Recurrent miscarriage and infertility: a national service evaluation

References

• Bailey, S.L., et al., 2019. Hope for the best …but expect the worst: a qualitative study to explore how women with recurrent miscarriage experience the early waiting period of a new pregnancy. BMJ Open, 9 (5), e029354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardos, J., et al., 2015. A national survey on public perceptions of miscarriage. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 125 (6), 1313–1320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya, S.S., Townend, J., and Bhattacharya, S.S., 2010. Recurrent miscarriage: are three miscarriages one too many? Analysis of a Scottish population-based database of 151,021 pregnancies. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, 150 (1), 24–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavalcante, M.B. and Barini, R., 2022. Recurrent pregnancy loss and hereditary thrombophilias – is it time to review the guidelines? Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 42 (6), 2545–2546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavalcante, M.B., Sarno, M., and Barini, R., 2021. Lymphocyte immunotherapy in recurrent miscarriage and recurrent implantation failure. American Journal of Reproductive Immunology, 85 (4), e13408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavalcante, M.B., Sarno, M., and Barini, R., 2022. Immunotherapies to optimize pregnancy outcomes in subfertile women. Human Reproduction Update, 28 (4), 601–602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavalcante, M.B., et al., 2020. Antinuclear antibodies and recurrent miscarriage: systematic review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Reproductive Immunology, 83 (3), e13215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coomarasamy, A., et al., 2020. Micronized vaginal progesterone to prevent miscarriage: a critical evaluation of randomized evidence. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 223 (2), 167–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coomarasamy, A., et al., 2021. Recurrent miscarriage: evidence to accelerate action. The Lancet, 397 (10285), 1675–1682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennehy, R., et al., 2022. How we define recurrent miscarriage matters: a qualitative exploration of the views of people with professional or lived experience. Health Expectations, 25 (6), 2992–3004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, A.C., et al., 2020. Subclinical hypothyroidism and thyroid autoimmunity in recurrent pregnancy loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertility and Sterility, 113 (3), 587–600.e1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ESHRE Early Pregnancy Guideline Development Group, 2023. Guideline on the management of recurrent pregnancy loss. Strombeek-bever.
   Google Scholar
• Ethics Committee (ASRM), 2022. Provision of fertility services for women at increased risk of complications during fertility treatment or pregnancy: an Ethics Committee opinion. Fertility and Sterility, 106 (6), 1319–1323.
   Google Scholar
• Flannery, C., et al., 2023. Factors that shape recurrent miscarriage care experiences: findings from a national survey. BMC Health Services Research, 23, 317.
   Google Scholar
• Franssen, M.T.M., et al., 2007. Management of recurrent miscarriage: evaluating the impact of a guideline. Human Reproduction, 22 (5), 1298–1303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freda, M.C., Devine, K.S., and Semelsberger, C., 2003. The lived experience of miscarriage after infertility. American Journal of Maternal Child Nursing, 28 (1), 16–23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grimbizis, G.F., et al., 2016. The Thessaloniki ESHRE/ESGE Consensus on diagnosis of female genital anomalies. Gynecological Surgery, 13, 1–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennessy, M., et al., 2021. Clinical practice guidelines for recurrent miscarriage in high-income countries: a systematic review. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 42 (6), 1146–1171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennessy, M., et al., 2022a. A national evaluation of recurrent miscarriage care services. Irish Medical Journal, 116 (1), 16.
   Google Scholar
• Hennessy, M., et al., 2022b. Developing guideline-based key performance indicators for recurrent miscarriage care: lessons from a multi-stage consensus process with a diverse stakeholder group. Research Involvement and Engagement, 8 (1), 18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• HFEA, 2023. Pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) [online]. Available from: https://www.hfea.gov.uk/treatments/treatment-add-ons/pre-implantation-genetic-testing-for-aneuploidy-pgt-a/ [Accessed 19 June 2023].
