The accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasonography in the diagnosis of Müllerian duct anomalies and its concordance with magnetic resonance imaging

References

• Behr SC, Courtier JL, Qayyum A. 2012. Imaging of Müllerian duct anomalies. Radiographics 32:E233–E250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bermejo C, Martínez Ten P, Cantarero R, Diaz D, Pérez Pedregosa J, Barrón E, et al. 2010. Three-dimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis of Müllerian duct anomalies and concordance with magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 35:593–601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bermejo C, Martínez-Ten P, Ruíz-López L, Estévez M, Gil MM. 2018. Classification of uterine anomalies by 3-dimensional ultrasonography using ESHRE/ESGE criteria: interobserver variability. Reproductive Sciences 25:740–747.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caliskan E, Ozkan S, Cakiroglu Y, Sarisoy HT, Corakci A, Ozeren S. 2010. Diagnostic accuracy of real-time 3D sonography in the diagnosis of congenital Müllerian anomalies in high-risk patients with respect to the phase of the menstrual cycle. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound 38:123–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle MB. 1992. Magnetic resonance imaging in Müllerian fusion defects. The Journal of Reproductive Medicine 37:33–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ergenoglu AM, Sahin Ç, Şimşek D, Akdemir A, Yeniel AÖ, Yerli H, et al. 2016. Comparison of three-dimensional ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis in surgically proven Müllerian duct anomaly cases . European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology 197:22–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faivre E, Fernandez H, Deffieux X, Gervaise A, Frydman R, Levaillant JM. 2012. Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasonography in differential diagnosis of septate and bicornuate uterus compared with office hysteroscopy and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 19:101–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghi T, Casadio P, Kuleva M, Perrone AM, Savelli L, Giunchi S, et al. 2009. Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound in diagnosis and classification of congenital uterine anomalies. Fertility and Sterility 92:808–813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graupera B, Pascual MA, Hereter L, Browne JL, Ubeda B, Rodriguez I, et al. 2015. Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound compared with magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of Müllerian duct anomalies using ESHRE-ESGE consensus on the classification of congenital anomalies of the female genital tract. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 46:616–622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimbizis GF, Sardo ADS, Saravelos SH, Gordts S, Exacoustos C, Van Schoubroeck D, et al. 2016. The Thessaloniki ESHRE/ESGE consensus on diagnosis of female genital anomalies. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England) 31:2–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinonen PK. 2016. Distribution of female genital tract anomalies in two classifications. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology 206:141–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knez J, Saridogan E, Van Den Bosch T, Mavrelos D, Ambler G, Jurkovic D. 2018. ESHRE/ESGE female genital tract anomalies classification system—the potential impact of discarding arcuate uterus on clinical practice. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England) 33:600–606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kougioumtsidou A, Mikos T, Grimbizis GF, Karavida A, Theodoridis TD, Sotiriadis A, et al. 2019. Three-dimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis and the classification of congenital uterine anomalies using the ESHRE/ESGE classification: a diagnostic accuracy study. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 299:779–789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludwin A, Ludwin I, Pitynski K, Jach R, Banas T. 2014. Are the ESHRE/ESGE criteria of female genital anomalies for diagnosis of septate uterus appropriate? Human Reproduction (Oxford, England) 29:867–868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludwin A, Ludwin I. 2015. Comparison of the ESHRE-ESGE and ASRM classifications of Müllerian duct anomalies in everyday practice. Human Reproduction 30:569–580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcal L, Nothaft MA, Coelho F, Volpato R, Iyer R. 2011. Mullerian duct anomalies: MR imaging. Abdominal Imaging 36:756–764.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohamed M, Momtaz MD, Alaa N, Ebrashy MD, Ayman A, Marzouk MD. 2007. Three-dimensional ultrasonography in the evaluation of the uterine cavity. MEFS Journal 12:41–46.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller GC, Hussain HK, Smith YR, Quint EH, Carlos RC, Johnson TD, et al. 2007. Müllerian duct anomalies: comparison of MRI diagnosis and clinical diagnosis. American Journal of Roentgenology 189:1294–1302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellerito JS, McCarthy SM, Doyle MB, Glickman MG, DeCherney AH. 1992. Diagnosis of uterine anomalies: relative accuracy of MR imaging, endovaginal sonography, and hysterosalpingography. Radiology 183:795–800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raga F, Bonilla-Musoles F, Blanes J, Osborne NG. 1996. Congenital Müllerian anomalies: diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound. Fertility and Sterility 65:523–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadek SM, Ahmad RA, Atia H. 2016. Performance of the ESHRE/ESGE classification in differentiating anomalies of double uterine cavity in comparison with the ASRM classification. Middle East Fertility Society Journal 21:75–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salim R, Woelfer B, Backos M, Regan L, Jurkovic D. 2003. Reproducibility of three-dimensional ultrasound diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 21:578–582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troiano RN. 2003. Magnetic resonance imaging of Mullerian duct anomalies of the uterus. Topics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging: TMRI 14:269–279.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wagner BJ, Woodward PJ. 1994. Magnetic resonance evaluation of congenital uterine anomalies. Seminars in Ultrasound, CT, and MR 15:4–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu MH, Hsu CC, Huang KE. 1997. Detection of congenital Müllerian duct anomalies using three-dimensional ultrasound. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound 25:487–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar