736
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Main Articles

Aristotle on the Non-Cause Fallacy

Pages 9-32 | Received 15 Aug 2015, Accepted 16 Aug 2015, Published online: 08 Oct 2015

References

  • Barnes, J. 1980. ‘Proof destroyed’, in J. Barnes, M. Burnyeat, and M. Schofield, Doubt and Dogmatism: Studies in Hellenistic Epistemology, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 161–81.
  • Barnes, J. 1981. ‘Proof and the syllogism’, in E. Berti, Aristotle on Science. The Posterior Analytics, Padova: Editrice Antenore, 17–59.
  • Barnes, J. 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, 2 vols, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Barnes, J. 1993. Aristotle. Posterior Analytics, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Barnes, J., Bobzien, S., Flannery, K., and Ierodiakonou, K. 1991. Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Aristotle Prior Analytics 1.1–7, London: Duckworth.
  • Boger, G. 2004. ‘Aristotle's underlying logic’, in M. Gabbay and J. Woods, Handbook of the History of Logic, vol. 1: Greek, Indian and Arabic Logic, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 100–246.
  • Brunschwig, J. 1967–2007. Aristote. Topiques, 2 vols., Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
  • Burnyeat, M. F. 1994. ‘Enthymeme: Aristotle on the logic of persuasion’, in D. Furley and A. Nehamas, Aristo-tle's Rhetoric: Philosophical Essays, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 3–55.
  • Castagnoli, L. 2012. ‘Aristotle on begging the question between dialectic, logic and epistemology’, Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy, 15, 90–121.
  • Cavini, W. 1989. ‘Modalità’ dialettiche nei Topici di Aristotele’, in Atti del convegno internazionale di storia della logica, Le teorie della modalità (S. Gimignano 5–8 dicembre 1987), Bologna: CLUEB, 15–46.
  • Cavini, W. 1991. ‘Sillogismo aristotelico e teoria logica’, Nuova civiltà delle macchine, 9, 29–36.
  • Charlton, W. 1992. Aristotle. Physics, Books I and II, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Crivelli, P. 2011. ‘Aristotle on syllogisms from a hypothesis’, in A. Longo, Argument From Hypothesis in Ancient Philosophy, Napoli: Bibliopolis, 95–184.
  • Crubellier, M. 2014. Aristote. Premiers Analytiques. Organon III, Paris: Flammarion.
  • Dancy, R. 1978. ‘On some of Aristotle's second thoughts about substances: Matter’, Philosophical Review, 87, 372–413.
  • Dorion, L.-A. 1995. Aristote. Les refutations sophistiques, Paris: Vrin.
  • Duncombe, M. 2014. ‘Irreflexivity and Aristotle's syllogismos’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 64, 434–52.
  • Dunn, J. M. and Restall, G. 2000. ‘Relevance logic’, in D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner, Handbook of Philosophical Logic, 2nd ed., vol. 6, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1–128.
  • Fait, P. 2004. ‘Aristotle on a puzzle about logical consequence: Necessity of being vs. necessity of saying’, Topoi, 23, 101–12.
  • Fait, P. 2007. Aristotele. Le confutationi sofistiche, Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  • Field, H. 2015. ‘What is logical validity?’, in C. R. Caret and O. T. Hjortland, Foundations of Logical Conse-quence, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 33–70.
  • Frede, M. 1974. ‘Stoic vs. Aristotelian syllogistic’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 56, 1–32.
  • Gobbo, E. 1997a. ‘La riconduzione aristotelica delle confutazioni apparenti all'ignoranza della confutazione (Sophistici elenchi, 6)’, Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa s. IV, 2, 233–72.
  • Gobbo, E. 1997b. ‘La concezione diretta dell’jelenchos negli Analitici Primi e nelle Confutazioni Sofistiche‘, Elenchos, 18, 311–57.
  • Hamblin, C. L. 1970. Fallacies, London: Methuen.
  • Hasper, P. S. 2012. ‘Aristotle's sophistical refutations: A translation’, Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy, 15, 13–54.
  • Lear, J. 1980. Aristotle and Logical Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Malink, M. 2014. ‘Deduction in Sophistici Elenchi 6’, in M.-K. Lee, Strategies of Argument: Essays in Ancient Ethics, Epistemology, and Logic, New York: Oxford University Press, 149–74.
  • McCall, S. 1967. ‘Connexive implication and the syllogism’, Mind, 76, 346–56.
  • Mignucci, M. 1969. Aristotele. Gli Analitici Primi, Napoli: Loffredo.
  • Mignucci, M. 2002. ‘Syllogism and deduction in Aristotle's logic’, in M. Canto-Sperber and P. Pellegrin, Le style de la pensée, Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 245–66.
  • Mignucci, M. 2007. Aristotele. Analitici secondi, Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  • Paoli, F. 2007. ‘Implicational paradoxes and the meaning of logic constants’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 85, 553–79.
  • Rapp, C. 2012. ‘Fallacious arguments in Aristotle's Rhetoric II 24’, Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy, 15, 122–58.
  • Read, S. 1988. Relevant Logic, Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Ross, W. D. 1949. Aristotle's Prior and Posterior Analytics, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Schreiber, S. G. 2003. Aristotle on False Reasoning: Language and World in the Sophistical Refutations, Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
  • Slomkowski, P. 1997. Aristotle's Topics, Leiden: Brill.
  • Smiley, T. J. 1973. ‘What is a syllogism?’, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2, 136–54.
  • Smiley, T. J. 1994. ‘Aristotle's completeness proof’, Ancient Philosophy, 14, 25–38.
  • Smith, R. 1989. Aristotle. Prior Analytics, Indianapolis: Hackett.
  • Smith, R. 1997. Aristotle. Topics: Book I and VIII, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Smith, R. 2011. ‘Aristotle's logic’, in E. N. Zalta, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2014 Edit-ion), URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/aristotle-logic/>.
  • Sorio, G. 2009. Aristotele, Elenchi sofistici, Introduzione, traduzione e commento, Padova, unpublished Ph.D thesis.
  • Striker, G. 2009. Aristotle. Prior Analytics: Book I, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Thom, P. 1981. The Syllogism, München: Philosophia Verlag.
  • Wehrle, W. E. 2000. The Myth of Aristotle's Development and the Betrayal of Metaphysics, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Woods, J. 2014. Aristotle's Earlier Logic, 2nd ed. (2001), Milton Keynes: College Publications.
  • Woods, J. and Hansen, H. V. 2001. ‘The subtleties of Aristotle's non-cause’, Logique et analyse, 44, 395–415.
  • Woods, J. and Irvine, A. 2004. ‘Aristotle's early logic’, in M. Gabbay and J. Woods, Handbook of the History of Logic, vol. 1: Greek, Indian and Arabic Logic, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 27–99.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.