The impact of selective episiotomy on maternal short-term morbidity: a retrospective study

References

• ACOG, 2015. ACOG practice bulletin number 154. ACOG practice bulletin no. 154: operative vaginal delivery. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 126 (5), 1–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baksu, B., et al., 2008. Effect of timing of episiotomy repair on peripartum blood loss. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, 65 (3), 169–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bansal, R.K., et al., 1996. Is there a benefit to episiotomy at spontaneous vaginal delivery? A natural experiment. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 175 (4 Pt 1), 897–901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyene, F., et al., 2020. Factors associated with episiotomy practices in Bahirdar City, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, 13, 2281–2289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blondel, B., et al., 2016. Variations in rates of severe perineal tears and episiotomies in 20 European countries: a study based on routine national data in Euro-Peristat Project. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 95 (7), 746–754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroli, G. and Mignini, L., 2009. Episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (1), CD000081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Sa, J.L., et al., 2024. Psychometric properties of a Saudi Arabian version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). Belitung Nursing Journal, 10 (1), 105–113.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dandolu, V., et al., 2005. Risk factors for obstetrical anal sphincter lacerations. International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, 16 (4), 304–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Leeuw, J.W., et al., 2001. Risk factors for third degree perineal ruptures during delivery. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 108 (4), 383–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Leeuw, J.W., et al., 2008. Mediolateral episiotomy reduces the risk for anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 115 (1), 104–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Santé, O.M., 1997. Les soins liés à un accouchement normal: guide pratique. Genève: Rapport d’un groupe de travail technique.
   Google Scholar
• Ecker, J.L., et al., 1997. Is there a benefit to episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery? Observations over ten years in a stable population. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 176 (2), 411–414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ejegård, H., Ryding, E.L. and Sjogren, B., 2008. Sexuality after delivery with episiotomy: a long-term follow-up. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, 66 (1), 1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goueslard, K., et al., 2018. How did episiotomy rates change from 2007 to 2014? Population-based study in France. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 18 (1), 208.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gün, İ., Doğan, B. and Özdamar, Ö., 2016. Long- and short-term complications of episiotomy. Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 13 (3), 144–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, K., et al., 2005. Outcomes of routine episiotomy: a systematic review. JAMA, 293 (17), 2141–2148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennewein, L., et al., 2019. The influence of the fetal leg position on the outcome in vaginally intended deliveries out of breech presentation at term – a FRABAT prospective cohort study. PLOS One, 14 (12), e0225546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, H., et al., 2017. Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2 (2), CD000081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kudish, B., et al., 2006. Operative vaginal delivery and midline episiotomy: a bad combination for the perineum. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 195 (3), 749–754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leclercq, C., Braund, S. and Verspyck, E., 2024. Évolution du taux d’épisiotomies et des lésions obstétricales du sphincter de l’anus depuis les recommandations de 2018. Gynecologie, Obstetrique, Fertilite & Senologie, 52 (2), 95–101.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• M Amorim, M., et al., 2017. Selective episiotomy vs. implementation of a non-episiotomy protocol: a randomized clinical trial. Reproductive Health, 14 (1), 55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Molyneux, R., Fowler, G. and Slade, P., 2024. The postnatal effects of perineal trauma on maternal psychological and emotional wellbeing: a longitudinal study. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, 294, 238–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muraca, G.M., et al., 2024. Variation in episiotomy use among nulliparous individuals by maternity care provider and associated rates of obstetric anal sphincter injury. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada: JOGC = Journal D’obstetrique Et Gynecologie Du Canada: JOGC, 46 (5), 102415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, Z., Nathan, B. and Mascarenhas, L., 2015. Kielland’s forceps. From controversy to consensus? Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 94 (1), 8–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassar, A.H., et al., 2019. FIGO statement: restrictive use rather than routine use of episiotomy. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: The Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 146 (1), 17–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nice, G.C., 2023. Intrapartum care for healthy women and babies.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, D.A., et al., 2016. A biomechanical analysis on the impact of episiotomy during childbirth. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, 15 (6), 1523–1534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pai, H.D., 2013. Manual on vaginal surgery: workshop manual. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Patel, R.R. and Murphy, D.J., 2004. Forceps delivery in modern obstetric practice. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 328 (7451), 1302–1305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putta, L.V. and Spencer, J.P., 2000. Assisted vaginal delivery using the vacuum extractor. American Family Physician, 62 (6), 1316–1320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Räisänen, S., Vehviläinen-Julkunen, K. and Heinonen, S., 2010. Need for and consequences of episiotomy in vaginal birth: a critical approach. Midwifery, 26 (3), 348–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rusavy, Z., Karbanova, J. and Kalis, V., 2016. Timing of episiotomy and outcome of a non-instrumental vaginal delivery. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 95 (2), 190–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagi-Dain, L. and Sagi, S., 2015. The correct episiotomy: does it exist? A cross-sectional survey of four public Israeli hospitals and review of the literature. International Urogynecology Journal, 26 (8), 1213–1219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagi-Dain, L. and Sagi, S., 2016. Indications for episiotomy performance – a cross-sectional survey and review of the literature. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology: The Journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 36 (3), 361–365.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sagi-Dain, L., et al., 2018. No episiotomy versus selective lateral/mediolateral episiotomy (EPITRIAL): an interim analysis. International Urogynecology Journal, 29 (3), 415–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sangkomkamhang, U., et al., 2020. Restrictive versus routine episiotomy among Southeast Asian term pregnancies: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 127 (3), 397–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stedenfeldt, M., et al., 2012. Episiotomy characteristics and risks for obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a case-control study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 119 (6), 724–730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thacker, S.B. and Banta, H.D., 1983. Benefits and risks of episiotomy: an interpretative review of the English language literature, 1860–1980. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 38 (6), 322–338.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turmo, M., et al., 2015. Development of chronic pain after episiotomy. Revista Espanola De Anestesiologia y Reanimacion, 62 (8), 436–442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vacca, A., 1999. The trouble with vacuum extraction. Current Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 9 (1), 41–45.
   Google Scholar
• Vayssière, C., et al., 2011. Instrumental delivery: clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, 159 (1), 43–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation, 1985. Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet (London, England), 2 (8452), 436–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar