References
- Barnes, J. 1980. ‘Proof destroyed’, in J. Barnes, M. Burnyeat, and M. Schofield, Doubt and Dogmatism: Studies in Hellenistic Epistemology, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 161–81.
- Barnes, J. 1981. ‘Proof and the syllogism’, in E. Berti, Aristotle on Science. The Posterior Analytics, Padova: Editrice Antenore, 17–59.
- Barnes, J. 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, 2 vols, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Barnes, J. 1993. Aristotle. Posterior Analytics, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Barnes, J., Bobzien, S., Flannery, K., and Ierodiakonou, K. 1991. Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Aristotle Prior Analytics 1.1–7, London: Duckworth.
- Boger, G. 2004. ‘Aristotle's underlying logic’, in M. Gabbay and J. Woods, Handbook of the History of Logic, vol. 1: Greek, Indian and Arabic Logic, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 100–246.
- Brunschwig, J. 1967–2007. Aristote. Topiques, 2 vols., Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
- Burnyeat, M. F. 1994. ‘Enthymeme: Aristotle on the logic of persuasion’, in D. Furley and A. Nehamas, Aristo-tle's Rhetoric: Philosophical Essays, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 3–55.
- Castagnoli, L. 2012. ‘Aristotle on begging the question between dialectic, logic and epistemology’, Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy, 15, 90–121.
- Cavini, W. 1989. ‘Modalità’ dialettiche nei Topici di Aristotele’, in Atti del convegno internazionale di storia della logica, Le teorie della modalità (S. Gimignano 5–8 dicembre 1987), Bologna: CLUEB, 15–46.
- Cavini, W. 1991. ‘Sillogismo aristotelico e teoria logica’, Nuova civiltà delle macchine, 9, 29–36.
- Charlton, W. 1992. Aristotle. Physics, Books I and II, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Crivelli, P. 2011. ‘Aristotle on syllogisms from a hypothesis’, in A. Longo, Argument From Hypothesis in Ancient Philosophy, Napoli: Bibliopolis, 95–184.
- Crubellier, M. 2014. Aristote. Premiers Analytiques. Organon III, Paris: Flammarion.
- Dancy, R. 1978. ‘On some of Aristotle's second thoughts about substances: Matter’, Philosophical Review, 87, 372–413.
- Dorion, L.-A. 1995. Aristote. Les refutations sophistiques, Paris: Vrin.
- Duncombe, M. 2014. ‘Irreflexivity and Aristotle's syllogismos’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 64, 434–52.
- Dunn, J. M. and Restall, G. 2000. ‘Relevance logic’, in D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner, Handbook of Philosophical Logic, 2nd ed., vol. 6, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1–128.
- Fait, P. 2004. ‘Aristotle on a puzzle about logical consequence: Necessity of being vs. necessity of saying’, Topoi, 23, 101–12.
- Fait, P. 2007. Aristotele. Le confutationi sofistiche, Roma-Bari: Laterza.
- Field, H. 2015. ‘What is logical validity?’, in C. R. Caret and O. T. Hjortland, Foundations of Logical Conse-quence, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 33–70.
- Frede, M. 1974. ‘Stoic vs. Aristotelian syllogistic’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 56, 1–32.
- Gobbo, E. 1997a. ‘La riconduzione aristotelica delle confutazioni apparenti all'ignoranza della confutazione (Sophistici elenchi, 6)’, Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa s. IV, 2, 233–72.
- Gobbo, E. 1997b. ‘La concezione diretta dell’jelenchos negli Analitici Primi e nelle Confutazioni Sofistiche‘, Elenchos, 18, 311–57.
- Hamblin, C. L. 1970. Fallacies, London: Methuen.
- Hasper, P. S. 2012. ‘Aristotle's sophistical refutations: A translation’, Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy, 15, 13–54.
- Lear, J. 1980. Aristotle and Logical Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Malink, M. 2014. ‘Deduction in Sophistici Elenchi 6’, in M.-K. Lee, Strategies of Argument: Essays in Ancient Ethics, Epistemology, and Logic, New York: Oxford University Press, 149–74.
- McCall, S. 1967. ‘Connexive implication and the syllogism’, Mind, 76, 346–56.
- Mignucci, M. 1969. Aristotele. Gli Analitici Primi, Napoli: Loffredo.
- Mignucci, M. 2002. ‘Syllogism and deduction in Aristotle's logic’, in M. Canto-Sperber and P. Pellegrin, Le style de la pensée, Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 245–66.
- Mignucci, M. 2007. Aristotele. Analitici secondi, Roma-Bari: Laterza.
- Paoli, F. 2007. ‘Implicational paradoxes and the meaning of logic constants’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 85, 553–79.
- Rapp, C. 2012. ‘Fallacious arguments in Aristotle's Rhetoric II 24’, Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy, 15, 122–58.
- Read, S. 1988. Relevant Logic, Oxford: Blackwell.
- Ross, W. D. 1949. Aristotle's Prior and Posterior Analytics, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Schreiber, S. G. 2003. Aristotle on False Reasoning: Language and World in the Sophistical Refutations, Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
- Slomkowski, P. 1997. Aristotle's Topics, Leiden: Brill.
- Smiley, T. J. 1973. ‘What is a syllogism?’, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2, 136–54.
- Smiley, T. J. 1994. ‘Aristotle's completeness proof’, Ancient Philosophy, 14, 25–38.
- Smith, R. 1989. Aristotle. Prior Analytics, Indianapolis: Hackett.
- Smith, R. 1997. Aristotle. Topics: Book I and VIII, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Smith, R. 2011. ‘Aristotle's logic’, in E. N. Zalta, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2014 Edit-ion), URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/aristotle-logic/>.
- Sorio, G. 2009. Aristotele, Elenchi sofistici, Introduzione, traduzione e commento, Padova, unpublished Ph.D thesis.
- Striker, G. 2009. Aristotle. Prior Analytics: Book I, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Thom, P. 1981. The Syllogism, München: Philosophia Verlag.
- Wehrle, W. E. 2000. The Myth of Aristotle's Development and the Betrayal of Metaphysics, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
- Woods, J. 2014. Aristotle's Earlier Logic, 2nd ed. (2001), Milton Keynes: College Publications.
- Woods, J. and Hansen, H. V. 2001. ‘The subtleties of Aristotle's non-cause’, Logique et analyse, 44, 395–415.
- Woods, J. and Irvine, A. 2004. ‘Aristotle's early logic’, in M. Gabbay and J. Woods, Handbook of the History of Logic, vol. 1: Greek, Indian and Arabic Logic, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 27–99.