87
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The Structure and Extension of (Proto)Type Concepts: Husserl’s Correlationist Approach

Pages 129-142 | Received 27 Nov 2020, Accepted 05 May 2021, Published online: 10 Jun 2021

References

  • Baker, G. P. and Hacker, P. M. S. 2005. Wittgenstein: Understanding and Meaning. Part 1: Essays. Volume 1 of an Analytical Commentary on the Philosophical Investigations, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Barsalou, L. W. 1987. ‘The instability of graded structure: implications for the nature of concepts’, in U. Neisser (ed.), Concepts and Conceptual Development: Ecological and Intellectual Factors in Categorization, Cambridge: CUP, pp. 101–140.
  • Bégout, B. 2002. ‘Un air de famille: La théorie husserlienne des types’, Recherches husserliennes, 17, 51–85.
  • Benoist, J. 2010. Concepts: Introduction à l’analyse, Paris: Cerf.
  • Beyer, C. 2011. ‘Husserl über Begriffe’, in V. Mayer, C. Erhard, M. Scherini and U. Meixner (eds.), Die Aktualität Husserls, Freiburg im Breisgau: Karl Alber, pp. 88–113.
  • Brooks, L. R. 1987. ‘Decentralized control of categorization: The role of prior processing episodes’, in U. Neisser (ed.), Concepts and Conceptual Development: Ecological and Intellectual Factors in Categorization, Cambridge: CUP, pp. 141–174.
  • Del Pinal, G. 2016. ‘Prototypes as compositional components of concepts’, Synthese, 193, 2899–2927.
  • Egré, P. 2018. Qu’est-ce que le vague?, Paris: Vrin.
  • Erdmann, B. 1894. ‘Theorie der typen-Einteilungen’, Philosophische Monatshefte, 30, 15–49 and 129–158.
  • Fodor, J. 1987. Psychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Gau, W.-L. and Buehrer, D. J. 1993. ‘Vague Sets’, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 23, 610–614.
  • Glock, H.-J. 1996. A Wittgenstein Dictionary, Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Glock, H.-J. 2011. ‘A cognitivist approach to concepts’, Grazer philosophische Studien, 82, 131–163.
  • Hampton, J. A. 2006. ‘Concepts as prototypes’, The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 46, 79–113.
  • Hampton, J. A. 2007. ‘Typicality, graded membership, and vagueness’, Cognitive Science, 31, 355–384.
  • Hampton, J. A. 2016. ‘Categories, prototypes and exemplars’, in N. Riemer (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Semantics, London: Routledge, pp. 125–141.
  • Horgan, T. 1990. ‘Psychologistic semantics, robust vagueness, and the philosophy of language’, in S. L. Tsohatzidis (ed.), Meanings and Prototypes: Studies in Linguistic Categorization, London: Routledge, pp. 535–557.
  • Husserl, E. 1939. Erfahrung und Urteil, ed. L. Landgrebe, Prague: Akademia. (Trans. J. S. Churchill and K. Ameriks, London: Routledge, 1973.)
  • Husserl, E. 1966. Analysen zur passiven Synthesis (Hua XI), ed. M. Fleischer, The Hague: Nijhoff.
  • Husserl, E. 1974. Formale and transzendentale Logik (Hua XVII), ed. P. Janssen, The Hague: Nijhoff. (Trans. P. Janssen, The Hague: Nijhoff, 1969.)
  • Husserl, E. 1976. Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie (Hua VI), ed. W. Biemel, The Hague: Nijhoff.
  • Husserl, E. 1977. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Erstes Buch (Hua III/1). Ed. K. Schuhmann. The Hague: Nijhoff. (Trans. F. Kersten, The Hague: Nijhoff, 1983.)
  • Husserl, E. 1979. ‘[Besprechung von] A. Marty, Untersuchungen zur Grundlegung der allgemeinen Grammatik und Sprachphilosophie’, in E. Husserl (ed.), Aufsätze und Rezensionen (1890-1910) (Hua XXII), ed. B. Rang, The Hague: Nijhoff, pp. 261–265.
  • Husserl, E. 1984. Logische Untersuchungen. Zweiter Teil (Hua XIX/1-2), ed. U. Panzer, The Hague: Nijhoff.
  • Husserl, E. 1987. Vorlesungen über Bedeutungslehre: Sommersemester 1908 (Hua XXVI), ed. U. Panzer, The Hague: Nijhoff.
  • Husserl, E. 2008. Die Lebenswelt (Hua XXXIX), ed. R. Sowa, New York: Springer.
  • Husserl, E. 2012. Zur Lehre vom Wesen und zur Methode der eidetischen Variation (Hua XLI), ed. D. Fonfara, New York: Springer.
  • Künne, W. 2013. ‘Intentionalität: Bolzano und Husserl’, in S. Centrone (ed.), Versuche über Husserl, Hamburg: Meiner, pp. 97–143.
  • Lohmar, D. 1996. ‘Zu der Entstehung und den Ausgangsmaterialien von Edmund Husserls Werk Erfahrung und Urteil’, Husserl Studies, 13, 31–71.
  • Lohmar, D. 1998. Erfahrung und kategoriales Denken: Hume, Kant und Husserl über vorprädikative Erfahrung und prädikative Erkenntnis, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  • Lohmar, D. 2003. ‘Husserl’s type and Kant’s schemata: Systematic reasons for their correlation or identity’, in D. Welton (ed.), The New Husserl: A Critical Reader, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 93–124.
  • Lohmar, D. 2008. ‘Denken ohne Sprache?’, in F. Mattens (ed.), Meaning and Language: Phenomenological Perspectives, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 169–194.
  • Lohmar, D. 2014. ‘Types and habits: Habits and their cognitive background in Hume and Husserl’, Phenomenology and Mind, 6, 40–51.
  • Machery, E. 2009. Doing Without Concepts, Oxford: OUP.
  • Margolis, E. and Laurence, S. 1999. ‘Concepts and cognitive science’, in E. Margolis and S. Laurence (eds.), Concepts: Core Readings, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 3–81.
  • Margolis, E. and Laurence, S. 2019. ‘Concepts’, in E. N. Zalta (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2019 Edition), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/concepts/.
  • Marty, A. 1908. Untersuchungen zur Grundlegung der allgemeinen Grammatik und Sprachphilosophie, Halle: Niemeyer.
  • Meinong, A. 1968. ‘Abstrahieren und Vergleichen’, in A. Meinong (ed.), Gesamtausgabe, vol. I, ed. R. Haller and R. Kindinger, Graz: Akademische Druck- u. Verlagsanstalt, pp. 443–494.
  • Moltmann, F. 2013. ‘Theoretical alternatives to propositions: Propositions, attitudinal objects, and the distinction between actions and products’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 43, 679–701.
  • Mulligan, K. 1990. ‘Marty’s philosophical grammar’, in K. Mulligan (ed.), Mind, Meaning and Metaphysics: The Philosophy and Theory of Language of Anton Marty, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 11–27.
  • Peacocke, C. 1992. A Study of Concepts, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Placek, T. 1996. ‘Thought as a product of thinking’, Conceptus, 29, 191–203.
  • Priest, G., Berto, G. and Weber, Z. 2018. ‘Dialetheism’, in E. N. Zalta (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2018 Edition), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/dialetheism/.
  • Prinz, J. 2012. ‘Regaining composure: A defence of prototype compositionality’, in W. Hinzen, E. Machery and M. Werning (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Compositionality, Oxford: OUP, pp. 437–453.
  • Rosch, E. and Mervis, C. 1975. ‘Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories’, Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573–605.
  • Sainsbury, R. M. 2012. ‘Concepts without boundaries’, in R. Keefe and P. Smith (ed.), Vagueness: A Reader, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 251–264.
  • Taieb, H. 2018. ‘Building objective thoughts: Stumpf, Twardowski and the late Husserl on psychic products’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 100, 336–370.
  • Taieb, H. 2020. ‘Ordinary language semantics: The contribution of Brentano and Marty’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 28, 777–796.
  • Taieb, H. 2021. ‘The early Husserl on typicality’, in A. Dewalque, C. Gauvry and S. Richard (eds.), Philosophy of Language in the Brentano School, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 263–278.
  • van Mazijk, C. 2020. Perception and Reality in Kant, Husserl, and McDowell, London: Routledge.
  • Weiskopf, D. 2009. ‘The plurality of concepts’, Synthese, 169, 145–173.
  • Williamson, T. 1994. Vagueness, London: Routledge.
  • Wittgenstein, L. 1953. Philosophical Investigations, ed. G. E. M. Anscombe, R. Rhees, transl. G. E. M. Anscombe, Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Wittgenstein, L. 1970. Das blaue Buch. Eine philosophische Betrachtung. Zettel, ed. R. Rhees, G. E. M. Anscombe, G. H. von Wright, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
  • Wolf, W. C. 2020. ‘Husserl on the overlap of pure and empirical concepts’, European Journal of Philosophy, online first, 1–13.
  • Zadeh, L. A. 1965. ‘Fuzzy sets’, Information and Control, 8, 338–353.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.