Factors associated with the outcome of TOLAC after one previous caesarean section: a retrospective cohort study

References

• Abdelazim IA, Elbiaa AA, Al-Kadi M, Yehia AH, Sami Nusair BM, Faza MA. 2014. Maternal and obstetrical factors associated with a successful trial of vaginal birth after cesarean section. Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association 15:245–249.
   Google Scholar
• ACOG. 2019. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 205: vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstetrics and Gynecology 133:e110–e127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhide A, Caric V, Arulkumaran S. 2016. Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 133:297–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birara M, Gebrehiwot Y. 2013. Factors associated with success of vaginal birth after one caesarean section (VBAC) at three teaching hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a case control study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 13:31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bujold E, Gauthier RJ. 2010. Risk of uterine rupture associated with an interdelivery interval between 18 and 24 months. Obstetrics and Gynecology 115: 1003–1006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng YW, Eden KB, Marshall N, Pereira L, Caughey AB, Guise JM. 2011. Delivery after prior cesarean: maternal morbidity and mortality. Clinics in Perinatology 38:297–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doshi HU, Jain RK, Vazirani AA. 2010. Prognostic factors for successful vaginal birth after cesarean section – analysis of 162 cases. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 60:498–502.
   Google Scholar
• Fagerberg MC, Maršál K, Källén K. 2015. Predicting the chance of vaginal delivery after one cesarean section: validation and elaboration of a published prediction model. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 188:88–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grivell RM, Dodd JM. 2011. Short-and long-term outcomes after cesarean section. Expert Review of Obstetrics & Gynecology 6:205–215.
   Google Scholar
• Grobman WA, Gilbert S, Landon MB, Spong CY, Leveno KJ, Rouse DJ, et al. 2007. Outcomes of induction of labor after one prior cesarean. Obstetrics and Gynecology 109:262–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guise JM, McDonagh MS, Osterweil P, Nygren P, Chan BK, Helfand M. 2004. Systematic review of the incidence and consequences of uterine rupture in women with previous caesarean section. British Medical Journal 329:19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Jeeyaselan S, Guleria R, Gupta A. 2014. An observational study of various predictors of success of vaginal delivery following a previous cesarean section. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 64:260–264.
   Google Scholar
• Haas J, Barzilay E, Chayen B, Lebovitz O, Yinon Y, Mazaki-Tovi S, et al. 2014. Safety of low-dose prostaglandin E2 induction in grandmultiparous women with previous cesarean delivery. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 27:445–448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan A. 2005. Trial of scar and vaginal birth after caesarean section. Journal of Ayub Medical College Abbottabad 17:57–61.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hibbard JU, Gilbert S, Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, et al. 2006. Trial of labor or repeat cesarean delivery in women with morbid obesity and previous cesarean delivery. Obstetrics and Gynecology 108:125–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Leindecker S, Varner MW, et al. 2004. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. New England Journal of Medicine 351:2581–2589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landon MB, Lynch CD. 2011. Optimal timing and mode of delivery after cesarean with previous classical incision or myomectomy: a review of the data. Seminars in Perinatology 35:257–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madaan M, Agrawal S, Nigam A, Aggarwal R, Trivedi SS. 2011. Trial of labour after previous caesarean section: the predictive factors affecting outcome. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 31:224–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzanares S, Ruiz-Duran S, Pinto A, Pineda A, Puertas A. 2020. An integrated model with classification criteria to predict vaginal delivery success after cesarean section. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 33:236–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer BM, Gilbert S, Landon MB, Spong CY, Leveno KJ, Rouse DJ, et al. 2008. Labor outcomes with increasing number of prior vaginal births after cesarean delivery. Obstetrics & Gynecology 111:285–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith GC, Pell JP, Bobbie R. 2003. Caesarean section and risk of unexplained stillbirth in subsequent pregnancy. The Lancet 362:1779–1784.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smithies M, Woolcott CG, Brock JAK, Maguire B, Allen VM. 2018. Factors associated with trial of labour and mode of delivery in Robson Group 5: A select group of women with previous caesarean section. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 40:704–711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stamilio DM, DeFranco E, Paré E, Odibo AO, Peipert JF, Allsworth JE, et al. 2007. Short interpregnancy interval: risk of uterine rupture and complications of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstetrics and Gynecology 110:1075–1082.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thapsamuthdechakorn A, Sekararithi R, Tongsong T. 2018. Factors associated with successful trial of labor after cesarean section: a retrospective cohort study. Journal of Pregnancy 2018:6140982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Bogaert LJ. 2004. Mode of delivery after one cesarean section. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 87:9–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu P, Feng Y, Shen H, Luo J, Tao Y. 2019. Verification a model of predicting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in Chinese pregnant women. Medicine 98:e18421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar