Is frozen embryo transfer better than fresh embryo transfer in women undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection over the age of thirty-five? A single referral centre experience

References

• Acet F, Goker ENT, Hortu I, Sahin G, Tavmergen E. 2020. A rare case of bilateral tubal ectopic pregnancy following intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer (ICSI-ET). Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia / RBGO Gynecology and Obstetrics 42:165–168.
   Google Scholar
• Achache H, Revel A. 2006. Endometrial receptivity markers, the journey to successful embryo implantation. Human Reproduction Update 12:731–746.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ALPHA Scientists In Reproductive Medicine. 2011. ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting. Reprod Biomed Online 22:632–646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai H, Mol BW, Li P, Liu X, Watrelot A, Shi J. 2020. Tubal factor infertility with prior ectopic pregnancy: a double whammy? A retrospective cohort study of 2,892 women. Fertility and Sterility 113:1032–1038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capodanno F, De Feo G, Gizzo S, Nicoli A, Palomba S, La Sala GB. 2016. Embryo quality before and after slow freezing: viability, implantation and pregnancy rates in 627 single frozen-thawed embryo replacement cycles following failure of fresh transfer. Reproductive Biology 16:113–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haouzi D, Assou S, Mahmoud K, Tondeur S, Reme T, Hedon B, et al. 2009. Gene expression profile of human endometrial receptivity: comparison between natural and stimulated cycles for the same patients. Human Reproduction 24:1436–1445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jee BC, Suh CS, Kim SH. 2009. Ectopic pregnancy rates after frozen versus fresh embryo transfer: a meta-analysis. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation 68:53–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaidi S, Bernard S, Lambert P, Massip A, Dessy F, Donnay I. 2001. Effect of conventional controlled-rate freezing and vitrification on morphology and metabolism of bovine blastocysts produced in vitro. Biology of Reproduction 65:1127–1134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolibianakis E, Bourgain C, Albano C, Osmanagaoglu K, Smitz J, Van Steirteghem A, et al. 2002. Effect of ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone, gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonists, and human chorionic gonadotropin on endometrial maturation on the day of oocyte pick-up. Fertility and Sterility 78:1025–1029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labarta E, Martínez-Conejero JA, Alama P, Horcajadas JA, Pellicer A, Simon C, et al. 2011. Endometrial receptivity is affected in women with high circulating progesterone levels at the end of the follicular phase: a functional genomics analysis. Human Reproduction 26:1813–1825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le KD, Vuong LN, Ho TM, Dang VQ, Pham TD, Pham CT, et al. 2018. A cost-effectiveness analysis of freeze-only or fresh embryo transfer in IVF of non-PCOS women. Human Reproduction 33:1907–1914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maheshwari A, Pandey S, Shetty A, Hamilton M, Bhattacharya S. 2012. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from the transfer of frozen thawed versus fresh embryos generated through in vitro fertilization treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertility and Sterility 98:368–377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papanikolaou EG, Bourgain C, Kolibianakis E, Tournaye H, Devroey P. 2005. Steroid receptor expression in late follicular phase endometrium in GnRH antagonist IVF cycles is already altered, indicating initiation of early luteal phase transformation in the absence of secretory changes. Human Reproduction 20:1541–1547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelkonen S, Koivunen R, Gissler M, Nuojua-Huttunen S, Suikkari A-M, Hydén-Granskog C, et al. 2010. Perinatal outcome of children born after frozen and fresh embryo transfer: the Finnish cohort study 1995-2006. Human Reproduction 25:914–923.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro BS, Daneshmand S, Garner F, Aguirre M, Ross R. 2008. Contrasting patterns in in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates among fresh autologous, fresh oocyte donor, and cryopreserved cycles with the use of day 5 or day 6 blastocysts may reflect differences in embryo-endometrium synchrony. Fertility and Sterility 89:20–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Garner FC, Aguirre M, Hudson C, Thomas S. 2011. Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer in normal responders. Fertility and Sterility 96:344–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Garner FC, Aguirre M, Thomas S. 2008. Large blastocyst diameter, early blastulation, and low preovulatory serum progesterone are dominant predictors of clinical pregnancy in fresh autologous cycles. Fertility and Sterility 90:302–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi Y, Sun Y, Hao C, Zhang H, Wei D, Zhang Y, et al. 2018. Transfer of fresh versus frozen embryos in ovulatory women. New England Journal of Medicine 378:126–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strowitzki T, Germeyer A, Popovici R, von Wolff M. 2006. The human endometrium as a fertility-determining factor. Human Reproduction Update 12:617–630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toner JP, Coddington CC, Doody K, Van Voorhis B, Seifer DB, Ball GD, et al. 2016. Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and assisted reproductive technology in the United States: a 2016 update. Fertility and Sterility 106:541–546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trounson A, Mohr L. 1983. Human pregnancy following cryopreservation, thawing and transfer of an eight-cell embryo. Nature 305:707–709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaegter KK, Lakic TG, Olovsson M, Berglund L, Brodin T, Holte J. 2017. Which factors are most predictive for live birth after in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) treatments? Analysis of 100 prospectively recorded variables in 8,400 IVF/ICSI single-embryo transfers. Fertility and Sterility 107:641.e2–648.e2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veleva Z, Orava M, Nuojua-Huttunen S, Tapanainen JS, Martikainen H. 2013. Factors affecting the outcome of frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Human Reproduction 28:2425–2431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitale SG, Riemma G, Cianci A. 2020. Unraveling the “double whammy” dilemma: do concomitant tubal infertility and previous ectopic pregnancy shrink the possibility of live birth? Fertility and Sterility 113:934–935.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vladimirov IK, Tacheva D, Diez A. 2017. Theory about the embryo cryo-treatment. Reproductive Medicine and Biology 16:118–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Bai L, Ren H, Liu X, Guo S, Xu P, et al. 2020. Perinatal and maternal outcomes after frozen versus fresh embryo transfer cycles in women of advanced maternal age. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology S0301:30624.
   Google Scholar