Medium-term outcomes 2 years after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a retrospective cohort study in Japan

References

• Barber MD, Brubaker L, Nygaard I, Wheeler TL, Schaffer J, Chen Z, et al. 2009. Defining success after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstetrics and Gynecology 114:600–609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC. 2005. Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 193:103–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovbjerg VE, Trowbridge ER, Barber MD, Martirosian TE, Steers WD, Hullfish KL, et al. 2009. Patient-centered treatment goals for pelvic floor disorders: association with quality-of-life and patient satisfaction. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 200:568.e1–568–e6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bø K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P, et al. 1996. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 175:10–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coolen A-LWM, van Oudheusden AMJ, van Eijndhoven HWF, van der Heijden TPFM, Stokmans RA, Mol BWJ, et al. 2013. A comparison of complications between open abdominal sacrocolpopexy and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of vault prolapse. Obstetrics and Gynecology International 2013:528636.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ellerkmann RM, Cundiff GW, Melick CF, Nihira MA, Leffler K, Bent AE, et al. 2001. Correlation of symptoms with location and severity of pelvic organ prolapse. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 185:1332–1337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald MP, Janz NK, Wren PA, Wei JT, Weber AM, Ghetti C, Pelvic Floor Disorders Network, et al. 2007. Prolapse severity, symptoms and impact on quality of life among women planning sacrocolpopexy. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 98:24–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman RM, Pantazis K, Thomson A, Frappell J, Bombieri L, Moran P, et al. 2013. A randomized controlled trial of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: LAS study. International Urogynecology Journal 24:377–384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelhorn HL, Coyne KS, Sikirica V, Gauld J, Murphy M. 2012. Psychometric evaluation of health-related quality-of-life measures after pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery 18:221–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giugale LE, Carter-Brooks CM, Ross JH, Shepherd JP, Zyczynski HM. 2019. Outcomes of a staged midurethral sling strategy for stress incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Obstetrics and Gynecology 134:736–744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gotoh M, Homma Y, Funahashi Y, Matsukawa Y, Kato M. 2009. Psychometric validation of the Japanese version of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form. International Journal of Urology 16:303–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. 1989. Measurement of health status ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Controlled Clinical Trials 10:407–415.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jelovsek JE, Maher C, Barber MD. 2007. Pelvic organ prolapse. The Lancet 369:1027–1038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanda Y. 2013. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplantation 48:452–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karjalainen PK, Mattsson NK, Jalkanen JT, Nieminen K, Tolppanen A-M. 2021. Minimal important difference and patient acceptable symptom state for PFDI-20 and POPDI-6 in POP surgery. International Urogynecology Journal 32:3169–3176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacquée S, Nawapun K, Claerhout F, Werbrouck E, Veldman J, Dʼhoore A, et al. 2019. Long-term assessment of a prospective cohort of patients undergoing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Obstetrics and Gynecology 134:323–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pizzoferrato A-C, Fermaut M, Varas C, Fauconnier A, Bader G. 2019. Medium-term outcomes of laparoscopic sacropexy on symptoms and quality of life. Predictive factors for postoperative dissatisfaction. International Urogynecology Journal 30:2085–2092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarlos D, Kots L, Ryu G, Schaer G. 2014. Long-term mesh erosion rate following abdominal robotic reconstructive pelvic floor surgery: a prospective study and overview of the literature. International Urogynecology Journal 25:1207–1212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawada Y, Kitagawa Y, Hayashi T, Tokiwa S, Nagae M, Cortes AR, et al. 2021. Clinical outcomes after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a 3-year follow-up study. International Journal of Urology 28:216–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner L, Chevrot A, Llinares E, Costa P, Droupy S. 2019. Long-term anatomical and functional results of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a prospective study. International Urology and Nephrology 51:795–802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wattiez A, Canis M, Mage G, Pouly JL, Bruhat MA. 2001. Promontofixation for the treatment of prolapse. The Urologic Clinics of North America 28:151–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins MF, Wu JM. 2017. Lifetime risk of surgery for stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse. Minerva Ginecologica 69:171–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshida M, Murayama R, Ota E, Nakata M, Kozuma S, Homma Y, et al. 2013. Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the pelvic floor distress inventory-short form 20. International Urogynecology Journal 24:1039–1046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar