The impact of caesarean scar niche on fertility - a systematic review

References

• Abdou, A.M. and Ammar, I.M.M., 2018. Middle East. Middle East Fertility Society Journal , 23 (4), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Asoglu, M.R., et al., 2021. Impact of Isthmocele on Assisted Reproductive Treatment Outcomes: An Age-matched Retrospective Study. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 28 (5), 1113–1120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betran, A.P., et al., 2021. Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates. BMJ Global Health, 6 (6), e005671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bij de Vaate, A.J.M., et al., 2014. Prevalence, potential risk factors for development and symptoms related to the presence of uterine niches following Cesarean section: systematic review. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology: The Official Journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 43 (4), 372–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, M., et al., 2022. Intra-cavitary fluid resulted from caesarean section but not isthmocele compromised clinical pregnancy after IVF/ICSI treatment. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 306 (1), 229–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C., et al., 2017. The microbiota continuum along the female reproductive tract and its relation to uterine-related diseases. Nature Communications, 8 (1), 875.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Diao, J., et al., 2021. Caesarean section defects may affect pregnancy outcomes after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: a retrospective study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 21 (1), 487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedenthal, J., et al., 2021. The association between prior cesarean delivery and subsequent in vitro fertilization outcomes in women undergoing autologous, frozen-thawed single euploid embryo transfer, in: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 225 (3), 287.e1-287–e8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghasemi, M., et al., 2022. Uterine Cavity Irrigation With Office Hysteroscopy During Ovarian Stimulation for IVF: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 13, 778988.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurol-Urganci, I., et al., 2013. Impact of Caesarean section on subsequent fertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 28 (7), 1943–1952.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, I., et al., 2022. Bacterial colonization at caesarean section defects in women of secondary infertility: an observational study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 22 (1), 135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, L., et al., 2022. Reduced pregnancy and live birth rates after in vitro fertilization in women with cesarean section scar diverticulum: A retrospective cohort study. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 48 (1), 146–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordans, I.P.M., et al., 2019. Sonographic examination of uterine niche in non-pregnant women: a modified Delphi procedure. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology: The Official Journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 53 (1), 107–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kathuria, P., et al., 2024. Systematic review analyzing significance of endometrial cavity fluid during assisted reproductive techniques. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 309, 413–425.
   Google Scholar
• Klein Meuleman, S.J.M., et al., 2023. Definition and Criteria for Diagnosing Cesarean Scar Disorder. JAMA Network Open, 6 (3), e235321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koedooder, R., et al., 2019. The vaginal microbiome as a predictor for outcome of in vitro fertilization with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a prospective study. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 34 (6), 1042–1054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrenz, B., et al., 2020. Isthmocele and ovarian stimulation for IVF: considerations for a reproductive medicine specialist. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 35 (1), 89–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., et al., 2020. Trends in Cesarean Delivery Rates in China, 2008-2018. Jama, 323 (1), 89–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, I., et al., 2022. Endometrial microbiota composition is associated with reproductive outcome in infertile patients. Microbiome, 10 (1), 1–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, S. M., et al., 2013. Caesarean Delivery and Subsequent Pregnancy Interval: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 13, 165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riemma, G., et al., 2021. Reproductive and pregnancy outcomes following embryo transfer in women with previous cesarean section: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 100 (11), 1949–1960.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, J., et al., 2020. Prevalence of Repeat Cesarean Section in a Tertiary Care Hospital. Journal of Nepal Medical Association, 58 (229), 650–653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skafte-holm, A., et al., 2021. The Association between Vaginal Dysbiosis and Reproductive Outcomes in Sub-Fertile Women Undergoing IVF-Treatment: A Systematic PRISMA Review and Meta-Analysis. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 10 (3), 295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsuji, S., et al., 2022. Decreased Fertility in Women with Cesarean Scar Syndrome Is Associated with Chronic Inflammation in the Uterine Cavity. The Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine, 258 (3), 237–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vikhareva Osser, O., Jokubkiene, L. and Valentin, L., 2009. High prevalence of defects in Cesarean section scars at transvaginal ultrasound examination. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology: The Official Journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 34 (1), 90–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vissers, J., et al., 2020. Post-Caesarean section niche-related impaired fertility: hypothetical mechanisms. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 35 (7), 1484–1494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vissers, J., et al., 2020. Reduced pregnancy and live birth rates after in vitro fertilization in women with previous Caesarean section: a retrospective cohort study. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 35 (3), 595–604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L., et al., 2022. Pregnancy and Perinatal Outcomes of Patients With Prior Cesarean Section After a Single Embryo Transfer in IVF/ICSI: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 13, 851213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, X., et al., 2021. Front Med (Lausanne) 8.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, X., et al., 2022. Interaction between Cervical Microbiota and Host Gene Regulation in Caesarean Section Scar Diverticulum. Microbiology Spectrum, 10 (4), e0167622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., et al., 2022. Previous caesarean delivery and the presence of caesarean scar defects could affect pregnancy outcomes after in vitro fertilization frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 22 (1), 769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, J., et al., 2021. Impact of previous Caesarean section on reproductive outcomes after assisted reproductive technology: systematic review and meta-analyses. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 43 (2), 197–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar