125
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Gynaecology

A 5-gene DNA methylation signature is a promising prognostic biomarker for early-stage cervical cancer

, , , &

References

  • Ayhan A, Al RA, Baykal C, Demirtas E, Ayhan A, Yüce K, et al. 2004. Prognostic factors in FIGO stage IB cervical cancer without lymph node metastasis and the role of adjuvant radiotherapy after radical hysterectomy. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer 14:286–292.
  • Cai S, Yu X, Gu Z, Yang Q, Wen B, Sheng J, et al. 2020. A 10-gene prognostic methylation signature for stage I–III cervical cancer. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 301:1275–1287.
  • Cao B, Zeng Y, Wu F, Liu J, Shuang Z, Xu X, et al. 2018. Novel TRERF1 mutations in Chinese patients with ovarian endometriosis. Molecular Medicine Reports 17:5435–5439.
  • Chrysostomou AC, Stylianou DC, Constantinidou A, Kostrikis LG. 2018. Cervical cancer screening programs in Europe: the transition towards HPV vaccination and population-based HPV testing. Viruses 10:729.
  • Di J, Rutherford S, Chu C. 2015. Review of the cervical cancer burden and population-based cervical cancer screening in China. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention 16:7401–7407.
  • Figueroa ME, Lugthart S, Li Y, Erpelinck-Verschueren C, Deng X, Christos PJ, et al. 2010. DNA methylation signatures identify biologically distinct subtypes in acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer Cell 17:13–27.
  • Gonzalez-Reymundez A, Vazquez AI. 2020. Multi-omic signatures identify pan-cancer classes of tumors beyond tissue of origin. Scientific Reports 10:8341.
  • Guo W, Zhu L, Yu M, Zhu R, Chen Q, Wang Q, et al. 2018. A five-DNA methylation signature act as a novel prognostic biomarker in patients with ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma. Clinical Epigenetics 10:142.
  • Haldrup C, Mundbjerg K, Vestergaard EM, Lamy P, Wild P, Schulz WA, et al. 2013. DNA methylation signatures for prediction of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy of clinically localized prostate cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 31:3250–3258.
  • Harder E, Hertzum-Larsen R, Frederiksen K, Kjaer SK, Thomsen LT. 2020. Non-participation in cervical cancer screening according to health, lifestyle and sexual behavior: a population-based study of nearly 15,000 Danish women aged 23–45 years. Preventive Medicine 137:106119.
  • Horn LC, Fischer U, Raptis G, Bilek K, Hentschel B. 2007. Tumor size is of prognostic value in surgically treated FIGO stage II cervical cancer. Gynecologic Oncology 107:310–315.
  • Kawaguchi A, Iwadate Y, Komohara Y, Sano M, Kajiwara K, Yajima N, et al. 2012. Gene expression signature-based prognostic risk score in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma. Clinical Cancer Research 18:5672–5681.
  • Kumar A, Bandapalli OR, Paramasivam N, Giangiobbe S, Diquigiovanni C, Bonora E, et al. 2018. Familial cancer variant prioritization pipeline version 2 (FCVPPv2) applied to a papillary thyroid cancer family. Scientific Reports 8:11635.
  • Lee Y-Y, Choi CH, Sung CO, Do I-G, Huh SJ, Song T, et al. 2012. Prognostic value of pre-treatment circulating monocyte count in patients with cervical cancer: comparison with SCC-Ag level. Gynecologic Oncology 124:92–97.
  • Li HR, Wu XH, Cheng X. 2016. Advances in diagnosis and treatment of metastatic cervical cancer. Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 27:e43.
  • Li M, Feng YM, Fang SQ. 2017. Overexpression of ezrin and galectin-3 as predictors of poor prognosis of cervical cancer. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research 50:e5356.
  • Li X, Xiao B, Chen XS. 2017. DNA methylation: a new player in multiple sclerosis. Molecular Neurobiology 54:4049–4059.
  • Liang H, Fu M, Zhou J, Song L. 2016. Evaluation of 3D-CPA, HR-HPV, and TCT joint detection on cervical disease screening. Oncology Letters 12:887–892.
  • Lin Y-W, Chung M-T, Lai H-C, De Yan M, Shih Y-L, Chang C-C, et al. 2009. Methylation analysis of SFRP genes family in cervical adenocarcinoma. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 135:1665–1674.
  • Morris MR, Ricketts CJ, Gentle D, McRonald F, Carli N, Khalili H, et al. 2011. Genome-wide methylation analysis identifies epigenetically inactivated candidate tumour suppressor genes in renal cell carcinoma. Oncogene 30:1390–1401.
  • Munjal K, Adamson CS-C, Rajendran V, Nandedkar S, Cooper K, Evans MF, et al. 2014. Human papillomavirus type distribution in invasive cervical cancers from Madhya Pradesh: implications for vaccination programs in Central India. International Journal of Gynecological Pathology 33:531–536.
  • Parashar S, Cheishvili D, Mahmood N, Arakelian A, Tanvir I, Khan HA, et al. 2018. DNA methylation signatures of breast cancer in peripheral T-cells. BMC Cancer 18:574.
  • Roik E, Sharashova E, Kharkova O, Nieboer E, Postoev V, Odland JØ. 2018. Sociodemographic characteristics, sexual behaviour and knowledge about cervical cancer prevention as risk factors for high-risk human papillomavirus infection in Arkhangelsk, North-West Russia. International Journal of Circumpolar Health 77:1498681.
  • Sun Y, Li S, Shen K, Ye S, Cao D, Yang J. 2015. DAPK1, MGMT and RARB promoter methylation as biomarkers for high-grade cervical lesions. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology 8:14939–14945.
  • Thorsen K, Mansilla F, Schepeler T, Øster B, Rasmussen MH, Dyrskjøt L, et al. 2011. Alternative splicing of SLC39A14 in colorectal cancer is regulated by the Wnt pathway. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics: MCP 10:M110.002998.
  • Uehiro N, Sato F, Pu F, Tanaka S, Kawashima M, Kawaguchi K, et al. 2016. Circulating cell-free DNA-based epigenetic assay can detect early breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research: BCR 18:129.
  • Verlaat W, Van Leeuwen RW, Novianti PW, Schuuring E, Meijer CJLM, Van Der Zee AGJ, et al. 2018. Host-cell DNA methylation patterns during high-risk HPV-induced carcinogenesis reveal a heterogeneous nature of cervical pre-cancer. Epigenetics 13:769–778.
  • Xu W, Xu M, Wang L, Zhou W, Xiang R, Shi Y, et al. 2019. Integrative analysis of DNA methylation and gene expression identified cervical cancer-specific diagnostic biomarkers. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy 4:55.
  • Yang WJ, Liu Y, Dong RY, et al. 2020. Accurate detection of HPV integration sites in cervical cancer samples using the nanopore MinION sequencer without error correction. Frontiers in Genetics. 11:660.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.