   Google Scholar
• HPRA, 2022. Blood and tissues establishments list [online]. Available from: http://www.hpra.ie/homepage/blood-tissues-organs/blood-and-tissues-establishments-list [Accessed 13 December 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Kato, H., et al., 2022. Systematic review and meta-analysis for impacts of oral antibiotic treatment on pregnancy outcomes in chronic endometritis patients. Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy, 28 (5), 610–615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koert, E., et al., 2019. Recurrent pregnancy loss: couples’ perspectives on their need for treatment, support and follow up. Human Reproduction, 34 (2), 291–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linehan, L., Hennessy, M., and O'Donoghue, K., 2021. Infertility and subsequent recurrent miscarriage: current state of the literature and future considerations for practice and research. HRB Open Research, 4, 100.
   Google Scholar
• Linehan, L., Hennessy, M., and O'Donoghue, K., 2023a. An examination of care received by women with recurrent miscarriage and infertility against guideline-based key performance indicators. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, 282, 17–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linehan, L., et al., 2023b. National Clinical Practice Guideline: recurrent miscarriage. Dublin: National Women and Infants Health Programme and the Institute of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, R., et al., 2021. Are we managing women with recurrent miscarriage appropriately? A snapshot survey of clinical practice within the United Kingdom. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 41 (5), 807–814.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musters, A.M., et al., 2011. Supportive care for women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage: patients’ perspectives. Human Reproduction, 26 (4), 873–877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musters, A.M., et al., 2013. Supportive care for women with recurrent miscarriage: a survey to quantify women’s preferences. Human Reproduction, 28 (2), 398–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naimi, A.I., et al., 2021. The effect of preconception-initiated low-dose aspirin on hCG pregnancy, pregnancy loss, and live birth: per-protocol analysis of a randomized trial. Annals of Internal Medicine, 174 (5), 595–601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NICE, 2015. Hysteroscopic metroplasty of a uterine septum for recurrent miscarriage [online]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ipg510/chapter/1-Recommendations [Accessed 27 Jul 2023].
   Google Scholar
• O’Regan, C., et al., 2022. A quantitative content analysis of Irish and UK websites providing miscarriage and recurrent miscarriage information. Junior Obstetricians and Gynaecology Society (JOGS) Annual Scientific Meeting – Book of Abstracts – Irish Medical Journal, 166.
   Google Scholar
• Poon, L.C., et al., 2017. Aspirin for evidence-based preeclampsia prevention trial: effect of aspirin in prevention of preterm preeclampsia in subgroups of women according to their characteristics and medical and obstetrical history. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 217 (5), 585.e1–585.e5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. 2020. Definitions of infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss: a committee opinion. Fertility and Sterility, 113, 533–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quenby, S., et al., 2021. Miscarriage matters: the epidemiological, physical, psychological, and economic costs of early pregnancy loss. Lancet, 397 (10285), 1658–1667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan, L., Backos, M., and Rai, R., 2011. The investigation and treatment of couples with recurrent first-trimester and second-trimester miscarriage green-top guideline No. 17.Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (RCOG).
   Google Scholar
• Regan, L., et al., 2023. Recurrent miscarriage (Green-top Guideline No. 17). RCOG [online]. Available from: https://www.rcog.org.uk/guidance/browse-all-guidance/green-top-guidelines/recurrent-miscarriage-green-top-guideline-no-17/ [Accessed 21 June 2023].
   Google Scholar
• Sauermann, H. and Roach, M., 2013. Increasing web survey response rates in innovation research: an experimental study of static and dynamic contact design features. Research Policy, 42 (1), 273–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timoney, A., 2022. Data: assisted human reproduction. Dublin.
   Google Scholar
• Van Den Boogaard, E., et al., 2013. Recurrent miscarriage: do professionals adhere to their guidelines. Human Reproduction, 28 (11), 2898–2904.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, M.M., et al., 2020. Recurrent pregnancy loss: diagnostic workup after two or three pregnancy losses? A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Human Reproduction Update, 26 (3), 356–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Woon, E., et al., 2020. Immunotherapy to improve pregnancy outcome in women with abnormal natural killer cell levels/activity and recurrent miscarriage or implantation failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Reproductive Immunology, 142, 103189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Women’s Health Action Plan, 2023. Women’s Health Action Plan 2022–2023 [online], Available from: https://www.gov.ie/en/publication/232af-womens-health-action-plan-2022-2023/ [Accessed 8 January 2023].
   Google Scholar
• Wu, M.J., Zhao, K., and Fils-Aime, F., 2022. Response rates of online surveys in published research: a meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 7, 100206.
   Google Scholar