A Pragmatic-Semiotic Defence of Bivalence

References

• Anellis, I. H. 2012. ‘Peirce’s truth-functional analysis and the origin of the truth table’, History and Philosophy of Logic, 33, 87–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellucci, F. 2016. ‘Charles S. Peirce and the medieval doctrine of consequentiae’, History and Philosophy of Logic, 37, 244–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellucci, F. 2017. Peirce’s Speculative Grammar: Logic as Semiotics, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Benacerraf, P. 1973. ‘Mathematical truth’, Journal of Philosophy, 70, 661–79.
   Google Scholar
• Béziau, J.-Y. 2012. ‘A history of truth-values’, in D. M. Gabbay, F. J. Pelletier, and J. Woods (eds.), Handbook of the History of Logic, Volume 11: A History of its Central Concepts, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 235–307.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, G. 2000. From Peirce to Skolem: A Neglected Chapter in the History of Logic, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Brandom, R. B. 1994. Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braver, L. 2012. Groundless Grounds: A Study of Wittgenstein and Heidegger, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, L. 1895. ‘What the Tortoise said to Achilles’, Mind, 4, 278–80.
   Google Scholar
• Cellucci, C. 2009. ‘The universal generalization problem’, Logique & Analyse, 52, 3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Champagne, M. 2009. ‘Some semiotic constraints on metarepresentational accounts of consciousness’, in J. N. Deely and L. G. Sbrocchi (eds.), Specialization, Semiosis, Semiotics, Toronto: Legas Press, 557–64.
   Google Scholar
• Champagne, M. 2014. ‘Just do it: Schopenhauer and Peirce on the immediacy of agency’, Symposium, 18, 209–32.
   Google Scholar
• Champagne, M. 2015a. ‘Disjunctivism and the ethics of disbelief’, Philosophical Papers, 44, 139–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champagne, M. 2015b. ‘Don’t be an ass: rational choice and its limits’, Reason Papers, 37, 137–47.
   Google Scholar
• Champagne, M. 2015c. ‘Sound reasoning (literally): prospects and challenges of current acoustic logics’, Logica Universalis, 9, 331–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champagne, M. 2016. ‘Brandom, Peirce, and the overlooked friction of contrapiction’, Synthese, 193, 2561–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champagne, M., and A.-V. Pietarinen. 2020. ‘Why images cannot be arguments, but moving ones might’, Argumentation, 34, 207–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Church, A. 1956. Introduction to Mathematical Logic, 1, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dennett, D. C. 1991. ‘Real patterns’, The Journal of Philosophy, 88, 27–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dummett, M. A. E. 1959. ‘Truth’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 59, 141–62.
   Google Scholar
• Dummett, M. A. E. 1978. Truth and Other Enigmas, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dutilh Novaes, C. 2015. ‘A dialogical, multi-agent account of the normativity of logic’, Dialectica, 69, 587–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everett, D. L. Forthcoming. The American Aristotle: The Life and Mind of C. S. Peirce, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fisch, M., and A. Turquette. 1966. ‘Peirce’s triadic logic’, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 2, 71–85.
   Google Scholar
• Gentzen, G. 1969. The Collected Papers of Gerhard Gentzen, M. E. Szabo (ed.), Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Haack, S. 1976. ‘The justification of deduction’, Mind, 85, 112–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haack, S. 1996. Deviant Logic, Fuzzy Logic: Beyond the Formalism, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hausman, C. R. 2002. ‘Charles Peirce’s evolutionary realism as a process philosophy’, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 38, 13–27.
   Google Scholar
• Hintikka, J. 1962. Knowledge and Belief: An Introduction to the Logic of the Two Notions, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hintikka, J. 2007. Socratic Epistemology: Explorations of Knowledge-Seeking by Questioning, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hitchcock, D. 2003. ‘Toulmin’s warrants’, in F. H. V. Eemeren, J. A. Blair, C. A. Willard, and A. F. S. Henkemans (eds.), Anyone Who Has a View: Theoretical Contributions to the Study of Argumentation, Dordrecht: Springer, 69–82.
   Google Scholar
• Howat, A. 2013. ‘Regulative assumptions, hinge propositions and the Peircean conception of truth’, Erkenntnis, 78, 451–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howat, A. 2014. ‘Peirce on grounding the laws of logic’, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 50, 480–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hull, K. A., and R. K. Atkins (eds.). 2017. Peirce on Perception and Reasoning: From Icons to Logic, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, R. 1998. Charles Sanders Peirce and the Principle of Bivalence, PhD diss. University of Miami.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, R. 1999. ‘Peirce’s triadic logic revisited’, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 35, 284–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, R. 2018. Peirce on Realism and Idealism, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Legg, C. 2012. ‘The hardness of the iconic must: can Peirce’s existential graphs assist modal epistemology?’, Philosophia Mathematica, 20, 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legg, C. 2014. ‘Charles Peirce’s limit concept of truth’, Philosophy Compass, 9, 204–13.
   Google Scholar
• Legg, C., and J. Franklin. 2017. ‘Perceiving necessity’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 98, 320–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, M., and A.-V. Pietarinen. 2018. ‘Gamma graph calculi for modal logics’, Synthese, 195, 3621–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolis, J. 1998. ‘Peirce’s fallibilism’, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 34, 535–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misak, C. J. 2004. Truth and the End of Inquiry: A Peircean Account of Truth, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. 1931–58. The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 8 vols., C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss, and A. W. Burks (eds.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Cited as CP, giving volume number and paragraph.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. 1976. The New Elements of Mathematics, 4 vols., C. Eisele (ed.), The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. 2019. Logic of the Future: Writings on Existential Graphs, 1: History and Applications, A.-V. Pietarinen (ed.), Berlin: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. 2020. Logic of the Future: Writings on Existential Graphs, 2: The 1903 Lowell Lectures, A.-V. Pietarinen (ed.), Berlin: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Pietarinen, A.-V. 2006. Signs of Logic: Peircean Themes on the Philosophy of Language, Games, and Communication, Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pietarinen, A.-V. 2019. ‘To Peirce Hintikka’s thoughts’, Logica Universalis, 13, 241–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pietarinen, A.-V. 2020. ‘Introduction to volume 2: the 1903 Lowell lectures’, in A.-V. Pietarinen (ed.), Logic of the Future: Writings on Existential Graphs, 2: The 1903 Lowell Lectures, Berlin: De Gruyter, 67–199.
   Google Scholar
• Pietarinen, A.-V., and F. Bellucci. 2016. ‘Habits of reasoning: on the grammar and critics of logical habits’, in D. E. West and M. Anderson (eds.), Consensus on Peirce’s Concept of Habit: Before and Beyond Consciousness, Cham: Springer, 265–82.
   Google Scholar
• Priest, G. 1995a. ‘Gaps and gluts’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 25, 57–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priest, G. 1995b. Beyond the Limits of Thought, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Priest, G. 2007. ‘Paraconsistency and dialetheism’, in D. M. Gabbay and J. Woods (eds.), Handbook of the History of Logic, Volume 8: The Many Valued and Nonmonotonic Turn in Logic, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 129–204.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, A. N. 1976. Papers in Logic and Ethics, London: Duckworth.
   Google Scholar
• Quine, W. V. O. 1986. Philosophy of Logic, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raatikainen, P. 2004. ‘Conceptions of truth in intuitionism’, History and Philosophy of Logic, 25, 131–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, D. D. 1973. The Existential Graphs of Charles S. Peirce, The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Rumfitt, I. 2015. The Boundary Stones of Thought: An Essay in the Philosophy of Logic, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sayward, C. 1989. ‘Does the law of excluded middle require bivalence?, Erkenntnis, 31, 129–37.
   Google Scholar
• Short, T. L. 2007. Peirce’s Theory of Signs, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stjernfelt, F. 2014. Natural Propositions: The Actuality of Peirce’s Doctrine of Dicisigns, Boston: Docent Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suszko, R. 1975. ‘Remarks on Łukasiewicz’s three-valued logic’, Bulletin of the Section of Logic, 4, 87–90.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, J. F. 2011. ‘What Achilles should have said to the Tortoise’, in S. M. Cahn, R. B. Talisse, and S. F. Aikin (eds.), Thinking about Logic: Classic Essays, Boulder: Westview Press, 19–33.
   Google Scholar
• Van Benthem, J., G. Heinzmann, M. Rebuschi, and H. Visser (eds.). 2006. The Age of Alternative Logics: Assessing Philosophy of Logic and Mathematics Today, Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Vargas, F., and M. E. Moore. 2021. ‘The Peircean continuum’, in S. Shapiro and G. T. Hellman (eds.), The History of Continua: Philosophical and Mathematical Perspectives, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 328–46.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. 2017. ‘On the justification problems: towards a Peircean diagnosis and solution’, History and Philosophy of Logic, 38, 222–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar