019097902
- Yardim MS, Uner S. 2018. Equity in access to care in the era of health system reforms in Turkey. Health Policy 122:645–651.