Agreement between digital vaginal examination and intrapartum ultrasound for labour monitoring

References

• Al-Adwy AM, Sobh SM, Belal DS, Omran EF, Hassan A, Saad AH, et al. 2018. Diagnostic accuracy of posterior cervical angle and cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labor. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 141:102–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahadori F, Ayatollahi H, Naghavi-Behzad M, Khalkhali H, Naseri Z. 2013. Predicting factors on cervical ripening and response to induction in women pregnant over 37 weeks. Medical Ultrasonography 15:191–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. 2020. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement [Internet] [cited 2020 Jul 14]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Dashe JS, Hoffman BL, Casey BM, et al. 2018. Normal labor. In: Williams obstetrics, editor. 25th ed. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill Education [Internet] [cited 2021 Jul 19]. Available from: accessmedicine.mhmedical.com/content.aspx?aid=1160775159
   Google Scholar
• Dimassi K, Ben Amor A, Belghith C, Ben Khedija MA, Triki A, Gara MF. 2014. Ultrasound diagnosis of fetal head engagement. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 127:6–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimassi K, Hammami A, Bennani S, Halouani A, Triki A, Gara MF. 2016. Use of transperineal sonography during preterm labor. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 36:748–753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimassi K, Temessek H, Ben Amor A, Triki A. 2018. Diagnosis of fetal occiput position using transperineal ultrasound. La Tunisie médicale 96:360–365.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dupuis O, Silveira R, Zentner A, Dittmar A, Gaucherand P, Cucherat M, et al. 2005. Birth simulator: reliability of transvaginal assessment of fetal head station as defined by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Classification. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 192:868–874.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggebø TM, Gjessing LK, Heien C, Smedvig E, Økland I, Romundstad P, et al. 2006. Prediction of labor and delivery by transperineal ultrasound in pregnancies with prelabor rupture of membranes at term. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 27:387–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggebø TM, Økland I, Heien C, Gjessing LK, Romundstad P, Salvesen KA. 2009. Can ultrasound measurements replace digitally assessed elements of the Bishop score? Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 88:325–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fouché CJ, Simon EG, Potin J, Perrotin F. 2012. Ultrasound in monitoring of the second stage of labour. Gynecologie, Obstetrique & Fertilite 40:658–665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghi T, Bellussi F, Eggebø T, Tondi F, Pacella G, Salsi G, et al. 2015. Sonographic assessment of fetal occiput position during the second stage of labor: how reliable is the transperineal approach? Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 28:1985–1988.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghi T, Farina A, Pedrazzi A, Rizzo N, Pelusi G, Pilu G. 2009. Diagnosis of station and rotation of the fetal head in the second stage of labor with intrapartum translabial ultrasound. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 33:331–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomes F, Ramalho C, Machado AP, Calado E, Cardoso F, Montenegro N. 2006. Transvaginal ultrasound assessment of the cervix and digital examination before labor induction. Acta Médica Portuguesa 19:109–114.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hassan WA, Eggebø T, Ferguson M, Gillett A, Studd J, Pasupathy D, et al. 2014. The sonopartogram: a novel method for recording progress of labor by ultrasound. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 43:189–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan WA, Eggebø TM, Ferguson M, Lees C. 2013. Simple two-dimensional ultrasound technique to assess intrapartum cervical dilatation: a pilot study. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 41:413–418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISUOG. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: intrapartum ultrasound, Ghi, 2018, ultrasound in obstetrics & Gynecology, Wiley Online Library. 2020. [Internet] [cited 2020 Jul 14]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.19072
   Google Scholar
• Larscheid P, Maass N, Kennes LN, Najjari L. 2015. Transperineal ultrasound to measure cervical length of pregnant women in general and in particular with cervical insufficiency – a comparison of transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound as alternatives to transvaginal ultrasound. Ultraschall in Der Medizin 36:59–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin Bland J, Altman DG. 1986. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. The Lancet 327:307–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molina FS, Nicolaides KH. 2010. Ultrasound in labor and delivery. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy 27:61–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onderoğlu LS. 1997. Digital examination and transperineal ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length to assess risk of preterm delivery. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 59:223–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson K, Henrici OMFE VII. 1896. Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution. III. Regression, heredity, and panmixia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 187:253–318.
   Google Scholar
• Philpott RH. 1972. Graphic records in labour. British Medical Journal 4:163–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PREG Effect of partograph use on outcomes for women in spontaneous labour at term. 2020. [Internet] [cited 2020 Jul 14]. Available from: /CD005461/PREG_effect-partograph-use-outcomes-women-spontaneous-labour-term
   Google Scholar
• Rane SM, Guirgis RR, Higgins B, Nicolaides KH. 2004. The value of ultrasound in the prediction of successful induction of labor. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 24:538–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitlauf JC, Finney JW, Ruzek JI, Lee TT, Thrailkill A, Jones S, et al. 2008. Distress and pain during pelvic examinations: effect of sexual violence. Obstetrics and Gynecology 112:1343–1350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westover T, Knuppel RA. 1995. Modern management of clinical chorioamnionitis. Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology 3:123–132.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• WHO. 2020a. Effect of partogram use on outcomes for women in spontaneous labour at term. World Health Organization. [Internet] [cited 2020 Jul 14]. Available from: http://cms.kcn.unima.mw:8002/moodle/downloads/Department%20of%20Maternal%20&%20Child%20Health/who%20videos/apps.who.int/rhl/pregnancy_childbirth/childbirth/routine_care/cd005461_sonibl_com/en/index.html
   Google Scholar
• WHO. 2020b. Managing complications in pregnancy and childbirth: a guide for midwives and doctors. 2nd ed. World Health Organization. [Internet] [cited 2020 Jul 14]. Available from: http://www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/documents/managing-complications-pregnancy-childbirth/en/
   Google Scholar
• Wiafe YA, Whitehead B, Venables H, Dassah ET, Eggebø TM. 2018. Intrapartum ultrasound assessment of cervical dilatation and its value in detecting active labor. Journal of Ultrasound 21:233–239.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yuce T, Kalafat E, Koc A. 2015. Transperineal ultrasonography for labor management: accuracy and reliability. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 94:760–765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zilianti M, Azuaga A, Calderon F, Pagés G, Mendoza G. 1995. Monitoring the effacement of the uterine cervix by transperineal sonography: a new perspective. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine 14:719–724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar