Begging the Question as a Criticism of an Argument in Itself in Topics 8.11

References

• Alexander. 1883. ‘Aristotelis analyticorum priorum librum i commentarium’, in M. Wallies, Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca 2.1, Berlin: Reimer, 1–418.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander. 1891. ‘Aristotelis topicorum libros octo commentaria’, in M. Wallies, Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca 2.2, Berlin: Reimer, 1–591.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, J. 1995. ‘The development of Aristotle's logic: Part of an account in outline’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, 11, 177–205. doi: 10.1163/2213441795X00110
   Google Scholar
• Anonymous. 1884. ‘Aristotelis sophisticos elenchos paraphrasis’, in M. Hayduck, Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca 23.4, Berlin: Reimer, 1–68.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, J. 1976. ‘Aristotle, Menaechmus, and circular proof’, Classical Quarterly, 26, 278–92. doi: 10.1017/S0009838800033152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, J. 1993. Aristotle's Posterior Analytics, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bobzien, S. 2002. ‘The development of modus ponens in antiquity: From Aristotle to the 2nd century AD’, Phronesis, 47, 359–94. doi: 10.1163/156852802321016541
   Google Scholar
• Bolton, R. 1994. ‘ The problem of dialectical reasoning () in Aristotle’, Ancient Philosophy, 14, 99–132. doi: 10.5840/ancientphil199414SpecialIssue79
   Google Scholar
• Brunschwig, J. 1967–2007. Aristote. Topiques, 2 vols, Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
   Google Scholar
• Castagnoli, L. 2013. ‘Aristotle on begging the question: Between dialectic, logic, and epistemology’, Philosophiegeschichte und logische Analyse, 15, 90–121.
   Google Scholar
• Crivelli, P. 2004. Aristotle on Truth, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Di Lascio, V. 2013. ‘The theoretical rationale behind Aristotle's classification of the linguistic fallacies in the Sophistical Refutations’, Philosophiegeschichte und logische Analyse, 15, 55–89.
   Google Scholar
• Dorion, L.-A. 1995. Aristote. Les réfutations sophistiques, Paris: Vrin.
   Google Scholar
• Dutilh-Novaes, C. 2015. ‘The “built-in opponent” conception of logic and deduction’, Dialectica, forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Ebbesen, S. 1987. ‘The way fallacies were treated in scholastic logic’, Cahiers de l'Institut du Moyen Age Grec et Latin, 55, 107–34.
   Google Scholar
• Fait, P. 2007. Aristotele. Le confutazioni sofistiche, Roma: Editori Laterza.
   Google Scholar
• Fait, P. 2013. ‘The “false validating premise” in Aristotle's doctrine of fallacies’, Philosophiegeschichte und logische Analyse, 15, 238–66.
   Google Scholar
• Frede, M. 1974. ‘Stoic vs. Aristotelian syllogistic’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 56, 1–32. doi: 10.1515/agph.1974.56.1.1
   Google Scholar
• Krabbe, E. and van Laar, J. 2011. ‘The ways of criticism’, Argumentation, 25, 199–227. doi: 10.1007/s10503-011-9209-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lear, J. 1980. Aristotle and logical theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malink, M. 2014a. ‘Deduction in Sophistici Elenchi 6’, in Mi-Kyoung Lee, Strategies of Argument: Essays in Ancient Ethics, Epistemology, and Logic, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 149–74.
   Google Scholar
• Malink, M. 2014b. ‘Deduction in Aristotle's Topics and Prior Analytics’, unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Michael. 1898. ‘Alexandri quod fertur in Aristotelis sophisticos elenchos commentarium’, in M. Wallies, Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca 2.3, Berlin: Reimer, 1–198.
   Google Scholar
• Mignucci, M. 1969. Aristotele. Gli Analitici Primi, Naples: Loffredo.
   Google Scholar
• Moraux, P. 1968. ‘La joute dialectique d'après le huitième livre des Topiques’, in G. E. L. Owen, Aristotle on Dialectic. The Topics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 277–312.
   Google Scholar
• Philoponus. 1905. ‘Aristotelis analytica priora commentaria’, in M. Wallies, Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca 13.2, Berlin: Reimer, 1–485.
   Google Scholar
• Poste, E. 1866. Aristotle on fallacies, or the Sophistici Elenchi, London: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, D. 1949. Aristotle's Prior and Posterior Analytics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schreiber, S. G. 2003. Aristotle on False Reasoning: Language and World in the Sophistical Refutations, Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slomkowski, P. 1997. Aristotle's Topics, Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. 1989. Aristotle. Prior Analytics, Indianapolis: Hackett.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. 1997. Aristotle. Topics: Book I and VIII, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Striker, G. 1996. ‘Perfection and reduction in Aristotle's Prior Analytics’, in M. Frede and G. Striker, Rationality in Greek Thought, 203–219, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Striker, G. 2009. Aristotle. Prior Analytics, Book I, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thom, P. 1981. The Syllogism, München: Philosophia Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, J. and Walton, D. N. 1982. ‘The petitio: Aristotle's five ways’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 12, 77–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar